716 Mimosa Dr, Mineola, TX 75773 · Wood County · (903) 569-5366
82 certified beds, about 41 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675981 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on July 9, 2025, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 23 health citations since April 2023, 4 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (4 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 3 fines totaling $50,527 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated April 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.16 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.49 of those hours.
88.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Opco Skilled Management, an affiliated group of 68 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 23 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident #1) The facility failed to prevent CNA A from taking Resident #1's debit card and spending $1103.11 from 06/27/26 through 07/13/26. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of life, misappropriation of property, and loss of dignity.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA D did not handle Resident #3 roughly when he provided incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to implement their abuse policy when the Administrator failed to report to HHSC after the ADON reported to the Administrator an allegation of abuse made by Resident #3 on 04/09/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of unreported abuse, neglect, exploitation, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse, for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for abuse and neglect reporting. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator reported to HHSC within 2 hours on 04/09/2026 when the ADON reported to her Resident #3 alleged CNA D was rough with him while providing incontinent care. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, physical harm, mental anguish, and emotional distress.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address Resident #2's preference to not have males provide personal/hands on care. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their individual needs met and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received showers as scheduled. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed services and care, decreased self-esteem, and a decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts (Hall 2 Medication Cart) reviewed for drugs and biologicals. The facility failed to ensure LVN A secured the Hall 2 Medication Cart, when it was not in use and unattended on 04/14/2026. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving drugs and biologicals as needed, medication errors, medication misuse, and drug diversion.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 resident (Residents #9) reviewed for infection control. RN A failed to put on a gown prior to administering medications through a jejunostomy tube (also called aJ-Tube, enteral tube, or feeding tube). This failure could place residents at risk of exposure and/or possible transmission of communicable diseases and infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician and notify the resident representative of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure LVN A notified the physician/designee and the resident's representative after Resident #1 had a change of condition with agonal breathing (the medical term for gasping for air), fixed pupils, no urine output and lethargy. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/07/2025 and ended on 04/08/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 6 resident's reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to notify the physician/designee and or seek a higher level of care on 4/07/2025 5:00 a.m. - 6:00 a.m. when Resident #1 had a change of condition with agonal breathing, fixed pupils, no urine output and lethargic. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented any additional assessments/monitoring of Resident #1 after the initial assessment on 4/07/2025 at 5:00 a.m. The facility failed to ensure LVN A initiated any interventions to prevent a further decline in Resident #1. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 04/07/2025 and ended on 04/08/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 2 of 9 residents (Residents #1 and #2) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not sexually abuse Resident #1 during his shower earlier in the week of January 5, 2025 - January 9, 2025, when he allegedly placed his finger in his rectum. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not sexually abuse Resident #2 during a shower provided during the period of December 28, 2024, and December 29, 2024, when he allegedly attempted to place his finger in his rectum. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) noncompliance began on 1/11/2025 and ended on 1/11/2025. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent the abuse of residents for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #149) reviewed for abuse. 1. The facility failed to ensure the Administrator was notified immediately when Resident #149 accused CNA L of sexual abuse. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #149 and other vulnerable residents were protected from CNA L. CNA L was not immediately suspended and remained in the facility until the end of his shift. 3. The facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. The facility did not include evidence of Resident #149's interview, resident safe surveys, and LVN D's one-on-one education of the abuse policy in their provider investigation report. 4. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an MDS accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 2 dialysis residents (Residents #14 and #33) reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #14 quarterly MDS assessment for Hemodialysis treatment on his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], 2/29/2024, and 12/15/2024. The facility failed to accurately code Resident #33 quarterly MDS assessment for Hemodialysis treatment on his quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to provide 7 (seven) of 11 doses of Resident #11's physician prescribed Lotemax (Loteprednol) Ophthalmic Suspension (eye drops used to treat conditions of the eye that cause itching) between the dates of 06/20/2024 - 06/25/2024. 2. There was documentation in the MAR indicating 2 of the 7 doses were administered when the Lotemax eye medication was not available in the facility. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #150) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure LVN H did not verbally abuse Resident #150 during shift change. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, mental distress, depression, and decreased quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review , the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that meet professional standards of quality care within 48 hours of the resident's admission for 2 of 2 dialysis residents (Residents #14, and Resident #33). The facility failed to ensure Residents # 14 and # 33's, baseline care plans included instructions to address both residents' admission diagnoses of ESRD and physician orders within 48 hours of admission. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk of receiving inadequate care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident #11) reviewed for medical records accuracy. The facility failed to insure LVN F and LVN G accurately documented the administration of Lotemax Ophthalmic Suspension on 2 (two) occasions when they indicated the eye drops medication had been administered when the medication was not available in the facility. This deficient practice could affect residents whose records are maintained by the facility and could place them at risk for errors in care and treatment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of a medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 21.21%, based on 7 errors out of 33 opportunities, which involved 2 of 6 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #7) reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to administer Resident #13's duloxetine (a medication used to treat depression [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]) as ordered. The facility failed to administer Resident #13's furosemide (a medication used to treat fluid retention) as ordered. The facility failed to administer Resident #13's lisinopril Hydrochlorothiazide (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) as ordered. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 13 residents (Residents #3, #6, and #10) reviewed for incontinent care and wound care and 1 of 2 linen carts (Hall 200 cart) reviewed for infection control practices. 1. CNA F failed to change her gloves when going from a dirty to a clean procedure and when her gloves were visibly soiled when performing incontinent care on Resident #10. 2. The facility failed to store linen in a clean area. 3. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, a indwelling catheter in use for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #4) had indication for the use on admission. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4 had a physician order for his indwelling catheter. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and treatment services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #6) reviewed for respiratory care and services. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22's oxygen filter was cleaned. 2. The facility failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen for Resident #6. These failures could place residents who receive respiratory care at risk for developing respiratory complications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #13 and Resident #7) reviewed for medication pass. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 had a sufficient supply of medications which resulted in Resident #13 missing 4 prescribed medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had a sufficient supply of medications which resulted in Resident #7 missing 3 prescribed medications. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of their medications or receiving them as prescribed, per physician orders.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication pass. (Resident #13) The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 received his furosemide (a medication used to treat fluid retention) as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of medical complications and not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications.
6 fire safety citations on file: 2 on July 9, 2025, 2 on June 26, 2024, 2 on April 19, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 17, 2025 | Fine | $16,381 |
| January 21, 2025 | Fine | $17,345 |
| June 26, 2024 | Fine | $16,801 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.16 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.06 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.52 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.14 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 88.9% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 75.0% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.94 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.20 on weekdays and 3.06 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 12.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.32 in April to June 2025 to 3.16 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.16 | 0.49 | 3.20 | 3.06 | 12.5% | 0 of 90 | 41 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 2.82 | 0.39 | 2.81 | 2.84 | 23.4% | 1 of 92 | 41 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.15 | 0.48 | 3.19 | 3.04 | 21.8% | 1 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.32 | 0.75 | 3.44 | 3.01 | 21.5% | 0 of 91 | 36 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.03 | $16.97 to $20.71 | 88,680 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.92 | $27.46 to $32.89 | 57,560 |
| Registered nurses | $46.14 | $38.06 to $50.53 | 271,380 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.1 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.3 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mineola Gardens Wellness & Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (47.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
47.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Texas: 116 better, 50 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 36 eligible stays.
11.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Texas: 0 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 45 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Texas: 4 better, 11 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas57.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Texas1.3% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 24 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Texas98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: STRATFORD HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Opco Skilled Management, a group of 68 nursing homes averaging 2.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stratford Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 06/01/2022 |
| Chumley, Richard | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/2022 | |
| Mineola Gardens Wellness & Rehabilitation LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Garetz, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2025 | |
| Davidovich, Niv | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| Hagins, Elizabeth | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| Kaplan, Esther | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| Mindle, Adam | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| Sternshein, Jennifer | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 04/17/2026 | |
| 716 Mimosa Street Tx LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Esdov Investments LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| First Sweetzer Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2021 | |
| Linz Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Pimento Property Holdings LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Red Stone Advisors LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Rojo Re Trust | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 11/01/2025 | |
| Moffitt, Tinisha | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/12/2024 | |
| Morris, James | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.