Home / Mississippi / Jackson
3680 Lakeland Lane, Jackson, MS 39216 · Lee County · (601) 982-5505
105 certified beds, about 94 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255116 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on January 30, 2025, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
None of its 30 health citations since August 2021 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,424 in the last three years; the largest was $8,424, and the latest is dated December 5, 2023.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.90 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.40 of those hours.
59.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 30 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure personal funds that were deposited with the facility were returned within (30) days of discharge for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1. Findings Included:Record review of the Transaction Report dated 6/16/26 for 11/01/25 through 7/16/26 revealed the resident had a credit balance of $580.07. Record review of the Trust Statement dated 2/28/26 for Resident #1 revealed that she had an Opening Balance of $178.00 with one debit on 2/10/26 for $21.00 for Shampoo, Cut & Style (in-facility beauty shop service) leaving a Closing Balance of $157.00. On 6/15/26 at 3:40 PM, during an interview the Administrator explained that Resident #1 was cared for by the facility 11/14/25 through 11/30/25 at no charge to the resident. She said that in January 2026 the resident paid $3,173.92 and should have paid $3,343.97. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' rights to access the use of a telephone privately for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #1Findings Include:Record review of the facility policy Resident Rights revised December 2016 revealed . 1. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to.cc. access to a telephone, mail and email; dd. communicate in person and by mail, email and telephone with privacy. Record review of the admission Record for Resident #1 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/18/24 and the resident had diagnoses of Sjogren syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic kidney disease, and morbid obesity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to maintain personal hygiene for one (1) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #2. Findings Included:Record review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018 revealed .Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene .Record review of the admission Record for Resident #2 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 12/09/25 with diagnoses that included heart failure, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a clean, orderly homelike environment for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to provide palatable food at an appetizing temperature for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident discharge rights by not providing all medications, specifically as needed pain medications, for one (1) of four (4) discharged residents. Resident #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents for four (4) of 14 staffing days reviewed in January, 2025. (1/19/25, 1/20/25, 1/25/25, and 1/27/25). Findings Include: Record review of a typed document on facility letterhead dated January 30, 2025, and signed by the Executive Director (Administrator) revealed There is no Staffing policy A review of anonymous complaints, received 1/20/25 and 1/21/25, revealed 3-11 and 11-7 shifts are always short CNAs and there was one CNA working the floor Central Unit by herself on 3-11 Sunday 1/19/25. A record review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Data Report for the 4th Quarter (July 1-September 30) revealed the facility triggered for One Star Staffing Rating and Excessively Low Weekend Staffing. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility job description review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to a homelike environment for one (1) of eighteen (18) sampled residents, Resident #5.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling and sanitation practices to prevent cross-contamination when Dietary [NAME] (DC) #2 failed to sanitize the thermometer when checking food temperatures on the tray line for one (1) of two (2) kitchen observations
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were followed while providing care to a resident requiring high-contact precautions for two (2) of three (3) care observations, Resident #27.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident who was coded as discharged to the hospital but was discharged to home instead of the hospital for one (1) of 18 sampled residents. (Residents #83)
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan regarding a resident's impaired vision for one (1) of (18) care plans reviewed. Resident #68.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and inaccessible to unauthorized residents and staff one (1) of four (4) days of survey observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by failing to document that residents were informed of their rights regarding Advance Directives for three (3) of (18) resident records reviewed, Residents #22, #27, and #61.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and Resident Representative (RR) interviews, record review, facility investigation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff treated residents with respect and dignity during procedures and medication administration for two (2) of eight (8) residents sampled. Residents #5 and Resident #6. Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights, reviewed/revised on 1/23, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence . and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life .10. Reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation or resident needs and preferences . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three (3) of five (5) sampled residents. Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5 Findings Include: Resident #3 On 1/25/24 at 11:15 AM, an observation revealed the call light for Resident #3 was draped over the back of a bedside chair at the end of the resident's bed. The resident was seated on the end of the bed with the call light out of reach. On 1/25/24 at 4:14 PM, an observation revealed the call light for Resident #3 was draped over the back of a bedside chair. The resident was seated in her wheelchair with her call light out of reach. Resident #3 was observed looking for her call light, attempted to reach it, however, the call light was out of reach. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement interventions included in the individualized care plans for four (4) of five (5) sampled residents. Residents #1, #3, #4 and #5. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled, COMPREHENSIVE PERSON-CENTERED CARE PLANS, with revision date 3/18, revealed, Policy: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs, strengths, preferences, and goals that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care . Procedure: .6. Staff approaches are to be developed for each problem/strength/need . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that dependent residents received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs).
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care regarding fingernail care for residents who are dependent upon staff for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents. Resident #1 and Resident #2 Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy, Fingernails/Toenails Care, reviewed 10/09, POLICY:The purpose of this procedure is to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections. Responsibility: Nursing Assistant or Licensed Nurse .1. Nails can be partially cleaned during bath care .3. Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming . Resident #1 On 12/04/23 at 4:00 PM, an observation and interview with Resident #1 revealed she had contractures of both hands, and all of her fingernails were long. There was a black substance caked under her right thumbnail. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medication included limited of access, for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents reviewed for pressure sores as evidenced by skin protectant ointment left unattended at resident's bedside. Resident #1. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage ,reviewed 11/10 revealed POLICY: Medication supply must be accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. All drugs, treatments, and biologicals must be stored securely and following the manufacturer's labeled recommendations, or per facility policy . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of urine odor for two (2) of three (3) facility halls. Central Hall and North Hall.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was without physical restraints related to the use of full-length bed rails for one (1) of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review the facility failed to provide respiratory services in a manner to prevent the possibility of complications for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for respiratory conditions. Resident #3 and Resident #15.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility spread of infections by placing soiled dressings in the resident's trash for (1) out of 21 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor residents' rights by not providing showers per choice for five (5) of 18 residents sampled. Residents #1, #15,#25, #29, #38. Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Resident [NAME] Of Rights, dated 11/17, revealed, Each resident has a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the Facility in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of (his or her) quality of life, regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition or payment source and to exercise those rights as a citizen of the Unites (United) States without interference, coercion. including those rights specified herein .15. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident, staff and family interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to honor the residents rights for visitation for four (4) of seven (7) family interviews. Resident #15, #17,#38, #77. Findings Include: A review of the facility's visitation policy, titled Visitation Guidance, dated May 2021 revealed .Indoor visitation for unvaccinated residents in a facility that has less than 70 % of the residents vaccinated and county positivity rate greater than 10 % visitation should be compassionate only. Any resident with active COVID, regardless of vaccination status, will have no visitation until they meet criteria to discontinue isolation . [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the resident or resident representative in writing of residents' hospitalization for four (4) of 21 records reviewed. Resident #34, #46, #83, #57 Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy, Discharge and Transfer Policies-Involuntary, with a revision date of 1/2015, revealed before a facility transfers a resident to a hospital or allows a resident to go on therapeutic leave, the nursing facility must provide written information to the resident and a family member or legal representative that specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy and the facility's policies regarding bed-hold policies. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan by not providing showers per residents' request for five (5) of 18 sampled residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of food-borne illness for one (1) of four (4) observations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of three (3) meals observed. Resident #34. Findings Include: A record review of the facility's policy, Standard Precautions, reviewed date 1/15, revealed, POLICY: Standard Precautions will be utilized to provide a primary strategy for the prevention of healthcare-associated infectious (HAI) agents among patients and healthcare personnel. A review of the facility's policy, Contact Precautions, dated 9/19, revealed, POLICY: Contact Precautions are a transmission based precaution that will be utilized to reduce the risk of epidemiologically important micro-organisms by direct or indirect contact. [...]
3 fire safety citations on file: 3 on January 30, 2025.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 5, 2023 | Fine | $8,424 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.90 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.40 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.03 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.43 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.07 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 59.0% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 55.6% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.15 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.25 on weekdays and 3.03 on weekends, 29% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.75 in April to June 2025 to 3.90 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.90 | 0.40 | 4.25 | 3.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 94 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.99 | 0.40 | 4.32 | 3.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 89 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.79 | 0.40 | 4.04 | 3.17 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 94 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.75 | 0.35 | 4.03 | 3.05 | 0.1% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.9 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.1 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.2 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.6 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.3 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.4 | 27.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.6 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Lakeland Community Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (53.8% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
53.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 134 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 138 eligible stays.
6.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 71 eligible stays.
22.0% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 50 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 80 residents counted.
87.5% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: Legal Business Name Not Available.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership data not available |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.