Marquis Vermont Hills
6010 Sw Shattuck Road, Portland, OR 97221 · Multnomah County · (503) 246-8811
73 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385218 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on May 22, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 13 health citations since January 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.13 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.74 of those hours.
36.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Marquis Companies, an affiliated group of 15 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
801/24
412/24
105/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 22, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unwanted sexual contact by Witness 2 (Non-Family Visitor) for 1 of 1 sampled Resident (#12) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for unwanted sexual contact and mental anguish.
December 19, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and stored in a way to minimize food spoilage in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for potential infections related to foodborne pathogens.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise the plan of care to reflect residents' needs for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#29) reviewed for hospice. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain a physician order for a respiratory device and ensure resident respiratory equipment was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#14) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for increased respiratory concerns.
- D Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the garbage area dumpsters were covered and free from debris for 1 of 1 facility dumpster reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to used medical supplies.
January 12, 2024Standard inspection · 8 citations
- E Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure records were accurate for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 8, 18, 25 and 26) reviewed for Advance Directives. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate medical interventions.
- D Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) information for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for beneficiary notification. This placed residents at risk for unknown financial liabilities.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet ADL needs and loss of dignity.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate and sufficient supervision and ensure interventions were followed to reduce the risk of accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#14) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for choking and aspiration.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct timely post-dialysis assessments for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#9) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for unidentified complications of dialysis treatment.
- D Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by a physician at least once every 60 days for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#15) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for unassessed and unmet needs.
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide physical therapy services as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#13) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for reduced mobility and quality of life.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate disinfection of a shared glucometer (a device used to obtain blood sugar levels) for 3 of 5 sampled residents (#s 9, 25 and 196) observed for CBG monitoring. This placed residents at risk for the spread of bloodborne infection.
Fire safety inspections
14 fire safety citations on file: 1 on May 22, 2026, 3 on December 19, 2024, 10 on January 12, 2024.
Every fire safety citation14 citations
- E Have exits that are accessible at all times.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Meet other general requirements.
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- D Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- D Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.13 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.74 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.51 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.34 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.05 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.0% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 30.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.37 on weekdays and 4.51 on weekends, 16% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.14 in April to June 2025 to 5.13 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.13 | 0.74 | 5.37 | 4.51 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 49 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.10 | 0.69 | 5.35 | 4.47 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 48 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.07 | 0.69 | 5.32 | 4.42 | 0.0% | 2 of 92 | 48 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.14 | 0.83 | 5.41 | 4.45 | 0.0% | 1 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 28.2 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.3 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 13.9 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.1 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 8.8 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC. CMS links this home to Marquis Companies, a group of 15 nursing homes averaging 4.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marquis Companies I, Inc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 07/01/2004 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Bucher, Amy | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/01/2008 | |
| Fogg, Steven | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Tone, Staci | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Fogg, Phillip | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Fogg, Steven | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/01/2004 | |
| Bucher, Amy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2008 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 19, 2024: "Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on May 22, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Robison Jewish Health Center Portland, 0.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care Portland, 0.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- West Hills Health & Rehabilitation Portland, 1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Avamere Crestview of Portland Portland, 1.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 57 citations
- Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia Beaverton, 2.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Mirabella Portland Portland, 3.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Maryville Beaverton, 4.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- The Pearl at Kruse Way Lake Oswego, 4.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Marquis Vermont Hills's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Marquis Vermont Hills 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Marquis Vermont Hills get at its last inspection?
- 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on May 22, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Marquis Vermont Hills been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Marquis Vermont Hills accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Marquis Vermont Hills?
- CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Marquis Companies. Legal business name: MARQUIS COMPANIES I, INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.