Find a nursing home

Home / Arkansas / Little Rock

Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc

516 So Rodney Parham Rd, Little Rock, AR 72205 · Pulaski County · (501) 224-9000

120 certified beds, about 103 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
3 of 5
Quality measures
4 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 045387 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on May 15, 2025, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Arkansas average is 2.7, the national average 9.2).

None of its 16 health citations since December 2022 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.87 hours per resident per day, against 4.02 across Arkansas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.16 of those hours.

38.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Arkansas average 49.5%).

CMS links it to Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, an affiliated group of 38 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
7D
7E
2F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
May 15, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 4 citations
  1. E
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    F814 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were disposed of properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters observed.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a catheter bag did not touch the floor for 1 (Resident #42) of 1 resident during 2 of 2 observations to prevent hospital readmissions and the risk of infection in a resident with a suprapubic catheter and history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI).
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, interview, and Centers for Disease Control guidance, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care. Specifically, the Treatment Nurse failed to wear a gown when performing wound care for 1 sampled (Resident #7) resident during 1 of 1 observation to prevent cross contamination and the risk for infection.
  4. D
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 14, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to immediately report to the Office of Long-Term Care (OLTC), an allegation of verbal and physical abuse for one (Resident #317) of one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect.
March 7, 2024Standard inspection · 9 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 refrigerators and freezers used for the storage of food items was clean and sanitary; food items stored in the refrigerator and freezers were labeled and dated to prevent potential cross-contamination and minimize the potential for food borne illness; the main facility kitchen failed to provide open dates on food items; expired food items were properly disposed of; open food items were not in sealed containers or had open dates. These failed practices had the potential to harm 99 residents. On 03/04/24 at 12:29 PM, in the 500-hall dining room, Surveyor observed 9 cups of water, 3 cups of flavored drink, and 3 cups of tea, on the dining hall cart without covers. The straws placed in the drinks were not covered. [...]
  2. E
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    F636 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for 7 (Resident #9, #23, #32, #36, #54, #77 and #97) sampled residents, and failed to complete admission MDS assessments in a timely manner for 2 (Resident #46 and #274) sampled residents. The failed practice had the potential to affect 135 residents who discharged home in the past 120 days and 124 residents admitted in the last 120 days.
  3. E
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    F641 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately to reflect that a resident was receiving anticoagulant medication for 1(Resident #17) sampled resident. The failed practice had the potential to affect 8 (Residents #68, #99, $73, #56, #31, #323, #4 and #116) sampled residents.
  4. E
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans to address one resident with a pressure ulcer for 1(Resident #99) one resident receiving a tube feeding (Resident #173) 2 residents receiving anticoagulant medications (Resident #111 and 173), and one resident receiving antianxiety and antidepressant medications (Resident #173) to ensure appropriate coordination of care. This failed practice had the potential to affect 6 residents that had pressure ulcers, 2 residents that had tube feedings, 25 residents that received anticoagulant medications, 18 residents that received antianxiety medications and 48 residents that received antidepressant medications.
  5. E
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oral care was provided for 1 (Resident #96) of 4 (Resident #11, #21, #91, #96) sampled residents with the potential to affect 23 residents on 400 hall dependent on staff for receiving oral care and the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident #116) of 2 sampled Residents (#116, #324) was cleaned in a sanitary manner to promote good body hygiene. This failed practice had the potential to cause skin breakdown, infection, and poor hygiene for 4 Residents on 500 hall who were dependent on staff for bathing assistance.
  6. E
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 9, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen tubing was dated and stored correctly for 2 (Resident #46 and #275) sampled residents to reduce the potential for respiratory complications. This failed practice had the potential to affect 11 residents that had physicians for oxygen therapy.
  7. E
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 14, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to properly store and maintain a denture cup and toothbrush in a safe, clean, sanitary manner to prevent the risk of cross contamination for 1 (Resident #96) of 4 sampled (Resident 11, R#21, R#91, R#96) with the potential to affect 23 residents on 400 hall dependent on staff for receiving oral care for personal hygiene. The facility failed to ensure that staff used proper hand hygiene while assisting Residents (#22, #30, #59, #86, #275) with meal service and while aiding with bed bath for Resident #116. The facility also failed to ensure that staff refrained from placing items used during care on the floor. This failed practice had the potential to cause the spread of infectious disease throughout the facility.
  8. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from hazards by leaving the storage room door unsecured, allowing residents access to supplies that are not for human consumption. This failed practice had the possibility of affecting 6 (Residents #43, #61, #323, #324, #326, #327) sampled residents with a Brief Interview for Mental status score (BIMS) of 13 or below out of 29 residents the reside on 500 Hall. The facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was in safe operational condition to prevent possible injury for 1 (Resident #11) of 2 sampled residents (Residents #11 and #21) with the potential to effect 6 residents on 400 hall requiring mechanical lift assistance.
  9. D
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    F803 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 8, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #11) received double portions as part of a dietary intervention to prevent weight loss and malnutrition for 1 of 3 residents receiving double portions.
February 15, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 11, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans and reassess the effectiveness of interventions to meet resident needs for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 sampled residents. This failed practice had the potential to affect 8 residents that had falls in the last 3 months.
December 9, 2022Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. F
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine in the kitchenette on the 300 Hall and the 400 Hall was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and expired food was not available for resident use in the kitchenette; and failed to ensure dietary staff washed their hands before handling clean equipment or food items to prevent potential food borne illness for residents who received meals from 1 of 1 kitchen. These failed practices had the potential to affect 102 residents who received meals from the kitchen (total census: 103) as documented on a list provided by Dietary Employee (DE) #1.
  2. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 9, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was kept locked when unattended to prevent the potential loss of medication and/or access by residents who were able to ambulate with or without assistance. This failed practice had the potential to affect 14 (Residents #4, #10, #23, #28, #32, #33, #37, #38, #39, #42, #45, #60, #66 and #67) sampled residents who were mobile and would be able to access the unsecured cart on 300/400 hall as documented on a list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/9/22 at 9:28 AM.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeArkansasUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)3.874.023.86
Registered nurses0.160.410.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.473.453.42
Nurse aides2.63
Licensed practical nurses1.07
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)38.9%49.5%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover66.7%44.8%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.48 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.03 on weekdays and 3.47 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.05 in April to June 2025 to 3.87 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20263.870.164.033.47 0.0%0 of 90103
Oct to Dec 20253.880.134.063.41 0.0%0 of 92101
Jul to Sep 20254.190.144.383.73 0.0%0 of 9294
Apr to Jun 20254.050.174.303.45 0.0%0 of 91103
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Arkansas, Jan to Mar 20264.050.404.283.472.0%0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.

Official wage estimates for Arkansas

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Arkansas, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$16.55$14.52 to $17.3417,260
LPNs and LVNs$27.22$23.82 to $29.4310,010
Registered nurses$37.95$32.04 to $43.4029,400
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeArkansasUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
8.79.513.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.70.60.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.01.21.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.53.93.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.11.31.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
6.810.114.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.14.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
5.610.915.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
31.024.123.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
10.112.512.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
1.52.01.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days
Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
0.52.11.8

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (50.7% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

50.7% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Arkansas: 7 better, 25 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 409 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.4% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Arkansas: 0 better, 3 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 392 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

10.4% this home

Worse than the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Arkansas: 0 better, 7 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 243 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

42.2% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas64.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 147 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

1.4% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 210 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

1.9% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas2.7% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 210 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

99.2% this home

Median of homes: Arkansas98.8% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 123 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: BRIARWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC. CMS links this home to Central Arkansas Nursing Centers, a group of 38 nursing homes averaging 3.6 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Morton, MichaelCorporate directorIndividual10/24/2005
Morton, MichaelCorporate officerIndividual10/24/2005
Sams, JerryCorporate officerIndividual12/12/2014
Robbins, JoanOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/10/2024
Central Arkansas Nursing Centers IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Nursing Consultants IncAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2025
Stites and Morton, Inc .Adp of the SNFOrganization12/12/2024
Morton, MichaelAdp of the SNFIndividual12/12/2024
Robbins, JoanAdp of the SNFIndividual10/20/2024
Shah, BushraAdp of the SNFIndividual12/10/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2025: "Dispose of garbage and refuse properly."
  2. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
  3. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 7, 2024: "Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months."
  4. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on May 15, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."

Other nursing homes nearby

Arkansas contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Arkansas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 3 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on May 15, 2025. The Arkansas average is 2.7.
Has Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Briarwood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc?
CMS lists 10 owners and managers, and links the home to Central Arkansas Nursing Centers. Legal business name: BRIARWOOD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection