Presbyterian Village, Inc
500 Brookside Drive, Little Rock, AR 72205 · Pulaski County · (501) 225-1615
70 certified beds, about 59 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2010
CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
2 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045436 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on June 4, 2026, inspectors cited 0 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).
None of its 7 health citations since February 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.51 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.22 of those hours.
32.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
502/24
204/25
006/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 7 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
1D
5E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
June 4, 2026Standard inspection · 0 citations
April 17, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, facility policy review, and document review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene while feeding dependent residents to prevent the spread of infection and cross contamination. This failed practice had the potential to spread infection to 4 residents (Resident #18, #21, #32, and #37) of 4 sampled residents observed for dependent dining.
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for applying compression stockings/leg wraps was being followed for 1 (Resident #40) of 1 resident reviewed requiring compression stocking or legs wraps.
February 9, 2024Standard inspection · 5 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility kitchen and food storage areas were maintained in a clean, sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 65 residents receiving their meals from the facility kitchen.
- E Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a posting of a list of names, addresses (mailing and email), and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups in a form and manner accessible and understandable to residents and resident representatives. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 13 Residents in the secured unit.
- E Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards by making sure lift pads/slings were free of fraying, rips, or tears to prevent accidents, or falls. This failed practice had the potential to affect 1(Residents #43) requiring mechanical lift transfer, with the potential to affect 4 sampled (Residents #3, #16, #31, and #43) requiring lift assistance on the 3rd floor. The facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate transfer devices to aid in the transfer of Resident #40 in the transfer from the recliner to the wheelchair. This failed practice had the potential to affect 7 sampled (Resident #7, #8, #220, #53, #28, #59, #21) of 12 on the 2nd floor who required assistance for transfers without a lift.
- E Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a leg strap was in place to prevent injury or trauma from pulling on the catheter tubing. This failed practice affected 1 (Resident #43) and had the potential to affect 1 (Resident #43) on 3rd floor requiring a foley or indwelling catheter. The facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #7) of 2 sampled (Residents #7, #55) received the appropriate care for an indwelling catheter. This failed practice had the potential to cause UTI (urinary tract infection), trauma and or damage to the bladder.
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff used proper hand hygiene to prevent the potential for cross contamination for 3 (Residents #5, #21, and #46) sampled residents. The facility also failed to implement a Legionella plan to prevent the potential for waterborne pathogens, and the facility failed to flush capped off water valves to reduce the potential for waterborne pathogens. This failed practice had the potential to affect all 63 residents.
Fire safety inspections
7 fire safety citations on file: 2 on June 4, 2026, 2 on April 17, 2025, 3 on February 9, 2024.
Every fire safety citation7 citations
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- F Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- F Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Properly provide smoke detection systems in areas open to corridors.
- F Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.51 | 4.02 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.22 | 0.41 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.83 | 3.45 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.51 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.78 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 32.9% | 49.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 44.8% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.79 on weekdays and 4.83 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 2.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.76 in April to June 2025 to 5.51 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.51 | 0.22 | 5.79 | 4.83 | 2.1% | 0 of 90 | 59 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 6.16 | 0.26 | 6.46 | 5.37 | 1.6% | 0 of 92 | 61 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.54 | 0.22 | 5.86 | 4.72 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 66 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.76 | 0.25 | 6.07 | 4.97 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 63 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Arkansas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.05 | 0.40 | 4.28 | 3.47 | 2.0% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Arkansas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.9 | 9.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.7 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.7 | 10.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 18.1 | 10.9 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 23.6 | 24.1 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.1 | 12.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE INC..
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mendiratta, Priya | Contracted managing employee | Individual | 01/01/2019 | |
| Burnett, Dana | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 08/07/2023 | |
| Lewellen, Steven | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/14/2022 | |
| Marsh, Chris | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 03/20/2018 | |
| Berry, Marian | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Compton, Mary | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2019 | |
| Craig, Mike | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2012 | |
| Estes, Maggie | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Garlington, Shirley | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Harrison, Fred | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2019 | |
| Maxey, Joanne | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2024 | |
| Murphy, Cathy | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2012 | |
| Parke, Paula | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Pettit, Allen | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2019 | |
| Roberts, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2021 | |
| Rogers, Tony | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2023 | |
| Roy, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 07/26/2010 | |
| Secrest, Alisa | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Smith, Roy | Corporate director | Individual | 05/01/2022 | |
| Marsh, Chris | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/01/2007 | |
| Lewellen, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2025 | |
| Mendiratta, Priya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/14/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on April 17, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 9, 2024: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 1 problem in this area, most recently on February 9, 2024: "Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency."
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Blossoms at Breckenridge Rehab & Nursing Cente Little Rock, 0.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- The Blossoms at Woodland Hills Rehab & Nursing Cen Little Rock, 1 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 31 citations
- The Green House Cottages of Poplar Grove Little Rock, 1.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 24 citations
- Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc Little Rock, 1.6 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 16 citations
- The Springs of Barrow Little Rock, 1.8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- The Blossoms at Midtown Rehab & Nursing Center Little Rock, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- Pleasant Valley Rehabilitation and Nursing Little Rock, 2.3 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 15 citations
- Nursing and Rehabilitation Center at Good Shepherd Little Rock, 2.3 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 26 citations
Arkansas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Arkansas Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Presbyterian Village, Inc's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Presbyterian Village, Inc 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 2 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Presbyterian Village, Inc get at its last inspection?
- 0 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on June 4, 2026. The Arkansas average is 2.7.
- Has Presbyterian Village, Inc been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Presbyterian Village, Inc accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Presbyterian Village, Inc?
- CMS lists 22 owners and managers. Legal business name: PRESBYTERIAN VILLAGE INC..
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.