Find a nursing home

Home / Missouri / Mountain View

Mountain View Healthcare

1211 North Ash Street, Mountain View, MO 65548 · Howell County · (417) 934-6818

105 certified beds, about 64 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 265412 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 4, 2025, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Missouri average is 11.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 14 health citations since April 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.71 hours per resident per day, against 3.43 across Missouri and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.55 of those hours.

54.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Missouri average 56.0%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 14 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
10D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
April 4, 2025Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the use of bed and chair alarms (devices that contain sensors that trigger an alarm when they detect a change in pressure) to determine if utilized as restraints, to complete on-going evaluations for the continued need, and to identify a medical symptom that supported the use of the bed and chair alarms for one resident (Resident #45) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised July 2017, showed: - Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities; [...]
  2. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) for two residents (Residents #27 and #45) out of 16 sampled residents. The facility's census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised November 2019, showed: - All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. 1. Review of Resident #27's medical record showed: - An admission date of 03/15/25; - Diagnoses of acute kidney failure; [...]
  3. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an accurate baseline care plan (the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident) upon admission with specific interventions for one resident (Resident #25) out of one sampled resident. The facility's census was 63. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the baseline care plan. 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record showed: - An admission date of 03/15/25; - Diagnosis of acute kidney failure. Review of the resident's Hospital Discharge paperwork, dated 03/15/25, showed: [...]
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #45 and #57) out of three sampled residents receiving hospice (palliative care for the terminally ill with a life expectancy of six months or less) services had a complete hospice coordinated plan of care. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hospice Program, revised July 2017, showed: - Coordinated care plans for residents receiving hospice services will include the most recent hospice plan of care as well as the care and services provided by our facility (including the responsible provider and discipline assigned to specific tasks) in order to maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; [...]
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a urinary indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag was kept off the floor for three residents (Residents #16, #27, and #117) and to ensure proper drainage position of a urinary catheter drainage bag for one resident (Resident #117) out of three sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure a resident with a urostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen to allow urine to exit the body) and a nephrostomy (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the kidney through an opening in the skin to drain urine directly from the kidney) had physician orders for one resident (Resident #27) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, revised September 2014, showed: [...]
  6. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 23, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care for one resident (Resident #117) out of two sampled residents, wound care for one resident (Resident #13) outside the sample of two sampled residents, and incontinent care for one resident (Resident #45) out of three sampled residents. The facility failed to utilize proper sterile technique for accessing a venous port (a medical device surgically placed under the skin in the chest area, providing access to a large vein for administering medications, fluids, or drawing blood) for one resident (Resident #27) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 63. Review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary, revised September 2014, showed: [...]
January 11, 2024Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    F584 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 66. Review of the facility's policy titled, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, showed: - Residents are provided with a safe, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible; - Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence, and personal needs and preferences; - The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting which includes a clean, sanitary and orderly environment. Observations made on 1/10/24 at 8:40 A.M. of the 100 hall showed: [...]
September 8, 2023Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinent care was provided to prevent possible infection when staff failed to provide peri-care for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who were incontinent of urine and failed to completely clean one resident (Resident #3) who was incontinent of urine and bowel. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, dated February 2018, showed the purpose of perineal care was to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet (brief resident profile sheet) showed the following: -admission date of 08/22/22; [...]
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when staff failed to complete appropriate hand hygiene while assisting three residents (Resident #1, Resident #2 and Resident #3) with cares. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, undated, showed the following: -This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections; -Wash hands with soap and water when hands are visibly soiled and after contact with a resident with infectious diarrhea; -Use an alcohol-based hand rub before and after direct contact with residents; -Use an alcohol-based hand rub before donning gloves; -Use an alcohol-based hand rub before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; [...]
April 22, 2022Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards of practice and protect food from possible contamination when staff did not maintain clean surfaces, stored a scoop in the dry food storage bin, and staff did not wear proper facial hair or hair coverings. The facility census was 67. 1. Record review of the 2013 Missouri Food Code showed the following information: -Chapter 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils showed; (A) Equipment food-contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch; (B) The food-contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations; [...]
  2. E
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a risk/versus benefit review for one resident's side rails (Resident #51), and failed to document alternatives attempted prior to bed rail use for two residents (Resident #51 and #17); failed to complete bed rail safety check to include measurements of the bed frame and bed rails for risk of entrapment for four residents (Residents #51, #17, #15, #46); failed to obtain physician order for the use of side rails for two residents (Resident #15 and #46), failed to obtain documented consent for use of side rails for two residents (Resident #51 and #17), and failed to address the use of bed rails in the residents' care plans for one resident (Resident #46). The facility census was 67. [...]
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated all residents with dignity and respect when they did not provide a dignity bag for one resident's (Resident #23) catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag. The facility census was 67. Record review of the facility's policy titled' Dignity, dated February 2021, showed the following: -Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times; -Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited; -Staff are expected to promote dignity and assist residents to keep urinary catheters (a sterile tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine) bags covered. 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) showed the following: -admission dated 11/20/18; [...]
  4. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed, reviewed, and revised one resident's (Resident #11) comprehensive care plan to include wandering and elopement behaviors. The facility census was 67. Record review of the facility's policy titled care plan, dated 2001, revised 2006, showed the following information: -The care plan shall be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident; -Completed care plans are placed in the resident's chart; -Certified Nurse's Aides/CNA's, are responsible for reporting to the nurse supervisor any change in the resident's condition and care plan goals and objectives that have not been met or expected outcomes that have not been achieved; [...]
  5. D
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement physician orders of Two-Cal (a liquid dietary supplement) and calcium for one resident (Resident #46), who had a history of weight loss. The facility census was 67. Record review of the facility's policy, titled nutrition (impaired)/unplanned weight loss-clinical protocol, dated September 2017, showed the following information: -The nursing staff will monitor and document the weight and dietary intake of residents in a format which permits comparisons over time; -The staff and physician will define the individual's current nutritional status and identify individuals with anorexia (lack or loss of appetite for food), weight loss or gain, and significant risk for impaired nutrition; [...]

Fire safety inspections

8 fire safety citations on file: 1 on April 4, 2025, 2 on January 11, 2024, 5 on April 22, 2022.

Every fire safety citation8 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · January 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Meet requirements for the installation and maintenance of electrical systems.
    K 911 · January 11, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Have proper medical gas storage and administration areas.
    K 923 · April 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Meet other general requirements.
    K 200 · April 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · April 22, 2022 · Waiver
  7. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · April 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · April 22, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.713.433.86
Registered nurses0.550.460.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.183.013.42
Nurse aides2.62
Licensed practical nurses0.53
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)54.9%56.0%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover62.5%47.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.23 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.93 on weekdays and 3.18 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.01 in April to June 2025 to 3.71 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.710.553.933.18 0.0%0 of 9064
Oct to Dec 20253.850.604.103.21 0.0%0 of 9261
Jul to Sep 20253.850.524.083.29 0.0%0 of 9263
Apr to Jun 20254.010.504.143.69 0.0%0 of 9160
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Missouri, Jan to Mar 20263.340.403.502.933.9%1.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Missouri

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Missouri, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$18.11$17.02 to $20.0034,050
LPNs and LVNs$29.58$27.06 to $33.7714,700
Registered nurses$39.32$36.56 to $47.3976,310
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMissouriUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
12.618.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.42.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.64.13.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.017.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
7.94.54.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.323.515.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.326.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
21.313.712.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.02.11.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.62.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Mountain View Healthcare's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (54.0% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

54.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Missouri: 41 better, 31 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 56 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Missouri: 0 better, 7 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Missouri: 1 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

64.3% this home

Median of homes: Missouri51.6% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Missouri2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 44 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Missouri100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 19 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: WILLOW HEALTH CARE INC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Willow Health Care Inc5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%09/22/2009
Amyx, TraceyW-2 managing employeeIndividual11/05/2022
Counts, EmilyW-2 managing employeeIndividual01/01/2023
Williamson, JackieW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/01/2009
Amyx, TraceyCorporate officerIndividual11/05/2022
Counts, EmilyCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2023

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 4, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  2. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 4, 2025: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 4, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 11, 2024: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."

Other nursing homes nearby

Missouri contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Missouri. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Mountain View Healthcare's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Mountain View Healthcare 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Mountain View Healthcare get at its last inspection?
6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 4, 2025. The Missouri average is 11.4.
Has Mountain View Healthcare been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Mountain View Healthcare accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Mountain View Healthcare?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers. Legal business name: WILLOW HEALTH CARE INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection