5601 Plum Creek Drive, Amarillo, TX 79124 · Potter County · (806) 351-1000
99 certified beds, about 84 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1986
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 455675 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 26, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 28 health citations since November 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $160,948 in the last three years; the largest was $147,878, and the latest is dated May 20, 2026.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.43 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.54 of those hours.
97.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, an affiliated group of 149 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 28 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not have access to a double-sided razor blade. Resident #1 used the razor blade to cut his left wrist, resulting in a 7 cm laceration on the inside of Resident #1's left wrist which required 23-26 stitches on the night of [DATE]. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigator entered the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of harm or death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to establish and follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for transfer/discharge rights. The facility failed to allow Resident #1 to return to the facility after he was admitted to a short-term psychiatric hospital following an apparent suicide attempt. This failure could place residents at risk of feelings of instability/insecurity. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had a right to a dignified existence for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #56) observed for dining room experience when the facility failed to: Ensure Resident #56 was treated with respect, dignity and consideration when she failed to receive her noon meal at the same time as her table mates. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling neglected or ignored and could negatively impact residents' quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment for 1 (Resident #59) of 17 residents reviewed for environment. -Resident #59 had soiled washcloths left in her room for 29 hours. This failure could place residents at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 (Resident #18 and Resident #71) of 18 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessment. The facility inaccurately coded Resident #18 as having a bipolar diagnosis when he did not have a bipolar diagnosis. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving unnecessary care/medication or not receiving necessary care/medication. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review the facility failed to refer to the state designated authority all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 1 (Resident #9) of 18 residents reviewed for PASRR.The facility failed to refer Resident #9 to the state designated authority for a PASRR Evaluation due to his diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Severe. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving necessary services or of being harmed by residents who have not been screened properly for placement in a nursing home setting. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to perform a preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability for 1 (Resident #18) of 18 residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The facility failed to ensure an accurate PL1 for Resident #18 prior to her admission on [DATE]. She was coded as not having mental illness when she did have mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #5) of 18 residents reviewed for respiratory care. Resident #5 did not have physician orders for oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential to affect residents by placing them at risk for respiratory compromise and associated complications, including shortness of breath, confusion, respiratory failure, infection, and exacerbation of their condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare, and serve foods using methods to ensure palatability and flavor for 1 of 4 residents with a pureed diet (Resident #56) when they failed to: A. Ensure facility staff prepared pureed foods for meal service using standardized recipes, and nutritive methods to ensure palatability, flavor and meal satisfaction. These failures placed Reside1 of 4 residents who ate food that was pureed and served by the kitchen at risk of meal dissatisfaction and potential weight loss.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1of 1 kitchen when they failed to: Ensure facility staff wore hair restraints and beard guards while in the kitchen. These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #65) of 17 residents observed for infection control. -Resident #65's oxygen nasal cannula was left on the floor for 23 hours. This deficient practice has the potential to affect residents by exposing them to the spread of infections, tissue breakdown, and feelings of isolation related to poor hygiene.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained periodically reconciled for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's OxyContin Oral Tablet ER 12-hour abuse-deterrent 10mg-28 count was accounted for at the time of receiving from the facility's Pharmacy on 05/02/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medication therapy that would be effective for their treatment, resulting in the exacerbation of conditions and disease processes.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include the accurate dispensing and administering of drugs to meet the needs for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for physician orders. The facility failed to accurately enter physician orders for Lamotrigine (a medication that is used to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder) for Resident #1. The deficient practice could affect residents in the facility resulting in not receiving needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for injury and/or deterioration in their condition.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 1of 1 kitchens when they failed to: A. Ensure stored food was properly labeled and dated. B. Ensure hairnets were worn. C. Ensure frozen foods were properly stored according to the label. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 3 of 3 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. -LVN F left medications for Resident #4 unattended on top of her medication cart. -2C South medication cart contained 2 insulins for Resident #68 that were expired. Lantus and Humalog insulin both had open dates of 12/10/2024. -2C South Medication room refrigerator contained Acetaminophen 650mg suppositories for Resident #71 with an expiration date of 10/2024. -1C North Medication cart contained 1 loose pill identified as Benzonatate 100mg for Resident #45. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for trauma-informed care. The facility did not ensure Resident #18 had a trauma screening that identified possible triggers when Resident #18 had a history of trauma. These failures could put residents at an increased risk for severe psychological distress due to re-traumatization.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communication diseases and infections for 2 (Resident #11, and Resident #27) of 18 Residents in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's catheter bag and tubing were kept off the floor and below the level of his waist. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA G performed hand hygiene and a glove change during incontinent care of Resident #11. 3. The facility failed to ensure CNA C performed hand hygiene and glove changes while performing catheter care for Resident #27 as well as cross contaminating Resident #27's belongings. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen observed. The facility failed to ensure that all staff were wearing proper protective hair restraints in the kitchen. This failure placed residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food contamination caused by fallen hair.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 18 residents (Resident # 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility failed to prevent the development of one facility-acquired Stage III pressure injury for Resident #4. This failure could place residents at risk for worsening of an ulcer, infection, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with the professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. 2. The facility failed to ensure general cleanliness was maintained in the kitchen. 3. The facility failed to ensure beard covers were worn. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles to include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 2 of 3 medication carts (1BEast and 1BWest medication carts) and 1 of 3 (1BEast/1BWest Medication room) medication rooms in that: 1. 3 loose pills were found in the 1BEast medication cart. 2. 16 loose pills were found in the 1BWest medication cart. 3. Refrigerator in medication room, shared by 1BWest and 1Beast, had a temperature at 29 degrees. 4. 5 Medications discovered in E-kit for 1BEast and 1BWest were expired. These failures could result in residents not receiving an accurate dose of medication as well as not being maintained at their best therapeutic level.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to a dignified existence and to treat each resident with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #180) of 18 residents reviewed for resident's rights. The facility failed to keep Resident #180's catheter bag covered in a privacy bag. This failure could lead to residents at risk of experiencing feelings of shame and/or embarrassment as well as having their right to privacy violated.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents had the right to formulate an advanced directive for 1 (Resident #36) of 18 residents reviewed for advanced directives in that: Resident #36's DNR was signed on [DATE]. The chart header stated that resident was a Full Code. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving healthcare as per their or their legal representatives wishes.
Inspectors wroteThe facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations including abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, which included injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report an unwitnessed fall with injury for Resident #31. This failure could place residents at risk for physical and psychological harm, worsening injuries, and delay of care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care for 1 (Resident #52) of 18 residents reviewed for baseline care plans in that: Resident #52 was admitted to the facility with a gastrostomy tube (a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth, are unable to swallow safely, or need nutritional supplementation) and her baseline care plan did not mention the tube. This failure could place residents in danger of not receiving necessary care. Findings Included: [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systemically organized medical records for 2 (Resident #36 and Resident #180) of 18 residents reviewed for medical records. 1. Resident #180 was admitted to the facility with a catheter and no physician's orders for catheter care. 2. Resident #36 was receiving antipsychotic injections bi-weekly outside of the facility and there was no documentation of said in his EHR. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care through inadequate documentation possibly resulting in deterioration in condition, exacerbation of disease process, overmedication, and increased risk of harm or injury.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control programs designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 (Resident #180) of 18 residents reviewed for infection control in that: Resident #180's catheter bag and tubing were allowed to rest on the floor of his room. This failure could place residents at risk of infection.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the following information on a daily basis: facility name, the current date, the total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift--registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, or licensed vocational nurses (as defined under state law), certified nurse aides-and resident census for one of one facility reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The facility failed to post nurse staffing data as required in that it did not include the current date on posting, posting was dated 11/06/2023. This failure could place residents and visitors at risk of not being informed regarding the current day's nurse staffing levels.
10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on March 26, 2026, 2 on January 15, 2025, 3 on November 20, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2026 | Fine | $13,070 |
| November 9, 2023 | Fine | $147,878 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.43 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.54 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.98 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.89 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.00 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 97.6% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 90.9% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.57 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.61 on weekdays and 2.98 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.17 in April to June 2025 to 3.43 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.43 | 0.54 | 3.61 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 84 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.46 | 0.38 | 3.66 | 2.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 84 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.47 | 0.42 | 3.68 | 2.95 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.17 | 0.29 | 3.29 | 2.87 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 79 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 22.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 38.6 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 4.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Landmark of Amarillo Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (57.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
57.7% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 55 eligible stays.
10.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 92 eligible stays.
6.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
63.6% this home
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 22 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
6.7% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 30 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 11 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: CHILDRESS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Creative Solutions in Healthcare, a group of 149 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Childress County Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 09/01/2017 |
| Driver, James | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Favor, Debra | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Garrison, Reagan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Head, Howard | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Holcomb, Holly | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/29/2021 | |
| Inman, John | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Johnson, Larry | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Pierce, Brian | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Stratton, Emilee | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/18/2018 | |
| Huggins, Linda | Corporate director | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Willig, Zachary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Holcomb, Holly | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/29/2021 | |
| Stratton, Emilee | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/29/2021 | |
| Amarillo IV Enterprises, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 12/01/2023 | |
| Blake, Gary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Blake, Malisa | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Cunningham, Tia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2025 | |
| Henson, Harry | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/14/2025 | |
| Amarillo IV Enterprises, L.L.C. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/14/2025 | |
| Blake, Gary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/01/2023 | |
| Cunningham, Tia | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2025 | |
| Henson, Harry | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/14/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.