Home / Washington / Kennewick
2702 S Ely St., Kennewick, WA 99337 · Benton County · (509) 582-5900
53 certified beds, about 50 residents a day · For profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1990
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 505372 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 10, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Washington average is 15.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 10 health citations since April 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.
CMS lists 2 fines totaling $18,220 in the last three years; the largest was $9,110, and the latest is dated December 26, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.85 hours per resident per day, against 4.36 across Washington and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.30 of those hours.
35.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Washington average 45.1%).
CMS links it to Regency Pacific Management, an affiliated group of 27 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure grievances (resident and/or resident representative concerns that can be voiced or written) conveyed during resident council meetings (a meeting of the facility's residents to communicate concerns, request improvements and keep up to date of the facility's activities/events) underwent prompt resolution through to their conclusion or appropriately updated on the grievance progress/conclusion for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 22, 348, 350, 349) reviewed for the grievances process. This failure placed residents at risk for unresolved concerns and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) had the required Level 2 referral sent when residents had a positive Level 1 PASARR and were an exempted hospital discharge in the facility for more than 30 days or had a change in condition in which a new Level 1 PASARR would require completion for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 24 and 2) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the mental health care and services appropriate to their needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1) identify and monitor individualized targeted behaviors (ITB's), and implement non-pharmacological (methods used to improve health and/or manage a residents conditions without the use of medications) interventions before prescribing a psychotropic medication (a group of drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior), 2) monitor for adverse side effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, that can lead to a decline in an individual's mental or physical condition); and 3) ensure appropriate justification for the use of a psychotropic medication for 1of 5 residents (Resident 19), reviewed for unnecessary medications. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff implemented appropriate infection control practices in the prevention of urinary tract infections (a condition were pathogens like bacteria enter through the urinary meatus [a passage or opening leading to the interior of the body] and infect the kidneys or bladder) with residents indwelling urinary catheter (IUC, a tube placed in the bladder which drains urine out into a collection bag) care for 1 of 2 resident (Resident 17), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed the residents at risk of developing an IUC associated UTI and unmet care needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for medication administration, was free from a significant medication error. Resident 1 experienced harm when Staff A (Registered Nurse) did not follow standard practices for medication administration when they administered multiple medications, belonging to another resident, to Resident 1. This resulted in Resident 1 becoming unresponsive with low blood pressure (BP) and low blood glucose (BG) levels, necessitating an emergency transfer to the emergency room and admission to the hospital. The facility corrected the deficient practice prior to the initiation of the abbreviated survey on 12/26/2024. This failure was past non-compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the situation occurred; [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely care and services and perform assessments for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed with indwelling urinary retention catheters. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had prolonged bladder pain due to urinary retention with a delay in treatment. The facility corrected the deficient practice prior to the initiation of the abbreviated survey on 09/04/2024. This failure was past non-compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the situation occurred; however, there was sufficient evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified) and was corrected by the facility on 08/29/2024 and is no longer outstanding. The facility removed the noncompliance by: - Resident 1 was immediately assessed by a LN and action was taken to address their medical needs. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary (the conditions that affect hygiene and health) environment for residents and staff for 1 of 1 shower room (SR 1), reviewed for a comfortable environment. This failure placed residents and staff at an increased risk for not feeling safe and secure with their environment.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to periodically test the sanitizing agent used to ensure proper sanitation of food preparation surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for one of one kitchen reviewed for food service safety. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors that ate from the facility's kitchen at risk for food borne illnesses and the spread of infectious diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention and control precautions were implemented by seven of ten staff (H, D, O, I, Q) observed during dining and meal tray delivery to residents, and one of two staff (J) observed during wound care dressing changes. These failures placed residents and staff at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical appropriateness for safe self-administration of medication for two of two residents (5 and 192), reviewed for medication administration. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medications for the residents and did not update the individualized care plan. Failure to complete a self-administration assessment and obtain a physician's order placed the residents at risk for medication errors and adverse medication interactions.
21 fire safety citations on file: 3 on April 10, 2025, 13 on May 13, 2024, 5 on April 21, 2023.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| December 26, 2024 | Fine | $9,110 |
| September 4, 2024 | Fine | $9,110 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Washington | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.85 | 4.36 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.30 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.98 | 3.80 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.64 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 35.5% | 45.1% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 31.3% | 45.4% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.05 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.19 on weekdays and 3.98 on weekends, 23% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.1% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.82 in April to June 2025 to 4.85 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.85 | 1.30 | 5.19 | 3.98 | 0.1% | 0 of 90 | 50 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.81 | 1.40 | 5.24 | 3.74 | 1.8% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.68 | 1.39 | 5.10 | 3.63 | 2.0% | 0 of 92 | 50 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.82 | 1.48 | 5.22 | 3.81 | 2.0% | 0 of 91 | 50 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Washington, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.21 | 0.90 | 4.44 | 3.66 | 3.7% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Washington, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $23.65 | $22.59 to $27.85 | 30,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $39.98 | $36.98 to $45.18 | 6,780 |
| Registered nurses | $59.71 | $49.57 to $64.54 | 69,260 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Washington | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 31.4 | 14.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.3 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 6.7 | 15.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 26.8 | 19.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 20.9 | 13.4 | 12.0 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab and Nursing Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (71.2% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
71.2% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Washington: 71 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 506 eligible stays.
9.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Washington: 7 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 461 eligible stays.
6.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Washington: 4 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 322 eligible stays.
60.7% this home
Median of homes: Washington61.4% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 298 residents counted.
0.8% this home
Median of homes: Washington0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 379 residents counted.
1.6% this home
Median of homes: Washington1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 379 residents counted.
100.0% this home
Median of homes: Washington98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 103 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: MBB KENNEWICK LLC. CMS links this home to Regency Pacific Management, a group of 27 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regency Pacific Management LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 04/01/2010 | |
| Beddoe, Marvin | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2016 | |
| Kosuri, Sridivya | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Rapp, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/08/2016 | |
| Rieckelman, Parker | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/22/2016 | |
| Mbb Kennewick Properties I LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 06/01/2016 | |
| Omnicare LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/01/2013 | |
| Regency Pacific Management LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/26/2025 | |
| Beddoe, Marvin | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/22/2016 | |
| Beddoe, Sandra | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2016 | |
| Kosuri, Sridivya | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 11/01/2023 | |
| Rapp, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 03/08/2016 | |
| Rieckelman, Parker | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 09/22/2016 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Washington. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.