Find a nursing home

Home / Mississippi / Louisville

Louisville Healthcare LLC

543 East Main Street, Louisville, MS 39339 · Winston County · (662) 773-8047

60 certified beds, about 55 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
1 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255096 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 16, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since February 2022, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,788 in the last three years; the largest was $8,788, and the latest is dated April 16, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.63 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.53 of those hours.

41.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).

CMS links it to Trend Consultants, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
9D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 16, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. G
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident with chronic pain (Resident #39) and a resident dependent on staff for nail care (Resident # 22) for two (2) of 16 care plans reviewed. Resident #22 and #39 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans-Comprehensive revealed under, Policy Statement: An individual (person centered) comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. [...]
  2. G
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management for one (1) of sixteen (16) sampled residents (Resident #39), when staff failed to provide continued access to prescribed pain medication (Lyrica) and failed to implement appropriate interventions. This resulted in the resident experiencing uncontrolled neuropathic pain, impaired mobility, disruption in therapy services, and a decline in quality of life. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Pain Assessment/Management with a revision date of 9/10 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide guidelines in the identification and treatment of residents at risk for acute and chronic pain. [...]
  3. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that resident call lights were within reach, which limited residents' ability to request assistance as needed for two (2) of 54 residents observed.
  4. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment for residents in four (4) of forty-eight rooms observed during the survey. Rooms 209, 210, 212, and 216.
  5. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one (1) of sixteen sampled residents reviewed. Resident #22. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Policy revealed It is the policy of this facility to provide appropriate treatment and services in relation to ADL care to residents to ensure all ADL needs are met on a daily basis . On 4/14/25 at 2:43 PM an observation revealed Resident #22 sitting up in his wheelchair in the room and his fingernails on both hands were long and approximately one-half to three-fourths inch past his fingertips. There was a brown substance underneath each of them. An observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 9:14 AM with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, revealed that Resident #22 had long fingernails with brown substance underneath. [...]
September 14, 2023Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidence by not removing a mask after exiting a COVID-19 isolation room (Resident #2) and failed to clean a wound during wound care (Resident # 28) for two (2) of seven (7) resident care observations. Resident #2 and Resident #28 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled Standard Precautions Infection Control with no revision date revealed under, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: #2. Using Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) .c. Before leaving the patient's room or cubicle, remove and discard PPE into the appropriate receptable. [...]
  2. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident with a new mental health diagnosis for one (1) of four (4) PASARRs reviewed. Resident #23. Findings Include: A review of the facility policy title, PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) dated 6/27/2023 revealed, .Procedure (2) The nursing facility must submit a Change in Status Request whenever a Significant Change in Condition occurs for an individual with a PASARR identified condition (i.e. Serious Mental Illness (SMI), Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability (ID/DD) and/or Related Condition (RC) This includes residents previously identified by PASARR to have a mental illness, intellectual disability or a condition related to an intellectual disability who: [...]
  3. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan related to nail care (Resident 8) and wound care (Resident 28) for 2 (two) of 13 care plans reviewed.
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care to a resident for 1 (one) of 48 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 30, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean a residents wound as prescribed by the physician for one (1) of four (4) residents observed for wound care.
February 24, 2022Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by staff not performing hand hygiene in between residents when passing meal trays and when assisting residents with a meal for two (2) of three (3) halls observed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program with a revision date of 8/2017 revealed Policy: It is a policy of this facility to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .4. Hand Hygiene Protocol: a. [...]
  2. D
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a Level ll Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a resident with a new mental health diagnosis for one (1) of four (4) PASRRs reviewed. Resident #33.
  3. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on staff and pharmacy consultant interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to have stop dates on psychotropic and anti-psychotic as needed (PRN) medications for two (2) of five (5) residents medications reviewed. Resident #23 and #33.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on February 24, 2022.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. F
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · February 24, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 16, 2025Fine $8,788

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.634.183.86
Registered nurses0.530.640.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.633.503.42
Nurse aides2.73
Licensed practical nurses1.38
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)41.9%45.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover28.6%38.5%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.08 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.03 on weekdays and 3.63 on weekends, 28% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.00 in April to June 2025 to 4.63 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.630.535.033.63 0.0%0 of 9055
Oct to Dec 20254.770.515.163.80 0.0%0 of 9255
Jul to Sep 20254.860.565.293.79 0.0%0 of 9254
Apr to Jun 20255.000.595.453.87 0.0%0 of 9152
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Mississippi, Jan to Mar 20264.090.604.353.446.2%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Mississippi

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Mississippi, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$15.15$14.19 to $16.9214,200
LPNs and LVNs$24.14$22.50 to $27.909,850
Registered nurses$37.06$31.22 to $40.6229,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMississippiUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.320.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.01.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.42.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.33.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.22.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.119.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.96.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.221.715.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
18.527.723.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
20.815.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.12.41.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
3.32.91.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Louisville Healthcare LLC's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (48.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

48.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 49 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

52.2% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

8.5% this home

Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 31 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC. CMS links this home to Trend Consultants, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 3.3 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Trend Consultants LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization01/01/2009
Kelly, CharlesDirect ownership interestIndividual01/01/2009
Trend Consultants LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2009
Kelly, CharlesOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/20/2025
Warnock, LoriOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/27/2021
Trend Consultants LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization05/15/2025
Kelly, CharlesAdp of the SNFIndividual01/20/2025
Warnock, LoriAdp of the SNFIndividual02/24/2014

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2025: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2025: "Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 14, 2023: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Mississippi contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Louisville Healthcare LLC's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Louisville Healthcare LLC 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 1 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Louisville Healthcare LLC get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 16, 2025. The Mississippi average is 6.8.
Has Louisville Healthcare LLC been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,788 in the last three years.
Does Louisville Healthcare LLC accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Louisville Healthcare LLC?
CMS lists 8 owners and managers, and links the home to Trend Consultants. Legal business name: LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection