115 Elmwood Circle, West Carrollton, OH 45449 · Montgomery County · (937) 866-3814
88 certified beds, about 76 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1983
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365598 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 9, 2025, inspectors cited 12 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 35 health citations since September 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.51 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.
51.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Ohio average 48.7%).
CMS links it to Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care, an affiliated group of 81 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 35 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of critical lab values in a timely manner. This affected one ( Resident #1) out of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 67.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered. This affected one (#62) resident out of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observations, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected two residents, (#62 and #79) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 79.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, observations and policy review, the facility failed to ensure durable medical equipment i.e. bedside commode was in good repair which resulted in resident experiencing an avoidable fall. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a thorough fall investigation was completed following a residents fall. This affected one (#12) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained and monitored in accordance with facility policy. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) in isolation rooms. This had the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure delayed-release and extended-release mediations were administered correctly to the residents. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 73.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident for self-administration of medications prior to allowing the resident to keep medication at their bedside for one (Resident #79) of two residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation of property within 24 hours, which affected one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property, which affected one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for three (Residents #21, #76, and #83) of three residents reviewed for smoking. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the care plans accurately reflected the level of care required for the residents who smoked. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to update a care plan to consistently reflect a diet change from nothing by mouth (NPO) to a pureed diet for one (Resident #2) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 (Resident #7) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of accidental hazards, which affected one (Resident #65) of six residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, Resident #65 had medications in their room, and they had not been assessed as safe to self-administer medication. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter tubing was secured to prevent urethra (tube that transports urine from the body) trauma for one (Resident #49) of one resident reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, Resident #6 received insulin glargine when the resident's blood sugar was less than 140 and should not have been given, per their physician orders. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (Resident #49) of 35 residents on EBP. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy, which affected three (Residents #21, #76, and #83) of three residents reviewed for smoking. Specifically, smoking assessments were not completed fully or timely according to the policy. The facility census was 78.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, medical record review, review of hospital documentation, review of the Certification and Licensure System (CALS) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, medical record review, review of hospital documentation and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 75.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a residents medications were accurately transcribed upon a residents admission resulting in omission of medications and medication errors. This affected one (#217) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 76.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications in the medication storage room were not expired. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents who received medications from the medication storage room. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wrote4. Observation on 09/15/22 at 8:01 A.M. revealed Aide #100 in Resident #26's room, who was on droplet isolation precautions. Aide #100 was observed to remove her gloves and wash her hands. Aide #100 proceeded to remove her isolation gown and discard the isolation gown in the trash can in Resident #26's room. Aide #100 did not perform hand hygiene after removing her isolation gown or prior to leaving Resident #26's room. Interview on 09/15/22 at 8:20 A.M. with Aide #100 confirmed she did not wash or sanitize her hands after removing her isolation gown in Resident #26's room and/or prior to leaving Resident #26's room. 5. Observation on 09/14/22 at 8:56 A.M. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans addressed their smoking and activity needs. This affected one (Resident #39) out of 24 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely complete a thorough fall investigation to determine the root cause of a fall. This affected one (Resident #43) out of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wrote2. Review of the medical record of Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 08/22/20. Diagnoses included diabetes, edema, breast cancer, congested heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the pharmacy consultation report, dated 03/10/22, revealed Resident #59 received sliding scale insulin for the treatment of diabetes since July 2021 with a hemoglobin A1C level (measures average blood sugar levels over the past three months) drawn in December 2021. A new recommendation was made by the pharmacist to discontinue the sliding scale insulin and initiate alternative antidiabetic therapy. There was no physician signature and the recommendation was not addressed. Resident #59's medical record did not reflect a discontinuation of the sliding scale insulin. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications. This affected one (#47) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and review of the facility's Drug Storage Policy, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and treatment supplies were discarded appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive dental care plan. This affected one Resident (#4) of two reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to update and revise comprehensive plan of care to include fall interventions. This affected one Resident (#9) of 24 reviewed during the investigative phase of the survey. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on medical record review, review of hospital record and resident and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling Foley catheter had a diagnosis for the use of the Foley. This affected one (#84) of one reviewed for Foley catheter. The facility identified two residents with indwelling catheters. The total facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on review of medical records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to address a change in a resident's respiratory status and failed to report the change to a physician. This affected one Resident (#3) of two reviewed for respiratory care. The census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and facility staff interview the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records. This affected two (#6 and #84) of 24 residents reviewed during the investigative phase of the survey. The facility census was 84.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and facility staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident care equipment was maintained in safe operational condition. This affected one (# 82) of 24 residents reviewed during the investigative phase. The total facility census was 84.
18 fire safety citations on file: 12 on September 19, 2022, 4 on September 19, 2019, 2 on August 2, 2018.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.51 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.19 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.00 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.03 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 51.2% | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 81.8% | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.89 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.63 on weekdays and 3.19 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.28 in April to June 2025 to 3.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.51 | 0.48 | 3.63 | 3.19 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 76 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 0.51 | 3.69 | 3.16 | 0.5% | 0 of 92 | 79 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.58 | 0.48 | 3.74 | 3.16 | 1.3% | 1 of 92 | 79 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.28 | 0.43 | 3.46 | 2.85 | 0.5% | 1 of 91 | 78 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.5 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.4 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 10.7 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Laurels of West Carrollton the's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (56.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
56.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.
11.3% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 52 eligible stays.
8.4% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 32 residents counted.
5.2% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: THE LAURELS OF WEST CARROLLTON, LLC. CMS links this home to Ciena Healthcare/Laurel Health Care, a group of 81 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khan, Anis | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Laurel Health Care Company | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2016 | |
| Khan, Anis | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Modgil, Parminder | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Qazi, Mohammad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Schoenlein, Stephanie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/21/2023 | |
| Laurel Health Care Company | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 03/31/2025 | |
| Khan, Anis | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2016 | |
| Modgil, Parminder | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Schoenlein, Stephanie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/21/2023 | |
| Stobb, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.