1800 Riverside Drive, Columbus, OH 43212 · Franklin County · (614) 486-9511
47 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365047 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 23, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 26 health citations since March 2020, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,610 in the last three years; the largest was $17,610, and the latest is dated June 23, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.06 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.89 of those hours.
51.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteTHIS IS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility incident report and investigative documents, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 01/30/25 when staff attempted to transfer Resident #16 from the bed to his wheelchair with the mechanical lift and due to poor staff transferring techniques, Resident #16 was dropped to the floor. Resident #16 was sent to the hospital and returned to the facility with the following injuries: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide proper behavior monitoring and documented discussion of the need for psychotropic's and causes of anxiety. This affected two residents (#10 and #11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 31.
Inspectors wrote3. Review of the medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 04/16/25 with no cognitive deficits. Diagnoses included aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, malignant neoplasm colon, and intestinal obstruction, unspecified as to partial versus complete obstruction. Resident #54 discharged from the facility to home on on 04/25/25. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated Resident #54 was transferred to the hospital. After surveyor intervention it was modified on 06/17/25 to indicate Resident #54 was discharged home. Interview on 6/17/25 at 10:14 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed a corrected MDS for Resident #54 was submitted after surveyor intervention on 06/17/25 indicating Resident #54 was not discharged to the hospital as previously recorded, but was discharged home. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure dressing changes were completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #22) out of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 31.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide parameters for as needed pain medication. This affected one (Resident #16) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 31. Findings Include: Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included but were not limited to osteoporosis, spastic hemiplegia, morbid obesity, Type II diabetes, pneumonia, spinal stenosis, coronary atherosclerosis, chronic embolism and thrombosis, chronic kidney disease, cerebral infarction, mood disorder, peripheral vascular disease, anemia, nicotine dependence, acute kidney failure, epilepsy, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/25, revealed he was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for transfers. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, review of the facility policy, and physician and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of the pain interventions for a resident per the resident's plan of care and professional standards of practice. This affected one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 33.
Inspectors wroteThe following deficiency represents an incident of past non-compliance that was subsequently corrected prior to this survey. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the fall investigation and witness statements, review of the hospital records, and review of the manufacturer recommendations for use, the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely transferred by a mechanical lift. This resulted in Actual Harm on 03/28/23 when Resident #07 was transferred from the bed to the wheelchair with the mechanical lift when the straps to the lift pad tore and Resident #07 dropped to the floor approximately two to three feet. Resident #07 complained of coccyx and buttock pain. Subsequently, Resident #07 was sent to the local hospital where he was diagnosed with a sacral fracture. This affected one resident (#07) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, review of the tray line temperature log, and policy review, the facility failed to serve foods at the appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate food in the facility. The census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, review of the meal times, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were provided timely. This affected all 34 residents who ate meals in the facility. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to store and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent potential contamination. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who eat in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on resident record review, observation, staff interviews, review of the infection control logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control logs were completed for tracking trends and patterns. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who reside in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to follow proper infection control policies and procedures during catheter care. This affected one resident (#24) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor antibiotic use appropriately as part of an antibiotic stewardship plan. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents. The facility census was 34. Findings Include: Review of documents dated April, May, and June 2023, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed there was no documentation and analysis of appropriate indications for the use of antibiotics. Interview on 07/20/23 at 2:45 P.M. with the DON confirmed the facility used McGreer's criteria for the antibiotic stewardship program. The DON had no evidence how the facility was monitoring antibiotic medications using the McGreer criteria. The DON verified there was no documentation of an antibiotic stewardship program. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, review of the self reported incidents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident abuse, neglect and misappropriation allegations were thoroughly investigated. This affected four residents (#138, #142, #141, and #143) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and menu review, the facility failed to ensure diets met the needs of residents. This had the potential to affect four residents (#07, #10, #13, and #22) who received a mechanically altered diet in the facility. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and menu review, the facility failed to follow the menu. This affected four residents (#07, #10, #13, and #22) out of four residents on a mechanical altered diet. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the beneficiary notices, staff interview, review of the State Operations Manual, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided appropriate beneficiary notices when Medicare part A services were reduced or discontinued and the residents remained in the facility. This affected two residents (#24 and #30) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 34. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date on 01/10/23. Diagnoses included type II diabetes, Parkinson's, dementia, muscle weakness, and a history of falling. Review of Resident #24's census revealed the resident had a Medicare part A payer source from 01/10/23 until 03/13/23. Effective 03/13/23, Resident #24 changed to a private pay payer source and remained in the facility. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility document review, the facility failed to notify the ombudsmen of a resident's discharge from the facility. This affected two residents (#05 and #27) out of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to resident or resident representative. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for resident specific care needs. This affected three residents (#13, #08, and #20) out of thirteen residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents fluid intake was adequate to meet their nutritional needs. This affected one resident (#13) out of two residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents oxygen tubing and humidifiers were labeled and dated. This affected three residents (#08, #20 and #148) out of three residents reviewed for respiratory services. The facility identified eight residents (#04, #06, #08, #11, #14, #20, #21, and #148) who were receiving oxygen. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was updated on residents uncontrolled pain. This affected one resident (#13) out of three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of the hospital continuity of care form, review of a pharmacy faxed correspondence, and interview, the facility failed to properly monitor a resident on antibiotics and prescribe medications as ordered. This affected one resident (#20) of two residents reviewed for antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect five residents (#09, #10, #13, #20, and #244) who were receiving antibiotics in the facility. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were administered with less than five percent error rate. There were two medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error with a calculated error rate of eight percent. This affected two residents (#11 and #17) out of four residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 34.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to implement their Water Management Plan to reduce the risk, growth and spread of the Legionella Disease. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents of the facility.
Inspectors wrote2. Medical record review revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility 09/07/16 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Observations on 03/02/20 at 10:16 A.M., on 03/03/20 at 8:37 A.M., and on 03/04/20 at 8:38 A.M. revealed Resident #43 in her wheelchair in the dining room. Her wheelchair had two strips of pink tape and one strip of blue tape with her first initial of her first name, and full last name taped to the back of her chair. Interview on 03/04/20 at 11:35 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #211 confirmed Resident #43 had two strips of pink duct tape and one strip of blue painter's tape with her first initial of her first name, and full last name on her wheelchair. [...]
15 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 23, 2025, 6 on July 24, 2023, 7 on March 5, 2020.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 23, 2025 | Fine | $17,610 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.06 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.66 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.80 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.37 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.0% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 50.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.20 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.22 on weekdays and 4.66 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 27.7% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.64 in April to June 2025 to 5.06 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.06 | 0.89 | 5.22 | 4.66 | 27.7% | 0 of 90 | 38 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.46 | 1.06 | 5.61 | 5.07 | 25.7% | 0 of 92 | 31 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.02 | 0.98 | 5.21 | 4.56 | 23.6% | 0 of 92 | 36 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.64 | 0.77 | 4.76 | 4.33 | 14.8% | 0 of 91 | 34 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.3 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.6 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.4 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for First Community Village Healthcare Ctr's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (70.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
70.3% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 262 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 251 eligible stays.
7.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 146 eligible stays.
68.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 63 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
2.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 37 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: FIRST COMMUNITY VILLAGE.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fcv Corporation | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/30/2003 |
| Adcock, Heather | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Barkin, Victoria | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Bloomfield, Sally | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Davis, John Terrance | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Hoff, Angela | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mettler, Brianna | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Alexander, Sean | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Dehring, Lindsey | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Meyung, Kelli | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2024 | |
| Rule, Matthew | Corporate officer | Individual | 04/01/2019 | |
| Woolley, Julie | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| National Church Residences Health Care | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2010 | |
| Macpherson, Gregory | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Macpherson, Gregory | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/19/2025 | |
| Patel, Bhavesh | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/29/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.