Find a nursing home

Home / California / Los Banos

New Bethany Skilled Nursing

1441 Berkeley Dr, Los Banos, CA 93635 · Merced County · (209) 827-8949

35 certified beds, about 29 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
2 of 5
Health inspections
2 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555758 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on September 5, 2025, inspectors cited 15 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

None of its 29 health citations since September 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.45 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.48 of those hours.

22.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
13D
6E
10F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) free from falls when Resident 1 fell after Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 completed a two-person required mechanical lift (device used to safely raise, lower and transfer individuals with limited mobility) transfer without assistance using a stand-up lift (device to assist individuals transfer from a seated position to a standing position), failing to follow the resident's care plan and physician's order requiring a Hoyer lift (overhead full body sling lift) transfer. This failure resulted in Resident 1's fall causing her discomfort and need to be transported to the emergency department (ED) on 11/20/25 for evaluation and had the potential to cause significant injury and harm. During a review of the facility's report dated 11/19/25, the report indicated, . [...]
September 5, 2025Standard inspection · 15 citations
  1. F
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of four sampled residents (Resident 9 and 23 ) when:1. The Nutritional assessment was not completed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) for Resident 9's significant change of condition assessment dated [DATE]. This failure had the potential to put Resident 9 at an increased risk unavoidable significant weight loss. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not assess Resident 23's pain prior to administering PRN (means as needed) pain medication (Acetaminophen - is a medication used to treat minor aches and pain and to reduce fever) on 9/3/25. This failure had the potential for Resident 23 not to receive an appropriate pain medication to effectively manage her pain. 3. [...]
  2. F
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for five of eight residents (Residents 1, 8, 20, 21 and 28) when: 1. Residents 1 ,8 , 20, 21 and 28's medications located in the medication cart had the room number of the residents listed and had no label with patient identifiers (information used by healthcare providers to accurately and reliably identify a patient like name and date of birth ). These failures had the potential to result in a medication error (medication being given to the wrong patient).2. The medication room was widely open and unattended by authorized staff. [...]
  3. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food services safety for 29 of 29 sampled residents when:1. A portion of Chicken meat was not fully submerged in water while thawing under running water2. The dishwasher had built up white residue on the surface and black dirt and debris on the top surfaceThese failures placed residents at risk for foodborne (sickness resulting from contaminated food) illness and food contamination.1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/2/25 at 9:00 a.m. with [NAME] 1, chicken meat was being thawed under running water, a portion of the meat was not fully submerged under water or in the path of the running water. [NAME] 1 stated the meat should have been fully submerged under water or in the path of the running water. [...]
  4. F
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    F865 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI- a meeting where staff members come together to talk about ways to improve the quality of care for patients and prevent problems before they happen) plan for 29 of 29 sampled residents when the Registered Dietitian's (RD) QAPI recommendation to be involved in Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a collaborative meeting where professionals from various disciplines [such as doctors, nurses, therapists, and social workers], come together to discuss and coordinate care for an individual) meetings were not followed:This failure had the potential to have resident weight changes go unmonitored by the RD.During an interview on 9/4/25 at 10:07 a.m. with the RD, the RD stated she has emailed the facility her QAPI report and recommendations for the facility to implement. [...]
  5. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections in the medication room and for two of two sampled residents (Residents 3 and 15) when 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 stored her personal belongings inside of the medication room on the medication counter. 2. Resident 15's oxygen nasal cannula (NC - a plastic tube used to deliver oxygen) was stored in an open package.3. Resident 3's NC was stored in the top drawer of the resident's nightstand with no packaging to protect it from the environment. [...]
  6. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote the rights of the residents, and treat residents with respect and dignity for two of three sampled residents (Resident 7 and 22) when1. The facility did not use an alternate communication method with non-English speaking resident (Resident 7) such as language assistance, communication card, interpreters or translated materials. This failure violated Resident 7's rights to understand the care provided to her in a language she understood and had the potential to result in Resident 7's needs to go unmet.2. Resident 22 was waiting to be fed by the nursing staff while watching another resident eating lunch meal at the same table on [DATE]. This failure violated Resident 22's right to be treated with respect and dignity in a manner which recognized each resident's individuality. 1. [...]
  7. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of six sampled residents (Resident 7 and 9) when:1. The facility did not use an alternate communication method with non-English speaking resident (Resident 7) such as language assistance, communication card, interpreters or translated materials. This failure violated Resident 7's rights to understand the care provided to her in a language she understood and had the potential to result in Resident 7's needs to go unmet.2. Resident 9's fall care plan intervention to minimize fall related injuries was not implemented. Resident 9 did not have bilateral floor mats on the sides of the bed. This failure had the potential to place Resident 9 at an increased risk of an avoidable fall and obtaining fall-related injuries. 1. [...]
  8. E
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured appropriate receipt, reconciliation and identification of controlled drugs (medications with potential for abuse or addiction and are required by federal law to be accounted for by Licensed Nurses) for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 10 and 14) when Licensed Nurses did not verify and ensure completion of the controlled drug record upon receipt from the pharmacy. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (drugs used illegally) of controlled substance medications. During an interview on 9/5/25 at 10:49 a.m. [...]
  9. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative in writing of the transfer to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33) when Resident 33 was transferred to the GACH on 7/4/2025 and his Responsible Party (RP - a person responsible for another person's healthcare decisions) was not informed of the reason for the transfer. This failure resulted in the lack of written notification for Resident 33's change in condition. During an interview on 9/6/25 at 8:18 a.m. with the License Vocational Nurse/Director of Staff Development (LVN/DSD), the LVN/DSD stated, Resident 33 was transferred to a GACH on 7/4/25. The LVN/DSD stated Resident 33's RP was given verbal notice of Resident 33's transfer to the hospital on 7/4/25. [...]
  10. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan to reflect assessments and interventions to address a significant change of condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 9) when Resident 9's care plans were not updated and revised after completion of significant change of condition assessment. 1. Resident 9's nutritional care plan was not revised to reflect Resident's 9's significant change of condition assessment dated [DATE]. 2. Resident 9's activities care plan was not revised to reflect Resident's 9's significant change of condition assessment dated [DATE]. These failures had the potential for Resident 9 not to receive the necessary care and services and put Resident 9 at an increased risk of not having her needs met.1. During an observation on 9/2/25 at 9:45 a.m. [...]
  11. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 9) when Resident 9's fingernails were long and dirty with brownish dirt built up underneath the nails. This failure had potential for Resident 9 in obtaining avoidable skin related injuries (including cuts (laceration), scrapes (abrasion), scratches, etc.) and infection (the invasion and growth of germs in the body). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/2/25 at 11:00 a.m. with Resident 9, in Resident 9's room, Resident 9 was awake, alert oriented to her name only. Resident 9 stated her name and declined to be interviewed. Resident 9's left hand fingernails are long and dirty with brownish dirt built up underneath the nails mostly on left thumb finger. Resident 9's right hand was tucked underneath the blanket. [...]
  12. D
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    F685 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a hearing device was in placed to maintain resident's hearing abilities for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had not been using a left ear implant hearing device (a surgical device that restores or improves hearing in individuals with severe hearing loss or deafness). This failure had resulted in Resident 1 experiencing a difficulty in hearing during conversation with staff and other residents and having the potential not to effectively communicate his needs with the staff. During an observation on 9/2/25 at 12:00 p.m. with Resident 1, in the dining room, Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair in front of the table waiting for his lunch meal. Resident 1 was alert and oriented to his name. Resident 1 was pleasant, clean and well groomed. [...]
  13. D
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    F806 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and was provided food that accommodates the resident's preferences or provide a substitute meal of similar nutritive value for two of three residents (Residents 1 and 25) when1. Resident 1 was served and consumed non-fortified substitute/alternative food during lunch on 9/2/25.2. Resident 25 disliked gravy and was provided lunch with gravy, ate 10 percent of the meal, and was not offered a substitute meal at lunch on 9/2/25. This failure had the potential for Residents 1 and 25 not meeting the calories required to maintain the weight and nutritional status and placed Residents 1 and 25 at risk for avoidable significant weight loss. 1. During an observation on 9/2/25 at 12:00 p.m. [...]
  14. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were complete and accurately documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's Physician Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a document that contains a persons end of life wishes) form was not signed by Resident 4's current responsible party (RP-an individual who has control over healthcare decisions). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 4's healthcare wishes not being followed. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:38 a.m. with Social Services Director/ Medical Records (SSD/MR) the SSD/MR stated the process of the facility was to review and update the POLST form once a year and as needed. The SSD/MR stated Resident 4's spouse was her RP before 5/2025. [...]
  15. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and monitor safety and accident hazards (are situations or factors with the potential to cause harm or damage in a workplace) when a personal portable electric heater (is a device that converts electric current into heat) was being used in the Infection Preventionist (IP) room. This failure placed the facility at an increased risk of fire. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/5/25 at 8:40 a.m. with the Social Services Director (SSD), in SSD/IP's room, a personal portable electric heater was located on the floor at the back of the IP's chair. The IP nurse was not in the room. The SSD stated the personal portable heater belonged to the IP nurse. The SSD stated it was hot in the room. The SSD stated the IP nurse had been using her personal portable heater because she was always cold. [...]
October 7, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a full-time qualified person responsible for food and nutrition services (FNS) when the Registered Dietitian and Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) were employed part time and failed to provide the required number of hours for oversight of FNS. This failure resulted in a lack of oversight for food and nutrition services and had the potential to compromise the dietary and nutritional needs of the residents. (Cross reference F812)
  2. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 2, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food services safety when: 1. The spice storage area contained food products which were not discarded on or before the expiration dates according to facility policies. 2. There was a cart with multiple personal belongings and used items in the kitchen area. 3. Four of four staff did not have their hair properly covered by a hair restraint. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and contamination. (Cross reference F801)
August 28, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    F625 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the Bed-hold notice at the time of transfer for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was transferred to the acute care hospital (ACH) on 7/11/24 and the responsible party (RP) was not provided the written Bed-hold notice which specifies the duration of the Bed-hold policy according to federal regulations. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for his resident rights to be violated. (Cross reference F626)
  2. D
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    F626 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were hospitalized were permitted to return to the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility refused to take Resident 1 back after Resident 1 was medically cleared (when a patient no longer needs to receive inpatient care) to return to the facility from the acute care hospital (ACH). This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for psychosocial harm by not allowing the resident to return to the skilled nursing facility (SNF) near his home and caused him to be transferred to a SNF in a different city. This caused a hardship for Resident 1 ' s spouse when she had to decrease the frequency of her visits to the resident. (Cross reference F625)
June 21, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 128 and 19) were treated with dignity and respect when: 1. Resident 19 was assisted with lunch by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 did not engage in conversation and did not inform the resident when she was providing beverages, spoons with food or wiping her face. This failure resulted in Resident 19 not being provided a respectful and dignified dining experience which could further enhance resident's quality of life. 2. Resident 128's urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow body opening into the bladder and used for draining urine) bag was left uncovered.
  2. E
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of practice for 17 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 127, and 128) when: 1. LVN 1 failed to explain the medication name and indication to Resident 1, 13, 18, 21, 127, and 128 during medication administration. This failure had the potential to place Residents 1, 13, 18, 21, 127, and 128 at risk of receiving the wrong medication and experience unnecessary side effects. 2. The facility failed to have a Licensed Nurse confirm the lunch meal tray matched residents' dietary orders for Residents 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 11,12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, and 21. [...]
  3. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program to prevent the development and transmission of diseases for seven of 18 sampled resident (Resident 128, 8, 1, 9 177, 16, and 19) when: 1. Resident 177 was on contact precautions and isolations gowns were not stocked and available outside the room for staff to use. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 did not use an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR-an alcohol containing liquid, gel or foam rubbed on hands that kill microorganisms) when passing out breakfast trays for five of seven residents (Resident 128, 8, 1, 9, 177). 3. CNA 1 failed to use an ABHR prior to and after feeding two of two residents (Resident 16, 19). This failure had the potential to result in the transmission of infection between residents. Findings 1. During an observation on 6/18/24 at 10:51 a.m. [...]
September 23, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. F
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 6, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for ten of ten sampled residents (1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 222) when: 1. Resident 7 had four bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the four bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; obtain consent, physician order and care plan prior to the use of the four bed rails. 2. Resident 16 had two bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the two bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; obtain consent, physician order and care plan prior to the use of the two bed rails. 3. Resident 15 had two bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the two bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment. After prompting from the surveyor, the consent, physician order and care plan were implemented on 9/22/22. 4. [...]
  2. F
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 6, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ten of ten Residents (Residents 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 222) were assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered position) prior to installation and had no consent (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of side rail use), physician order, indication for use, and care plans prior to the use of side rails when: 1. Resident 7 had four bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the four bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; obtain consent, physician order and care plan prior to the use of the four bed rails. 2. [...]
  3. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and/or prepared in accordance with professional standards for food services safety when: 1. Food products stored in the dry storage area and refrigerator contained food items that were not labeled and dated and discarded on or before the expiration dates. 2. Shelled eggs prepared for residents were not pasteurized eggs. 3. Kitchen staff did not follow the facility's policy for Cool Down. These failures placed residents at risk for foodborne illness and food contamination.
  4. D
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    F604 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 6, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 20) was free from physical restraints when Resident 20 had a self-releasing seat belt with alarm and the initial physical restraint evaluation had not been performed to determine the need for the seat belt. This failure resulted in Resident 20 to be unnecessarily restrained and kept her from getting up or moving freely due to the self-releasing seat belt.
  5. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 6, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurses have the competencies necessary to meet the needs of the residents for ten of ten sampled residents (Residents 1, 4, 5, 7, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 222) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 and Director of Staff Development DSD/IP did not have training and competencies on the proper use of bed rails when: 1. Resident 7 had four bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the four bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; obtain consent, physician order and care plan prior to the use of the four bed rails. 2. Resident 16 had two bed rails raised. Prior to the use of the two bed rails, staff did not conduct an entrapment risk assessment; obtain consent, physician order and care plan prior to the use of the two bed rails. 3. Resident 15 had two bed rails raised. [...]
  6. D
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    F801 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 20, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Services Supervisor (DS) possessed the appropriate competencies and skills set to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services department in accordance with the DS job description when: 1. The DS did not provide the necessary oversight of food safety, sanitation, and storage in the kitchen: 1a. Dietary staff were not implementing or accurately documenting safe food cool down process. 1b. Dietary staff did not label food and did not dispose expired food. 1c. The DS did not have the required certification or education to meet the needs of the DS position. [...]

Fire safety inspections

12 fire safety citations on file: 5 on September 5, 2025, 6 on June 21, 2024, 1 on September 23, 2022.

Every fire safety citation12 citations
  1. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · September 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Ensure that personnel concerned with handling of medical gases and cylinders are trained on the risk.
    K 926 · September 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · September 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. D
    Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
    K 920 · September 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. C
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · September 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. E
    Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
    K 351 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
    K 346 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. D
    To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
    K 761 · June 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. D
    Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
    K 223 · September 23, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.454.523.86
Registered nurses0.480.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.884.093.42
Nurse aides2.91
Licensed practical nurses1.06
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)22.2%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.52 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.68 on weekdays and 3.88 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.29 in April to June 2025 to 4.45 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.450.484.683.88 0.0%1 of 9029
Oct to Dec 20254.650.494.854.12 0.0%1 of 9227
Jul to Sep 20254.350.404.533.87 0.0%0 of 9229
Apr to Jun 20254.290.424.493.80 0.0%0 of 9129
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
35.110.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.91.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.61.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
34.39.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.44.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.012.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
17.822.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.311.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
2.02.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.31.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for New Bethany Skilled Nursing's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (46.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

46.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 54 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.1% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 34 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

28.6% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 28 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.9% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 38 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 15 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: NEW BETHANY.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Fonesca, Lucinda5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual100%02/11/2021
Fonseca, JuliaCorporate directorIndividual02/11/2021
Moises, AcaciaCorporate directorIndividual02/11/2021
D'cruz, AstridaCorporate officerIndividual02/11/2021
Fonesca, LucindaCorporate officerIndividual02/11/2021
Petrovich, HelenCorporate officerIndividual02/11/2021
Fonesca, LucindaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/11/2021

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  2. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on September 5, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on December 3, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.88 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Los Banos

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is New Bethany Skilled Nursing's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates New Bethany Skilled Nursing 2 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did New Bethany Skilled Nursing get at its last inspection?
15 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on September 5, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has New Bethany Skilled Nursing been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does New Bethany Skilled Nursing accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns New Bethany Skilled Nursing?
CMS lists 7 owners and managers. Legal business name: NEW BETHANY.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection