2001 Hampton Place, Rogers, AR 72758 · Benton County · (479) 986-9945
140 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045435 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).
Of 29 health citations since May 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (3 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $77,541 in the last three years; the largest was $25,847, and the latest is dated December 11, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.59 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.39 of those hours.
58.3% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).
CMS links it to Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation of medication administration, interview, record review, facility document review, policy review, and the manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's instructions during the administration of insulin for 1 (Resident #69) of 4 residents sampled for medication administration.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure physical and psychosocial care interventions were implemented and modified to meet a resident ' s activities of daily living needs and failed to exhaust all available remedies as evidenced by the deterioration of a resident ' s physical status resulting in death for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 sampled residents. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.12 (Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation) at a scope and severity of J. [...]
Inspectors wroteF686 J Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to prevent new pressure ulcer development and promote healing of existing pressure ulcers including admission and ongoing wound care assessments, appropriate and alternative interventions, and resident understanding of consequences of refusal; specifically no surgical interventions under anesthesia were offered, no intravenous pain medication was offered, no anti-anxiety medication was offered, the Medical Director was not made aware of or involved in care, interventions, or resident education; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a newly admitted resident, who continued to refuse activity of daily living (ADL) care and assistance, and assessment and treatment for pressure wounds, and all available remedies were provided to ensure the resident's mental and psychosocial health did not continue to deteriorate for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for mental and psychosocial health, as evidenced by the failure to ensure a newly admitted resident's wounds were assessed, monitored, and treated to prevent death. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.40 (Behavioral Health) at a scope and severity of J. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility document review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately identify resident verbal, physical, or other self-directed behavior symptoms as potential indicators of mental instability for 1 (Resident #1) of 1 resident reviewed for significant change assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet residents' needs as evidenced by not following the facility assessment staffing guidelines for 74 of 87 shifts reviewed from 11/10/2024 day shift through 12/07/2024 night shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an account of all controlled substances for 1 (Medication Cart 300-Hall) of 5 medication carts reviewed for accounting of controlled substances; and maintain a record of controlled substances for 4 Residents on 2 medication carts (Resident #20, Resident #21, Resident #22, and Resident #23) of 5 medication carts reviewed for accurate records; and it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident medications were administered within the specified time to ensure continued therapeutic status was maintained for 3 (Resident #26, # 27 and #28) of 3 residents who stated medications were not received.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to keep medications safely secured for 1 medication cart of 1 medication cart reviewed for medication storage. A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, revised January 2018, indicated, Medications are stored safely and securely accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. Medication room, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/28/2024 at 6:13 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #12 was seen passing medication at the end of 600-Hall. The medication cart was parked in the hallway outside suite 610. RN #12 took medication into room [ROOM NUMBER]-B. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during meal service for 1 dining room of 4 dining rooms observed during meal service. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals in the 100-hall dining room.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were promptly removed from stock to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meal trays from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 92 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff did not stand over residents while assisting with meal service to maintain and promote dignity for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained for 2 (Resident #46, and #392) sampled residents due to personal health information left unattended in public areas.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure necessary services were provided in a timely manner to maintain good hygiene for 1 (Resident #21) sampled resident that was unable to carry out personal care without assistance.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents environment was free from accidents and hazards to prevent possible ingestion and or injury for 2 (Resident #49 and #56) of 2 sampled residents; and failed to ensure chemicals and handheld razor blades were stored and contained properly; and failed to ensure a smoking assessment was obtained for 1 (Resident #295) of 1 sampled resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled narcotics were properly documented when acquired from the pharmacy to prevent the risk of misappropriation, and to ensure a record of receipt and disposition was in place for Ativan oral concentrate in 1 of 2 medication rooms. This failed practice had the potential to affect 5 sampled Residents (Residents #12, #56, #73, #79, and #342) of 21 residents with a physician's order for Ativan.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with state laws and accepted standards of pharmacy practice for 3 (Resident #49, #72, and #342) of 3 sampled residents; and the facility failed to ensure a narcotic box was double locked to prevent the possible misappropriation, ingestion and or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene/change gloves was performed to prevent the spread of disease and or infections during meal service for 1 (Resident #26) of 1 sampled residents; and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during medication administration for 2 (Resident #69 and #392) of 2 sampled residents; and failed to ensure hand hygiene / change gloves was performed and clean items were not contaminated during incontinent care for 2 (Resident #82 and #28) of 2 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe and functional environment to prevent possible injury, as evidenced by failure to ensure a night light cover was provided for 2 (Resident #33 and #92) of 2 sampled residents; and failed to ensure the vinyl flooring was maintained on the 300 hall secure unit.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to coordinate with the state designated office to get evaluation of resident to ensure resident received designated services for 1 (Resident #44) of 2 resident reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and record review the facility failed to ensure that oxygen order included parameters for 1 of 1 Resident #12 receiving oxygen to prevent respiratory complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents sitting at the same table were assisted with meals to promote dignity and respect for 4 (Residents #12, #20, #62, and #80) residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents who need assistance with meals as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 5/18/2023 at 9:13 a.m.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to safely self-administer medications for 1 (Resident #58) of 32 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' individualized care plans were updated to ensure appropriate care was received for 3 (Residents #53, #54, and #58) of 32 sampled residents who had a new service or level of care ordered or provided.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure smokeless tobacco was contained and out of reach of cognitively impaired residents to prevent the potential accidental ingestion of hazards. This failed practice had the potential to affect 2 (Resident #53 and #54) cognitively impaired residents who ambulated by any means according to a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/18/2023 at 11:08 a.m.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had an order for oxygen administration for 1 (Resident #58) resident; and failed to ensure residents received oxygen was administered at the physician prescribed rate for 1 (Resident #54) resident; and failed to ensure residents oxygen tubing was changed based on the physicians order for 1 (Resident #75) of 8 sampled residents: and the facility failed to ensure nebulizer masks were contained when not in use for 1 (Resident #54) of 7 sampled residents who had orders for updraft/nebulizer treatments according to a list provided by the Administrator on 5/18/2023 at 9:13 a.m. 1. Resident #54 had a diagnosis of Heart Failure, Alzheimer's Disease, and Respiratory Failure. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Hall 100) of 5 medication carts was locked and failed to ensure medication was locked in a secure location for 1 (Resident #54). This practice had the potential to affect 1 (Resident #47) of 1 cognitively impaired residents who ambulate by any means as documented on a list provided by Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/18/2023 at 11:08 a.m.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items stored in the refrigerator, freezer and dry storage areas were sealed or covered and were stored in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions; staff washed their hands between dirty and clean tasks and before handling clean dishes or food items; ice machines were maintained in clean and sanitary condition; and cold food items were maintained at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). while awaiting service to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 105 residents who received meals from the 1 of 1 affected kitchen (total census:105), as documented on a list provided by the Administrator on 5/18/2023
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before, during, and after assisting residents with meals/meal trays for 4 of 4 (Resident #20, #40, #62, and #80) sampled residents observed during meal service and this failed practice had the potential to affect 104 residents as documented on the Resident Census and Conditions provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/14/2023 at 11:08 a.m.; and the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene before performing flushing an intravenous (IV) line for 2 of 2 (Resident #62 and #94) sampled residents with IV therapy; and the facility failed to ensure staff perform hand hygiene prior to performing/emptying a suprapubic foley catheter to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 1(Resident #84) sampled residents with a catheter. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident #78, who is unable to carry out Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) the necessary services to promote and maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This had the potential to affect 8 sampled residents (R#84, R#25, R#20, R#7, R#47, R#53, R#80, and R#62) out of 19 Residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care. 1. Resident #78 had diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an annual review date (ARD) of February 14, 2023, had a Staff Assessment for Mental Status with extensive assistance with dressing and personal hygiene with 2-person support and assistance. a. On 05/14/23 at 12:14 PM, The Surveyor observed Resident #78 sitting in a recliner in the resident room. [...]
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on May 22, 2025, 4 on June 13, 2024, 1 on May 18, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 11, 2024 | Fine | $25,847 |
| December 11, 2024 | Fine | $25,847 |
| December 11, 2024 | Fine | $25,847 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.59 | 4.02 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.57 | 3.45 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.87 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.33 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.3% | 49.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 61.5% | 44.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.26 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.01 on weekdays and 4.57 on weekends, 24% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.95 in April to June 2025 to 5.59 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.59 | 0.39 | 6.01 | 4.57 | 1.0% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.23 | 0.53 | 5.67 | 4.11 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 90 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.13 | 0.34 | 5.47 | 4.27 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.95 | 0.30 | 6.42 | 4.80 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 81 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 2.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $16.55 | $14.52 to $17.34 | 17,260 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $27.22 | $23.82 to $29.43 | 10,010 |
| Registered nurses | $37.95 | $32.04 to $43.40 | 29,400 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.8 | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.2 | 10.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.1 | 10.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.8 | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 12.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Jamestown Nursing and Rehab, LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 108 eligible stays.
9.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 127 eligible stays.
7.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 61 eligible stays.
52.6% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: JAMESTOWN NURSING AND REHAB, LLC. CMS links this home to Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morton, Michael | Direct ownership interest | Individual | 12/12/2024 | |
| Kramer, Jessica | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/10/2024 | |
| Morton, Michael | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/25/2025 | |
| Jamestown Estates, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/12/2024 | |
| Nursing Consultants Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/25/2025 | |
| Kramer, Jessica | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/20/2004 | |
| Naeem, Bilal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/10/2024 | |
| Norsworthy, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.