Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC
200 Medical Drive, Lagrange, GA 30240 · Troup County · (706) 845-3256
150 certified beds, about 142 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1980
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 115277 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 21, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Georgia average is 5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 9 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.56 across Georgia and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.36 of those hours.
46.0% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Georgia average 46.0%).
CMS links it to The Rosenberg Family, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
112/22
307/24
511/25
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 9 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
0E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
November 21, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to keep track of when to discard refrigerated food items through labeling and dating the items. This failure had the potential to negatively impact (through foodborne illness) 139 residents residing at the facility by exposing them to food items that may have spoiled.
- D Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for code status matched the residents' Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and wishes for two of four residents (Resident (R) 57 and R49) reviewed for advance directives out of 29 sampled residents. This failure increased the likelihood of causing severe harm or death if CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) was performed or withheld against a resident's wishes.
- D Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one of four residents (Resident (R) 49) reviewed for abuse and neglect out of 29 sampled residents. The facility neglected the resident when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1 removed the call light out of the resident's reach. CNA 1 intimidated R49 when she stood over her and told the resident not to use the call light again. These failures had the potential to cause unmet care needs.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure abuse and neglect by staff was reported timely to the Director of Nursing (DON) and to the State Survey Agency (SSA) when a resident's call light was placed out of reach, and told not to use the call light anymore by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 for one of four residents (Resident (R) 49) reviewed for neglect out of 29 sampled residents.
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure another method to call for assistance was provided when a resident's call light malfunctioned and was removed from the resident's wall for one of four residents (Resident (R) 157) reviewed for call lights out of 29 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in residents' care needs not being met by nursing staff.
July 25, 2024Standard inspection · 3 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen cooler were properly stored and labeled with open or discard dates, failed to dispose of expired foods in a resident nourishment pantry, and failed to ensure an ice maker was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. The deficient practices placed the 106 residents (R) who consumed an oral diet from the kitchen at risk for avoidable foodborne illness.
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled Quality of Care and Quality of Life-Accommodation of Needs, the facility failed to provide dining assistance to one of 13 residents (R) (R38) selected for dining observation. The deficient practice placed R38 at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from chemical hazards for one of four residents (R) (R91) reviewed for accident hazards. This deficient practice placed R91 at risk for avoidable chemical incidents, injuries, and a diminished quality of life.
December 15, 2022Standard inspection · 1 citation
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directive, the facility failed to update the care plan for one of five sampled Residents (R#17) related to code status.
Fire safety inspections
5 fire safety citations on file: 5 on November 21, 2025.
Every fire safety citation5 citations
- E Have properly installed electrical wiring and gas equipment.
- D Have horizontal exits used in accordance with safety requirements.
- D Have an enclosure around a vertical opening shaft.
- D Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- D Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.60 | 3.56 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.36 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.09 | 3.10 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.10 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.14 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 46.0% | 46.0% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 27.8% | 44.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.81 on weekdays and 3.09 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 5.6% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.79 in April to June 2025 to 3.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.60 | 0.36 | 3.81 | 3.09 | 5.6% | 0 of 90 | 142 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.75 | 0.40 | 4.02 | 3.06 | 0.4% | 0 of 92 | 138 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.67 | 0.50 | 3.85 | 3.24 | 3.6% | 0 of 92 | 130 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.79 | 0.61 | 4.02 | 3.19 | 5.6% | 0 of 91 | 117 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Georgia, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.50 | 0.46 | 3.68 | 3.03 | 3.3% | 0.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Georgia | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.6 | 15.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 7.0 | 15.2 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.0 | 5.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 26.3 | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.2 | 25.0 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 11.5 | 11.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PEACHTREE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC. CMS links this home to The Rosenberg Family, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peach 2 Ga LLC | Direct ownership interest | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Az 22 Tr | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Za 22 | Indirect ownership interest | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | Indirect ownership interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| 200 Peachtree Ga LLC | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Moshe | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| 200 Peachtree Ga LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Moshe | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | 5% or greater security interest | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Bou Alwan, Melhim | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Ramey, Donna | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Az 22 Tr | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Za 22 | Trustee of the SNF | Organization | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | Trustee of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| 200 Peachtree Ga LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/21/2025 | |
| Peach 2 Ga LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 01/21/2025 | |
| Bou Alwan, Melhim | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Ramey, Donna | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/21/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Avraham | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Jonathan | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Moshe | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/21/2025 | |
| Rosenberg, Zvi | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/08/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive."
- How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on November 21, 2025: "Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.09 hours per resident per day, below the Georgia average of 3.10.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Lagrange Trails of Journey LLC Lagrange, 1.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 18 citations
- Green Acres Care Center LLC Lagrange, 4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 13 citations
- Diversicare of Lanett Lanett, 14.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 4 citations
- Eamc Lanier Nursing Home Valley, 15.7 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Pruitthealth - Franklin Franklin, 16.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 9 citations
- Pruitthealth - Greenville Greenville, 18.9 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 8 citations
- Roanoke Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center Roanoke, 20.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Traylor Retirement Community Roanoke, 20.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 10 citations
Georgia contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Georgia. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Georgia Department of Community Health, Healthcare Facility Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Georgia Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 1-866-552-4464. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: GaMap2Care, Find a Facility, where Georgia publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on November 21, 2025. The Georgia average is 5.
- Has Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Peachtree Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC?
- CMS lists 29 owners and managers, and links the home to The Rosenberg Family. Legal business name: PEACHTREE NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.