Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Menomonie

Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)

658 Howison Circle, Menomonie, WI 54751 · Dunn County · (715) 232-2661

46 certified beds, about 45 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525713 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 7, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since August 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.09 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.69 of those hours.

50.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
2E
3F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
July 20, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 17, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 of 3 residents at risk for elopement received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. R3 is at risk for elopement and did not have a wander guard in place as ordered. R1 eloped out of facility on [DATE]. R1 had wander guard attached to the front bottom metal bar of R1's walker. R2 had wander guard attached to the wheelchair metal frame. Facility staff did not follow recommendations from the manufacturer's instructions.
January 7, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    F887 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain documentation of screening, education, offering, and current Coronavirus 19 (COVID) vaccination status to staff. This has the potential to affect all 45 residents. The facility did not provide education to all staff for the COVID 19 vaccine. Facility did not develop and implement policies and procedures regarding the COVID 19 vaccine immunization.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. Housekeeping did not use any type of clothing barrier (e.g., apron) when sorting and washing dirty laundry. This practice had the potential to affect all 16 residents residing in the same household. Improper hand hygiene was observed during catheter care and personal care for R5 and R29. The facility policy, titled Laundry Duties, last reviewed 2/5/25, states in part: Policy: The Neighbors of [NAME] County provides laundry services to its residents. This includes both personal clothing and facility linens. Purpose: [...]
  3. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure residents/representatives received notice of bed-hold policy indicating specific reason for transfer or discharge, received notice before transfer or discharge indicating reserve payment, and/or did not send a copy of the discharge notice to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman Notification for 2 of 3 residents (R8 and R16).-Facility did not provide a transfer notice form for R16's hospitalizations on 07/09/25, 07/19/25, and 07/23/25.-Facility did not provide specific reason for transfer for R8's hospitalization on 12/06/25.-Facility did not have notification of the daily bed rate on the bed hold policy forms for R8's hospitalization on 12/06/25 or R16's hospitalizations on 07/09/25, 07/19/25, and 07/23/25.-Facility did not notify Ombudsman of R16's hospitalization on 07/19/25. [...]
  4. D
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 7, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure follow up dental care for 1 (R7) of 1 resident reviewed for dental care. R7 complained of tooth pain and requested to see a dentist to have remaining teeth pulled due to broken teeth causing pain during eating. The facility did not document the follow up or extenuating circumstances that led to the delay. Evidenced by: R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/11/25, indicates R7's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. Surveyor reviewed R7's dental progress notes, physician orders, and an email chain pertaining to dental needs: On 07/18/23, progress note states, Specialty care referral form completed to VA for [R7]. [R7] asking to have the rest of his teeth pulled. [...]
October 20, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 31, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 3 residents (R) reviewed. (R1)On 10/01/25, R1 alleged was sexually assaulted by a man. The facility nursing staff did not complete a full body skin assessment to thoroughly investigate the allegation. Facility's policy titled Reporting & Investigating Resident Rights Violations with revised date of 12/15/24, read in part: Assess the Effect on the Resident: Nursing supervisor immediately completes a body assessment and documents findings. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's current diagnoses include dementia with anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia with mood disturbance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and restless legs syndrome. [...]
September 26, 2024Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish an Infection Control Program under which it investigates, controls, and prevents infections in the facility, or a system for recording incidents identified under the facility's Infection Control Program, including corrective action in a timely manner, for both residents and staff. This has the potential to affect all 43 residents in the facility. The facility did not have an adequate surveillance and infection control program in place for tracking and monitoring infection and communicable disease for staff and residents. Staff did not sanitize lift for R11 after resident use. Staff did not sanitize hands during dressing change for R24. Enhanced Barrier Precautions were not put in place for R24, R18 and R26. This is evidenced by: [...]
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and record review, the facility did not ensure residents (R) were treated with dignity and respect and cared for in a manner to enhance their quality of life. Facility staff used clothing protectors and edge of spoon to wipe resident's face and stood over R32 and R6 while assisting them to eat.
  3. D
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 residents (R) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) screen (R37). R37's MDS assessment is coded in error stating that a PASARR level 2 screen had not been completed when it was. This is evidenced by: R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, dementia and anxiety. Review of R37's medical record found a PASARR level 2 screen was completed, dated 05/06/24. R37's admission MDS assessment, dated 05/14/24, and significant change MDS assessment, dated 07/26/24, indicated for question A1500 that no PASARR level 2 had been completed. On 09/26/24 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Social Worker (SW) C, who completed the MDS Section A1500 on R37's admission and significant change MDS. [...]
  4. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 1 resident (R) R3, reviewed for respiratory care was provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. R3 requires continuous oxygen and has a physician's order to change oxygen tubing every 5 days. This was not changed as ordered. This is evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION last revised 03/01/24 states in part 2. Oxygen tubing, masks, etc. c. Are to be changed every 5 days and as needed per the E-MAR/TAR. R3 was admitted to the facility in 2023 and has diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atherosclerotic heart disease. R3 utilizes continuous oxygen. On 09/24/24 at 9:14 AM, Surveyor observed R3's oxygen tubing connected to the concentrator in his bedroom. The oxygen tubing is dated 9/1. [...]
February 13, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility did not provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for supervision with showers and monitoring of water temperatures. R1 had a known history of taking long showers independently, when assessed to require maximum assistance with showers. The facility did not address this behavior in a plan of care. The facility was aware of fluctuating water temperatures on R1's household. The water temperatures were not monitored. R1 entered the shower independently. without assistance, on 1/30/24 and suffered actual harm sustaining second and third degree burns.
August 30, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility did not implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff observed with open sores assisting residents with meals and prepping silverware. Staff observed washing hands and turning off the faucet with clean hands. No hand hygiene was offered for residents before meals on 2 of the 3 households. This affected 30 of 46 residents (R33, R28, R20, R147, R44, R7, R3, R9, R19, R10, R21, R37, R31, R14, R1, R12, R43, R27, R25, R14, R25, R36, R8, R6, R41, R16, R24, R197, R30, and R26). Staff touching straws with bare hands. This affected 13 residents (R33, R28, R20, R147, R44, R7, R3, R9, R19, R10, R21, R37, R31). No hand hygiene with glove change during medication pass for R97.
  2. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility did not follow proper food handling practice. This practice had the potential to affect 16 of 46 residents (R14, R25, R45, R36, R12, R8, R6, R27, R41, R16, R1, R24, R197, R28, R30, R26) residing in the facility. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E did not wear a hairnet while serving breakfast.

Fire safety inspections

1 fire safety citation on file: 1 on September 26, 2024.

Every fire safety citation1 citation
  1. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · September 26, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.094.213.86
Registered nurses0.690.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.973.773.42
Nurse aides2.89
Licensed practical nurses0.52
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)50.8%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover33.3%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.18 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.15 on weekdays and 3.97 on weekends, 4% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 32.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.29 in April to June 2025 to 4.09 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.090.694.153.97 32.8%0 of 9045
Oct to Dec 20254.180.674.293.91 38.5%1 of 9245
Jul to Sep 20254.140.594.243.88 31.7%0 of 9246
Apr to Jun 20254.290.634.414.01 38.0%0 of 9144
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the). No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
27.116.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.02.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.12.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.13.33.2
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
21.018.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.35.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
11.715.815.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.31.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.92.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)'s Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (36.3% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

36.3% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 31 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.6% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 44 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 24 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 16 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 5 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COUNTY OF DUNN.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
County of Dunn5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2013
McCullough, KellyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2022
County of DunnOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2013
Dunbar, DanielOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2025
Meyer, CarmenOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2020
Phillips, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2020
County of DunnAdp of the SNFOrganization01/02/1961
Dunbar, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2025
Meyer, CarmenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2020
Phillips, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual10/20/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on July 20, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
  4. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on October 20, 2025: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the) 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the) get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 7, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the) been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the) accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Neighbors - East Neighborhood (the)?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers. Legal business name: COUNTY OF DUNN.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection