Find a nursing home

Home / Kansas / Bucklin

Hill Top House

505 W Elm, Bucklin, KS 67834 · Ford County · (620) 826-3202

29 certified beds, about 23 residents a day · Government - Hospital district · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 175500 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on November 20, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Kansas average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 15 health citations since August 2021, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.38 hours per resident per day, against 4.07 across Kansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.06 of those hours.

29.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Kansas average 48.1%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 15 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
8D
1E
4F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
November 20, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. The sample included 12 residents and five nurse aides. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of the five staff members reviewed possessed the knowledge, skills, and competencies required for resident care needs. This placed the residents at risk of impaired care.
  2. F
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate nurse staffing.
  3. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a water management plan to mitigate risks for Legionella (a bacterium spread through the mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease, or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing pneumonia caused by Legionella). The facility failed to maintain an antibiotic tracking system and did not review its infection control policies annually. This deficient practice placed the 21 residents of the facility at risk for infection.
  4. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for Resident (R) 123. This placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to unidentified or uncommunicated care needs.
  5. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain a stop date from the physician for the use of as-needed (PRN) lorazepam (antianxiety medication) for Resident (R) 9. This placed the resident at risk for complications related to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications and unnecessary medication.
  6. D
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    F849 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 4, 2025
    Inspectors wroteThe facility had a census of 21 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a communication process and collaboration between the hospice provider and the facility for Resident (R) 9 and R17 to coordinate hospice services provided including visit frequency and assessment, medications, and medical equipment. This placed the residents at risk of impaired end-of-life care.
February 15, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 1, 2023
    Inspectors wrote- Observation on 02/14/23 at 09:12 AM revealed Licensed Nurse (LN) G, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) M and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) N in the resident's room to provide R 12 morning cares CMA M raised the head of the bed and CNA N assisted her to pivot transfer from the bed. The resident's brief was wet and removed and staff sat the resident on the bedside commode. LN G held the back of the commode. Observation of the commode revealed the leg to the back rest of the commode. LN G held the back so it did not wobble or collapse while the resident used it. The back bar of the commode also had an area of rust approximately 4 inches long across the bar. On 02/14/23 at 09:15 AM, LN G stated she noticed commode lacked a wingnut the day before. LN G stated she reported the broken commode to Maintenance Staff U. LN G was unaware how long it had been broken. [...]
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 1, 2023
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 24 residents with 12 sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plans for one Resident (R)17, regarding new interventions to prevent falls.
August 2, 2021Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    F838 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to address staffing in the Facility Assessment to document resources required to provide necessary care to the residents in regard to staffing across all shifts. This failure had the ability to affect all resident care in the facility.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the residents with a way to file a grievances anonymously.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality dignified care for Resident (R) 25 by allowing his fingernails to be overgrown with a dark substance under them after he requested staff trim them.
  4. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents, with 12 included in the sample, including one for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R) 12 which included oxygen use and care. Findings Include: - Review of R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 06/11/21 documented the following diagnoses: schizophrenia (a psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), COVID-19, shortness of breath (SOB), and localized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). [...]
  5. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for discharge to the community. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary to include the recapitulation of Resident (R) 28's stay.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for respiratory care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for Resident (R) 12. - Findings Include: Review of Resident (R) 12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) dated 06/11/21 documented the following diagnoses: Schizophrenia (a psychotic disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) - (a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), COVID 19, shortness of breath (SOB), and localized edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). [...]
  7. C
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    F882 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 9, 2021
    Inspectors wroteThe facility reported a census of 26 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff person designated as the Infection Preventionist (IP) who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control.

Fire safety inspections

6 fire safety citations on file: 5 on November 20, 2024, 1 on February 15, 2023.

Every fire safety citation6 citations
  1. F
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · November 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · November 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Ensure that building systems meet requirements determined by risk assessment procedures performed by qualified personnel.
    K 901 · November 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
    K 926 · November 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. D
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · November 20, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · February 15, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeKansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.384.073.86
Registered nurses1.060.710.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.183.603.42
Nurse aides3.10
Licensed practical nurses0.22
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)29.0%48.1%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%42.0%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.03 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.46 on weekdays and 4.18 on weekends, 6% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.42 in April to June 2025 to 4.38 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.381.064.464.18 5.4%0 of 9023
Oct to Dec 20254.300.954.354.18 2.9%0 of 9224
Jul to Sep 20254.471.054.544.28 1.3%0 of 9223
Apr to Jun 20254.420.864.524.17 27.1%0 of 9123
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Kansas, Jan to Mar 20264.010.674.193.564.8%0.6% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Kansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Kansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.27$17.41 to $21.2424,610
LPNs and LVNs$29.69$27.05 to $33.407,530
Registered nurses$38.14$35.24 to $45.5333,800
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeKansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.317.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.71.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.24.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.616.214.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.74.44.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.618.115.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.91.81.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.22.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Hill Top House's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BUCKLIN DISTRICT HOSPITAL.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bucklin District Hospital5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/01/1966
Hokanson, StephenCorporate directorIndividual11/26/2013
Imel, CynthiaCorporate directorIndividual04/25/2011
Scott, MelanieCorporate directorIndividual04/22/2002
Farmer, FredrickOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2024
Kregar, JudithOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/21/1991
Hokanson, StephenTrustee of the SNFIndividual01/01/2017
Imel, CynthiaTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/25/2011
Scott, MelanieTrustee of the SNFIndividual04/22/2002
Farmer, FredrickAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2024
Hokanson, StephenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2017
Imel, CynthiaAdp of the SNFIndividual04/25/2011
Kregar, JudithAdp of the SNFIndividual12/21/1991
Scott, MelanieAdp of the SNFIndividual04/22/2002

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2024: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  2. Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2024: "Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 20, 2024: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 15, 2023: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."

Other nursing homes nearby

Common questions

What is Hill Top House's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Hill Top House 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Hill Top House get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 20, 2024. The Kansas average is 9.5.
Has Hill Top House been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Hill Top House accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Hill Top House?
CMS lists 14 owners and managers. Legal business name: BUCKLIN DISTRICT HOSPITAL.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection