Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Glasgow

Glasgow Gardens

100 Audsley Drive, Glasgow, MO 65254 · Howard County · (660) 338-2297

59 certified beds, about 38 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1993

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265535 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 17, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since January 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 2.52 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.

44.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

CMS links it to James & Judy Lincoln, an affiliated group of 56 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
6D
8E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
1B
0C
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    F727 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's policy, Staff Scheduling, dated April 2015, showed an RN must work eight consecutive hours on the day shift every day, seven days a week. 1. Review of the facility's RN daily staffing sheets and time-clock data, dated December 2024, showed the facility did not have documentation to show an RN (including the Director of Nursing (DON)) worked on 12/01/24, 12/07/24, 12/13/24, and 12/26/24. Review of the facility's RN daily staffing sheets and time-clock data, dated January 2025, showed the facility did not have documentation to show an RN (including the DON) worked on 01/13/25, 01/19/25, and 01/27/25. [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete or maintain documentation of a two-step or prior two step Tuberculin Skin Tests (TST), or a chest x-ray in the last year, as required to rule out Tuberculosis (TB) (a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough, and difficulty breathing), and failed to complete annual TB screening as required for three residents (Resident #17, #239, and #15), in a review of five sampled residents evaluated for immunization status. The facility failed to ensure there was a complete water management program in place to reduce the risk of legionellosis (any disease caused by Legionella (a bacteria which people can breathe in without knowing, sometimes causing infection in the lungs)) in the facility. The facility census was 36. [...]
  3. E
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    F881 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow the facility's policy for the antibiotic stewardship program by not reporting infections to the infection preventionist as directed in policy, and failed to timely track infections and review antibiotic use following initiation of the medications. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's undated policy, Surveillance: Antibiotic Stewardship Program, showed the following: -Measures of Antibiotic Prescribing, Use, and Clinical Outcomes: -The Infection Preventionist/designee will be responsible to audit the clinical assessment documentation at the time of the antibiotic prescription; -The Infection Preventions/designee will be responsible for auditing the completeness of antibiotic prescribing documentation to include dose, route, start date, end date, days of therapy, and indication; [...]
  4. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal vaccinations (a vaccine that can protect against pneumococcal disease) as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines for four residents (Residents #15, #25, #6, and #34), of five five residents reviewed for immunization status. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's undated policy, Immunization, showed the following: -Pneumococcal vaccination in persons age [AGE] and older years, unless contraindicated, would be administered according to the following guidelines when determining the vaccination status; -Adults 65 years or older who have not already received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine should receive either a single dose of PCV15 followed by a dose of PPSV23 one year later, or a single dose of PVC20. [...]
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person centered care plan for two residents (Resident #35 and #89), in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's undated policy Care Plan Comprehensive, showed the following: -An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and time frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; -Assessment of each resident is ongoing and the care plan will be revised as changes occur in the resident's condition; -The comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment; -Periodic review and updating of care plans will occur: a. When a significant change in the resident's condition has occurred; b. [...]
  6. B
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary and recapitulation of stay for one resident (Resident #38), in a review of one closed records. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's undated policy for discharge/transfer showed the following: -Purpose of the policy was to provide safe departure from the facility and provide sufficient information for after care of the resident; -Complete a discharge summary and post discharge plan of care form which included: a. List of medications with instructions in simple terms; b. Instructions for post discharge care and explain to the resident and/or representative; c. Have resident and/or representative responsible for care sign the discharge summary and post discharge care form; d. Give a copy of the form to the resident and/or representative responsible for care; e. [...]
August 23, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to perform assessments and obtain consents for bed rails for 3 (Residents #19, #24, and #26) of 3 residents reviewed for the use of bed rails. This affected 27 residents that had bed rails on their bed.
  2. E
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    F909 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 36 out of 59 beds in the facility with bed rails.
  3. D
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment as required for 2 (Resident #26 and Resident #8) of 19 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to conduct a significant change MDS when Resident #26 had a decline in two areas of activities of daily living (ADL) and when Resident #8 was admitted to hospice services.
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for 1 (Resident #24) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #24's care plan was appropriately revised when the resident's diet status changed by removing the portions of the care plan that were no longer pertinent.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 3, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess an open wound for 1 (Resident #8) of 13 sampled residents after hospice staff identified superficial areas to Resident #8's buttocks on 08/04/2023.
January 16, 2020Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for the residents. The facility census was 34. Observation on 1/13/20, at 10:24 A.M., on the 100 hallway showed the following: -Each residents' room door was scratched the entire width, in several places from the middle of the door to the bottom of the door; -A piece of handrail was missing at the beginning of the 100 hall by room [ROOM NUMBER]; -The doors to storage areas and offices on the 100 hallway were scratched and marred; -The door to the shower room had deep scratches and chips to the exterior, exposing the particles inside the door; -The shower room wall, located to the right of entrance to the shower room, was scratches and marred. The lower trim board was missing paint and the wood underneath was exposed; [...]
  2. E
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    F637 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, for three residents ( Residents #8, #14, and #32) in a review of 12 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 34. 1. Review of the Long Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, version 3.0 showed a significant change is a decline or improvement in a resident's status that: [...]
  3. E
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan consistent with the resident's specific condition, needs and risks to provide person centered care that met professional standards of quality care, and reviewed or provided a printed copy to the resident/responsible party for four residents ( Resident #8, #137, #6,and #10) in a review of 12 sampled residents, and one additional resident (Resident #187). The facility census was 34. 1. Review of Resident #8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed the following: -Admit 7/1/2019; -Diagnoses of chronic pain, stress fracture of left tibia (lower leg bone), depression, acquired absence of left leg below knee, and edema. Review of the resident's EMR showed no interim care plan to meet the resident's immediate needs completed within 48 hours of facility admission. 2. [...]
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and revise comprehensive, person centered care plans for two residents (Resident #10 and #32) in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, dated 10/1/19, showed the facility must develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. [...]
  5. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 27, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and obtain medication timely for a yeast infection for one resident (Resident #21) in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 34. 1. During interview on 1/16/2020 at 2:55 P.M., the associate director of nursing (ADON) said the facility did not have a policy regarding following physician's orders. 2. Review of Resident #21's physician's orders dated 12/14/19-12/20/19, showed the resident's diagnoses included candidiasis (yeast infection), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Review of the resident's progress notes dated 1/13/2020 at 7:07 P.M., showed the following: [...]

Fire safety inspections

18 fire safety citations on file: 8 on April 17, 2025, 8 on August 23, 2023, 2 on January 16, 2020.

Every fire safety citation18 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
    K 921 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Meet other general requirements.
    K 100 · April 17, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.
    K 374 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. E
    Establish policies and procedures including evacuation.
    E 20 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. E
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · August 23, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · January 16, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · January 16, 2020 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)2.523.433.86
Registered nurses0.300.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends2.233.013.42
Nurse aides1.75
Licensed practical nurses0.47
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)44.0%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.13 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 2.64 on weekdays and 2.23 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 2.70 in April to June 2025 to 2.52 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20262.520.302.642.23 0.0%0 of 9038
Oct to Dec 20252.950.443.112.56 3.3%0 of 9234
Jul to Sep 20252.950.323.042.72 3.2%13 of 9231
Apr to Jun 20252.700.352.792.49 0.4%1 of 9136
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Glasgow Gardens. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
30.318.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.51.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.72.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.64.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.92.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
42.317.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.04.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.023.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
15.726.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
5.213.712.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Glasgow Gardens's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (55.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

55.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 41 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: N & R OF GLASGOW LLC. CMS links this home to James & Judy Lincoln, a group of 56 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Lincoln, James5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%09/01/2016
Lincoln, Judy5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual50%09/01/2016
Crowder, TabithaW-2 managing employeeIndividual12/16/2021
LTC Management Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization09/01/2016

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on August 23, 2023: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.23 hours per resident per day, below the Missouri average of 3.01.

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Glasgow Gardens's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Glasgow Gardens 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Glasgow Gardens get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 17, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Glasgow Gardens been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Glasgow Gardens accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Glasgow Gardens?
CMS lists 4 owners and managers, and links the home to James & Judy Lincoln. Legal business name: N & R OF GLASGOW LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection