Park Manor of South Belt
11902 Resource Pkwy, Houston, TX 77089 · Harris County · (281) 922-6802
120 certified beds, about 102 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2000
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
2 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675819 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 27, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 9 health citations since March 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.22 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.59 of those hours.
45.4% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Hmg Healthcare, an affiliated group of 31 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
203/23
005/24
506/25
212/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
5D
4E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
December 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed in accordance with state and local laws, to store all drugs and biological in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for medications storage for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for medication storage. -LVN A left normal saline flushes at Resident #1's bedside. This failure placed residents at risk for infections related to contamination and safety precautions.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. -CNA C failed to thoroughly and properly clean Resident #1 during incontinent care. -CNA C failed to wear full PPE when providing incontinent care for Resident #1 on EBP. This failure placed residents at risk for cross contamination, skin irritation, discomfort, and infections.
June 27, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- E Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report findings to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident and the corrective action taken if the alleged violation was verified for 9 (Resident #39, Resident #44, Resident #79, CR #1, CR #2, CR #3, CR #4, CR #5, CR #6) of 18 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation when discrepancies were found between the MAR and narcotic reconciliation sheets for Resident #39, Resident #44, Resident #79, CR #1, CR #2, CR #3, CR #4, CR #5, and CR #6 that were not found in the facility's investigation report. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving their prescribed medications, experiencing untreated pain, and a decreased quality of life.
- E Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident and failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 9 (Resident #39, Resident #44, Resident #79, CR #1, CR #2, CR #3, CR #4, CR #5, CR #6) of 18 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure the reconciliation of controlled drug sheets compared to MAR for Resident #39, Resident #44, Resident #79, CR #1, CR #2, CR #3, CR #4, CR #5, CR #6 to ensure every controlled drug that was administered and documented as administered in the MAR reflected the correct quantity on the controlled drug/disposition form. [...]
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 residents (Resident #69 and Resident #8) of 6 residents reviewed for Infection Control. -LVN B failed to follow proper hand hygiene while providing treatment to Resident #69's wounds on her lower legs. -Resident #69 had an open wound but was not on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. -The facility failed to ensure CNA D followed proper infection control, for Resident # 8 during incontinent care. CNA D failed to clean from front to back when the resident was incontinent of stool. These failures placed residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (Resident #78) of 19 residents reviewed for catheters, as evidenced by: -Resident #78 did not have a STATLOCK (catheter stabilization device) to secure Foley catheter (flexible tube inserted into bladder to drain urine). This failure placed the residents at risk of their Foley catheters getting dislodged, unwanted pain, trauma, infections, and decreasing their quality of life. Resident # 78 Record review of Resident #78's admission face sheet undated revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. [...]
- D Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted medical standards and practices and failed to maintain medical records for 2 residents (Resident #69 and Resident #11) that were accurately documented. -LVN B initialed Resident #69's treatments as been completed prior to the treatments being provided. -Resident #69 had bilateral edema that was not being charted correctly. -LVN B changed documentation after being asked about Resident #69's edema. -LVN B initialed Resident #11's treatment as been completed prior to the treatments being provided. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving care and worsening of skin conditions.
May 23, 2024Standard inspection · 0 citations
March 3, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation --the facility stored expired food items in the dry goods storage area This failure placed residents at risk of complications from foodborne illness and compromised health status.
- D Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to act upon the recommendations of the pharmacist report of irregularities for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #307), reviewed for the Drug Regimen Review (DRR). The facility failed to review and act on, Resident #307's allergy to sertraline, reported by the pharmacist as a high priority on the DRR report, dated 2/24/23. This failure could place residents at risk from maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and could place them at risk for adverse consequences related to medication therapy.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 3 on June 27, 2025, 2 on May 23, 2024, 2 on March 3, 2023.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- E Have a fire alarm with audible and visual signals that transmits the alarm automatically to notify emergency forces in event of fire.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Ensure precautions for handling oxygen cylinders and equipment are correctly followed.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.22 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.59 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.75 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 1.88 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.75 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 45.4% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 42.1% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.87 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.41 on weekdays and 2.75 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.27 in April to June 2025 to 3.22 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.22 | 0.59 | 3.41 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 102 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.25 | 0.67 | 3.40 | 2.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 104 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.40 | 0.67 | 3.57 | 2.98 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 99 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.27 | 0.56 | 3.43 | 2.85 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.9 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.1 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.6 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Hmg Healthcare, a group of 31 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stramecki, Anthony | Corporate director | Individual | 11/01/2016 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/01/2012 | |
| Cibc Bank USA | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Hm Group LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/06/2001 | |
| Hmg Healthcare LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/06/2001 | |
| Hmg Long Term Care, LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2012 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Cypress Station LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 02/01/2012 | |
| Hmg Park Manor of Southbelt, L.L.C. | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Cook, Tina | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/20/2001 | |
| Culp, Roland | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Holt, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Murrell, Edward | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Pico, Ana | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Rollo, Jeffery | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Stramecki, Anthony | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Vratis, Kacey | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Way, George | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Cibc Bank USA | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Hmg Services LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Zions Bancorporation | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/01/2018 | |
| Balsamo, Krystal | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Cook, Tina | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/20/2001 | |
| Culp, Roland | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Daspit, Laurence | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Dohn, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/27/2019 | |
| Eisenberg, Michael | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/01/2018 | |
| Holt, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/03/2023 | |
| Pico, Ana | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Prince, Derek | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2012 | |
| Reinarz, Christian | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/13/2024 | |
| Stanbridge, Norma | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/29/2014 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 12, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 27, 2025: "Respond appropriately to all alleged violations."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on June 27, 2025: "Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.75 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Magnolia Crossing Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente Houston, 0.8 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- The Suites Pasadena Pasadena, 4.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- Hca Houston Healthcare Southeast Pasadena, 4.4 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 5 citations
- Oasis at Pearland Pearland, 4.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Ignite Medical Resort Webster, LLC Webster, 4.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 12 citations
- Pasadena Post Acute Pasadena, 5.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente Pasadena, 5.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- Avir at Pasadena Pasadena, 5.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 13 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Park Manor of South Belt's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Park Manor of South Belt 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Park Manor of South Belt get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 27, 2025. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Park Manor of South Belt been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Park Manor of South Belt accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Park Manor of South Belt?
- CMS lists 38 owners and managers, and links the home to Hmg Healthcare. Legal business name: WINNIE-STOWELL HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.