Home / Connecticut / Moodus
534 Town St., Moodus, CT 06469 · Lower Ct River Vly County · (860) 873-1455
76 certified beds, about 71 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075307 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 26, 2024, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.24 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.89 of those hours.
42.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a new medication ordered for a change in condition and there was a noted medication interaction identified by the pharmacy, the facility failed inquiry the pharmacy why the medication had not been available and to notify the provider for six (6) days.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for constipation, the facility failed to ensure an abdominal assessment was conducted and continued monitoring following an incident of rectal bleeding.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 15 of 70 residents (Resident #4, Resident #6, Resident #22, Resident #28, Resident #30, Resident #32, Resident #33, Resident #39, Resident #41, Resident #45, Resident #48, Resident #58, Resident #65, Resident #69, Resident #326) reviewed for preventative weekly body audits, the facility failed to perform preventative weekly body audits according facility policy and physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #45) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide medication administration education to a temporary agency staff nurse before starting work to meet professional standards of practice to prevent a significant medication error.
Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #58) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that side rails were used for positioning and bed mobility resulting in a fall.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #34) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to obtain a reweight as directed by provider order and failed to notify a provider of a weight change and failed to obtain daily weights as directed by a provder order.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to inform residents of how to complete a grievance, failed to ensure forms were available and accessible to residents and visitors and failed to maintain the results of grievances for three years.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interview for 3 of 3 sampled residents, (Resident #45, Resident #58, and Resident #61), reviewed for change of condition, the facility failed to submit significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for a decline in more than two functional ability areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #44 and 422) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters, the facility failed to ensure the residents dignity when the urinary drainage bags were left uncovered and visible.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interview for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #36) reviewed for positioning, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place and nurse monitoring was regularly performed and documented, for a resident utilizing a positioning device, and for 1 resident (Resident #52) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a RN assessment was completed when the resident had a change in condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #44) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was dated per facility policy.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for hemodialysis, the facility failed to monitor a hemodialysis Arterio-Venous (AV) fistula.
6 fire safety citations on file: 3 on February 15, 2023, 3 on January 30, 2020.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.24 | 3.73 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.84 | 3.37 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.72 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.63 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 42.7% | 37.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 26.7% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.40 on weekdays and 3.84 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 10.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.35 in April to June 2025 to 4.24 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.24 | 0.89 | 4.40 | 3.84 | 10.0% | 0 of 90 | 71 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.30 | 0.91 | 4.39 | 4.06 | 8.8% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.24 | 0.75 | 4.38 | 3.91 | 8.5% | 0 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.35 | 0.84 | 4.49 | 4.00 | 3.7% | 0 of 91 | 70 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 3.80 | 3.31 | 6.0% | 1.3% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecticut, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $21.53 | $20.14 to $22.68 | 21,380 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $35.43 | $32.05 to $36.94 | 8,540 |
| Registered nurses | $49.39 | $41.40 to $58.58 | 40,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Connecticut | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.2 | 17.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.5 | 16.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 17.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.9 | 24.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 17.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chestelm Health and Rehabilitation Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (63.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
63.7% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Connecticut: 75 better, 2 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 75 eligible stays.
9.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Connecticut: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
6.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Connecticut: 0 better, 2 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 67 eligible stays.
52.3% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut58.9% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 65 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.
2.8% this home
Median of homes: Connecticut1.6% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 73 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Connecticut100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHESTELM SKILLED OPERATIONS LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chestelm Skilled Operations Holdco LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/27/2025 |
| Mfk Holdings LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 02/27/2025 |
| Promos First LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 50% | 02/27/2025 |
| Horowitz, Pinchos | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Kalmanowitz, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Cavicke, Dana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Horowitz, Pinchos | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Kalmanowitz, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Marinar, Brenda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Mfk Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/27/2025 | |
| Promos First LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 02/27/2025 | |
| Cavicke, Dana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/27/2025 | |
| Horowitz, Pinchos | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Kalmanowitz, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/27/2025 | |
| Marinar, Brenda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/27/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.