Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Sapulpa

Arbor Village

310 W Taft Ave, Sapulpa, OK 74066 · Creek County · (918) 224-6012

142 certified beds, about 69 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1996

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375284 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on August 10, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since January 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.38 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.25 of those hours.

63.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).

CMS links it to Skyblue Healthcare, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
3E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 11, 2026Complaint inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · deficient, provider has July 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteThe 2567 had been amended based on a determination resulting from an Informal Dispute Resolution (IDR). Existence of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) has been removed. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to:a. ensure supervision for residents who smoke and to secure smoking materials to prevent accident hazards for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for smoking; andb. prevent elopement for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for elopement. The DON identified 15 residents at risk for elopement resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · deficient, provider has July 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · deficient, provider has July 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene to prevent worsening pressure ulcers for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The DON identified 7 residents with pressure ulcers resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · deficient, provider has July 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medications. The DON identified 65 residents resided in the facility.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · deficient, provider has July 8, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained for residents with indwelling urinary catheters for 1 (#8) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for infection control. The DON identified 5 residents with indwelling urinary catheters.
August 10, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1 (# 69) of 20 sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. The administrator identified 84 residents resided in the facility.
  2. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to:a. review infection prevention control policies and procedures at least annually,b. assess locations Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens can grow and spread,c. implement measures to prevent the growth of waterborne pathogens, andd. have monitoring in place to evaluate effectiveness of water pathogen program. The administrator reported 64 residents resided in the facility. FindingsA facility policy titled Legionella Surveillance, implemented on 08/22/22, did not include a plan for assessing, evaluating and monitoring the measures to prevent the growth of waterborne pathogens. On 08/07/25 at 2:20 p.m., the infection prevention coordinator was asked about annual review of policies. They stated they were not current and had not been reviewed in a few years. [...]
  3. E
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    F848 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement provided the selection of a neutral arbitrator for 3 (#2, 11, and #71) of 3 sampled residents whose arbitration agreements were reviewed. The administrator identified 63 residents had signed binding arbitration agreements.
  4. D
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date for 3 (#6, 27, and #28) of 20 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
  5. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were submitted/transmitted within 14 days of completion for 2 (#27 and #28) of 20 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
  6. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were accurate for 1 (#2) of 20 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility.
  7. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated for 1 (#2) of 20 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. A care plan, dated 05/09/25, did not include restorative care for Resident #2. An admission assessment, dated 05/17/25, showed the Resident #2 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis and a BIMS score of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A restorative care order dated, 07/07/25, showed a resting hand splint was to be applied daily to the right hand and removed after 6-8 hours. A progress note, dated 07/07/25, documented restorative care treatment with the application of a splint to Resident #2's right hand. On 08/10/25 at 10:01 a.m. [...]
  8. D
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 12, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review of nurse aides, hired over one year ago, at least once every 12 months for 1 (CNA #1) of 2 reviewed for performance reviews. Human resources identified 13 CNAs have been employed over one year.
March 14, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for 77 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen. The administrator identified 77 residents who resided in the facility and ate meals prepared by the kitchen.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for one (#10) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The director of nursing identified 12 residents who received wound care.
  3. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the PASRR for a resident with a serious mental health diagnosis was filled out correctly and referred to the OHCA for two (#14 and #25) of three sampled residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The Administrator identified 77 residents resided in the facility.
  4. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist medication reviews related to the GDR request with a clinical rational for three (#1, 25, and #34) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Administrator reported 77 residents resided in the facility.
February 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 21, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan included fall risk and interventions for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls. The DON identified 70 residents resided in the facility.
January 26, 2023Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (#42) of six residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 01/23/23, documented a census of 78.
  2. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary for one (#77) of one resident reviewed for discharge summary. The Entrance Conference Worksheet, completed on 01/23/23, documented 10 residents had been discharged in the last six months.
  3. D
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 31, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed meals were prepared in a sanitary manner. The administrator reported two residents received pureed meals from the kitchen.

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 10, 2025, 3 on January 26, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. E
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 10, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
    K 521 · January 26, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
August 10, 2025Payment Denial 7 days from September 5, 2025

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.383.793.86
Registered nurses0.250.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.913.443.42
Nurse aides2.13
Licensed practical nurses1.00
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)63.0%55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who left2

CMS expects 2.78 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.58 on weekdays and 2.91 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.38 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.380.253.582.91 5.4%0 of 9069
Oct to Dec 20253.560.263.802.96 7.6%0 of 9264
Jul to Sep 20253.750.253.903.34 7.5%0 of 9263
Apr to Jun 20253.740.253.893.37 6.6%0 of 9162
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.113.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.32.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.11.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.113.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.74.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.317.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
39.527.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
8.316.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.52.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.33.01.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ARBOR SNF OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Skyblue Healthcare, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Rivers Edge Operations LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/06/2023
Rivers Edge Partners LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization50%10/01/2023
Oelbaum, Yitzchok5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual15%01/06/2023
Johnson, ErnestW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/06/2023
Ganz, DavidCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2023
Oelbaum, YitzchokCorporate officerIndividual01/06/2023
Ganz, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2023
Oelbaum, YitzchokOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/06/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 11, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.91 hours per resident per day, below the Oklahoma average of 3.44.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Arbor Village's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Arbor Village 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Arbor Village get at its last inspection?
8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 10, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Arbor Village been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Arbor Village accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Arbor Village?
CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Skyblue Healthcare. Legal business name: ARBOR SNF OPERATIONS LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection