Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center
220 E Ash Street, Huntington, TX 75949 · Angelina County · (936) 876-2273
112 certified beds, about 67 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 2008
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 676183 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 16, 2025, inspectors cited 13 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 40 health citations since March 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.39 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.12 of those hours.
94.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 40 health citations on file.
July 16, 2025Standard inspection · 13 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food stored the kitchen refrigerator was labeled, dated and not expired. 2. The facility failed to ensure food stored in the kitchen dry storage area was labeled, dated, and not expired. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for foodborne illness. During an observation on 7/15/2025 at 10:15 AM revealed the following: #2 refrigerator contained (2) 46-ounce containers of opened and undated thickened lemon water. #3 refrigerator contained (2) pies with a graham cracker crust and unknown white filling that was opened, unlabeled and undated. #4 Freezer contained (5) bags of French fries that were unlabeled and undated. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #14) and 3 of 7 staff (CNA D, CNA E and LVN G) reviewed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed EBP (enhanced barrier precautions) for Resident #3 when providing care on 7/15/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the ice cooler's scoop compartment on hall 400 did not contain a towel with a black substance on 7/15/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN G washed or sanitized her hands during administration of IV medications to Resident #14 on 7/16/2025.
- E Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public on 1 of 4 resident hallways (Hallway 100) and the main dining room reviewed for environmental concerns. 1. The facility failed to ensure rooms 101, 103, 106, and 107 did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure the floors on 100 hallway did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure the dining room did not have soiled floors on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025. These failures could place residents at risk of a diminished quality of life.
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's physician when there was a significant change in resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #52) reviewed for notification of changes in that: The facility did not notify Resident #52's physician for a significant change in weight. (weight loss of 25.8 pounds in 30 days.) This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician notified of changes resulting in a delay in continuity of care.
- D Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive MDS assessment within 14 days after a significant change in the resident's mental or physical condition for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to reassess Resident #6 following a hospice admission (specific care for the sick or terminally ill) on 03/24/25. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their individual needs met due to inaccurate assessments.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #6) reviewed for PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The facility failed to ensure Resident #6 had a new level 1 PASSR completed with a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions (a mental disorder in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect) and major depressive disorder (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and a range of emotional and physical problems). [...]
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #21. The PASRR Level 1 screening did not indicate a diagnosis of mental illness, although the diagnoses (bipolar disorder) were present upon Resident #21's admission date on 9/27/2024. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment for 1 of 4 (Resident #6) residents reviewed for care plan revisions. The facility failed to update Resident #6's care plans for hospice status. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #9 and Resident #20) reviewed for quality of care.1. The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service for Resident #9 on 7/15/2025 and 7/16/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure a bottle of peri-wash was not left in Resident #20's room on 7/15/25. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries due to environmental hazards.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals and preferences for 1 resident (Resident #57) out of 2 residents observed for respiratory therapy. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for Resident #57's Bipap settings he used each night at the facility since his admission on [DATE]. This failure could place residents who reside at the facility at risk for inaccurate care and communication of health conditions to other providers. Record review of Resident #57's electronic medical record and face sheet dated 7/16/2025 reflected he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering for all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 12 months (May 2025). The facility failed to have a licensed pharmacist, 2 facility staff witnesses and sign the drug destruction log during drug destruction occurrence May 22, 2025. These failures could place residents at risk for misappropriation and drug diversion.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for storage of medications and for 1 of 4 medication carts (Nurse Cart L) reviewed for pharmacy services.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's 10 ml sterile normal saline prefilled syringe and intravenous site dressing were not kept at the bedside and was unable to be accessed by unauthorized personnel or residents on 07/15/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure expired Tresiba (insulin degludec) for Resident #30 was not on the nurse medication cart on 7/16/25. [...]
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling and consumption for 1 of 2 resident personal refrigerators (Resident #57) reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #57 was clean and contained food items that were labeled and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #57 did not contain expired milk or expired whipped cream. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illnesses.
April 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation for transfer or discharge by resident's physician for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge requirements. The facility failed to provide a reason for Resident #1's discharge by the resident's physician and the specific resident needs the facility could not meet, the facility's efforts to meet those needs and the specific services the receiving facility would provide to meet the needs of the resident which could not be met at current facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not having the needed records when transferring care and services and causing a disruption in their care and/or services.
May 30, 2024Standard inspection · 14 citations
- F Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement contained all the required elements for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. The facility did not ensure the arbitration agreement granted the resident or his/her representative the right to rescind the agreement within 30 calendar days of signing. The facility did not ensure the arbitration agreement allowed the resident or anyone else (e.g., resident's representative) to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal and state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees, and representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman. This failure could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues.
- F Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Arbitration Agreement contained all the required elements for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for Arbitration Agreements. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement included provision of a neutral arbitrator. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement contained a section indicating the provision of a convenient venue. These failures could place the residents or the residents' responsible parties in binding agreements not fully understood, have a loss of their legal rights, and cause negative psychological issues.
- F Have policies on smoking.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policy regarding smoking areas, and smoking safety for 1 of 1 smoking area reviewed. The facility failed to empty ash trays and keep trash out of the ash trays in the designated smoking area on 5/29/2024. This failure could place residents who smoke at risk of physical harm and lead to an unsafe smoking environment.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident #3, #33, and #38) The facility failed to remove worn and damaged mechanical lift slings from service. This deficient practice could result in a loss of quality of life due to injuries.
- E Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents requiring respiratory care are provided care, consistent with professional standards of practices for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents #15, #29, and #1). The facility failed to ensure the external filters of Resident's #15, #29, and #1 oxygen concentrators were free of dust buildup on 5/28/2024. These failures could place residents who require respiratory care at risk for respiratory infections, breathing in dust and allergens, decreased effectiveness of oxygen concentrators, and exacerbation of respiratory distress.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions in the only kitchen. Temperature logs for the dishwasher, refrigerator 1, refrigerator 2, freezer 1, and freezer 2 were missing recorded temperatures. This failure could place residents who ate from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #116) and 3 of 8 staff (MDS nurse, CNA E, and CNA F) reviewed for infection control. MDS nurse failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during noon meal service on 5/28/2024. CNA E and CNA F failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when they provided foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) care and incontinent care to Resident #116 on 5/28/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care in a manner and in an environment that promoted resident independence and dignity while dining for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed for meal service. (Resident #53). LVN B stood beside Resident #53 while she assisted the residents to eat. This failure could place residents who need assistance with eating at risk for weight loss and a decreased quality of life.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from physical or chemical restraints imposed for purposes of discipline or convenience and that were not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for 1 of 10 residents (Resident #54) reviewed for physical restraints. The facility failed to obtain physician order and informed consent for Resident #54 before implementing a position change alarm. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of decreased quality of life, injury and being subjected to restraints for purposes of convenience or discipline.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 6 Residents (Resident #32) reviewed for PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services). The facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had a new level 1 PASSAR completed with a new diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (a mental health condition that develops following a traumatic event characterized by intrusive thoughts about the incident, recurrent distress/anxiety, flashback, and avoidance of similar situations) and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that interferes with daily life). [...]
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #48 and #64) reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission on Resident # 48 and provide a care plan summary to the resident or representative. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission on Resident # 64 and provide a care plan summary to the resident or representative. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving correct and/or necessary care or treatment.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications from the medication storage room. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications, decreased quality of life, and hospitalization.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for residents interviewed for food temperature and taste. (Resident #168) The facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. Resident #168 complained the food was served cold and did not taste good. These failures could place residents at risk for weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of life.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for call lights. (Residents #44 & #55). The facility failed to ensure Resident #44's and Resident #55's emergency call lights in the bathroom were reachable from the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.
March 30, 2023Standard inspection · 12 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 3 medication carts (nurse cart 100 hall) and the medication storage room reviewed for labeling and storage. 1. The facility failed to remove expired insulin and glucose control solutions (high and low solutions) from the nurse medication cart on hall 100. 2. The facility failed to label and remove expired Tuberculin (TB) testing solution from the medication room refrigerator. [...]
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. Cook D had hair hanging out of the back of her hair net while washing dishes. The inside bin of the ice maker was dirty. Cook E laid the spoon used for stirring the pureed meat, on the three-compartment sink drainboard, then picked it up and continued to use it. These failures could place the residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for 2 of 15 residents (Residents #14 and #25) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 and Resident #25's care plans accurately reflected residents' PASRR positive status. This deficient practice could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #43) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure an aerosol can of air freshener was not sitting on the bedside table of Resident #43's room. Label contained the phrase .KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN AND PETS . This failure could place residents with dementia that may wander at risk of injury by ingestion or inhalation.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 2 of 13 residents (Residents #16 and #28) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Residents #16 and #28's nasal cannula tubing on the wheelchair was changed every 7 days and labeled. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of developing respiratory infections and complications.
- D Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for the lunch meal on 03/28/23 reviewed for food form and preparation. The facility failed to ensure the pureed turkey, prepared on 03/28/22 for the noon meal, was pureed to a smooth consistency without grainy, fibrous particles in it. This failure could place residents who received pureed or mechanically chopped meat at risk of consuming foods that could cause choking, decrease meal intake, and not having nutritional needs met.
- D Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 3 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #25). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #25 did not contain expired diced peaches and box of coffee creamer singles. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses.
- D Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality for 1 of 18 licensed staff (ADON) reviewed for valid nursing licenses. The facility failed to ensure the ADON's nurse license did not expire as of [DATE]. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving nursing services by a licensed nurse.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurate, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #17, Resident #28 and Resident #38) reviewed for accurate records. The facility failed to ensure Resident #17, Resident #28 and Resident #38's executed (signed by MD and resident representative) Consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic Medication Treatment (Form 3713) was placed in the medical record per facility policy. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and risk to safety.
- D Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 stove in the kitchen reviewed for food service. The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in working order. One of six gas stove burners did not light automatically, when the knob was turned. This failure could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk for injury and under cooked food.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident # 30 and Resident #48) The facility failed to ensure Resident #30 and #48's emergency call light in the bathroom would reach the floor. The call light cord was coiled up in a bundle above the support bar. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.
- C Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS reviewed for administration (Fiscal year 2023 for the first quarter October 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022) The facility failed to submit PBJ staffing information to CMS for the 4th quarter of the fiscal year 2022. The facility's failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 1 on July 16, 2025, 1 on May 30, 2024, 3 on March 30, 2023.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- C Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- F Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.
- E Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.39 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.12 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.11 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.29 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.98 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 94.8% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.47 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.50 on weekdays and 3.11 on weekends, 11% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.22 in April to June 2025 to 3.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.39 | 0.12 | 3.50 | 3.11 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 67 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.36 | 0.13 | 3.47 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.67 | 0.18 | 3.81 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.22 | 0.16 | 3.32 | 2.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 65 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 34.5 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 19.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 33.4 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HUNTINGTON HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LTD..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryer, Shannon | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 96% | 01/01/2024 |
| Reynolds, Jeanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/08/2024 | |
| Janus Gp, LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 12/01/2007 | |
| Cryer, Shannon | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Reynolds, Jeanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/08/2024 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2025: "Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition"
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on July 16, 2025: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Southland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Lufkin, 8.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Pinecrest Retirement Community Lufkin, 9.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Parkwood in the Pines Lufkin, 11.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Kennedy Health & Rehab Lufkin, 11.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 54 citations
- Castle Pines Health & Rehabilitation Lufkin, 11.8 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Larkspur Lufkin, 12.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Diboll Nursing and Rehab Diboll, 14.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 33 citations
- Corrigan LTC Partners Corrigan, 24.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 30 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center get at its last inspection?
- 13 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 16, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Huntington Health Care & Rehabilitation Center?
- CMS lists 5 owners and managers. Legal business name: HUNTINGTON HEALTH CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER, LTD..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.