Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Mannford

Cimarron Pointe Care Center

404 East Cimarron, Mannford, OK 74044 · Creek County · (918) 865-7701

108 certified beds, about 31 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1998

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375346 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 20, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since May 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.49 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.34 of those hours.

78.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

CMS links it to Conhold, an affiliated group of 5 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
5E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 20, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure:a. a resident assessed as a wandering risk was included in the comprehensive care plan for 1 (#5); andb. preventative devices for impaired range of motion were included in the comprehensive care plan for 1 #27) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The DON identified four residents had range of motion impairments and 5 residents were at risk for wandering.
June 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan related to significant weight loss for one (#9) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The DON identified 34 residents who resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure meal consumption percentages and weights were documented on a resident who experienced significant weight loss for one (#9) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The DON identified 34 residents who resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed with two errors. The total medication error rate was 8%. The DON identified 34 residents who received medications in the facility.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired supplies were removed from the medication/supply storage room. The DON reported 34 residents resided in the facility.
December 28, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    F557 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room and belonging were not searched without their consent for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.
May 5, 2023Standard inspection · 8 citations
  1. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS Resident Assessments were accurate for two (#7 and #13) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for MDS resident assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility.
  2. E
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. meal consumption percentages were documented on a resident who experienced weight loss for two (#7 and #13) and b. ordered supplement consumption was documented on a resident who experienced weight loss for one (#13) of three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility.
  3. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for two (#7 and #10) of six sampled residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Consultant #3 identified 16 residents with blood pressure parameter orders.
  4. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. prepare food in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (the lunch meal service) of one meal service observed, and b. ensure food items in the refrigerator were dated, and covered. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. LPN #1 identified one resident with orders for nothing by mouth.
  5. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement and maintain an infection control tracking and trending program. The Resident Census and Conditions report, dated 05-03-23, documented 28 residents resided in facility.
  6. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 28, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the nutritional care plan for one (#13) of three sampled residents reviewed for nutrition. The Residents Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in facility.
  7. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to utilize a safe technique to transfer a resident to the bathroom for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 15 residents required the assistance of one or two staff members for transfers and 13 residents required the assistance of one or two staff members for toilet use.
  8. D
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    F908 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 19, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the steam table located in the kitchen was maintained in a safe operating condition. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 05/03/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. LPN #1 identified one resident with orders for nothing by mouth.

Fire safety inspections

3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 13, 2024, 2 on May 5, 2023.

Every fire safety citation3 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · June 13, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · May 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · May 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.493.793.86
Registered nurses0.340.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.323.443.42
Nurse aides2.26
Licensed practical nurses0.89
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)78.9%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover60.0%53.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 2.75 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.56 on weekdays and 3.32 on weekends, 7% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.65 in April to June 2025 to 3.49 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.490.343.563.32 0.0%0 of 9031
Oct to Dec 20253.330.273.413.14 0.0%0 of 9236
Jul to Sep 20253.130.273.192.97 0.0%0 of 9242
Apr to Jun 20252.650.282.742.45 0.0%0 of 9143
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.713.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.42.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.713.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.94.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.017.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.227.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.816.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.22.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.93.01.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CONHOLD OF MANNFORD LLC. CMS links this home to Conhold, a group of 5 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sullivan, James5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual100%08/30/2010
Conhold of Mannford LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization08/13/2010
Allred, AmyOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/14/2018
Allred, AmyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/14/2018

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 20, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2024: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 13, 2024: "Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 28, 2023: "Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.32 hours per resident per day, below the Oklahoma average of 3.44.

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Cimarron Pointe Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Cimarron Pointe Care Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Cimarron Pointe Care Center get at its last inspection?
1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on April 20, 2026. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Cimarron Pointe Care Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Cimarron Pointe Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Cimarron Pointe Care Center?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to Conhold. Legal business name: CONHOLD OF MANNFORD LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection