Home / California / Ontario
Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP
933 E Deodar St., Ontario, CA 91764 · San Bernardino County · (909) 985-2731
59 certified beds, about 54 residents a day · For profit - Partnership · Medicare and Medicaid since 1971
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 055693 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 5, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).
None of its 29 health citations since May 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.20 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.44 of those hours.
CMS links it to Corporate Interface Services, an affiliated group of 40 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 29 health citations on file.
December 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 (a highly infectious disease caused by a respiratory virus) when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) failed to wear the required eye protection before entering a COVID-19 isolation room on December 19, 2025. 2. Certified Nurse Assistant 2 (CNA 2) did not ensure that the isolation room door was closed when exiting a COVID-19 isolation room on December 19, 2025. These failures had the potential to cause harm to the 54 residents residing within the facility by causing cross contamination of the environment and increasing the risk of exposure and spread of the COVID-19 virus.1. [...]
June 5, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, label, and maintain food and food storage areas in a sanitary manner, as required by professional food service standards when: 1. One bunch of cilantro, which was turning black, was found inside of a plastic bag at the bottom shelf of the refrigerator. 2. One produce storage box that contained whole heads of lettuce was found with debris (dirt). 3. A box, containing fully cooked boneless pork ribs, dated May 9, 2025, was found open with its internal plastic liner unsealed and with freezer burn (food got too dry and frosty due to being exposed to air in the freezer for too long). 4. One 12 quart (qt- unit of measurement) clear plastic container labeled Noodles Pasta, did not have a Use by: date was found inside the dry storage room. [...]
- D Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accommodation of communication needs to one resident reviewed for language (Resident 24) when Resident 24's communication board was in a different language than the one spoken by Resident 24. This failure had the potential to delay Resident 24's request and did not provide Resident 24 with a method to communicate with facility staff.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program (proper methods used to stop the spread of germs and protect residents, staff and visitors from getting sick) for one of three residents reviewed for infection control (Resident 17) when Resident 17's suction tubing (flexible tube, used to remove bodily fluids and debris from one's airway or surgical site) was left open to air and without a dated label. This failure had the potential to result in cross-contamination (germs or bacteria from one dirty surface or item get spread to something clean, which can make people sick) causing preventable infection to Resident 17.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible for three of three residents reviewed for environment (Residents 36, 54, and 159) when Residents 36, 54, and 159's call lights were found inaccessible to the three residents. This failure had the potential to result in leaving Residents 36, 54, 159 unable to use the call light system to call for any assistance the residents may require.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.) of livable space per resident for nine of 19 resident rooms (Rooms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34) when Rooms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34 measured less than 80 square feet per resident. This failure had the potential for the residents housed in Rooms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34 to not have the ability to move about freely if the square footage limited their personal space.
March 3, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate treatment and assessment of bowel elimination for one of four sample residents (Resident 1) when record indicated resident 1 has not had bowel movement (BM) from February 7, 2025, through February 11, 2025. This failure potentially resulted in Resident 1 readmission to the hospital with abnormal vital sign.
September 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide care and services for residents and ensure call lights are answered in a timely manner for one of three sampled residents (Residents 1). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1) when Resident 1 ' s requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly.
December 2, 2022Standard inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitization and food handling practices when: 1. Raw thawing beef and bacon was stored on the same shelf as raw thawing chicken breast. 2. The dishwashing machine was not sanitizing the dishes. 3. The ice machine was found to have brown residue under the ice dispenser and on the ceiling of the ice storage bin. 4. A floor repair was unfinished, and the surface was not easily cleanable. These failures had the potential to expose 51 highly susceptible residents who received food from the kitchen to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverage) due to cross contamination (the transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food).
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the advance directives (written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated), were completed in accordance with the facility policy for one of six residents (Resident 27) reviewed for advance directives. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for Resident 27 related to advance directives, or for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what the resident wanted.
- D Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week. This failure had the potential to prevent 54 residents from reaching their highest practicable level of well-being when oversite by an RN was not utilized by the facility.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy recommendations identified from the Medication Regimen Review (MRR- thorough evaluation of a resident's medication regimen in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities) were followed up in accordance with federal regulations and facility policy, for two of five residents (Residents 3 and 26) reviewed for unnecessary medications when: 1. The pharmacy recommendation, from May 12, 2022, for Resident 3's use of Seroquel (medication to treat mood disorders), was not communicated to the physician. 2. The pharmacy recommendation, from May 12, 2022, for Resident 26's use of Abilify (medication for mood disorders), was not communicated to the physician. [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medications when one of three medication carts (Treatment Cart) was found to be unlocked while unattended by a licensed nurse. This failure had the potential for medications to be accessed and dispersed by an unauthorized person, in a vulnerable population of 54 residents.
- D Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and utilize a planned vegetarian menu for one of 51 residents(Resident 45). This failure has the potential to adversely affect Resident 45's nutritional status.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of a completed Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-voluntary form used statewide as a physician order that converts a resident's wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment and resuscitation into physician orders.) was filed in the medical record of one of six residents (Resident 209) reviewed for advance directive (written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated), in accordance with the facility procedure. This failure has the potential to place Resident 209 at risk of unmet care needs in the event of an emergency requiring lifesaving interventions due to the POLST not being accessible.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program to help prevent the spread of infections and other infectious diseases when four staff members did not complete the screening log (a log used to screen staff and visitors for COVID-19 [A highly infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus] symptoms and exposure upon entering the facility) on multiple occasions. This failure had the potential to place 54 residents residing within the facility to be at risk of exposure to COVID-19 virus.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft.- unit of measurement) of livable space per resident for nine of 19 resident rooms (rooms 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34). This failure had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety and prevent the residents from maintaining their highest level of well-being by limiting the movements of these residents in their rooms.
May 31, 2019Standard inspection · 12 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 14 sampled residents with a dignified experience when he was told to have a bowel movement in the shower, after he tried to get up from the shower chair and walk to the bathroom. This failure led to Resident 402 feeling embarrassed and for the experience to not be homelike.
- D Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 403) had a Physicians order for padded side rails for a resident with a history of seizures. This had the potential to result in Resident 403 being restrained without his consent.
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - facility assessment tool) assessments, for two of 14 residents reviewed for (Residents 27 and 49), when: 1. For Resident 27, the MDS assessment, dated April 15, 2019, was not coded for fall since admission when the resident had an actual fall on April 13, 2019. 2. For Resident 49, the MDS assessment was inaccurately coded for discharged status. These failed practices had the potential to result in unmet care needs for Resident 27 and 49, which can potentially jeopardize their health and safety.
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an individualized comprehensive care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was initiated, and implemented for two of 14 residents (Residents 5 and 24), when: 1. Resident 5 had an unwitnessed fall on January 11,2019, and the care plan was not updated until March 8, 2019. 2. Resident 24's medical record did not have documentation of a revised comprehensive care plan after Resident 24 experienced an unwitnessed fall on April 23, 2019. These failures had the potential to cause inadequate management and interventions by placing Resident's health and safety to at risk in order to prevent a recurrence.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician order for one of 14 sample residents (Resident 9) was carried out timely. This failure had the potential of not meeting the care and needs of the resident.
- D Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the post dialysis assessment was completed for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 149). This failure had the potential of not meeting the needs of the resident after dialysis treatment.
- D Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility's nursing staff failed to demonstrate competency in administration of medication when a Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) administered Symbicort inhaler medication (medication to improve lung function) to Resident 399 without instructing the resident to rinse her mouth with water. This failure had the potential to cause harm by placing Resident 399 at an increased risk of developing an infection in the mouth and throat due to not rinsing.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. One of two of the sanitation buckets for wiping down food contact surfaces had the improper concentration of sanitizer. 2. One tray and one plastic bin in the dry storage did not have a cleanable surface when it was lined with parchment paper (baking paper treated or coated to make them non-stick) and a paper towel and food was stored on top. These failures had the potential to lead to harmful bacteria and cross contamination that could lead to foodborne illness for a medically compromised population of 50 residents who received food from the kitchen.
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation for four of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plan, post fall assessment, and consent forms (Residents 12, 24, and 40) when: 1. Resident 24's medical record did not have documentation of a post fall assessment after Resident 24 experienced an unwitnessed fall on April 23, 2019. 2. Resident 12 did not have a complete and accurate documentation for the influenza (flu a contagious respiratory virus) and pneumonia (is an infection in one or both of the lungs) consent forms. 3. Resident 40 did not have a complete and accurate documentation for the influenza and pneumonia consent forms. These failures had the potential to cause inadequate management of Residents 12, 24, and 40's medical condition, placing their health and safety at risk.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the infection control and prevention program when two staff (a certified nurse aide - CNA and a housekeeper - HSK) did not perform hand washing. This failure had the potential of transmission of infection to vulnerable residents whose conditions were already compromised.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to have documentation of screening and eligibility for one of 14 sampled residents (Resident 403) to receive the influenza (flu) vaccine (protect against infection by the flu virus). This failure had the potential for Resident 403 to not be protected from the influenza virus by not being provided the opportunity to receive the vaccine if he chose to receive it.
- B Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to meet the required square footage (sq./ft.) for nine rooms (Rooms 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33, and 34.) This failure had the potential to limit freedom of movement and affect the health and safety of nine residents who resides in these rooms.
Fire safety inspections
12 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 5, 2025, 3 on December 2, 2022, 6 on May 31, 2019.
Every fire safety citation12 citations
- F Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- D Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- D Provide emergency officials' contact information.
- D Have posted "No-smoking" signs in areas where smoking is not permitted or ashtrays provided where smoking was allowed.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- D Establish staff and initial training requirements.
- D Implement emergency and standby power systems.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- D Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | California | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.20 | 4.52 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.84 | 4.09 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.49 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.27 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 36.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 38.1% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | not reported |
CMS expects 4.70 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.34 on weekdays and 3.84 on weekends, 12% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.20 in April to June 2025 to 4.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.20 | 0.44 | 4.34 | 3.84 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 54 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.07 | 0.44 | 4.20 | 3.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 56 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.20 | 0.41 | 4.39 | 3.71 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 53 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| California, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.36 | 0.59 | 4.52 | 3.97 | 2.3% | 0.5% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
Staff pay at this home
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
Official wage estimates for California
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| California, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.90 | $22.04 to $26.35 | 110,060 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $38.34 | $35.98 to $45.06 | 82,850 |
| Registered nurses | $67.44 | $58.87 to $83.25 | 338,940 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | California | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 11.1 | 10.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.0 | 9.8 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.2 | 12.0 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.6 | 22.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 12.3 | 11.2 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: ONTARIO GROVE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP. CMS links this home to Corporate Interface Services, a group of 40 nursing homes averaging 2.5 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate Interface Services LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 03/18/2024 | |
| Rockport Administrative Services, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 10/31/2014 | |
| Bartolome, Nenita | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Thiagarajan, Deepak | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2025 | |
| Ontario Grove Wellness Gp, LLC | General partnership interest | Organization | 08/01/2014 | |
| Rechnitz, Shlomo | Limited partnership interest | Individual | 08/01/2014 | |
| Corporate Interface Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2025 | |
| Ontario Grove-Let LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2025 | |
| Rockport Administrative Services, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 05/02/2025 | |
| Bartolome, Nenita | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/16/2024 | |
| Thiagarajan, Deepak | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 23, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 2, 2022: "Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on June 5, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.84 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Las Colinas Post Acute Ontario, 0.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Upland Rehabilitation and Care Center Upland, 0.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- Heritage Park Nursing Center Upland, 1 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Villa Mesa Care Center Upland, 1.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Community Extended Care Hospital of Montclair Montclair, 2.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- Ontario Healthcare Center Ontario, 3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 23 citations
- Montclair Manor Care Center Montclair, 3.2 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 27 citations
- Rancho Mesa Care Center Alta Loma, 3.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 29 citations
California contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: California Department of Public Health, Center for Health Care Quality, Licensing and Certification Program, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-800-231-4024. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Cal Health Find, where California publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 5, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
- Has Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Ontario Grove Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LP?
- CMS lists 11 owners and managers, and links the home to Corporate Interface Services. Legal business name: ONTARIO GROVE HEALTHCARE & WELLNESS CENTRE, LP.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.