What is Marquis Mill Park's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Marquis Mill Park 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Marquis Mill Park get at its last inspection?

9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.

Does Marquis Mill Park accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Marquis Mill Park?

CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC.

Marquis Mill Park: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 24, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

Of 17 health citations since August 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 2 fines totaling $35,010 in the last three years; the largest was $17,665, and the latest is dated April 24, 2026.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.19 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.50 of those hours.

42.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

108/23

702/25

904/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

12D

Potential for minimal harm

April 24, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations

G

Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.

F760 · Pharmacy Service · Actual harm, isolated · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to administer the correct medications for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#45) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure resulted in Resident 45 experiencing decreased blood pressure and hospitalization.
E

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were locked and secured appropriately for 1 of 4 halls observed (200 Hall) during random observations for medication and treatment cart storage. This placed residents at risk for unsafe access to stored medications.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during wound care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#7) reviewed for pressure ulcer. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
D

Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.

F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to self-administer medications for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#9) reviewed for accident hazards. This placed resident at risk for unsafe medication administration.
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's advance directive was filed in her/his clinical record for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for advance directive. This placed residents at risk for end-of-life choices not being honored.
D

Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident representative after a change of condition for 1 of 1 resident (#87) reviewed for notifications. This placed residents at risk for uninformed healthcare decisions.
D

Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.

F602 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#86) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for continued depravation of goods and services.
D

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman office was notified of a resident's discharge for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#85) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for lack of advocacy.
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen equipment was cleaned for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#5) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for decreased oxygen quality.

February 3, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations

K

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow appropriate infection control practices during a COVID-19 outbreak for 2 of 4 halls reviewed for infection control. This deficient practice was determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation and placed residents at risk for contracting COVID-19.
D

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately code the MDS for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 6 and 65) reviewed for dental care and hospitalizations. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
D

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan related to the use of hearing aids for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#269) reviewed for hearing. This placed residents at risk for communication barriers and impaired hearing.
D

Provide appropriate foot care.

F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for lack of nail care and increased infections.
D

Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.

F699 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#6) reviewed for PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review). This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and a decrease in their quality of life.
D

Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.

F742 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment and services to correct ongoing signs of depressive behavior for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#49) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life.
D

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

F759 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 18, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5%. There were two errors in 29 opportunities resulting in a 6.9% error rate. This placed residents at risk for reduced medication efficacy and adverse medication side effects.

August 25, 2023Standard inspection · 1 citation

E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 13, 2023

Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene during medication administration for 3 of 9 sampled residents (#s 33, 41 and 161) reviewed during medication administration. This placed residents at risk for spread of infection.

Fire safety inspections

9 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 24, 2026, 1 on February 3, 2025, 4 on August 25, 2023.

Every fire safety citation9 citations

F
Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.

K 355 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have restrictions on the use of flammable curtains.

K 751 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · April 24, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · February 3, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · August 25, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · August 25, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · August 25, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · August 25, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
April 24, 2026	Fine	$17,665
February 3, 2025	Fine	$17,345

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oregon	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.19	5.03	3.86
Registered nurses	1.50	0.72	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.52	4.51	3.42
Nurse aides	2.67
Licensed practical nurses	1.02
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	42.9%	47.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	21.1%	51.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	2

CMS expects 4.02 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.46 on weekdays and 4.52 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 1.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.17 in April to June 2025 to 5.19 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.19	1.50	5.46	4.52	1.4%	0 of 90	63
Oct to Dec 2025	5.05	1.35	5.26	4.51	1.0%	0 of 92	64
Jul to Sep 2025	5.10	1.22	5.35	4.47	0.9%	0 of 92	65
Apr to Jun 2025	5.17	1.23	5.43	4.53	5.6%	0 of 91	66
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026	4.91	0.64	5.12	4.40	6.2%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oregon

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Oregon, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$23.96	$22.83 to $28.40	14,800
LPNs and LVNs	$38.69	$35.11 to $43.60	4,260
Registered nurses	$62.02	$51.55 to $64.63	39,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oregon	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	27.3	14.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.4	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.6	2.0	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.8	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.8	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	9.1	20.6	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	23.1	5.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	13.9	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	22.0	21.4	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	12.1	16.1	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Marquis Mill Park's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (76.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

76.9% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 571 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

8.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 534 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

5.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Oregon: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 339 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

41.7% this home

Median of homes: Oregon59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 259 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.9% this home

Median of homes: Oregon0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 337 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

6.9% this home

Median of homes: Oregon2.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 337 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

96.9% this home

Median of homes: Oregon98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 98 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Since
Marquis Companies I, Inc	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	03/01/1994
Fogg, Phillip	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Individual	03/01/1994
Bucher, Amy	W-2 managing employee	Individual	12/01/2007
Fogg, Steven	W-2 managing employee	Individual	10/16/2001
Hagen, Jennifer	W-2 managing employee	Individual	09/24/2007
Tone, Staci	W-2 managing employee	Individual	03/01/1994
Fogg, Phillip	Corporate director	Individual	03/01/1994
Fogg, Steven	Corporate director	Individual	10/01/2001
Fogg, Phillip	Corporate officer	Individual	03/01/1994
Fogg, Steven	Corporate officer	Individual	10/16/2001
Bucher, Amy	Operational/managerial control	Individual	12/01/2007
Hagen, Jennifer	Operational/managerial control	Individual	09/24/2007

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 2 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Gateway Care and Retirement
Portland, 0.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Glisan Post Acute
Portland, 0.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Portland Health and Rehabilitation
Portland, 1.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
Menlo Park Post Acute
Portland, 1.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 36 citations
Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia
Portland, 1.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 37 citations
Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation
Portland, 1.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Gracelen Care Center
Portland, 1.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 58 citations
Avalon Care Center - Portland
Portland, 1.9 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 32 citations

Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Marquis Mill Park's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Marquis Mill Park 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Marquis Mill Park get at its last inspection?: 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 24, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
Has Marquis Mill Park been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 2 fines totaling $35,010 in the last three years.
Does Marquis Mill Park accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Marquis Mill Park?: CMS lists 12 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.