Find a nursing home

Home / Connecticut / West Redding

Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge

100 Redding Road, West Redding, CT 06896 · Greater Bridgeport County · (203) 544-1000

59 certified beds, about 52 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2002

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
4 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075429 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on March 24, 2025, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

None of its 18 health citations since February 2020 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.93 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.26 of those hours.

27.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
May 7, 2026Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two of three residents (Resident #2 and #3) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality and privacy of Resident #2 and #3, when their medication blister packs containing resident-identifying information was improperly included with Resident #1's discharge medications.
  2. D
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    F628 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 12, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge process, the facility failed to ensure the resident was discharged with all prescribed narcotic medications as ordered.
April 1, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 1, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for a change in condition, the facility left unlicensed staff with a resident who was identified with a significant change in condition, and failed to ensure a resident's active do not resuscitate (DNR) order was honored when he/she was identified to have no pulse, no respirations, and had fixed and dilated pupils, and failed to ensure Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was notified prior to a pronouncement of death.
March 24, 2025Standard inspection · 5 citations
  1. D
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of staff interviews, review of the clinical record and facility documentation for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident #29) and for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #46) reviewed for death, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Care Plan (RCP) was comprehensive to include hospice care.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on the facility policy, record review, and interviews for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Care Plan was reviewed and revised after a fall with a major injury. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnosis that included heart failure, hypotension, and falls. A Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 was a fall risk, and a fall prevention care plan was initiated or updated. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] identified was cognitively intact and was independent for eating, and oral hygiene. The MDS also, identified Resident #36 required partially moderate assistance for transfers, dressing, and was dependent for showering. The MDS further identified Resident #36 required touch supervision when ambulating. [...]
  3. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, review of the clinical record, and facility policy for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure physician orders related to an air mattress included type of setting and ensure the air mattress was set correctly.
  4. D
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews regarding medication storage, the facility failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of and failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when not in use.
  5. C
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 5, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews for medication storage and narcotic reconciliation, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation of controlled medication and failed to ensure that an account of all controlled drugs was maintained and periodically reconciled.
November 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 27, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include a refusal of care.
October 16, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to notify the health care representative prior to the initiation of an antidepressant.
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 13, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the RN timely after a resident had an unwitnessed fall.
October 27, 2022Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    F694 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 10, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility Infection Control Program, review of facility documentation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nursing staff completed the facility's annual education and competencies training for Intravenous Therapy IV.
  2. E
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    F947 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 22, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on a review of the facility Infection Control Program, review of facility documentation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that unlicensed nursing staff completed the facility's annual education and competencies training for Intravenous Therapy IV.
  3. D
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    F585 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 10, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident # 145 and #146) reviewed for grievances, the facility failed to act on the resident reported concern related to missing personal items in a timely manner and within accordance to facility policy.
  4. D
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 10, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 346) reviewed for allegations of neglect, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation regarding an allegation of being left on the toilet for several hours.
  5. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 2, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, review of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for advance directive, the facility failed to transcribe the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and Registered Nurse may Pronounce (RNP) physician's orders according to professional standard and within accordance to facility practice.
  6. D
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    F825 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 10, 2022
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and staff interviews for 1 resident (Resident # 145) reviewed for rehabilitation, the facility failed to implement specialized rehabilitative services related to the use of a motorized chair for mobility to attain the resident's highest level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being in a timely manner.
February 13, 2020Standard inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 26, 2020
    Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, facility policy and procedures, review of facility documentation and interviews for one of two units (Elm) reviewed for infection control for (Residents # 32 and #101), the facility failed to consistently implement standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.933.733.86
Registered nurses1.260.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends4.563.373.42
Nurse aides2.81
Licensed practical nurses0.86
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)27.9%37.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover21.1%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 4.17 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.08 on weekdays and 4.56 on weekends, 10% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 6.4% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.38 in April to June 2025 to 4.93 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.931.265.084.56 6.4%0 of 9052
Oct to Dec 20254.991.265.124.66 5.8%0 of 9251
Jul to Sep 20255.151.395.304.75 4.0%0 of 9249
Apr to Jun 20255.381.535.584.88 1.0%0 of 9146
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 20263.660.613.803.316.0%1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.117.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.41.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.03.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.91.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.64.04.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
15.017.815.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
35.624.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
14.810.812.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: REDDING LIFE CARE LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Bsl Meadow Ridge Investors LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization15%12/10/2020
David Reis Family Trust No. 1a5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization11%01/06/2023
David Reis Family Trust No. 35% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization19%07/01/2016
Georgetown Meadows LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization6%08/22/1995
Priest, Donald5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual5%12/15/1994
Reis, David5% or greater direct ownership interestIndividual19%12/15/1994
Bsl Investors Fund III LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization15%12/10/2020
Mehlman, BrettIndirect ownership interestIndividual11/07/2024
Barstein, ChristopherManaging control - governing bodyIndividual01/01/2021
Brown, PaulManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/04/2024
Catizone, HeatherManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/01/2025
Grape, ThomasManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/11/2021
Liang, JerryManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/11/2021
Mahmood, FariaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual05/28/2024
Mehlman, BrettManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/11/2021
Quigley, JakeManaging control - governing bodyIndividual06/01/2025
Rosario, AnnefeiaManaging control - governing bodyIndividual10/04/2024
Zaccaro, MichaelManaging control - governing bodyIndividual03/06/2025
Benchmark Senior Living LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2021
Senior Care Development LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization05/01/1995
Barstein, ChristopherOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Brown, PaulOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/04/2024
Catizone, HeatherOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/01/2025
Mehlman, BrettOperational/managerial controlIndividual12/10/2020
Quigley, JakeOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/12/2023
Reis, DavidOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/01/1995
Rosario, AnnefeiaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2021
Beers, Hamerman, Cohen & Burger, PCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/22/2025
Benchmark Senior Living LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2021
Bsl Investors Fund III LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/10/2020
Bsl Meadow Ridge Investors LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization12/10/2020
Celtic Consulting LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization01/01/2021
David Reis Family Trust No. 1aAdp of the SNFOrganization01/06/2023
David Reis Family Trust No. 3Adp of the SNFOrganization07/01/2016
Georgetown Meadows LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization08/22/1995
Healthpro Heritage LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization10/01/2023
Brown, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual08/19/2025
Mahmood, FariaAdp of the SNFIndividual05/28/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on April 1, 2026: "Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on May 7, 2026: "Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential."
  3. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2025: "Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 24, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."

Other nursing homes nearby

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge get at its last inspection?
5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 24, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge been fined?
CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge?
CMS lists 38 owners and managers. Legal business name: REDDING LIFE CARE LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection