Avamere Crestview of Portland
6530 Sw 30th Avenue, Portland, OR 97239 · Multnomah County · (503) 244-7533
127 certified beds, about 65 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1967
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385031 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 13, 2026, inspectors cited 9 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 57 health citations since June 2023, 3 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.19 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.82 of those hours.
36.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Avamere, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1706/23
310/23
110/23
301/24
2409/24
902/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 57 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
1K
0L
Actual harm
2G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
44D
9E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
February 13, 2026Standard inspection · 9 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and expired medications were removed from the cart immediately for 3 of 5 sampled medication carts reviewed for medication. This placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications.
- D Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unsafe medication administration and adverse medication side effects.
- D Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain consent, assess, monitor and reevaluate a resident for a wheelchair seatbelt for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#60) reviewed for restraints. This placed residents at risk for being restrained.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers and necessary care and assistance to maintain good grooming and hygiene for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 31 and 68) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of personal hygiene and dignity.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing person-centered activities program for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 35 and 43) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk of a decline in psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed care plans related to fall safety for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 3, 6 and 35) reviewed for falls. This placed residents at risk for continued falls and potential injury.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#35) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life.
- D Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were 2 errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities, resulting in an 8% error rate. This placed residents at risk of receiving a sub-therapeutic medication dose and reduced medication efficacy.
- D Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#43) reviewed for food. This placed residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and poor intake.
September 13, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 24 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for 4 of 7 facility halls reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for living in an unkempt environment.
- E Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide staff with appropriate competencies and skills to attain and maintain the highest practicable well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for communications and activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- E Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 5 of 14 sampled residents (#s 7, 20, 34, 46 and 51) reviewed for behaviors, communication and sensory care, dental and PASARR. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs and decreased dignity.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment in the facility's ice machine, dry storage, and dish drying area for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for sanitary conditions. This placed residents at risk of potential infections related to foodborne pathogens and cross contamination.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to follow proper infection control precautions for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#40) reviewed for catheter care and while handling clean laundry for 1 of 1 laundry areas. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and risk of infection. Finds include: According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Guidelines for Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (2009) III. B.2: -Keep the collecting bag below the level of the bladder at all times. Do not rest the bag on the floor. 1. Resident 40 admitted to the facility in 9/2022 with diagnoses including a urinary tract infection. On 9/11/2024 at 12:14 PM Resident 40 was observed to ambulate independently in his/her wheelchair as his/her catheter bag dragged on the ground. [...]
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dignity for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#23). This placed residents at risk for lack of dignity.
- D Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a consent was obtained prior to administering antipsychotic medications to residents for 1 of 5 sampled residents(#24) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for being uninformed about their medications.
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to honor a resident's preference to get dressed for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for lack of choices and self-determination.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for abuse and neglect.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments for 2 of 12 sampled residents (#s 11 and 20) reviewed for communication, dental, and activities. This placed residents at risk for inaccurate assessments.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to incorporate PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II recommendations into residents' assessments and care plans for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 51) reviewed for PASARR coordination of care. This placed residents who have a mental health disorder at risk for delayed care and services to attain their highest practicable level of well-being.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to comprehensively complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#267) reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to revise care plans for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s 19 and 28) reviewed for pressure ulcers and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a recapitulation of the resident's stay was completed accurately for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#261) reviewed for discharge. This placed residents at risk for unmet discharge needs.
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services in communication for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#20) reviewed for communication. This placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life and potential decline in their ability to carry out activities of daily living.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received ADL care for 1 of 4 residents (#33) reviewed for ADLs. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a person-centered activity program for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 20, and 33) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain hearing abilities were received for 1 of 6 sampled residents (#34) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet hearing needs.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers and update care plans for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#19) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers.
- D Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to enteral (tube) feeding for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#28) reviewed for nutrition. This placed residents at risk for nutritional complications and weight loss.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care for 3 of 3 sampled residents (#s 7, 34, and 51) reviewed for mood. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life.
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure proper storage of biologicals on 1 of 1 medication rooms during random observations for medication storage. This placed residents at risk of unsafe access to stored biologicals.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#46) reviewed for dental care needs. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs.
January 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accident hazards related to a mechanical lift for 1 of 2 sampled residents (# 7) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for accidents.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide adequate urinary incontinence care for 2 of 3 residents (#s 2 and 6) reviewed for incontinence care. This placed residents at risk for unmet bladder care needs.
- D Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an adequate number of qualified staff to ensure residents received adequate care and services for 1 of 3 residents (#2) reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
October 16, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#60) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse medication consequences.
October 10, 2023Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by Witness 2 (Visitor/spouse of Resident 2) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for verbal and mental abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for 1 out of 1 sampled resident (#1) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for lack of complete investigations to rule out abuse.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of trauma received trauma- informed care for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse and a safe environment. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and decreased quality of life.
June 15, 2023Standard inspection · 17 citations
- K Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure standard and contact precautions for infection control were performed by staff. This failure, determined to be an immediate jeopardy situation, resulted in 30 residents identified and treatment prescribed for potential scabies (a contagious skin disease marked by itching and small raised red spots caused by mites). This placed all residents at risk for contracting scabies and the psychosocial impact related to symptoms, isolation, pain, and discomfort and serious harm and/or death.
- G Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wrote1. Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to safely transfer a resident according to the care plan for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#264) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in Resident 264 experiencing severe pain related to a right hip dislocation and requiring hospitalization and surgery.
- G Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly intervene when a resident experienced unplanned significant weight loss for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#12) reviewed for medications. This resulted in an unplanned severe weight loss for Resident 12 and placed residents at increased risk of unplanned weight loss.
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft for 4 of 5 sampled residents (#s1, 9, 42 and 52) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for living in an unhomelike environment.
- E Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet resident care needs in a timely manner for 6 of 6 resident halls reviewed for staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely assistance and unmet care needs.
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were secured for 4 of 5 medication carts observed. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and drug diversion.
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. This placed residents at risk for an undignified existence.
- D Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with a baseline care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#115) reviewed for new admissions. This placed residents at risk for being uniformed of their plan of care.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement care plans for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#114) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for unmet needs.
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, person-centered care plans for ADLs and nutrition were revised for 2 of 6 sampled residents (#s1 and 24) reviewed for dental and nutrition. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for increased swelling and discomfort.
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure treatment and services to maintain vision abilities were provided for 1 of 1 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for communication and sensory care. This placed residents at risk for unmet vision needs.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents with limited mobility received appropriate services and equipment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#24) reviewed for position and mobility. This placed residents at risk for worsening contractures.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to determine if a resident's clinical condition necessitated urinary catheterization and failed to obtained a physician order for urinary catheterization for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for urinary catheters. This placed residents at risk of unnecessary urinary catheterization and infections.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders and failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for adverse respiratory effects and discomfort.
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to limit orders for PRN antipsychotic medication to 14 days and not renewed unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner evaluated the resident for the appropritateness of medications for 1 of 5 sampled residents (# 42) reviewed for medications. This placed residents at risk for adverse side effects for the use of antipsychotic medication.
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the Direct Care Staff Daily Reports (DCSDR) were completed, current and accurately reflected the actual staff working each shift for 5 of 7 days reviewed for staff postings. This placed residents and visitors at risk for inaccurate daily staffing information.
Fire safety inspections
3 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 13, 2026, 1 on November 24, 2025, 1 on September 13, 2024.
Every fire safety citation3 citations
- F Develop Emergency Preparedness policies and procedures.
- F Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.19 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.82 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.60 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.55 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.82 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 36.6% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 40.0% | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.49 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.43 on weekdays and 4.60 on weekends, 15% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.76 in April to June 2025 to 5.19 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.19 | 0.82 | 5.43 | 4.60 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 65 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.17 | 0.77 | 5.40 | 4.59 | 0.3% | 0 of 92 | 64 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.97 | 0.63 | 5.16 | 4.50 | 1.0% | 0 of 92 | 63 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.76 | 0.49 | 4.97 | 4.25 | 1.2% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.5 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.8 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.7 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.1 | 21.4 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.3 | 16.1 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: CRESTVIEW OPERATIONS LLC. CMS links this home to Avamere, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midcap Finco LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Adams, Nancy | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Cavallo, Glen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Okoli, Ike | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Polson, Justin | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Sanders, Amanda | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 06/01/2025 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/01/2006 | |
| Midcap Finco LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/22/2010 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Julie | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/15/2025 | |
| Giles, Heatherann | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Hoskins, Tonia | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/19/2024 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Lao, Phoi | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/12/2024 | |
| Larson, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2020 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Tijerina, Sarah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/13/2023 | |
| Hampoian, Aram | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2025 | |
| Henrichon, Gregory | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2025 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/29/2025 | |
| Newell, Jo Ann | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 08/12/2025 | |
| Aequor Healthcare Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/20/2023 | |
| Avamere Health Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/13/2025 | |
| Avamere Skilled Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/03/2025 | |
| Cmg Cit Acquisition, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/18/2023 | |
| Consolidated Billing Services Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/24/1998 | |
| Converdia Health Staffing - Therapies | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/09/2024 | |
| Fusion Medical Staffing LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/12/2024 | |
| Incovate Solutions, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kevala Technologies, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 10/31/2023 | |
| Moss Adams LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/01/2009 | |
| National Staffing Solutions, Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/22/2023 | |
| Nursa Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2023 | |
| Rande Holdings, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2024 | |
| Sabra Health Care Limited Partnership | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care Reit Inc | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Sabra Health Care, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/17/2017 | |
| Ventura Medstaff, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2024 | |
| Adams, Nancy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Dana, Jennifer | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Davis, Julie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/01/2024 | |
| Doepker, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/28/2023 | |
| Feakin, Cody | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Funderberg, Michelle | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/31/2024 | |
| Games, Kim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/15/2024 | |
| Giles, Heatherann | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Harrison, Lori | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/22/2021 | |
| Hill, Kevin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/12/2022 | |
| Inskeep, Todd | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2022 | |
| Kofstad, Mary | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/13/2024 | |
| Lao, Phoi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/12/2024 | |
| Larson, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2020 | |
| Munro, Jolynn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/01/2023 | |
| Polson, Justin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/10/2025 | |
| Powelson, Michele | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/25/2015 | |
| Presley, Yolanda | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/06/2025 | |
| Reid, Misty | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/02/2025 | |
| Simpson, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2024 | |
| Staples, Carolyn | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/05/2023 | |
| Strunk, Colby | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/06/2022 | |
| Tijerina, Sarah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/13/2025 | |
| Vanderzanden, Carrie | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 23 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 8 problems in this area, most recently on September 13, 2024: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 7 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on February 13, 2026: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Marquis Vermont Hills Portland, 1.5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Robison Jewish Health Center Portland, 1.6 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 32 citations
- West Hills Health & Rehabilitation Portland, 1.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Marquis Autumn Hills Memory Care Portland, 1.6 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Mirabella Portland Portland, 2.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- The Creston Health & Rehabilitation Portland, 4 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- The Pearl at Kruse Way Lake Oswego, 4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 22 citations
- Reedwood Post Acute Portland, 4.1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Avamere Crestview of Portland's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Avamere Crestview of Portland 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Avamere Crestview of Portland get at its last inspection?
- 9 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on February 13, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Avamere Crestview of Portland been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Avamere Crestview of Portland accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Avamere Crestview of Portland?
- CMS lists 81 owners and managers, and links the home to Avamere. Legal business name: CRESTVIEW OPERATIONS LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.