Find a nursing home

Home / Oregon / Portland

Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia

10435 Se Cora Street, Portland, OR 97266 · Multnomah County · (503) 760-1737

53 certified beds, about 48 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2001

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385264 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on July 10, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

None of its 37 health citations since November 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.34 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.82 of those hours.

49.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

CMS links it to Cascadia Healthcare, an affiliated group of 47 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
27D
6E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
3C
July 10, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed for 1 or 2 halls reviewed for CBG monitoring. This placed residents at risk for bloodborne organisms.
  2. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 1 sampled dependent resident (#3) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life.
  3. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 13, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to inititiate wound care orders consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 or 1 sampled resident (#14) reviewed for skin conditions. This placed residents at risk for poor wound healing.
August 1, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    F573 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure access to medical records upon oral or written request within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#801) reviewed for the right to access medical records. This placed residents at risk for uninformed health care needs and delayed access to records.
March 28, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures met the minimum requirements for 1 of 1 dishwasher reviewed for the kitchen. This placed residents at risk for communicable diseases, un-sanitized dishware and utensils.
  2. E
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    F847 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were fully informed and understood the binding arbitration agreement for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 16 and 304) reviewed for binding arbitration agreement. This placed residents at risk of being uninformed of their legal rights.
  3. E
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff received 12 hours of in-service training annually for 2 of 5 randomly selected staff members (#s 9 and 18) reviewed for evidence of in-service training. This placed residents at risk for lack of quality care.
  4. D
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 2 residents (#21) reviewed for advance directives. This placed residents at risk for healthcare decisions to conflict with resident wishes.
  6. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for a lack of personal hygiene and loss of dignity.
  7. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement an activity care plan and failed to include residents in group and individual activities for 1 of 3 sampled residents (# 302) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for isolation, lack of social interaction and engagement.
  8. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure pressure injury wounds were comprehensively assessed and care plans were followed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 15 and 16) reviewed for pressure ulcers and positioning. This placed residents at risk for incomplete assessments and worsening of wounds.
  9. D
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    F730 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNAs received annual performance reviews for 1 of 4 randomly selected CNA staff (#19) reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff.
  10. D
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    F740 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide necessary behavioral health care and services and develop a comprehensive, person-centered behavioral health care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for behavioral-emotional needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral and emotional needs and a decrease in their quality of life.
  11. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effect of medications.
  12. C
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for homelike environment. This placed residents at risk for adverse health conditions related to an unclean environment.
  13. C
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    F732 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to the ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Report (DCSDR) postings were accurate for 13 of 38 days reviewed for staffing. This placed residents and visitors at risk for inaccurate staffing information.
September 19, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#7) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for mistreatment.
  2. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 4, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide pain management to 1 of 3 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at increased risk of unmanaged pain.
November 17, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 18 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    F565 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide a private space for resident council meetings for 1 of 1 resident council group reviewed. This placed the residents at risk for unaddressed concerns and needs related to resident care and quality of life.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for 1 of 1 facility and for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#26) reviewed for homelike environment and clean wheelchairs. This placed residents at risk for adverse health conditions and an unclean environment.
  3. E
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedure to screen new hires for 5 of 5 staff (#s 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8) reviewed for background checks. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
  4. D
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident needs and preferences related to lighting were accommodated for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 4, 10, and 13) reviewed for accommodation of needs. This placed residents at risk for lack of access to lighting and an unhomelike environment.
  5. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a menu as requested for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#153) reviewed for choices. This placed residents at risk for decreased food intake, weight loss and lack of choices being honored.
  6. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to assist residents with formulating an advance directive for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 12, 27 and 304) reviewed for advance directive. This placed residents at risk of not having their healthcare wishes followed.
  7. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to accurately assess weight gain and vision for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 8 and 18) reviewed for nutrition and sensory communication. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments and unmet care needs.
  8. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury.
  9. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans were revised for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 13 and 18) reviewed for nutrition, position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
  10. D
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    F660 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure discharge planning was developed and implemented for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 203 and 303) reviewed for discharge planning. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
  11. D
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    F661 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#206) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs.
  12. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate grooming and toenail care for 2 of 5 sampled residents (#s 18 and 47) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs.
  13. D
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#18) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life.
  14. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safety hazards were not accessible for 1 of 2 halls reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for injury.
  15. D
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    F693 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to prevent complications of tube feeding for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#303) reviewed for tube feeding. This placed residents at risk for complications related to tube feeding.
  16. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order and develop a care plan for the use of an oral suction machine for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#18) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet respiratory needs.
  17. D
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow up timely on pharmacist recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
  18. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 25, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the previous year's survey results in areas of the facility which were prominent for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for required postings. This placed residents and visitors at risk for not being informed of the facility's survey history.

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 3 on July 10, 2026, 2 on March 28, 2025, 5 on November 17, 2023.

Every fire safety citation10 citations
  1. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · July 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · July 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · July 10, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
    K 342 · March 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · March 28, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. F
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. F
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. F
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. E
    Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
    K 372 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · November 17, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeOregonUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.345.033.86
Registered nurses0.820.720.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.924.513.42
Nurse aides2.81
Licensed practical nurses0.71
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)49.2%47.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover28.6%51.6%42.9%
Administrators who left3

CMS expects 3.37 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.51 on weekdays and 3.92 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.85 in April to June 2025 to 4.34 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.340.824.513.92 2.9%0 of 9048
Oct to Dec 20254.490.654.703.96 10.8%1 of 9250
Jul to Sep 20254.390.634.593.86 10.3%0 of 9250
Apr to Jun 20254.850.665.104.21 15.3%0 of 9149
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 20264.910.645.124.406.2%0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Oregon

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Oregon, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$23.96$22.83 to $28.4014,800
LPNs and LVNs$38.69$35.11 to $43.604,260
Registered nurses$62.02$51.55 to $64.6339,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeOregonUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.914.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.40.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.42.01.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.82.43.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.81.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
23.120.614.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.65.84.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
13.613.915.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it worse than the national rate (32.6% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

32.6% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Oregon: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 13 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oregon59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oregon0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oregon2.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 14 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Oregon98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 8 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PORTLAND OF CASCADIA LLC. CMS links this home to Cascadia Healthcare, a group of 47 nursing homes averaging 3.1 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Cascadia Oregon Operations LLCDirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2017
Cascadia Hc Group LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization07/01/2017
Cascadia Holdco LLCIndirect ownership interestOrganization06/05/2025
Hammond, OwenIndirect ownership interestIndividual07/01/2017
Laforte, StephenIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/05/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLC5% or greater security interestOrganization06/05/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLC5% or greater security interestOrganization08/11/2022
Cascadia Services LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization04/05/2017
Dinh, DieuOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/20/2025
Hammond, OwenOperational/managerial controlIndividual07/01/2017
Laforte, StephenOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/05/2025
Vellody, NitaOperational/managerial controlIndividual09/01/2020
Cascadia Services LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization02/12/2025
Timberline Ctre Tenant LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization06/05/2025
Dinh, DieuAdp of the SNFIndividual04/09/2026
Vellody, NitaAdp of the SNFIndividual02/12/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on July 10, 2026: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on August 1, 2025: "Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on November 17, 2023: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  4. How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 28, 2025: "Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.92 hours per resident per day, below the Oregon average of 4.51.
  6. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 3 administrators who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on July 10, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
Has Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Secora Rehabilitation of Cascadia?
CMS lists 19 owners and managers, and links the home to Cascadia Healthcare. Legal business name: PORTLAND OF CASCADIA LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection