Home / Missouri / Fredericktown
Claru Deville Nursing Center
105 Spruce Street, Fredericktown, MO 63645 · Madison County · (573) 783-3993
90 certified beds, about 68 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265514 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2026, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 33 health citations since October 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $81,964 in the last three years; the largest was $81,964, and the latest is dated January 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.36 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.24 of those hours.
79.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).
CMS links it to James & Judy Lincoln, an affiliated group of 56 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 33 health citations on file.
April 24, 2026Standard inspection · 13 citations
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate evidence of maintaining an ongoing effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA), reviewed 01/26/26, showed:- The facility is committed to ensuring high-quality care and continuous improvement in resident outcomes through a structured Quality Assessment and Assurance program. [...]
- F Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program committee met at least quarterly with the required members present. This had the potential to affect all residents by limiting the facility's ability to identify and address quality of care and safety concerns. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA), reviewed 01/26/26, showed:- This facility is committed to ensuring high-quality care and continuous improvement in resident outcomes through a structured QAA program. [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate measures used to minimize the risk of Legionella (a bacteria naturally found in freshwater that can cause serious lung infections, most common Legionnaires' disease, which is a severe form of pneumonia) and other opportunistic pathogens in the building water system, by not providing a documented water management program. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors. The facility's census was 67. [...]
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their representatives, in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care, before beginning psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) for four residents (Residents #4, #10, #27, and #46) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's Management of Psychotropic Medications and Unnecessary Medications policy, dated 04/28/25, showed: - The use of psychotropic medications will be carefully monitored to prevent unnecessary usage and will be prescribed only when clinically indicated, with full consideration of the resident's preferences and rights; [...]
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) to two residents (Residents #10 and #66) out of two sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining and remained in the facility. The facility's census was 67. Review of the Form Instructions: [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by failing to ensure the building was free from odors and adequate reusable dinnerware was available for the residents, which resulted in the use of disposable foam dishware. This affected one resident (Resident #53) out of 17 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #44) outside the sample. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding odors or the use of disposable dinnerware. 1. Observations on 04/21/26 at 12:14 P.M., 04/23/26 at 2:50 P.M., and 04/24/26 at 1:04 P.M., of the 600 Hall showed a strong odor of urine. 2. Observation of the test tray on 04/21/26 at 12:00 P.M., showed the tray included a foam bowl containing black-eyed peas. 3. [...]
- D Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer to the hospital and failed to provide a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital for four residents (Residents #3, #10, #27, and #55) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility also failed to notify the ombudsman (a trained advocate who investigates and resolves complaints made by or on behalf of residents in nursing homes, assisted living, and other residential care facilities) of the transfers. The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record showed: - The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation the resident's representative was informed in writing, of the daily bed hold rate; [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plans with specific interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Residents #12 and #21) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy, dated 10/01/15, showed it is the policy of the facility to use the most current Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized comprehensive assessment completed by facility staff) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, any published interim RAI manual errata documents, and applicable federal guidelines as the authoritative guide for completion of MDS, Care Area Assessment (CAAs-investigations triggered by the MDS), and resident care planning. 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record showed: - admission date of 09/01/25; [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for two residents (Residents #1 and #75) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician's Orders, undated, showed:- Each resident must be under the care of a licensed physician authorized to practice medicine in this state and must be seen by the physician at least every sixty days;- Physician's orders must be signed by the physician and dated when such order was signed;- Physician orders must be reviewed and renewed. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed:- admission date of 12/27/23;- Diagnoses of chronic pain, tremor (involuntary movement), and fracture of left acetabulum (deep cup shaped socket where the upper part of the hip sits for the ball and socket hip joint). [...]
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and provide supportive interventions for three residents (Residents #12, #21, and #46) with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it; symptoms may include flashbacks, nightmares and severe anxiety, as well as uncontrollable thoughts about the event) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy. 1. Review of Resident #12's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - Diagnoses of PTSD and major depressive disorder (persistent low mood, loss of interest in pleasurable activities, and fatigue, lasting at least two weeks); - No trauma informed care assessment. Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS), dated 04/24/26, showed: [...]
- D Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of three sampled Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received an annual performance review. The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding CNA annual performance reviews.1. Review of CNA D's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 04/01/25;- No documentation of an annual performance review.2. Review of CNA E's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 04/07/25;- No documentation of an annual performance review.3. Review of CNA F's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 03/21/25;- No documentation of an annual performance review. During an interview on 04/24/26 at 12:30 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said performance reviews have not been getting done, but they are going to start doing them. She said she was unsure of how often they will be done, maybe yearly. [...]
- D Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a safety and maintenance assessment for the use of a trapeze bar (a medical mobility device consisting of a triangular handle hanging from an overhead metal frame, attached to a bed or freestanding) for one resident (Resident #75) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the use and maintenance of a trapeze bar.1. [...]
- D Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year to include dementia care (care of a resident with an impaired ability to remember, think or make decisions), care of cognitively impaired residents and/or abuse/neglect training for three of the three sampled Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). The facility's census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding CNA in-service requirements.1. Review of CNA D's in-service record showed:- A hire date of 04/01/25;- A total of nine in-services, dated 12/10/25; no length of time provided for each in-service;- No documented abuse/neglect, dementia care or the care of cognitively impaired residents training.2. Review of CNA E's in-service record showed:- A hire date of 04/07/25;- A total of nine in-services, dated 12/10/25; [...]
February 28, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight for two residents (Resident #1 and #3) with psychiatric diagnoses and a history of self harm who resided on the secured behavioral unit. On 02/25/25, Resident #3, who had and had a history of ingesting batteries, swallowed two AA batteries, which resulted in transfer to the emergency room (ER) and a procedure to remove the battery. On 02/26/25 at 12:44 P.M., Resident #1 became agitated and made threats of self harm by swallowing items. Resident #1 was placed on 15 minute checks, continued to make self harm threats, and ingested two AA batteries at 3:49 P.M., which resulted in an ER transfer. The facility did not provide documentation or evidence the 15 minutes checks were completed for Resident #1. [...]
January 17, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- K Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents on the secured behavioral unit from abuse through deprivation of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficiency affected three sampled residents (Resident #11, #61, and #68) on the secured behavioral unit, resulting in humiliation and embarrassment for those residents and back pain for Resident #68 from sleeping on a mattress on the floor and had the potential to affect all residents on the secured behavioral unit. The facility also failed to protect one resident's (Resident #11) right to be free from physical abuse when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A physically forced Resident #11 to the ground and physically restrained Resident #11 while on the ground, making Resident #11 feel humiliated. The facility's census was 74. [...]
- G Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure and promote an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life, recognizing each resident's rights, failed to protect and promote the rights of the resident, failed to allow the resident to exercise his or her rights as a resident of the facility without coercion, interference, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility, and failed to ensure the residents were able to exercise their rights as a resident of the facility and were free of restraints when 3 of 22 residents (Residents #11, #61 and #68) were placed in a secured unit without evaluation for appropriate placement and their resident rights were removed per the guardians' directions, based on a list of actions and consequences. The facility's census was 74. [...]
- G Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for three sampled residents (Residents #11, #61 and #68) out of 22 residents who reside on the secured behavior unit. The facility failed to care plan resident specific interventions and did not assess the affect of the use of an actions/consequences list requested by the guardian. The facility did not develop a behavior plan or crisis intervention plan for residents as indicated by the pre-admission behavioral health screening. The unit enforced a program of negative consequences should a resident exhibit behaviors. The facility census was 74. [...]
- F Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI, a program to improve the processes for the delivery of health care and quality of life for the residents) program in place with policies and protocols describing how the facility will identify and correct its own quality deficiencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide a QAPI policy or any documentation related to a QAPI program. During an interview on 01/15/25 at 12:30 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said they don't have QAPI meetings. During an interview on 01/16/25 at 3:36 P.M., the Administrator said he has no QAPI policy or plan, nor does he have a list of the QAPI committee members. He knows he should be doing something more formal. [...]
- F Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide a QAPI policy or any documentation related to a QAPI program. During an interview on 01/15/25 at 12:30 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said they don't have QAPI meetings. During an interview on 01/16/25 at 3:36 P.M., the Administrator said he has no QAPI policy or plan. He knows he should be doing something more formal. They do have a daily stand up meeting. [...]
- F Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) committee meetings with the required members. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide a QAPI policy or any documentation related to a QAPI program. During an interview on 01/15/25 at 12:30 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said they don't have QAPI meetings. During an interview on 01/16/25 at 3:36 P.M., the Administrator said he has no QAPI policy or plan, nor does he have a list of the QAPI committee members. He knows he should be doing something more formal. [...]
- F Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a risk management process specific to Legionnaires' disease (a severe type of pneumonia caused by the Legionella bacteria) which had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and the public. The facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infection during peri care (washing the genital and anal areas of the body) for one resident (Resident #23) out of one sampled resident. The facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) during wound care for one resident (Resident #1) out of one sampled resident when the policy was not followed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was available outside or near the rooms of those residents on EBP and proper PPE for EBP applied before and during care. The facility's census was 74. [...]
- E Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff with appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for three sampled residents (Residents #11, #61 and #68) who resided on the secured behavior unit. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 22 residents on the secured behavioral unit. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide any policies or procedures regarding secured behavior unit staffing needs, specialized training needed to work on the locked behavior unit, or criteria for admission to the locked behavior unit. The facility did not provide any mental health behavior training program for staff working on the secured behavioral unit. [...]
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally mandated preliminary assessment to determine whether a resident may have a mental illness or an intellectual disorder, to determine the level of care needed) for one resident (Resident #63) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility's census was 74. The facility did not provide a policy for PASARR. 1. Review of Resident #63's medical record showed: - An admission date of 03/10/23; [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clean bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP, a machine that pushes pressurized air into the lungs at distinct levels on inhalation and exhalation) and continuous positive air pressure (CPAP, a treatment for breathing issues that involves a machine delivering constant pressurized air through a mask) machines per the manufacturer's guidelines for two residents (Resident #39 and #46) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 74. Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated March 2015, showed: - Purpose, to administer oxygen to the resident when insufficient oxygen in being carried by the blood to the tissues; - At regular intervals, check and clean oxygen equipment, masks, tubing and cannulas; [...]
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an error rate of less than five percent when medications were administered. There were 25 opportunities with three medication errors made, for an error rate of 12%. Out of six residents observed, this affected two residents (Resident #41 and #57) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #53) outside the sample. The facility's census was 74. Review of the facility's policy titled, Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic metabolic disease that occurs when the body can't produce or use insulin properly), Control of, dated March 2015, showed: - Purpose, to assist the resident to establish a balance between diet, exercise and insulin (a hormone that regulates blood sugar levels by moving blood sugar into cells where it can be used for energy); [...]
October 31, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when two residents (Residents #1 and #2) were involved in a verbal and physical altercation, which resulted in both residents on the ground hitting each other. The facility's census was 74. The facility was notified of past non-compliance on 10/31/24. Facility staff immediately intervened, notified administration, separated the residents, and provided assessment and services to the involved residents. Staff were in-serviced on abuse and neglect prevention. The deficiency was corrected on 10/10/24. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, undated, showed: [...]
May 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a facility-initiated transfer when three residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3) out of three sampled residents transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled Discharge/Transfer of Resident, undated, showed: -discharge: To leave the facility without plans or intentions to return (i.e., discharge to go home, a lower level of care or another long-term care facility); -Transfer: To leave the facility with plans or intentions to return (i.e., transfer to an acute care facility for appropriate care); -To provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for aftercare of the resident; -discharge: [...]
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or legal representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy Guidelines, undated, showed: - This facility will notify all residents, and/or their representative of the bed hold policy guidelines. This notification shall be given: 1. Upon admission to the facility, 2. At the time of transfer to the hospital or leave; and 3. At the time of non-covered therapeutic leave; - If the resident or resident representative wants to hold the bed, a signed authorization of the Bed Hold Selection Notice must be obtained with each physician approved hospitalization or therapeutic leave of absence. [...]
- D Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was scheduled for at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 68. The facility did not provide a RN coverage policy. Review of the Nursing Daily Staffing Sheets for 04/01/24 through 05/01/24 showed: - No RN scheduled for 04/13/24 through 04/14/24; - No RN scheduled for 04/17/24 through 04/18/24. An agency RN was scheduled for 04/18/24. He/she called in, and was not replaced by another RN; - No RN scheduled for 04/26/24 through 04/27/24. An agency RN was scheduled for 04/26/24. He/she called in, and was not replaced by another RN; - No RN scheduled for six out of 31 days. Review of the current staff list showed two RNs which included the DON. [...]
October 5, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a facility-initiated transfer when two residents (Residents #6 and #14), out of two sampled residents, transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 67. The facility did not provide a policy regarding hospital transfer notifications. 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record showed: - Resident transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation on 09/27/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation of the written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the resident's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #14's medical record showed: - Resident transferred to the hospital for medical evaluation on 08/24/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; [...]
- D Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and family or legal representative of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for two residents (Resident #6 and #14) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge/Transfer of Resident, undated, showed: - Purpose is to provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for aftercare of the resident; - Notice of transfer or discharge to be provided as necessary; - Bed hold forms to be provided as necessary. 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record showed: - Transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; - No documentation that the resident's representative was informed in writing of the facility bed hold policy at the time of transfer. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plans with specific interventions to meet individual needs for one resident (Resident #40) out of six sampled residents, and one resident (Resident #48) outside the sample. The facility census was 67. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, dated March 2015, showed: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -Assessment of each resident is ongoing process and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -A well-developed care plan will be oriented to managing risk factors to the extent possible or indicating the limits of such interventions; [...]
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the residents and staff by not removing miscellaneous items on top of overbed light fixtures. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The facility census was 67. Review of the facility's policy titled, Environmental Safety and Health, dated May 2006, showed: - The Facility Safety and Health Committee with environmental safety in mind will work toward maintaining a safe work environment and control unsafe actions, and conduct periodic safety audits of specific areas of the workplace; - Each department will conduct a survey of their department every other month, and on the alternating month, the survey will be conducted by another department leader to be assigned by the Facility Safety and Health Committee Director; [...]
Fire safety inspections
10 fire safety citations on file: 6 on April 24, 2026, 3 on January 17, 2025, 1 on October 5, 2023.
Every fire safety citation10 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- F Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- F Meet other general requirements.
- F Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| January 17, 2025 | Fine | $81,964 |
| January 17, 2025 | Payment Denial | 48 days from February 25, 2025 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.36 | 3.43 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.24 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.04 | 3.01 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.59 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.53 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 79.1% | 56.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 47.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 2.66 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.49 on weekdays and 3.04 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 7.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.46 in April to June 2025 to 3.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.36 | 0.24 | 3.49 | 3.04 | 7.1% | 1 of 90 | 68 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.44 | 0.23 | 3.57 | 3.12 | 6.6% | 0 of 92 | 69 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.43 | 0.22 | 3.57 | 3.08 | 15.9% | 5 of 92 | 71 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.46 | 0.19 | 3.63 | 3.04 | 29.6% | 2 of 91 | 72 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Missouri, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 3.9% | 1.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 18.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 57.1 | 23.5 | 15.4 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: N & R OF FREDERICKTOWN, INC.. CMS links this home to James & Judy Lincoln, a group of 56 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln, James | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 08/01/1998 |
| Lincoln, Judy | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 50% | 08/01/1998 |
| Stotler, Daniele | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 04/25/2022 | |
| Bysor, Brandon | Corporate director | Individual | 04/25/2022 | |
| Drake, Timothy | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/25/2022 | |
| Stutts, Charlotte | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/01/1998 | |
| N & R of Fredericktown, Inc. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/1998 | |
| Lincoln, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/27/2016 | |
| Lincoln, Judy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/27/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Madison Medical Center Fredericktown, 1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- St. Francois Manor Farmington, 15.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Farmington Presbyterian Manor Farmington, 17 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Southbrook Nursing Center Farmington, 17.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Baptist Homes of Arcadia Valley Ironton, 17.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Camelot Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Farmington, 17.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Community Manor Farmington, 18.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
- Country Meadows Park Hills, 23.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Section for Long-Term Care Regulation, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Missouri Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 800-309-3282. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Show Me Long Term Care in Missouri, where Missouri publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Claru Deville Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Claru Deville Nursing Center 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Claru Deville Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
- 13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2026. The Missouri average is 11.4.
- Has Claru Deville Nursing Center been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $81,964 in the last three years.
- Does Claru Deville Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Claru Deville Nursing Center?
- CMS lists 9 owners and managers, and links the home to James & Judy Lincoln. Legal business name: N & R OF FREDERICKTOWN, INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.