Find a nursing home

Home / Wisconsin / Menomonie

Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the)

651 Howison Circle, Menomonie, WI 54751 · Dunn County · (715) 232-2661

46 certified beds, about 44 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 2013

CMS high performing icon Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 525714 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 19, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Wisconsin average is 9.5, the national average 9.2).

Of 13 health citations since December 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.20 hours per resident per day, against 4.21 across Wisconsin and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.17 of those hours.

47.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Wisconsin average 46.9%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 13 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
11D
1E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
March 19, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
  1. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, a resident's medication order was not limited to 14 days, and prescribing practitioner did not document the rationale for the extended time use or a specific duration for use for 1 of 3 sampled residents, (R) R15, reviewed for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications. R15 was prescribed PRN lorazepam for anxiety on 02/27/2026; there was no rationale for extended use written and no specific duration for use. This is evidenced by: R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include vascular dementia with agitation and anxiety. R15's physician order dated 02/27/26 states: lorazepam - Schedule IVtablet; 0.5 mg; amt: 0.25mg; oral, Special Instructions: anxiety AEB (as evidenced by) frightened facial expr;verbal statements; Monitor response and consider alternative if ineffective. [...]
  2. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remains free of accident hazards as possible and each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (R)(R11 and R35) reviewed. R11 and R35 had fallen; the facility did not initiate immediate intervention to prevent future falls, investigate the root cause of the fall and review and revise care plan fall interventions. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Fall Risk Program, with a reviewed date of 03/04/25, states in part: POLICY: This program emphasizes assessment, identification, and intervention of resident falls, utilizing the least restrictive method to keep the resident safe. [...]
  3. D
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    F697 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not adequately assess and provide necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing for 1 of 1 resident (R)(R37) reviewed for pain management. R37 did not have an individualized pain assessment completed to monitor, assess, and evaluate for efficacy for pain management and non-pharmacological interventions were not implemented. This is evidenced by:Facility policy titled, Pain Management, with a reviewed date of 04/13/25, states in part: POLICY: Control of resident's pain is integral to the mission statement of the facility; Nursing will set a high priority on pain management and pain control. Pain will be assessed, treated, and evaluated for effectiveness whenever a resident experiences pain, whether chronic, breakthrough or acute. [...]
  4. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 18, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 4 residents (R5, R1, and R31) observed for proper hand hygiene during cares.
January 8, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not complete comprehensive weekly wound assessments for 1 of 2 residents (R)30 to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. R30 did not receive weekly measuring and comprehensive assessment of a skin injury. This is evidenced by: Review of the facility's policy titled: Wound management with the revised date of 12/03/21, read in part: .PURPOSE: To track, prevent, heal pressure ulcers/wounds according to standards of practice . PROCEDURE: .II. Assistant Clinical Mentors or licensed designee are responsible for weekly wound documentation. Review of the facility's Treatment Order form, read in part: 9. Weekly measurement and documentation (in Matrix under wound management tab) on Wed. [...]
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 8, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Staff did not initiate enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 3 residents observed (R21) with a wound. Facility staff did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) for R30 who is on EBP or perform proper hand hygiene with cares. Facility staff used contaminated scissors to cut a wound dressing treatment and placed the cut dressing in R30's skin wound. Staff did not disinfect body sling after use for R11 and R21. Staff wore mask below nose when assisting one resident. This was evidenced by: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Enhanced Barrier Precautions recommendations, dated 06/28/24, state in part: [...]
December 13, 2023Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. G
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility did not implement interventions to protect other residents from abuse by a resident (R) (R97) with a history of aggressive behaviors which resulted in a fall with fracture for 1 of 1 resident (R28) reviewed for falls.
  2. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections; hand hygiene before meals was not offered for 10 of 43 residents (R) (R24, R14, R40, R12, R8, R36, R23, R197, R6, and R21)
  3. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when a resident to resident abuse was not reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law for 1 of 1 incidents with (R) R97 and R28 reviewed.
  4. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility did not thoroughly investigate an incident of potential resident to resident abuse for 1 of 1 incident reviewed.
  5. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan that reflected resident care and needs related to urinary catheters for 1 of 3 residents (R) with catheters. (R22)
  6. D
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    F758 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident with a dementia diagnosis had a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of psychotropic medications in the past year. This occurred for 1 of 5 residents (R) reviewed for unnecessary medications. (R26)
  7. D
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    F811 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 10, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility did not prevent untrained staff from feeding residents (R27 and R31) for 2 of 2 observations. This is evidenced by: Surveyor reviewed R31's medical record. Current diagnoses include dementia and Parkinson's disease. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with the review date of 10/06/23, documented R31 as being dependent on staff to assist with meals. Surveyor reviewed R27's medical record. Current diagnoses include non-traumatic brain dysfunction and dementia. Review of MDS quarterly assessment with the review date of 11/11/23, documented R27 needing partial to moderate assistance from staff with meals. On 12/13/23 at 8:12 AM, Surveyor observed Homemaker C give R31 a bite of their eggs. [...]

Fire safety inspections

4 fire safety citations on file: 2 on January 8, 2025, 2 on December 13, 2023.

Every fire safety citation4 citations
  1. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · January 8, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
    K 753 · January 8, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. E
    Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
    K 222 · December 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · December 13, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.204.213.86
Registered nurses1.170.990.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.913.773.42
Nurse aides2.95
Licensed practical nurses0.08
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)47.5%46.9%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover23.1%39.7%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.31 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.32 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 31.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.36 in April to June 2025 to 4.20 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.201.174.323.91 31.9%0 of 9044
Oct to Dec 20254.331.114.454.02 30.1%0 of 9244
Jul to Sep 20254.461.224.564.19 32.1%0 of 9243
Apr to Jun 20254.361.194.474.10 31.3%0 of 9143
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Wisconsin, Jan to Mar 20264.190.954.363.748.8%0.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Wisconsin

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Wisconsin, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$21.70$19.03 to $22.7528,370
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.67 to $36.067,390
Registered nurses$45.93$39.39 to $49.3368,060
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeWisconsinUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
31.716.113.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.62.10.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.32.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.23.33.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.81.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
28.418.414.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.65.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.715.815.4
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.41.71.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.72.31.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the)'s Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 51.5% · Wisconsin: 52 better, 26 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 22 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 6 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 27 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

US median of homes 7.1% · Wisconsin: 0 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 19 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

51.3% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin54.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 39 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin2.2% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: Wisconsin100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: COUNTY OF DUNN.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
County of Dunn5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%08/01/2013
McCullough, KellyManaging control - governing bodyIndividual04/01/2022
Meyer, CarmenCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2020
County of DunnOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2013
Dunbar, DanielOperational/managerial controlIndividual08/01/2025
Meyer, CarmenOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2013
Phillips, MichaelOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2020
County of DunnAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2013
Dunbar, DanielAdp of the SNFIndividual08/01/2025
Meyer, CarmenAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2013
Phillips, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual04/04/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on December 13, 2023: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."

Other nursing homes nearby

Wisconsin contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Wisconsin. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the)'s Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the) 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the) get at its last inspection?
4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 19, 2026. The Wisconsin average is 9.5.
Has Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the) been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the) accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Neighbors - West Neighborhood (the)?
CMS lists 11 owners and managers. Legal business name: COUNTY OF DUNN.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection