Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Brainerd

Good Samaritan Society - Bethany

804 Wright Street, Brainerd, MN 56401 · Crow Wing County · (218) 825-2593

79 certified beds, about 70 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1988

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245500 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

None of its 15 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.81 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.53 of those hours.

27.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Good Samaritan Society, an affiliated group of 92 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
1E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 4, 2025Standard inspection · 0 citations
October 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for dignity related to dressing. Findings Include: R2's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, moderate to mild cognitive impairment category, and had the following diagnoses: anxiety, mood disturbance, and dementia. R2's care plan last revised 8/29/25, indicated R2 required an assist of one for dressing related to activity intolerance, Dementia, and impaired balance. The care plan also indicated R2 had enhanced psychosocial well-being related to individualized daily routine and honoring personal preference. [...]
  2. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 2, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review failed to provide repositioning and toileting/incontinence cares for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) and who were dependent on staff for ADL's. Findings Include: R2's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE], was able to communicate clearly and understand others, was moderate to mild cognitive impairment category, and had the following diagnoses: anxiety, mood disturbance, and dementia. R2's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 9/23/25 had a score of 14 indicating R2 is a moderate risk for skin breakdown. The intervention guide included frequent turning with a planned schedule and managing moisture. R2's care plan last revised 8/29/25, indicated R2 has bowel and blader incontinence related to Alzheimer's Disease. [...]
February 14, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure acute, potentially distressing psychoactive symptoms were recorded and non-pharmacological interventions were attempted or recorded to ensure efficacy of as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
October 17, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate appropriate transmission based precautions according to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 2 of 3 residents (R11, R224) reviewed for transmission based precautions, failed to track and trend potential/actual infections for 6 of 6 residents (R11, R35, R36, R24, R1, R224) identified to have potential/actual infections; and failed to conduct COVID-19 testing per CDC guidelines for 5 of 5 residents (R11, R35, R36, R24, R15) who were identified to have COVID-19 signs and symptoms. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter bag was placed in a privacy bag to maintain dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R25) reviewed for dignity.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed ensure clinical monitoring was completed and documented for 2 of 3 residents (R37, R39) reviewed with recent COVID-19 infections.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate provider's order and rational for use were obtained for an indwelling urinary catheter for 1 of 3 residents (R30) who were reviewed for catheter care.
  5. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care according to standards of practice and per physician orders for gastrostomy tube feeding for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for tube feedings.
  6. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a discontinued presciption topical antifungal medication was detroyed and not administered; and failed to ensure only authorizied staff administered prescribed adminstered prescribed creams for 1 of 1 resident (R15) observed to have nursing assistants apply prescribtion creams during cares without an order.
June 12, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    F660 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to create an individualized discharge care plan, to develop interventions to meet the resident's discharge goals and needs to ensure a smooth and safe transition from the facility to the post-discharge setting, for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure physician treatment orders were followed for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers.
  3. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 25, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed, who was cognitively impaired and arrived at an outpatient appointment unaccompanied and was noted to be disorientated and exhibiting aggressive behaviors.
January 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a non-pressure related wound, to promote healing, for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who were reviewed.
December 20, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the most recent Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) education regarding the potential risks and benefits of the pneumococcal vaccine for 3 of 5 residents (R32, R36, R49) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 1, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to use the ordered wound care to promote wound healing for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for pressure ulcers.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on December 4, 2025, 3 on October 17, 2024, 3 on December 20, 2023.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · December 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · October 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. C
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · October 17, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
    K 741 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · December 20, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.814.193.86
Registered nurses1.531.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.223.713.42
Nurse aides1.89
Licensed practical nurses0.39
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)27.8%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover27.6%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.05 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 20% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.96 in April to June 2025 to 3.81 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.811.534.053.22 1.5%0 of 9070
Oct to Dec 20253.771.554.003.19 1.0%0 of 9270
Jul to Sep 20253.761.613.963.25 0.5%0 of 9267
Apr to Jun 20253.961.644.193.39 0.4%0 of 9168
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
18.618.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.61.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.32.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.34.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.620.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.65.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.717.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
28.823.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
29.114.812.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.11.61.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.41.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Good Samaritan Society - Bethany's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

62.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 218 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 220 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 132 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

74.8% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 131 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 165 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.6% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 165 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

99.1% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 114 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY. CMS links this home to Good Samaritan Society, a group of 92 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Sanford5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gassen, WilliamCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Molbert, LaurisCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
North, AndrewCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Schieffer, KevinCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieCorporate directorIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Fluit, JoelCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamCorporate officerIndividual05/30/2024
Middleton, AimeeCorporate officerIndividual01/27/2022
Olson, NicholasCorporate officerIndividual04/08/2024
Schema, NathanCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2022
Morrison, TonyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2019
Olson, JulieOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/16/2018
Pederson, JustinOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/10/2025
Sandgren, DeeandraOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/16/2023
Dtn Staffing IncAdp of the SNFOrganization08/02/2024
Focusone SolutionsAdp of the SNFOrganization03/04/2024
Grape Tree Medical Staffing LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization04/13/2018
Guardian Pharmacy of Minnesota LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization09/26/2024
SanfordAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan SocietyAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2019
Brown, GeorgeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Dykhouse, DanaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Engbrecht, WesleyAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Fluit, JoelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2022
Gassen, WilliamAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Gulsvig, NeilAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Herseth Sandlin, StephanieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Lundeen, MarkAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
McCausland, MaureenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Middleton, AimeeAdp of the SNFIndividual01/27/2022
Molbert, LaurisAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Morrison, TonyAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2019
North, AndrewAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Olson, JulieAdp of the SNFIndividual10/16/2018
Olson, NicholasAdp of the SNFIndividual04/08/2024
Pederson, JustinAdp of the SNFIndividual11/10/2025
Sandgren, DeeandraAdp of the SNFIndividual07/16/2023
Schema, NathanAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2022
Schieffer, KevinAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025
Shulkin, DavidAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Teiken, BrentAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Ventling-Herrmann, MarnieAdp of the SNFIndividual05/30/2024
Wenzel, ThomasAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on October 2, 2025: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 2, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  3. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 14, 2025: "Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on October 17, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.22 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Good Samaritan Society - Bethany's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Good Samaritan Society - Bethany 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Good Samaritan Society - Bethany get at its last inspection?
0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 4, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Good Samaritan Society - Bethany been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Good Samaritan Society - Bethany accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Good Samaritan Society - Bethany?
CMS lists 55 owners and managers, and links the home to Good Samaritan Society. Legal business name: THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection