Windflower Health Center
5500 Sw 9th Ave, Amarillo, TX 79106 · Potter County · (806) 352-7244
120 certified beds, about 79 residents a day · Non profit - Other · Medicare and Medicaid since 2002
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675904 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 18, 2026, inspectors cited 8 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.56 of those hours.
53.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Lifespace Communities, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
June 18, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 kitchens reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure food was properly stored, labeled, and dated.2. The facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment.3. The facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dishwasher reached appropriate temperatures. These failures could place residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of food-borne illness, cross contamination, and loss of nutrition.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident had a right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 (Residents #10 and #89) of 18 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 and Resident #89's call lights were in reach on 06/16/2026 and 06/17/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of unmet needs, injury, and/or feelings of helplessness and frustration.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of being admitted for 1 of 18 Residents (Resident #104) that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care Resident #44 did not have a baseline care plan that reflected bed being in the lowest position and a fall mat for safety within 48 hours of being admitted to the facility. This failure could place all newly admitted patients at risk for lack of care, needs not being met, and resident safety. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #104's face sheet, dated 06/16/2026, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet residents' medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #64) whose care plans were reviewed. The facility failed to care plan Resident #64 for utilizing a stand to lift assist for activities of daily living. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and increased safety risks.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 2 (Resident #5, Resident #14) of 18 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to update the comprehensive person-centered care plans to address Resident # 5 and Resident #14's needs within 7 days after MDS assessment was completed. The failure could affect residents by delaying treatment, care, and services that could result in residents not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and reviewed the risks and benefits of bed rails with 2 (Residents #38 and #89) of 18 residents or their resident representatives and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails. Resident #38 had (1) one-quarter bed rail, located on right side of bed with no documentation of consent or current safety assessment prior to installation. Resident #89 had (1) one-quarter bed rail, located on left side of bed with no documentation of consent or current safety assessment prior to installation. These failures could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in residents' ability to engage in activities of daily living.
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical service to include accurate dispensing and administering of drugs for 1 (Resident #43) of 12 residents reviewed to meet the needs of each resident. The facility failed to administer the prescribed anticoagulant (Coumadin) to Resident #43. The facility failed to administer the prescribed anticoagulant (Pradaxa) correctly to Resident #43. This failure could result in ineffective treatment resulting in exacerbation of residents' disease processes.
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of (Resident #43) 12 residents reviewed for anticoagulant therapy. Resident #43 did not receive her Pradaxa (anticoagulant medication) correctly or her Coumadin (anticoagulant medication) as ordered. The facility's failure could exacerbate the residents' condition resulting in complications to include increased pain, wounds, amputation, extended recovery time, and hospitalization.
May 19, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids and central venous catheter care were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician's orders and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 (Resident #1) of 8 residents reviewed for parenteral therapy services. The facility failed to ensure timely PICC (external access line for medication) line dressing changes were completed as ordered and failed to ensure ongoing assessment and monitoring of the PICC line dressing for integrity and signs of infection for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk of harm due to infection. [...]
April 11, 2025Standard inspection · 8 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions in 2 of 2 kitchens when they failed to: A. Ensure stored food was properly labeled, dated and covered. B. Ensure general cleanliness was maintained. These failures placed all residents who ate food served by the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illness.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, administering, and documentation of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 out of 5 residents (Residents #8) who was observed for medication administration. -RN I administered medication to Resident #8 via nebulizer and left Resident #8 unattended. These deficient practices can affect residents that receive medications resulting in adverse reactions to medication, deterioration in their health, exacerbation of their disease process, and/or hospitalization.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologics in accordance with professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions and the expiration date when applicable to meet the needs of for 1 of 17 (Resident #6,) and 1 of 5 medication carts (LTC Side B medication cart), and 2 of 2 (rehab side and LTC/MC side)medication storage rooms under review. -Medication cart for B side of LTC had a box of anti-diarrheal with an expiration date of 02/2025. -Resident #6's Albuterol inhaler had an expiration date of 01/2025, and a Breo Ellipta inhaler with no open date on medication. -Medication cart for A side of LTC had a box of acid reducer with an expiration date of 12/2024. -Medication cart for A side of LTC had bottle of Geri-Tussin with an expiration date of 03/2025. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 6 (LVN C, CNA F, CNA G, and RNI) staff observed for resident care. -LVN C did not perform hand hygiene, use PPE or sterile technique (to minimize the number of microbes present to as few as possible) to flush Resident #27's suprapubic catheter. -CNA F did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene during incontinent care of Resident #60. -CNA G did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene during incontinent care of Resident #60. -EBP signage or PPE for EBP was in place for Resident #319, who has a PICC line. -RN I did not use PPE while administering IV medications via PICC line for Resident #319. [...]
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program (PASRR) to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 17 (Resident #60) residents reviewed for PASRR. Resident #60 was not referred for PASRR Level II Assessment when a diagnosis of Mental Illness was identified on 07/03/2024. This failure could affect residents with mental illnesses and placed them at risk of not being assessed to receive needed services.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #114) of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan based on assessed needs to address Resident #114's pain and the appropriate interventions. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving desired and necessary care and treatment. Findings Included: [...]
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who need respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #39) of 17 residents reviewed for oxygen thearpy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #39 had physician's order in his chart for oxygen. This failure could place residents at risk of having records that do not reflect their current status or needs. Findings Included: [...]
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to assess residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation. The facility failed to review the risks and benefits of bed rails with 1 (Resident #319) of 17 residents or their resident representatives and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails. Resident #319 had (2) one-quarter bed rails, one on each side of his bed with no documentation of consent or safety assessment prior to installation. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, hinder residents from getting out of bed, and/or cause a decline in resident's ability to engage in activities of daily living.
April 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintatined periodically reconciled for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to prevent LVN B from misplacing narcotics for Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #6. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2, #5, and #6's narcotics medications were accounted for: 2 out of the 3 narcotics that were missing. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving medication therapy that would be effective for their treatment, resulting in the exacerbation of conditions and disease processes.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have acess to the keys for 3 of 10 residents (Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #6) reviewed for medication storage. -The facility failed to ensure LVN B stayed with Resident #6 until narcotic medications were taken. -The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not place narcotics in the nightstand table of Resident #5 and Resident #6's meal tray. -The facility failed to ensure LVN B did not destroy narcotic medications for Resident #2, by throwing them away in the medication cart trash can. These failures could place residents at risk for drug diversion, lack of drug efficacy, and adverse reactions.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident as determined by the resident assessments and infividual plans of care considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment for 1 of 5 (LVN B) staff reviewed for nursing services. The facility failed to ensure that LVN B distributed and destroyed narcotic medications in accordance with professional standards and facility policy. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion, lack of drug efficacy, and adverse reactions.
July 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representatives when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention or a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, psychosocial status for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for notification. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's resident representative was immediately notified when the resident had a change in condition that required her to be transported via ambulance to the hospital. This failure could result in residents not having the comfort and company of their families during traumatic times.
February 29, 2024Standard inspection · 7 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident has a right to a dignified existence and to treat each resident with respect and dignity for 1 (Resident #324) of 27 residents reviewed for resident's rights. The facility failed to keep Resident #324's catheter bag covered with a privacy bag. This failure could lead to residents at risk of experiencing feelings of shame and/or embarrassment as well as having their right to privacy violated.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknow source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident # 126) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse. [...]
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan must be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission, include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including, but not limited to initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and PASRR recommendation for 1 (Resident #73) of 3 closed resident records reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident #73 that addressed his diagnoses and physician's orders. [...]
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment and describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 18 Residents (Resident #55 and #65) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. - The facility failed to update the code status in the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #55. - The facility failed to include code status in the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #65. [...]
- D Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail, assess the resident for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation, and review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation for one (Resident #126) of 18 residents reviewed for bed rails. Resident #126 had quarter bed rails on both sides of her bed with an assessment that indicated no use of bed rails and no consent in the EHR. This failure could place residents at risk of entrapment or injury. Findings Included: [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable on 2 of 3 Medication Carts (East side cart #1 and East side cart #2) in that: 1 expired medication found in Medication Cart #1 on East side of building. 23 expired oral (buccal) dose of medication, 1 packaged medication without an expiration date, 1 box of expired medication, and 6 loose pills were found in Medication Cart #2 on East side of building. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized for 1 (Resident #324) of 27 residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to correctly transcribe the Nurse Practitioner orders for Resident #324 related to blood sugar. This failure could place resident at risk of not receiving needed care or treatments by misleading care providers regarding what care or treatment resident should receive.
November 20, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one of 6 (Resident #1) residents reviewed for medication administration. -Resident #1 received Propranolol HCl oral tablet 20mg, over the course of 8 days, without an order. This failure could place residents who receive blood pressure medications at an increased risk for complications such as decreased blood pressure, decrease pulse, and an exacerbation of symptoms and disease process.
Fire safety inspections
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on June 18, 2026, 1 on February 29, 2024.
Every fire safety citation2 citations
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.68 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.22 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.07 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 53.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 68.8% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.87 on weekdays and 3.22 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.74 in April to June 2025 to 3.68 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.56 | 3.87 | 3.22 | 0.5% | 0 of 90 | 79 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.65 | 0.53 | 3.88 | 3.06 | 0.6% | 0 of 92 | 75 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.80 | 0.64 | 4.03 | 3.22 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 72 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.74 | 0.58 | 3.97 | 3.16 | 2.3% | 0 of 91 | 76 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.4 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.4 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 25.5 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.9 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: HEMPHILL COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Lifespace Communities, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haley, Kelsey | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Haley, Kelsey | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Harshfield, Nicholas | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Jantzen, Jesse | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Craig Amarillo LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/19/2022 | |
| Hemphill County Hospital District | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/28/2015 | |
| Lifespace Communities Inc | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Gorman, Joseph | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Bradley & Associates Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2023 | |
| Craig Amarillo LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2025 | |
| Lifespace Communities Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/07/2025 | |
| Gorman, Joseph | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Jantzen, Jesse | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| McQuery, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 | |
| Rankin, Ron | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/07/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on June 18, 2026: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Heritage Convalescent Center Amarillo, 0.1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Amarillo Medical Lodge Amarillo, 0.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Landmark of Amarillo Rehabilitation and Nursing Ce Amarillo, 0.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 28 citations
- Amarillo Center for Skilled Care Amarillo, 0.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Kirkland Court Health and Rehabilitation Center Amarillo, 1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 38 citations
- Ussery Roan Texas State Veterans Home Amarillo, 1.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Five Points Nursing and Rehabilitation Amarillo, 1.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Ware Memorial Care Center Amarillo, 3.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Windflower Health Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Windflower Health Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Windflower Health Center get at its last inspection?
- 8 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 18, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Windflower Health Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Windflower Health Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Windflower Health Center?
- CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Lifespace Communities. Legal business name: HEMPHILL COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.