300 Yant Street, Nw, Bolivar, OH 44612 · Tuscarawas County · (330) 874-9999
115 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 366200 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
Of 22 health citations since March 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.94 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.94 of those hours.
38.7% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered under staff supervision and not left unsupervised at the resident's bedside. This affected one (Resident #102) of three residents reviewed for medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, policy review, observation, interview, and Resident Council Minute review revealed the facility failed to ensure requests for assistance with activities of daily living were provided timely for two dependent residents. This affected two (Resident #23 and Resident #55) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview and medication guideline review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five (5) percent (%). Observation of 36 medications administered with three errors revealed a medication error rate of 8.33%. This finding affected two residents (Residents #18 and #74) of four residents observed for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were served the correct diet and diet texture as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident#7) of five residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility census was 101.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures during meal service. This affected one resident (Resident #21) of eight residents who required assistance with eating. The facility census was 101. Findings Include: A review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date 03/13/24 with diagnoses including history of stroke, dysphagia, type two diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A review of Resident #21's physician's orders revealed an order dated 08/15/24 for LCS (Low Concentrated Sweets) diet Regular texture, Regular/Thin consistency, all liquids with small-bore straw. Cut food into bite-sized pieces. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, hospital record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to adequate monitor and seek timely medical intervention/hospitalization following a significant change in condition for Resident #31. This affected one resident (#31) of three reviewed for change in condition. Actual Harm occurred on 03/29/24 when Resident #31, who was severely cognitively impaired was transferred to the emergency room where he was intubated and admitted to the intensive care unit for respiratory failure and sepsis. On 03/11/24, Resident #31 was observed unresponsive and having seizure-like activity. He was a full code with no history of seizures. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of restorative nursing documentation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were documented accurately. This affected three residents (#30, #71, and #82) of three residents reviewed and had the potential to affect all 59 residents identified by the facility as receiving restorative nursing services for range of motion and ambulation. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician notification was completed related to weight changes. This affected one (Resident #38) of one resident reviewed for weight gain. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-Assessment Screenings (PAS) were accurately completed upon admission for Resident #71 and Resident #81. This affected two (Resident #71 and #81) of three residents reviewed for PAS. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure glasses were obtained in a timely manner for Resident #81. This affected one (Resident #81) of one residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by the physician. This resulted in a medication error rate of 8% with two medication errors out of 25 medications administered. This affected one (Resident #34) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to arrange dental consults as ordered and complete oral assessments as part of the resident's comprehensive dental care. This affected one (Resident #81) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure ordered antibiotics were reviewed and/or only administered with adequate indications for use. This affected three (Residents #69, #72 and #101) of seven residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The facility census was 107.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of an invoice, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner to prevent contamination of food. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record reviews, observation, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure goggles were sanitized upon exiting Resident #37's room, who was under droplet isolation precautions, and failed to ensure proper signage was displayed prior to entering Resident #21 and Resident #133 rooms who were reported to be on isolation precautions. This affected three residents (Resident #21, Resident #37, and Resident #133) with the potential to affect all 85 residents in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and policy review , the facility failed to offer residents a preference in bathing frequency. This affected four residents (Resident #28, #75, #77, and anonymous) of four residents reviewed for choices.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were provided the option to attend the Resident Council meetings, nor were resident concerns documented and no evidence was provided indicating concerns were addressed timely. This had the potential to affect 79 of 85 residents residing in the facility, as Resident #11, #20, #22, #28, #29, and #78 regularly attended resident council.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were accurately documented on all sources. This affected three residents (Resident #27, #40, and #66) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) beneficiary non-coverage notifications and interview, the facility failed to consistently provide written notification of services that would no longer be covered by Medicare Part A. This affected two residents (Residents #58 and #68) of three residents reviewed for notification of termination of Medicare Part A services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, review of wound practitioner notes, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place per the plan of care, treatments were administered per orders, and assessments and staging of pressure ulcers were accurate. This affected one resident (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #11 received foods and liquids at the appropriate texture per dietary orders. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of five residents reviewed.
5 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 15, 2025, 1 on January 25, 2024, 2 on March 3, 2022.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.94 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.94 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.62 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.42 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.57 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 38.7% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 24.0% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.07 on weekdays and 3.62 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.40 in April to June 2025 to 3.94 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.94 | 0.94 | 4.07 | 3.62 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.23 | 0.99 | 4.39 | 3.83 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.56 | 1.04 | 4.76 | 4.04 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.40 | 1.00 | 4.61 | 3.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.4 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.8 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hennis Care Centre of Bolivar's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (61.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
61.3% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
10.1% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 102 eligible stays.
8.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 66 eligible stays.
32.9% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 82 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 111 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MEGCO MANAGEMENT INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hennis, Harry | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 95% | 01/01/2000 |
| Hennis, Patricia | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 01/01/2000 |
| Hennis, Harry | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2000 | |
| Hennis, Harry | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2000 | |
| Hennis, Patricia | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2000 | |
| Baker, Jessica | Corporate officer | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Hennis, Harry | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2000 | |
| Hennis, Patricia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2000 | |
| Baker, Jessica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/01/2021 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.