The Estates at Roseville LLC
2727 North Victoria, Roseville, MN 55113 · Ramsey County · (651) 483-5431
140 certified beds, about 134 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1969
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245105 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 6, 2026, inspectors cited 7 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 30 health citations since March 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $27,378 in the last three years; the largest was $27,378, and the latest is dated June 10, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.57 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.
35.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
CMS links it to Monarch Healthcare Management, an affiliated group of 45 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
August 6, 2026Standard inspection · 7 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of beard restraints during food preparation. This practice had the potential to affect all 134 residents who received food from the kitchen.
- F Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement effective and timely pest control measures to reduce and/or eliminate a roach infestation for 1 of 1 resident (R76) reviewed for environment. This had the potential to affect all 142 residents who resided in the facility.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications was assessed and determined to be appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (R59) reviewed for the self-administration of medications.
- D Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (R39) reviewed for MDS completion.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow provider orders for medication and failed to ensure medication administration was correctly documented for 1 of 1 resident (R59) reviewed for medication administration.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper personal protective equipment was used for 2 of 3 residents (R31, R83) observed who required infection control precautions.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were kept in good working condition for 1 of 1 resident (R45) reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.
June 10, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who was identified as an elopement risk and had exit-seeking behavior. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when he left the facility and independently wheeled his wheelchair approximately 0.6 miles from the facility before being found, which placed R1 at likelihood for serious harm or death. The IJ began on 6/1/26 when R1 exited the building without staff awareness through the secured unit doors and then through an unknown door to the outside of the building. [...]
November 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications assessment was completed, and orders obtained, for all medications kept at bedside for 1 of 1 resident (R3) observed with medications at their bedside.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor a skin concern and notify the provider for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for wound care.
May 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 11 citations
- F Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to employ either a full-time registered dietician (RD) or a qualified culinary director (CD) to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services. This had the potential to affect all 135 residents.
- E Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before the installation of bed rails on resident's beds, identify medical needs to be met with bed rail use, and assess potential entrapment zones for 4 of 4 residents (R76, R23, R103, and R35) reviewed for bed rails.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated, milk was discarded past the best by date, cups were not stored in food bins, dented cans did not remain on the shelf, and failed to ensure kitchen floors and equipment were clean.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for 2 of 2 residents (R42, R440 ) reviewed for call lights.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom of movement was not restricted for 2 of 2 residents (R122, R335) who were observed during activities.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to provide monthly catheter changes for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for catheters.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure provider orders to wean supplemental oxygen were followed for 1 of 1 residents (R34) reviewed for oxygen use.
- D Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the provider maintained coordination of care with an outside provider in order to ensure an appropriate diagnoses and end date for an antibiotic, for 1 of 1 resident (R46) reviewed for prophylactic antibiotics.
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure there was an end date or to investigate and/or document the justification for a prophylactic antibiotic for 1 of 1 resident (R46).
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide the ordered therapeutic diet for 1 of 1 resident (101) reviewed for provision of modified diet.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteR123 R123's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R123 had moderate impaired cognition and diagnoses of dementia and frostbite to bilateral hands. R123's provider order dated 5/7/25 instructed staff to follow EBP while providing wound cares and other high contact activities. R123's care plan dated 4/3/25, indicated R123 required EBP related to frostbite of bilateral hands and surgical amputations. Furthermore the care plan directed staff to don personal protective equipment per EBP precautions when providing high contact cares. An observation on 5/20/25 at 10:45 a.m., registered nurse (RN)- B entered R123's room to perform a dressing change to their bilateral hands. R123's door had a sign that stated EBP and instructed staff to don gown and gloves when performing cares that require contact with the resident. RN-B performed hand hygiene and donned gloves, however, did not don a gown. [...]
March 14, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to knock on a shared resident bedroom door and introduce themselves for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for dignity.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to clean and maintain a resident's wheelchairs for 1 of 1 resident (R326). Reviewed for safe, clean, and homelike environment.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and document review the faciltiy failed to ensure an injury of unknown source was reported to the state agency (SA) in a timely manner and thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 residnet (R100) reviewed for reporting of alleged violations
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure transdermal pain patch placement was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R14, R68) reviewed for medication patch application.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure heel protectors were applied as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R14) reviewed for pressure ulcers.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure supply and administration of ordered medications for 2 of 2 residents (R50, R57) reviewed for pharmacy services.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure monthly medication regimen reviews were addressed in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents (R4, R41) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during wound care for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for infection control practices.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 resident (R4, R19) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 6, 2026, 2 on May 21, 2025, 3 on March 14, 2024.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| June 10, 2026 | Fine | $27,378 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.57 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.53 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.42 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.70 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.6% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.9% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.42 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.63 on weekdays and 3.42 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.2% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.60 in April to June 2025 to 3.57 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.57 | 0.53 | 3.63 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 0 of 90 | 134 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.60 | 0.57 | 3.65 | 3.48 | 3.1% | 0 of 92 | 131 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.65 | 0.63 | 3.74 | 3.41 | 2.3% | 0 of 92 | 134 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.60 | 0.62 | 3.67 | 3.41 | 5.1% | 0 of 91 | 135 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.3 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.7 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.0 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 25.7 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.8 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 9.6 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ESTATES AT ROSEVILLE LLC. CMS links this home to Monarch Healthcare Management, a group of 45 nursing homes averaging 2.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nij LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Spartan Healthcare LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Yazoma Holdings, LLC | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Arem, Jeffrey | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Stern, William | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 20% | 03/01/2017 |
| Halpert, Marc | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Jaffa, Noam | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 7% | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 03/01/2017 |
| Legum, Joshua | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Halpert, Marc | Corporate director | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Stern, William | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/01/2017 | |
| Monarch Healthcare Operating IV LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/01/2017 | |
| Stern, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/01/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on June 10, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 6, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 6, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 6, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.42 hours per resident per day, below the Minnesota average of 3.71.
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Villas at Roseville Roseville, 0.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Langton Shores Roseville, 0.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 2 citations
- Presbyterian Homes of Arden Hills Arden Hills, 2.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Lyngblomsten Care Center Saint Paul, 3.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Good Samaritan Society - Maplewood Saint Paul, 3.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- St. Anthony Health & Rehabilitation St. Anthony, 3.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- The Villas at New Brighton New Brighton, 3.6 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 61 citations
- New Brighton Care Center New Brighton, 3.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 26 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is The Estates at Roseville LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates The Estates at Roseville LLC 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did The Estates at Roseville LLC get at its last inspection?
- 7 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 6, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has The Estates at Roseville LLC been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $27,378 in the last three years.
- Does The Estates at Roseville LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns The Estates at Roseville LLC?
- CMS lists 13 owners and managers, and links the home to Monarch Healthcare Management. Legal business name: ESTATES AT ROSEVILLE LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.