What is Mirabella Portland's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Mirabella Portland 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Mirabella Portland get at its last inspection?

3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 27, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.

Has Mirabella Portland been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Mirabella Portland accept Medicaid?

CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.

Who owns Mirabella Portland?

CMS lists 16 owners and managers, and links the home to Pacific Retirement Services. Legal business name: MIRABELLA AT SOUTH WATERFRONT.

Mirabella Portland: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 27, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).

None of its 8 health citations since August 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.30 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.36 of those hours.

35.1% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).

CMS links it to Pacific Retirement Services, an affiliated group of 10 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

408/23

111/24

303/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 8 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

Potential for minimal harm

March 27, 2026Standard inspection · 3 citations

D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 11, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's fall investigations were completed timely for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for continued falls and injury.
D

Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.

F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 11, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident / representative was provided the bed hold policy and the State Ombudsman Office was notified of residents' discharge for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 4 and 27) reviewed for hospitalization. This placed residents at risk for right to return and lack of advocacy.
D

Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.

F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 11, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident was assisted to wear glasses for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#13) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for impaired vision.

November 25, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation

D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow fall prevention techniques for 1 of 4 residents (# 16) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for falls.

August 24, 2023Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.

F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete an admission or Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment in the required time frame for 4 of 14 sampled residents (#s 6, 8, 16 and 77) reviewed for resident assessments. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
E

Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

F638 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to complete a Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment in the required time frame for 10 of 14 sampled residents (#s 1, 4, 5, 10, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, and 23) reviewed for resident assessments. This placed residents at risk for unassessed needs.
D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#76) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 12, 2023

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 1 medication carts and 1 of 1 treatment carts observed during this survey. This placed residents at risk for medication diversion and accidents.

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on March 27, 2026, 6 on November 25, 2024.

Every fire safety citation8 citations

F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · March 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · March 27, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.

E 15 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.

E 18 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have an alternate power supply for its alarm system.

K 344 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.

K 712 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
F
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.

K 372 · November 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Oregon	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.30	5.03	3.86
Registered nurses	1.36	0.72	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	5.30	4.51	3.42
Nurse aides	3.34
Licensed practical nurses	0.61
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	35.1%	47.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	40.0%	51.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	2

CMS expects 3.50 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.30 on weekdays and 5.30 on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 21.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.44 in April to June 2025 to 5.30 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.30	1.36	5.30	5.30	21.5%	0 of 90	24
Oct to Dec 2025	5.04	1.39	5.18	4.70	17.3%	0 of 92	24
Jul to Sep 2025	5.22	1.54	5.44	4.68	15.0%	0 of 92	24
Apr to Jun 2025	5.44	1.64	5.68	4.86	19.7%	1 of 91	24
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026	4.91	0.64	5.12	4.40	6.2%	0.4% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Oregon

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Oregon, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$23.96	$22.83 to $28.40	14,800
LPNs and LVNs	$38.69	$35.11 to $43.60	4,260
Registered nurses	$62.02	$51.55 to $64.63	39,730
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Oregon	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	28.1	14.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.5	1.4	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.5	2.0	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	2.5	2.4	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	27.4	20.6	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	5.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.6	13.9	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	7.2	21.4	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	6.3	16.1	12.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mirabella Portland's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (45.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

45.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Oregon: 52 better, 3 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 32 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

11.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Oregon: 3 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 39 eligible stays.