Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
201 South Front Street, Chesaning, MI 48616 · Saginaw County · (989) 845-6602
51 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 235641 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 12, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Michigan average is 9.9, the national average 9.2).
Of 40 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,587 in the last three years; the largest was $32,587, and the latest is dated October 17, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 3.99 across Michigan and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.79 of those hours.
43.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Michigan average 44.1%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
December 12, 2025Standard inspection · 11 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area, resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents who consume food from the kitchen.
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1). have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), 2). ensure 2 of 2 residents' (Resident's #3 and #35) meet the facility criteria for infections, and 3) do infection control environmental rounds of the main dining room, resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility, an increased unnecessary use of antibiotic therapy, and an unsafe dining room environment.
- E Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights to be free from neglect for 3 residents ( #7, #14, #49) of 18 residents reviewed for dignity and the confidential Resident Council group, resulting in verbalizations from the council group of anger regarding call lights not being answered timely, frustration regarding not being able to reach call lights, and a heavy smell of urine in the back hall. Findings Include:Review of the facility's Maintaining Dignity policy, dated 12/25, stated It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances quality of life. Respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Call Light Availability and Response Time: [...]
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow policy and procedures for 1) Medication labeling and storage in 2 of 2 medication carts, 2) Storage and handling of medications for one medication room of one reviewed, and 3) Consistently monitor the medication refrigerator temperature in accordance with acceptable pharmaceutical standards of practice, for 11 residents (R3, R8, R10, R12, R19, R28, R35, R37, R40, R42, R50) of 11 sampled residents
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Mood/Behaviors care plan interventions for 1 resident (Resident #14) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in lack of documentation of any interventions for mood or behaviors and a lack of follow-up with intervention effectiveness. Findings Include:Resident #14:Review of the Face Sheet, MDS (dated 5/25), and care plans (dated 4/25), revealed Resident #14 was 63 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert and interviewable with a BIMS of 10 (cognitive assessment, interviewable), and required total assistance with all Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The residents' diagnosis included, sepsis, back pain, muscle weakness, seizures, difficulty walking, epilepsy, respiratory failure, traumatic brain injury with explosive disorder and hemiplegia of left side (weakness). [...]
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update care plan interventions for one resident (Resident #2) of 4 sampled residents reviewed.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of Stage II pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #2) of 1 resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury, resulting in Resident #2 developing a facility-acquired Stage II pressure ulcer.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the enteral tube feeding (TF) solution was labeled with the resident's name, date, and rate of infusion for one resident (Resident #6) of 1 sampled resident.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a post-dialysis pressure dressing for 1 resident (Resident #3) of 1 sampled resident, resulting in Resident #3 to be observed with a pressure dressing to the fistula access sites with no date on the dressing or documented nursing assessment.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Infection Control Preventionist Licensed Practical Nurse F completed an annual nursing skills competency evaluation for 1 of 2 nurses reviewed.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify targeted behaviors, medication classifications, and the duration of therapy on the informed consents for 3 residents (R5, R6, R22) of 5 sampled residents.
August 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake Number 2585037. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe, and homelike environment involving the Therapy room and 5 residents' rooms (Rooms 2, 3, 4, 14, and 19) of 20 rooms in total, resulting in the protentional for injury (therapy equipment stored in the therapy area, increases risk of tripping and falling), resident and family complaint's regarding the environment, anger, dissatisfaction and depression. Findings Include: Self-tour of facility on 8/19/2025 at 9:30AM noted Strong urine odors in the back hall noted coming from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Noted 2 male residents to reside in room, Resident #106 the bed by the window was noted with urinal on nightstand with yellow urine noted with no top on it, half full, next to white Styrofoam drinking glass with a straw. [...]
- D Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake Numbers: 2590687, 2577760, and 2581464. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a decline in the quality of life for one resident (Resident #101) of 6 residents reviewed, resulting in Resident #101 having a change in demeanor of a decrease in activity with an increase in depression of tearfulness.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to Intake Numbers 2590687, 2577760, and 2581464. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to get a signed informed consent for anti-anxiety medication prior to administering it for one resident (R101), resulting in Resident #101 receiving the medication with no written or verbal consent.
March 27, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure accurate orders for a feeding tube and 2) Failed to ensure maintenance of the feeding tube, including water flushes, for 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 2 residents reviewed for feeding tubes. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, tongue and throat cancer, feeding tube, chronic pain syndrome, depression, weakness, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. [...]
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow accepted standards of practice for obtaining a physician's order, assessment and monitoring of a Central Venous Catheter/CVS Mediport IV for one resident (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for IV catheters. Findings Include: Resident #1: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: History of a stroke, left sided weakness, tongue and throat cancer, feeding tube, chronic pain syndrome, depression, weakness, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Resident #1 was receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy for the cancer. [...]
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00151360. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1) Physician's orders for dialysis services; 2) Post- Dialysis assessment and monitoring were completed and 3) Dialysis communication forms were complete and included pre-dialysis and post-dialysis assessment, including location and assessment of the dialysis access site for one resident (Resident #4) of 1 resident reviewed for Dialysis care. Findings Include: Dialysis Resident #4: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses: Chronic kidney disease, receives dialysis, Diabetes, obesity, anemia, gout, hypothyroidism. Hypertension and bipolar disorder. [...]
October 21, 2024Standard inspection · 12 citations
- F Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care regarding implementation of COVID preventive measures in a timely manner during a COVID outbreak emergency, resulting in 11 residents (Resident's #6, #7, #14, #16, #23, #24,#25, #28, #35, #90) and 10 staff members (Nursing Assistant/CNA O, CNA P, CNA Q, CNA R, CNA S, Nurse, LPN G, Social Worker E, Dietary Aide N, Nurse, CNA H, and Dietary Manger A) testing positive for COVID, resulting in one resident's (Resident #7) hospitalization, resulting in rapid spread of COVID throughout the facility and staff members with the likelihood for the continued spread of COVID, resident and staff illness and the hospitalization of (Resident #7. Findings Include: [...]
- E Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that accurate resident information was completed on the Resident Roster Matrix (802) for five residents (Resident #1, Resident #14, Resident #16, Resident #26, Resident #140) of 12 sampled residents, resulting in COVID-positive residents and the likelihood of unmet care needs.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated and revised appropriately with new interventions for four residents (Residents #7, Resident #8, Resident #17, Resident #27) of 12 sampled residents, resulting in revision and interventions necessary for care and services not being care planned with the likelihood for unmet care needs.
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent facility-acquired urinary tract infections and follow up on contaminated urine samples for four residents (#7, #8, #9, #31), resulting in the likelihood for urinary tract infections and/or organisms to be unidentified and untreated, bladder injury, pain and decline in overall health status.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 medication carts (Rehab Hall and Long-Term Hall medication carts) were clean and sanitized, free of crushed pills, pieces of loose papers and dust in the drawers, and proper medication storage, resulting in the likelihood of cross contamination, low medications count with increased cost and missed resident medications. Findings Include: Observation of facility medication carts done on 10/14/24 at 10:30 a.m., revealed the following: Medication Cart on the Rehab Hall was found to have the second, and third drawers dirty with crushed meds, dust, and papers on the bottom of the carts. During an interview done on 10/14/24 at 10:30 a.m., Nurse, LPN V stated I don't know who is supposed to clean it, maybe third shift. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, and 2) Failed to ensure that partially opened food items had a open and use-by date on them, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 35 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen and ice machine of a total census of 35 residents. Findings Include: Review of the Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective October 1, 2012, Chapter 4-501.14 directs that equipment cleaning frequency is to be throughout the day at frequency necessary to prevent recontamination of equipment and utensils. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to 1) Ensure resident monthly infection data was analyzed for 7/24 and 8/24 for a census of 35 residents, and 2) Ensure enhanced barrier precautions were used during wound care, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, resident, and staff illness, antibiotic usage with possible hospitalization. Findings Include: Infection Control Data Analyzing: Review was done of 7/24 and 8/24 facility monthly data reports. Both reports had documentation of infection rates, and the total numbers of each infections. No documentation of any analysis done regarding the infection rates, employee call-ins, antibiotic usage or immunizations was found. [...]
- E Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and justify the administration of antibiotic medications for four residents (#7, #8, #9, #31), resulting in Resident #7 and Resident #31 to have recurrent urinary tract infections, Resident #8 and Resident #9 to be receive antibiotic without clinical rational and the likelihood of antibiotic resistance due to an inappropriate usage, resistance or the development of opportunistic organisms, and hospitalizations.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment, monitoring and timely provision of care, per professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #7), resulting in a lack of documentation and glucose monitoring with a change of condition with the likelihood for a lack of change of condition and delay in the treatment of low blood glucose level.
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weight monitoring timely for two residents (Resident #17, Resident #27) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of weight monitoring/follow-up of abnormal weights, and the likelihood for unidentified nutritional deficiencies and decline in overall health.
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (Resident #22) behavior's were documented and monitored, resulting in the likelihood for increased resident behaviors with no documentation of interventions done or effectiveness, lack of follow-up regarding care plan's, and medication reviews not being accurate. Findings Include: Resident #22: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans and nursing notes dated 10/11/24 though 10/14/24, revealed Resident #22 was 57 years-old, not able to make his own healthcare decisions, and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL. Review of the residents diagnosis included, epilepsy, intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia, adjustment disorder, major depression, Dementia, and delusional disorders. [...]
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consents for antipsychotic medication usage for one resident (Resident #8), resulting in Resident #8 being administered antipsychotic medications without appropriate consent and risk-versus-benefit analysis or medications explained to the resident/responsible party and the increased likelihood for serious side effects and adverse reactions.
September 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145893. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for 11 residents' rooms, 2 main hallways, and 1 residential sitting area, resulting in the likelihood for resident injury (bug and spider bites and hand splinters), anger and frustration from family members and residents, cross contamination with illnesses with increased use of antibiotics. Findings Include: During a walk-through of the facility done on 9/12/24 starting at 10:00 a.m., accompanied by the Administrator, the following concerns were observed: -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Extreme odor of urine near bed 2; resident in bed at the time. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: Several used tissues were observed on the floor near bed 1, the walls had numerous areas of chipping paint and black scuff marks from wheelchairs. -room [ROOM NUMBER]: [...]
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00145893. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #103), had the required Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care (showers) of 6 residents reviewed for ADL's, resulting in an increased likelihood for offensive odors, skin issues, and decreased self-esteem with isolation. Findings Include: Resident #103: Review of the Face Sheet, Care Plans dated 6/22, and shower sheets (dated 7/3/24, 7/16/24 and 7/23/24), revealed Resident #103 was 69 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], was cognitively impaired and unable to make healthcare decisions, and required staff assistance with all ADL's. The residents diagnosis included, stroke with severe cognitive impairment, seizures, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, mood disturbance, and diabetes. [...]
October 17, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- G Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138042. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to provide care following professional standards of practice and facility policy to prevent the development of avoidable pressure injuries, 2) Failed to accurately measure and stage residents' pressure injuries, and 3) Failed to promptly identify and provide necessary treatment for a deteriorating pressure injury for four residents (Resident #192, Resident #6, Resident #13, and Resident #26) reviewed for pressure injuries, resulting in R192 requiring emergent surgical intervention for sepsis and acute osteomyelitis of a Stage 4 sacral wound. [...]
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteThis Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00135195 and MI00138197. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of nursing practice for medication administration vital sign assessments for 6 residents (Resident #2, Resident #10, Resident #26, Resident #21, Resident #14, and Resident #3) reviewed for provision of nursing services, resulting in medications administered late, medications administered outside of physician-ordered parameters, medication errors without management follow through, incomplete laboratory testing, and the potential for less than therapeutic effects of medications, decreased effectiveness of medications, and the potential for a delay in treatment and the worsening of medical conditions.
- E Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and care for a resident receiving enteral tube feedings for one resident (Resident #6) reviewed for enteral tube feedings, resulting in the potential for aspiration pneumonia and an overall deterioration of health status.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility 1) Failed to implement an effective and current system of surveillance of staff illnesses to identify possible communicable diseases and infections to prevent the spread of an illness/outbreak, 2) Failed to perform incontinence care using infection control practices, and 3) Failed to ensure that staff were educated on and wore the appropriate recommended Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for residents. This deficient practice placed all residents residing in the facility at risk for the potential for the development and spread of disease and infection and the potential for an outbreak to go undetected.
- E Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to implement, and operationalize an antibiotic stewardship program and 2) Failed to ensure accurate monitoring and documentation of an antibiotic for three residents (Resident #13, Resident #19, Resident #30) reviewed for antibiotic use, resulting in the potential for inappropriate antibiotic utilization and the potential for antibiotic resistance.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to treat one resident (Resident #14) with dignity during care resulting in the potential for diminished feelings of self-worth.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that residents received complete and comprehensive wound assessments and 2) Failed to ensure the effectiveness of treatments and interventions based on wound assessments for one resident (Resident #13), reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, documentation, and the potential for the worsening of a wound and a delay in treatment.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document administration of controlled substances for three residents (Resident #13, Resident #22, and Resident #11) resulting in the potential for overdose and/or ineffective management of pain, and the potential for drug diversion of controlled substances.
September 1, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- G Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteThis citation pertains to intake #MI00138565. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, 1) ensure a complete and accurate nursing assessment was done after a significant change involving 1 resident (Resident #701), and 2) ensure the facility had a policy to follow for assessment regarding signs/symptoms of infection (not feeling well, increased temp, tiredness, nausea), resulting in hospitalization with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI) and sepsis (extensive infection), antibiotic given, and the likelihood for serious injury. Findings Include: [...]
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 4 on December 12, 2025, 4 on October 21, 2024, 2 on October 17, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
- E Have corridors or aisles that are unobstructed and are at least 8 feet in width.
- E Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- E Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $32,587 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 3.99 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.79 | 0.78 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.04 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.22 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.56 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.9% | 44.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 39.2% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.63 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.78 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.64 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.79 | 3.78 | 3.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 37 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.68 | 0.58 | 3.88 | 3.15 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 35 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.79 | 0.52 | 3.97 | 3.34 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 33 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.64 | 0.53 | 3.86 | 3.10 | 7.2% | 0 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Michigan, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.95 | 0.70 | 4.14 | 3.45 | 3.3% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Michigan
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $19.03 | $18.35 to $21.59 | 43,290 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $31.47 | $29.83 to $35.52 | 10,880 |
| Registered nurses | $45.34 | $39.46 to $49.74 | 104,950 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Michigan | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.6 | 10.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 12.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 5.1 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 52.3 | 14.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 36.6 | 24.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 7.2 | 11.7 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THE WELLCARE GROUP LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patel, Amee | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 100% | 02/13/2015 |
| Haun, Robert | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/13/2015 | |
| Haun, Robert | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2015 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 15 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.04 hours per resident per day, below the Michigan average of 3.50.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Medilodge of Montrose Inc Montrose, 12.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 84 citations
- Pleasant View Shiawassee County Medical Care Facil Owosso, 12.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 7 citations
- Memorial Healthcare Center Owosso, 12.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 1 citation
- Majestic Care of Flushing Flushing, 16.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 71 citations
- Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. Francis Saginaw, 16.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 41 citations
- Avista Nursing and Rehabilitation Saginaw, 17.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Ashley Healthcare Center Ashley, 18.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Ovid Healthcare Center Ovid, 18.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Michigan contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Michigan. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Survey and Certification, Long Term Care Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Michigan Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-485-9393. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: LARA State Licensing Search, where Michigan publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 12, 2025. The Michigan average is 9.9.
- Has Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $32,587 in the last three years.
- Does Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Chesaning Nursing and Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 3 owners and managers. Legal business name: THE WELLCARE GROUP LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.