Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley
#1 Arbor Terrace, Fenton, MO 63026 · St. Louis County · (636) 343-0016
190 certified beds, about 169 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265711 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on December 5, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since March 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.36 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.35 of those hours.
47.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).
CMS links it to Delmar Gardens, an affiliated group of 12 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
December 5, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control standards by not implementing Contact Precautions (CP, precautions that reduce the risk of transmission of infectious materials by direct contact.) for one resident (Resident #19), failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for four of 30 sampled residents (Residents #2, #3, #71, and #179), and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed by staff while feeding a resident (Resident #146). The census was 153. [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services were provided consistent with professional standards of practice when staff administered a nebulizer (a medical device that administers breathing medication in an aerosol form) treatment to a resident without monitoring the resident during the treatment. In addition, the nebulizer face mask was not cleaned and stored properly after use for one resident (Resident #151). The sample was 30. The census was 153. Review of the facility's Nebulizer policy, last revised 5/2021, showed:-Purpose: To deliver prescribed medication deeply into the pulmonary (lung) airways;-Procedure: Check the physician orders for treatment specifications. Assemble equipment at bedside: Explain the procedure to the resident. Instruct the resident to sit up straight as possible. [...]
April 9, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote the resident's self-determination through support of resident choices when staff failed to follow a resident's choice to be a no code (do not resuscitate (DNR), no life prolonging methods are performed), when staff performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating) when the resident was found not breathing and without a pulse (Resident #1). The sample size was 3. The census was 150. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] of the past non-compliance. The facility responded appropriately when the incident occurred. Staff were provided continuing education on where to locate a resident codes status. They updated their CPR/Code Status policy and added an additional system in which staff can access a resident's current code status. [...]
March 26, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
- E Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to check for a federal indicator (identifies when an employee who has ever held a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) certificate has ever been found to have abused, neglected, or misappropriated resident property) through the state Nurse Aide (NA) registry prior to hiring a new employee, in accordance with the facility's abuse policies, for three of eight employees files reviewed. The census was 163. The administrator was notified on 3/26/24, of the past non-compliance. The facility has changed their process on newly hired employees and in-serviced staff on the requirement to check the NA registry on all newly hired staff ongoing. The deficiency was corrected on 9/13/23. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Freedom From policy revised 9/22/19, showed: -Policy: [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control for one resident observed during personal care. The resident's urinary catheter tubing disconnected and fell to the floor. Staff did not cleanse the tubing and then re-inserted the tubing into the catheter port (Resident #19). The facility also failed to ensure 3 out of 8 sampled staff's two-step tuberculin (TB) skin test were read prior to staff working with residents. In addition, staff failed to change their gloves or sanitize their hands when exiting a resident room, and handled clean linen supplies. The sample was 32. The census was 164. 1. Review of the facility's catheter care policy, revised 3/2021, showed: -Suprapubic catheter (urinary catheter surgically inserted through the abdomen and into the bladder, to drain urine): [...]
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse was not violated, when residents were involved in physical resident to resident altercations resulting in two of the involved residents to be struck in the face, leaving a reddened area to their faces (Residents #59, #140, #129 and #21). The sample was 32. The facility census was 164. The facility was notified of past non-compliance on 3/27/24. Facility staff immediately intervened, notified administration, separated the residents, and provided assessment and services to the involved residents. Staff were in-serviced on abuse and neglect prevention. The deficiency was corrected on 3/15/24. Review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect policy, revised 9/2022, showed: -Resident safety position statement: [...]
- D Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff failed to verify an intravenous (IV, medical technique that administers fluids, medication, and nutrients directly into the vein) therapy order for one resident (Resident #91). The facility also failed to ensure oxygen administration orders were completed and accurate and orders were obtained for a specialty mattress for one resident (Resident #10). The sample was 32. The census was 164. 1. Review of the Following Physician Order policy, dated 6/29/21, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that all licensed professional nurses Registered Nurses, Licensed Practical Nurses and Licensed Vocational Nurses (RN, LPN and LVN) and other healthcare professionals, follow physician orders in accordance to state, federal regulations and respective practice acts; [...]
March 1, 2022Standard inspection · 15 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate, and individualized care plans to address the specific needs of the residents for five out of 29 sampled residents (Residents #58, #84, #4, #35 and #95). The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's care management policy, undated, showed the following: Purpose: To provide for management of resident care that is conducted systematically and comprehensively by a facility-wide (interdisciplinary) Team knowledgeable in current concepts of geriatric care. Resident care management should be consistent with the medical plan of care. Nursing uses the five steps of the nursing process: Assessment, diagnosis, goal setting, implementation and evaluation as a guide. Policy: [...]
- E Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when staff did not follow physician orders. Staff failed to ensure an arm immobilizer (used to restrict movement in and around the shoulder by reducing abduction -moving arm away from the body and arm rotation) was applied, report out of range blood sugar parameters, document weekly skin assessments, and ensure ordered weekly weights and fluid restrictions were followed. In addition, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments in accordance with their policy after a fall These affected 10 out of 29 sampled residents (Residents #16, #63, #58, #35, #84, #4 #133,#153, #70 and #357). The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Following Physician Orders policy, dated 6/29/21, showed: -Purpose: [...]
- E Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to fully implement the facility's Restorative Therapy (RT) program and ensure residents received RT as ordered for 11 residents (Resident #63, #132, #142, #42, #65, #95, #58, #35, #357, #16 and #70). The sample was 29. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Restorative Therapy (RT) Program Policy, dated revised 5/21, showed, purpose: It is the policy of the facility to assist each resident to attain and/or maintain their individual highest most practicable functional level of independence and well-being, in accordance to State and Federal regulation; -Procedure: [...]
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision as required for residents in an assisted dining room, utilized for residents who required assistance and/or oversight during meals. One resident was served his/her meal and consumed the meal without staff present (Resident #96). The facility also failed to ensure sharps were disposed properly. The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #96's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -Unclear speech, slurred or mumbled; -Usually understood, difficulty communicating some words or finishing thoughts but is able if prompted or given time; -Sometimes understands, responds adequately to simple, direct communication only; -No brief interview for mental status (BIMS, a screener for cognitive status) completed; -Eating: Required supervision/oversight, encouragement or cueing; [...]
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have adequate nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents as evidenced by incontinence care and/or toileting not provided, for four of 29 sampled residents (Residents #9, #131, #120 and #101). This had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 2/3/22, showed: -Cognitively intact: -No behaviors; -Required extensive staff assistance with dressing, toileting and hygiene; -Diagnoses included vascular disease, diabetes and Parkinson's (a nerve disorder affecting motor control) disease; -Urinary and bowel incontinence: incomplete; -Takes a diuretic (used to remove excessive fluid from the body) medication seven days a week. [...]
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets assisted residents to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for each resident. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents, by failing to administer medications per physician's orders and accurately document and maintain a controlled substance record. In addition, the facility failed to ensure all staff, were adequately trained and informed of facility policies and expectations per acceptable nursing standards. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. Review of the facility's 2020-2021 assessment tool, showed: -Staff training/education and competencies: -All Staff: [...]
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had a system in place to record and document all controlled drugs with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, for two of 29 sampled residents (Residents #9 and #115) and five out of five halls. This had the potential to affect all residents with orders for controlled substances. The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Controlled Medications policy, dated as last reviewed on 6/21, showed the following: -Purpose: A controlled drug record of individual resident form is accurately maintained on all resident requiring controlled medications. Strict control of narcotics is maintained always. A physician order is required for administration of controlled drugs. Controlled drugs are administered by licensed personnel. [...]
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to self-administer medications had been determined as clinically appropriate for one of 29 sampled residents (Resident #45). The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of facility's resident self administration of medications policy, dated 6/21, showed: -Before a resident is considered for self-administration of medications an assessment will be performed by the charge nurse and reviewed by the interdisciplinary care plan team for approval. A re-assessment will be repeated quarterly unless there is a significant change in condition affecting cognitive abilities and safety regarding self-administration; [...]
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative when the resident developed a wound on his/her right foot. (Resident #505). The sample was 29. The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Condition Change of the Resident (Observing, Recording and Reporting), revised 7/21, showed the following: -Purpose: To observe, record and report any condition change to the attending physician so proper treatment will be implemented; -Procedure: After all resident falls, injuries or change in physical or mental function, monitor the following: -Document the change in the Process Notes on the respective event; -Notify resident's responsible party; -Monitor the resident condition frequently until stable. [...]
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from chemical restraints. Staff administered Lorazepam (Ativan, a benzodiazepine medication used to treat anxiety) as well as other bedtime medications that included Donepezil (medication used to treat dementia) and Trazodone (antidepressant) to Resident #65, outside the parameters ordered by the physician in an attempt to prevent behaviors. Two additional residents from the memory care unit were sampled and two residents were identified in which staff did not document behaviors and notify the physician of changed administration times (Residents #82 and #152). The sample size was 29. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. [...]
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review,, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to follow the facility policy for wound management. The staff failed to document weekly skin assessments in the electronic medical record (EMR), failed to document the discovery of a wound and the wound assessment and also failed to ensure an ordered treatment remained in place. When assessed by the wound management company several days later, the resident's newly developed wound was documented as an unstageable pressure ulcer (Resident #131). In addition, facility staff failed to report one newly developed opened area to the charge nurse for 24 hours and when assessed by the surveyor the next day, the resident had developed two open areas. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored and labeled in accordance with accepted professional principles, when staff failed to date four out of six insulin pens, on the 200 hall after opened and check and/or record the refrigerator temperature daily for five out of five medication refrigerators. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Insulin Administration via a Pen Device policy, dated as reviewed 5/21, showed: -Purpose: To safely administer insulin via pen devices according to physician orders and the facility's policy and procedures; -Procedure: If a pen is being used for the first time, date the pen on the label. 1. Observation on the 200 hall on 2/18/22 at 10:00 A.M., of the top drawer of the treatment cart, showed six insulin pens. [...]
- D Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to establish a system to ensure all staff followed requirements from the state board of nursing for one registered nurse who held a nursing license on probation at the time of hire. The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of Registered Nurse (RN) GG's employment record, showed: -Employment application: Date of hire: 5/4/21; -Status: Full time; -Job Title: Registered Nurse; -Review of RN GG's license verification report, showed: -License original date: 4/14/11; -License status: Probation; -Date of action take: 4/6/21; -Basis for action: Failure to maintain adequate or accurate records; -Effective dates: 4/6/21 through 4/6/2024. Review of RN GG's State Board of Nursing Hearing Commission, dated 4/6/21, showed: -Employment Restrictions: [...]
- D Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan that identified and corrected quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement, which would lead to improvement in the lives of the nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety, by administering medications outside parameters and ensuring the narcotic sheets are accurate, completed and maintained. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. The census was 188 with 143 in certified beds. [...]
- C Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully implement their staff vaccination policy for COVID-19 by failing to ensure a process for tracking and documenting the COVID-19 vaccination status for all staff, to include staff who provide services via contract or other arrangement. This failure included facility staff and corporate staff, who were either employed by the facility or provided care to resident via an agreement. The census was 188 with 143 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's undated COVID-19 Vaccine Policy, showed: -This facility is obligated to adhere to the federal vaccine mandate for healthcare facilities as a condition of participation in the Medicare-Medicaid program. [...]
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 5, 2025, 1 on March 26, 2024, 11 on March 1, 2022.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- E Use approved construction type or materials.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- E Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- F List the names and contact information of those in the facility.
- F Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
- F Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
- F Have elevators that firefighters can control in the event of a fire.
- E Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.36 | 3.43 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.02 | 3.01 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 47.8% | 56.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 38.1% | 47.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.61 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.02 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.36 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.36 | 0.35 | 3.50 | 3.02 | 5.2% | 0 of 90 | 169 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.64 | 0.39 | 3.74 | 3.39 | 6.1% | 0 of 92 | 163 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.74 | 0.45 | 3.85 | 3.46 | 3.8% | 0 of 92 | 160 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.45 | 3.91 | 3.49 | 5.8% | 0 of 91 | 161 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Missouri, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.34 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 3.9% | 1.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Missouri | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.7 | 18.1 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.8 | 17.4 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.9 | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 21.1 | 23.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.3 | 26.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.8 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: DELMAR GARDENS OF MERAMEC VALLEY OPERATING, LLC. CMS links this home to Delmar Gardens, a group of 12 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delmar Gardens Enterprises Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 03/07/2003 |
| Gabe Grossberg and George Grossberg, Trustees of the Henry and Barbara | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 03/07/2003 |
| George Grossberg and Gabe Grossberg, Trustees of the Henry and Barbara | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 8% | 03/07/2003 |
| Goldberg-Nom LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 25% | 03/07/2003 |
| Non-Gst Family Trust Est U/W of Israel Goldberg Fbo Janice Bitanski | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 04/10/2013 |
| Non-Gst Family Trust Established U/W of Israel Goldberg Fbo Harry Zvi | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 04/10/2013 |
| Non-Gstfamily Trust Est U/W Israel Goldberg Fbo Diane Fredman | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 6% | 04/10/2013 |
| Grossberg, Gabe | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 16% | 03/07/2003 |
| Grossberg, George | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 11% | 03/07/2003 |
| Gray, Tracie | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/07/2021 | |
| Grossberg, Gabe | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/07/2003 | |
| Marx, Kenneth | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/11/2019 | |
| Oppenheimer, Howard | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/07/2003 | |
| Delmar Gardens Management Services Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2005 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 5, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 9, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 26, 2024: "Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Maple Grove Wellness & Rehabilitation Fenton, 0.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 53 citations
- Fieser Nursing Center Fenton, 1.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 56 citations
- South County Health Care Center Arnold, 3.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Friendship Village Sunset Hills Saint Louis, 3.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Fountain Care at Sunset Hills Saint Louis, 3.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 74 citations
- Delmar Gardens South Saint Louis, 4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Big Bend Woods Healthcare Center Valley Park, 4.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Garden View Care Center at Dougherty Ferry Valley Park, 4.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Section for Long-Term Care Regulation, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Missouri Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 800-309-3282. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Show Me Long Term Care in Missouri, where Missouri publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley get at its last inspection?
- 2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 5, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
- Has Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Delmar Gardens of Meramec Valley?
- CMS lists 14 owners and managers, and links the home to Delmar Gardens. Legal business name: DELMAR GARDENS OF MERAMEC VALLEY OPERATING, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.