Find a nursing home

Home / California / Upland

Heritage Park Nursing Center

275 Garnet Way, Upland, CA 91786 · San Bernardino County · (909) 949-4887

70 certified beds, about 67 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1992

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 555514 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on June 19, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the California average is 15.6, the national average 9.2).

Of 21 health citations since November 2022, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.79 hours per resident per day, against 4.52 across California and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.38 of those hours.

42.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (California average 36.7%).

CMS links it to Generations Healthcare, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
16D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 13, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect against physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) forcefully sat Resident 1 in the wheelchair by Resident 1's pants, then pushed the wheelchair into the room and closed the door behind Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause physical injury, emotional distress, and a decline in Resident 1's sense of safety and well being.
June 19, 2025Standard inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    F605 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 11, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy for Psychotropic (drugs that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) Medication Use was implemented for one of two residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to place Resident 38 at risk of staff not identifying the effectiveness of the psychotropic medication and missing potential side effects placing Resident 38 at risk for adverse health outcomes.
  2. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their medication administration policies and procedures when: 1. A Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) administered Metoprolol (medication used to lower blood pressure) Extended Release (ER- type of medications designed to be swallowed whole to allow the medication to work gradually over time) crushed to Resident 34. 2. The controlled drug inventory (when a nurse signs verifying that the nurses performed controlled medication counts during shift change- system in place used to prevent discrepancies in narcotic medication counts) had missing signatures on multiple shifts for two carts on Unit 2. [...]
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 7, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when a License Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not wear PPE (Personal Protective Equipment, such as gloves and gowns) as required under EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions, used to prevent the spread of resistant infections) while providing treatment to a resident in EBP isolation (Resident 117). This failure had the potential to spread infectious disease (disease caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites) to another 65 vulnerable residents and staff in the facility.
May 23, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure for investigating an allegation of suspected physical abuse for one of three sampled resident (Resident 3), when the facility did initiate an investigation for the incident within specified timeframes after Resident 3 reported an alleged abuse by another resident to the Administrator on April 2, 2025. This failure has the potential to jeopardize Resident ' s 3 health, safety, and well-being at risk and the other vulnerable population of 69 residents.
April 17, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 2, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards (refer to elements of the resident environment that have the potential to cause injury or illness) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 ingested a cleaning solution left by a housekeeper (HSK 1) in Resident 1's room on March 2, 2025. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to be transferred to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for higher level of care and suffered from additional health issues.
May 16, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) information for 3 (Residents #2, #26, and #61) of 6 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements.
  2. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) for 1 (Resident #51) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Specifically, Resident #59 had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and major depressive disorder; however, the resident's Level I PASRR screening indicated the resident did not have a mental disorder.
April 8, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 19, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged sexual abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) by another resident to the local, state and agencies. This failure had the potential to place a clinically compromised resident (Resident 2)'s health, safety and well-being at risk.
February 27, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 17, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure immediate measures were put into place to provide protections to one of three sampled resident (Resident 3) when a License Vocational Nurse (LVN) and a Program Counselor (PC) were not suspended immediately after an alleged abuse to Resident 3 was reported on February 14, 2024. This failure had the potential for further abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment in a vulnerable population of 68 residents as the alleged perpetrators, LVN and PC, continued to have access to the alleged victim, Resident 3, and to other residents while the investigation was still in process.
February 10, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 26, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) who eloped (leaving a safe area without authorization and/or appropriate supervision from the facility) was assessed to prevent or/and to minimize the risk for recurrence of elopement. This failure had the potential to cause a delay in identifying care and support needs which could place Resident 3 at risk for recurrence of elopement and at risk for injuries related to elopement.
January 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 12, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their closed observation protocol (a protocol for observing residents who are at risk for harm every fifteen minutes) documentation was complete in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) for one resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 returned to the facility after he eloped on January 7, 2024. This failure has the potential to result in Resident 1 to be at risk for further elopement without supervision of his whereabouts which could increase Resident 1 ' s risk for harm.
November 4, 2022Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: a. Stacked cups were stored wet. b. The ice machine had black build up in the ice chute (where ice exits the area where its formed and drops into the ice bin). These failures had the potential for bacteria to growth and cause foodborne illness in a highly susceptible population of 57 residents who received food from the kitchen.
  2. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure information whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) was displayed prominently in the medical record for three of six residents (Residents 156, 33, and 46) reviewed for advance directives. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of treatment for life sustaining measures to be rendered against what Residents 156, 33, and 46 wanted.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for two of six residents (Resident 4 and Resident 7) reviewed for urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) when: 1. Resident 4's urinary catheter bag was not covered by a privacy bag (bag used to cover catheter bag). 2. Resident 7's urinary catheter bag was not covered by a privacy bag. These failures had the potential to compromise Residents 4 and 7's dignity and violate their rights to privacy, which could cause psychosocial harm and lead to low self-esteem, feeling irritated, sad, and anxious.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    F688 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their splint (device applied to prevent or reduce contractures) application policy and procedure was implemented for one resident (Resident 23) reviewed for range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint) when Resident 23's multiple splint application refusals were not addressed from December 2021 through October 2022. This failure placed Resident 23 at risk of further deformities and having decline in ROM.
  5. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety policies and procedures were implemented for one of three residents (Resident 29) reviewed for accidents when the facility did not provide Resident 29 floor mats as per physician's orders. These failures have the potential to increase the risk of further falls, injuries, and unmet care needs, which could threaten the welfare, health, and safety of Resident 29.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe oxygen administration were provided in accordance with the physician's orders and facility's policies and procedures for one resident (Resident 156) reviewed for respiratory care when Residents 156's nasal cannula (a device which delivers oxygen utilizing a tube) was not labeled. This failure had the potential to place Resident's 156 at risk for developing a respiratory infection.
  7. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure medications and medication carts (used to transport medications from resident rooms; often come equipped with locking drawers, adjustable height) were properly secured when one of six medication carts (IV [Intravenous- method of putting fluids, including drugs, into the bloodstream] medication cart) was found unlocked and unattended by a licensed nurse. These failures had the potential to compromise the security of medication for potentially unauthorized staff and resident around the area could access it in a highly vulnerable population of 64 residents.
  8. D
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly and in accordance with their policy and procedure when garbage was found on the ground by the garbage storage area . This failure had the potential for the harborage or breeding place of insects and rodents that could affect the health and safety of a highly vulnerable population of 64 residents.
  9. D
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    F888 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 16, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 virus (a highly infectious respiratory disease) and other communicable diseases when one unvaccinated staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse - LVN 2) did not wear a respirator mask (a filtering facemask used to protect the wearer from fine particles including viruses) on November 3, 2022. This failure had the potential to cause harm to the 64 residents residing within the facility by causing cross contamination of the environment and increasing the risk of exposure and spread of the COVID-19 virus.

Fire safety inspections

28 fire safety citations on file: 13 on June 19, 2025, 9 on May 16, 2024, 6 on November 4, 2022.

Every fire safety citation28 citations
  1. F
    Address patient/client population and determine types of services needed.
    E 7 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. F
    Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.
    K 912 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. E
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.
    K 223 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. D
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. D
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. C
    Develop and maintain an Emergency Preparedness Program (EP).
    E 4 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. C
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. C
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. C
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · June 19, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. D
    Conduct risk assessment and an All-Hazards approach.
    E 6 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. D
    Include a process for Emergency Preparedness collaboration.
    E 9 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. D
    Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
    E 15 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  20. D
    Use approved construction type or materials.
    K 161 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  21. D
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  22. D
    Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
    K 355 · May 16, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  23. E
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  24. D
    Address subsistence needs for staff and patients.
    E 15 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  25. D
    Establish staff and initial training requirements.
    E 37 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  26. D
    Conduct testing and exercise requirements.
    E 39 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  27. D
    Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
    K 343 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  28. C
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · November 4, 2022 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.794.523.86
Registered nurses0.380.670.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.294.093.42
Nurse aides2.16
Licensed practical nurses1.25
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)42.0%36.7%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover0.0%38.1%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 2.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.99 on weekdays and 3.29 on weekends, 18% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.10 in April to June 2025 to 3.79 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.790.383.993.29 0.0%0 of 9067
Oct to Dec 20253.800.403.993.34 0.0%0 of 9266
Jul to Sep 20254.010.414.233.45 0.0%0 of 9266
Apr to Jun 20254.100.404.333.52 0.0%0 of 9165
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
California, Jan to Mar 20264.360.594.523.972.3%0.5% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for California

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
California, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.90$22.04 to $26.35110,060
LPNs and LVNs$38.34$35.98 to $45.0682,850
Registered nurses$67.44$58.87 to $83.25338,940
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Heritage Park Nursing Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeCaliforniaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.210.313.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.80.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.41.63.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.41.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.49.814.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.04.34.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.012.015.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
22.922.923.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.411.212.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.62.31.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.01.61.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Heritage Park Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

62.2% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · California: 301 better, 190 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 144 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · California: 10 better, 22 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 158 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

7.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · California: 8 better, 48 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 94 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

61.5% this home

Median of homes: California59.2% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 96 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: California0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.1% this home

Median of homes: California0.6% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 133 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

100.0% this home

Median of homes: California96.2% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 67 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: GHC OF UPLAND SNF, LLC. CMS links this home to Generations Healthcare, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bmo Bank, N.a.5% or greater security interestOrganization09/20/2023
Mastrocola, LoisW-2 managing employeeIndividual09/20/2023
Mastrocola, LoisCorporate directorIndividual02/01/1998
Olds, ThomasCorporate directorIndividual02/01/1998
Mastrocola, LoisCorporate officerIndividual02/01/1998
Olds, ThomasCorporate officerIndividual02/01/1998

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on May 13, 2026: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on May 16, 2024: "Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on June 19, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
  5. Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.29 hours per resident per day, below the California average of 4.09.

Other nursing homes nearby

Assisted living in Upland

Licensed assisted living homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its California inspection record.

Assisted living in California

California contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in California. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Heritage Park Nursing Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Heritage Park Nursing Center 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Heritage Park Nursing Center get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 19, 2025. The California average is 15.6.
Has Heritage Park Nursing Center been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Heritage Park Nursing Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Heritage Park Nursing Center?
CMS lists 6 owners and managers, and links the home to Generations Healthcare. Legal business name: GHC OF UPLAND SNF, LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection