Find a nursing home

Home / Oklahoma / Tulsa

Saint Simeons Episcopal Home

3701 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, Tulsa, OK 74106 · Tulsa County · (918) 425-3583

109 certified beds, about 74 residents a day · Non profit - Church related · Medicare since 2013

Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375554 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 24, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 13 health citations since August 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $4,017 in the last three years; the largest was $4,017, and the latest is dated May 22, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.51 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 4, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    F557 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 1 (#4) of 4 residents who were reviewed for dignity. The administrator identified 78 residents who resided at the facility.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect for 1 (#4) of 4 residents who were sampled and reviewed for neglect. The administrator identified 78 residents who resided at the facility.
  3. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 15, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assistance with activities of daily living was provided for 1 (#4) of 4 residents who were reviewed for ADL assistance. The administrator identified 78 residents who resided in the facility.
January 24, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    F640 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge assessments were submitted to CMS within seven days of completion of the assessment for two (#64 and #66) of 18 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator reported 75 residents resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were coded accurately for one (#75) of 18 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The administrator reported 75 residents resided in the facility.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain an order for suprapubic catheter care for one (#46) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The administrator identified 75 residents resided in the facility.
  4. E
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for two (#3 and #4) of three residents sampled for abuse. On 10/05/24 Res #3 was left soiled in bed and stuck between the bed and the wall. On 10/14/24 LPN #4 did not provide hydration, medication, or dressing changes for Res #4. The facility was in past noncompliance after having put the final measures in place to correct the deficiency on 12/13/24. The administrator identified 75 residents who resided in the facility.
October 9, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to prevent abuse for one (#2) of three sampled residents who were sampled for abuse. Administrator #1 identified 71 residents resided in the facility.
May 22, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    F622 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 30, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not involuntarily discharged for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for involuntary discharge. The Administrator identified 77 residents resided in the facility.
October 24, 2023Standard inspection · 0 citations
August 18, 2022Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to track infection and analyze the data for trends in infection for three, (June, July, and August of 2022), of three months of tracking and trending data. The administrator identified 83 residents resided in the facility.
  2. D
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    F698 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services related to dialysis were coordinated for one (#75) of one residents who were reviewed for dialysis services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented one resident received dialysis.
  3. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (#69) of five residents whose medications were reviewed during an observation of the medication pass. The administrator identified 83 residents who received medications.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 18, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to correctly label stored medications for one (#69) of five residents whose medications were reviewed during an observation of the medication pass. This resulted in a significant medication error for resident #69. The administrator identified 83 residents who received medications.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 24, 2025, 5 on October 24, 2023, 3 on August 18, 2022.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. C
    Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
    K 347 · January 24, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · October 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Establish emergency prep training and testing.
    E 36 · October 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · October 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · October 24, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · August 18, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 18, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · August 18, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
May 22, 2024Fine $4,017

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.933.793.86
Registered nurses0.510.340.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.433.443.42
Nurse aides4.03
Licensed practical nurses1.40
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported55.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported53.6%42.9%
Administrators who leftnot reported

CMS expects 3.95 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.13 on weekdays and 5.43 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 7.33 in October to December 2025 to 5.93 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.930.516.135.43 0.0%0 of 9074
Oct to Dec 20257.330.337.526.83 0.0%0 of 9268
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 20263.790.323.943.422.2%1.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOklahomaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.113.613.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.94.73.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.81.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.213.714.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.64.74.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.717.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.327.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.116.612.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.62.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.33.01.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: ST SIMEONS EPISCOPAL HOME, INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Chaffin, KyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2019
Green, AngelaCorporate officerIndividual08/01/2019
Green, AngelaOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2019
Chaffin, KyTrustee of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
Green, AngelaAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2019

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 4, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 4, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 4, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 24, 2025: "Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment."

Other nursing homes nearby

Oklahoma contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Saint Simeons Episcopal Home's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Saint Simeons Episcopal Home 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Saint Simeons Episcopal Home get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 24, 2025. The Oklahoma average is 6.4.
Has Saint Simeons Episcopal Home been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $4,017 in the last three years.
Does Saint Simeons Episcopal Home accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Saint Simeons Episcopal Home?
CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: ST SIMEONS EPISCOPAL HOME, INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection