Belmont Care and Rehabilitation
812 Se 48th Avenue, Portland, OR 97215 · Multnomah County · (503) 236-2624
41 certified beds, about 37 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2012
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
CMS note: This facility reported a high number of days without a registered nurse onsite.
Quality measures
2 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 385277 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Oregon average is 9.2, the national average 9.2).
None of its 37 health citations since December 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.26 hours per resident per day, against 5.03 across Oregon and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.52 of those hours.
68.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oregon average 47.4%).
CMS links it to Sapphire Health Services, an affiliated group of 8 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1012/23
103/24
307/24
1702/25
608/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 37 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
24D
12E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
August 7, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- F Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was available for at least eight consecutive hours for 3 of 46 days reviewed for RN coverage. This placed residents at risk for delayed nursing assessments.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure an ice machine had the required air gap for 1 of 1 facility ice and water machine reviewed for kitchen sanitation. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination and foodborne illness.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate contact precautions for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 1 and 32) reviewed for contact precautions. This placed residents at risk for the spread of infection.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#6) reviewed for respiratory care. This placed residents at risk for unsanitary conditions.
- D Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was in place related to the use of antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications.
- D Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate pain management for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#23) reviewed for pain. This placed residents at risk for uncontrolled pain.
February 28, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 17 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to promptly respond to grievances and complaints from the resident council for 2 of 3 months reviewed. This placed residents at risk for unresolved missing property.
- E Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to deliver mail on Saturdays for 1 of 1 Resident Council reviewed. This placed residents at risk for lack of timely mail delivery.
- E Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for 4 of 6 sampled residents (#s 3, 16, 22 and 26) reviewed for abuse and dental. This placed residents at risk for lack of psychosocial needs and decreased dignity.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to transport clean laundry and failed to transport soiled linens in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for infection control. This placed residents at risk for cross contamination.
- D Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#16) reviewed for environment. This placed residents at risk for a lack of homelike environment.
- D Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve resident grievances for 2 of 4 sampled residents (#s 2 and 22) reviewed for personal property and Resident Council. This placed residents at risk for unresolved missing property and unaddressed concerns.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 3 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3, 23 and 26) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for mental anguish and verbal abuse.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of verbal abuse within the mandated timeframe for 4 of 4 sampled residents (#s 3, 23, 26 and 41) for 1 of 2 Facility Reported Incident (FRI) reports reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for further abuse.
- D Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure incidents of suspected resident misappropriation were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for personal property. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurately assessed for 2 of 7 sampled residents (#s 16 and 23) reviewed for activities and abuse. This placed residents at risk for an inaccurate picture of the resident's status.
- D PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a PASARR Level II (Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder and/or individuals with intellectual disability) was completed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (# 11) reviewed for PASARR. This placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized services.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident-centered care plan was implemented for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#21) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for not being provided appropriate bed mobility assistance.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently received personal grooming assistance for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#16) reviewed for ADL care. This placed residents at risk for lack of grooming care needs.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support individual activity interests and preferences for 2 of 3 sampled residents (#s 16 and 27) reviewed for an activity program. This placed residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and social isolation.
- D Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and account for the residents' experiences and preferences to eliminate or mitigate triggers which may cause re-traumatization for 1 of 4 sampled residents (#26) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for re-traumatization and a decrease in their quality of life.
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to obtain dental services for 2 of 2 sampled residents (#s 16 and 22) reviewed for dental services. This placed residents at risk for unmet dental needs.
- D Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed rail was inspected and maintained according to manufacturer's recommendations for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for accidents. This placed residents at risk for potential injury.
July 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure the garbage area dumpsters were covered and free from debris for 1 of 2 facility dumpsters reviewed for sanitation. This placed residents at risk for exposure to used medical supplies.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by a resident for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#5) reviewed for abuse. This placed residents at risk for abuse.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 1 of 3 residents (#2) reviewed for bathing care. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs.
March 11, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a change in physician care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#20) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents and residents' representatives at risk for being uninformed of changes in physician providers.
December 1, 2023Standard inspection · 10 citations
- E Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide RN coverage for 8 hours a day, 7 days a week, for 4 of 28 days reviewed for sufficient staff. This placed residents at risk for lack of RN oversight including resident care and services.
- E Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure CNA staff annual performance reviews were completed for 5 of 5 sampled CNA staff (#s 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for a lack of care by competent staff.
- E Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to employ a director of food and nutrition services with the required certification for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for qualified dietary staff. This placed residents at risk for unmet dietary needs.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure the resident refrigerators were maintained at 41 degrees F or less for 1 of 2 resident refrigerators reviewed for food storage and handling. This place residents at risk for food-borne illnesses.
- E Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to have a system in place to track annual nurse aide training (required 12-hour minimum every year) for 5 of 5 sampled CNAs (#s 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15) reviewed for sufficient and competent nurse staffing. This placed residents at risk for lack of care by competent staff.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#38) reviewed for activities. This placed residents at risk for unmet psychosocial needs and isolation.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#22) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unmonitored weight gain.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow safety procedures for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#11) reviewed for smoking. This placed residents at risk for smoking related injuries.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to conduct post-dialysis assessments and to ensure post-dialysis communication with the dialysis center was received for 1 of 1 sampled resident (#28) reviewed for dialysis. This placed residents at risk for delayed treatment.
- D Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide rehabilitation services for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#35) reviewed for rehabilitation services. This placed residents at risk for reduced mobility and quality of life.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 2 on August 7, 2026, 4 on February 28, 2025, 2 on December 1, 2023.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Have a battery powered remote alarm panel in a location accessible by operating personnel.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
- F Establish procedures for tracking staff and patients during an emergency.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.26 | 5.03 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.52 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.88 | 4.51 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.45 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.29 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 68.6% | 47.4% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 51.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.68 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.42 on weekdays and 4.88 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.04 in April to June 2025 to 5.26 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.26 | 0.52 | 5.42 | 4.88 | 6.9% | 4 of 90 | 37 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.19 | 0.59 | 5.35 | 4.81 | 10.5% | 0 of 92 | 37 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.23 | 0.49 | 5.37 | 4.86 | 7.9% | 1 of 92 | 37 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.04 | 0.49 | 5.14 | 4.81 | 6.0% | 1 of 91 | 36 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oregon, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.91 | 0.64 | 5.12 | 4.40 | 6.2% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
Official wage estimates for Oregon
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.96 | $22.83 to $28.40 | 14,800 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.69 | $35.11 to $43.60 | 4,260 |
| Registered nurses | $62.02 | $51.55 to $64.63 | 39,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oregon | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.6 | 14.9 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.5 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 24.4 | 20.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.7 | 13.9 | 15.4 |
Short-term rehab results
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Belmont Care and Rehabilitation's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
CMS reports none of these results for this home: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SAPPHIRE AT BELMONT, LLC. CMS links this home to Sapphire Health Services, a group of 8 nursing homes averaging 2.1 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Becker, Andrew | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 30% | 08/01/2022 |
| Hilty, Lisa | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 25% | 08/01/2022 |
| Morris, Bryan | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 5% | 08/01/2022 |
| Ricker, Kevin | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 40% | 08/01/2022 |
| Sapphire Healthcare Srvs. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 08/01/2022 | |
| Ames, Deborah | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mina, Erin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 10/26/2023 | |
| Belmont Hc Investors, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/01/2022 | |
| Sapphire Healthcare Srvs. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/01/2025 | |
| Ames, Deborah | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Mina, Erin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 10/26/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 12 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2026: "Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2026: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2026: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
- How many nurses and aides work each shift, nights and weekends included?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on August 7, 2026: "Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis."
Other nursing homes nearby
- Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation Portland, 0.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Providence Child Center Portland, 0.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation Portland, 1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 49 citations
- Reedwood Post Acute Portland, 1.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- The Creston Health & Rehabilitation Portland, 2.1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 62 citations
- Holladay Park Plaza Portland, 2.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Marquis Mill Park Portland, 2.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Gateway Care and Retirement Portland, 2.5 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
Oregon contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Oregon. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Oregon Department of Human Services, Nursing Facility Licensing, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Oregon Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, (800) 522-2602. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Oregon Licensed Long-Term Care Settings Search, where Oregon publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Belmont Care and Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Belmont Care and Rehabilitation 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Belmont Care and Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on August 7, 2026. The Oregon average is 9.2.
- Has Belmont Care and Rehabilitation been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Belmont Care and Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Belmont Care and Rehabilitation?
- CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Sapphire Health Services. Legal business name: SAPPHIRE AT BELMONT, LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.