What is Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

Has Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation been fined?

CMS lists no fines in the last three years.

Does Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation?

CMS lists 36 owners and managers, and links the home to National Health Care Associates. Legal business name: LAUREL RIDGE ACQUISITION OPERATOR LLC.

Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation: Inspections

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on April 8, 2025, inspectors cited 11 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 31 health citations since October 2019, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.06 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.61 of those hours.

37.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Connecticut average 37.4%).

CMS links it to National Health Care Associates, an affiliated group of 42 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

410/19

1208/22

110/24

1304/25

105/25

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 31 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

17D

10E

Potential for minimal harm

May 6, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a change of condition was reported to the provider on two occasions in accordance with facility policy.

April 8, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 13 citations

F

Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) the facility failed provide appropriate number of staff for Quarter 2 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024 ).
F

Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.

F851 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview and review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submissions for Quarter 1, 2025 (October 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024) the facility failed to ensure the PBJ data was submitted accurately. Also, it was identified through the PBJ report that the facility failed provide appropriate number of staff for Quarter 2 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024 ).
E

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, for 2 of 4 residents involved in resident to resident altercations (Resident #59 and Resident #81), and for four of eight residents (Resident #27, #40, #62 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report the injury of unknown origin (Resident #9) and the resident to resident altercations to the Stage Agency. Additionally, for Resident #27, #40, #62 and #99, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of abuse immediately.
E

Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.

F679 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #104) reviewed for recreational activities, the facility failed to provide activities that met Resident #104's interests and preferences.
E

Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.

F804 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were palatable.
E

Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.

F809 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, initial tours and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure snacks were passed out after dinner/before bed.
D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for four sampled residents (Resident #59, Resident #81, Resident #90 and Resident #100) reviewed for mistreatment, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident altercations between Resident #59 and Resident #81, and between Resident #90 and Resident #100. Additionally, for four of eight residents (Residents #27, #40, #62 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from neglect and that care was provided in a timely manner on 3/8/2025 during the 7 AM to 3 PM shift.
D

Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.

F610 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to conduct a complete investigation for a resident with an injury of unknown origin.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #104) reviewed for recreational activities, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan regarding Resident #104's activity needs and preferences.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #40) reviewed for pressure ulcers, for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for positioning and for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #102) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure an air mattress was set at the appropriate setting. Additionally, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #65) reviewed for a non-pressure skin condition, the facility failed to initiate timely treatments.
B

Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.

F644 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to refer Resident #83 for a Level II PASRR evaluation after identifying a new mental disorder.
E

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of six residents (Resident #40) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include timely documentation of an APRN visit.
D

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 3, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on record review, facility documentation, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for accidents, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident to resident altercations (Resident #59 and Resident #81) and for four of eight residents (Residents #27, #40, #62 and #99) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) assessments were completed timely.

October 1, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

D

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 12, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #2) who was reviewed for an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse.

August 11, 2022Standard inspection · 12 citations

G

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · Actual harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #6, Resident #40, Resident #55, Resident #161, and Resident #262) reviewed for resident to resident altercations, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical mistreatment.
E

Provide appropriate foot care.

F687 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #10) reviewed for foot care, the facility failed to provide podiatry care to a diabetic resident in a timely manner.
E

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident #19 and Resident #96) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to follow manufacturer recommendations for the use of a Wanderguard and complete accurate wandering/elopement assessments.
E

Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.

F756 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed (Resident #21) for unnecessary medication, the facility failed to ensure the MD/APRN responded to pharmacy recommendations in a timely manner and failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was completed every 6 months for a resident receiving an antipsychotic medication.
E

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Dietary staff wore a beard restraint when working in the kitchen and the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner.
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and implement facial masking practices according to infection control standards.
D

Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.

F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for code status (the level of medical intervention a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing were to stop), the facility failed to obtain and verify Resident #78's code status with the responsible party on admission.
D

Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.

F609 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, policy and interview for 1 sampled resident (Resident #56) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Agency.
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #40 and Resident #262) reviewed for resident to resident altercations, the facility failed to implement the plan of care to ensure a resident with a previous history of physical mistreatment by another resident (Resident #262) was kept separated from that resident, which resulted in a second incident of a resident to resident altercation.
D

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, policy and interview for 1 sampled resident (Resident #56) reviewed for an injury of unknown origin, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) #2 documented an assessment of a bruise after the area was assessed per standards of practice.
D

Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.

F692 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for nutrition and for 1 resident (Resident #22) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained timely for a resident with a newly placed gastrostomy feeding tube (Resident #1) and failed to ensure the intake records were accurate and totaled each day for a resident on a fluid restriction (Resident #22).
D

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) September 22, 2022

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #44) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled and dated when changed per policy.

October 30, 2019Standard inspection · 4 citations

D

Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

F558 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #100) reviewed for accommodation of needs, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible to a resident with paraparesis.
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident #32) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to administer oxygen when the saturation level was low.
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2019

Inspectors wroteb. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, stiffness of the right and left hand, and contracture of the muscle in the right lower leg. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 was at a risk for falls. The Nurse Aide Care Card dated 6/7/19 identified Resident #19 required total assistance with bathing and in addition if the resident was resistive to bathing, tell nurse and try again later. A physician's order dated 8/2/19 directed for dressing and bathing Resident #19 required assistance of two. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 had short and long term memory problems and required extensive assistance with dressing, transfers, and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 8/10/19 identified Resident #19 required assistance with functional care. [...]
D

Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.

F791 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 5, 2019

Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews, for one of two residents reviewed for dental services (Resident #11), the facility failed to ensure timely follow up when the resident's upper dentures were lost at the facility.

Fines and payment denials

CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Connecticut	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	4.06	3.73	3.86
Registered nurses	0.61	0.69	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	3.66	3.37	3.42
Nurse aides	2.53
Licensed practical nurses	0.93
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	37.9%	37.4%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	50.0%	38.6%	42.9%
Administrators who left	not reported

CMS expects 3.54 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.23 on weekdays and 3.66 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.9% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.68 in April to June 2025 to 4.06 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	4.06	0.61	4.23	3.66	13.9%	0 of 90	114
Oct to Dec 2025	3.89	0.56	4.03	3.51	16.5%	0 of 92	110
Jul to Sep 2025	3.70	0.47	3.82	3.42	5.8%	0 of 92	113
Apr to Jun 2025	3.68	0.53	3.81	3.33	8.8%	0 of 91	111
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 2026	3.66	0.61	3.80	3.31	6.0%	1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Connecticut	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	6.5	17.9	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.5	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.7	3.5	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.0	1.5	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.6	16.4	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.7	4.0	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	22.8	17.8	15.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	11.1	24.3	23.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	11.8	10.8	12.0
Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	1.5	2.1	1.9
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231	0.9	1.5	1.8

Owners and operators

Legal business name: LAUREL RIDGE ACQUISITION OPERATOR LLC. CMS links this home to National Health Care Associates, a group of 42 nursing homes averaging 3.2 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Bg II Opco Ml LLC	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	10/10/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Dymer Holdings LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Oak Management Capital LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ysro Trust	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Zadun II Holdings LLC	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ehrenfeld, Mindy	5% or greater indirect ownership interest	Individual		10/10/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLC	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Master Tenant Holdco Ct5 II LLC	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Oak Management Capital LLC	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ysro Trust	5% or greater security interest	Organization		10/10/2024
Ostreicher, Marc	5% or greater security interest	Individual		10/10/2024
National Health Care Associates Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		12/10/2024
Cannavaro, Caitlin	Operational/managerial control	Individual		12/31/2024
Gilmartin, Thomas	Operational/managerial control	Individual		12/04/2024
Ostreicher, Marc	Operational/managerial control	Individual		10/10/2024
Baker Tilly Advisory Group LP	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/10/2024
Cedar Hill Capital Associates LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		11/19/2024
Dymer Holdings LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		11/19/2024
Ilana Ostreicher Family Trust	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/04/2024
Juniper Capital Associates LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/04/2024
Marc Ephram Ostreicher Family Trust	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/04/2024
Master Tenant Holdco Ct5 II LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/10/2024
National Health Care Associates Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/10/2024
Preferred Therapy Solutions LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/10/2024
Procare LTC Holding LLC	Adp of the SNF	Organization		12/10/2024
Berman, Edward	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/31/2024
Cannavaro, Caitlin	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/31/2024
Ostreicher, Ilana	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/04/2024
Ostreicher, Marc	Adp of the SNF	Individual		12/04/2024

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on May 6, 2025: "Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals."
How are allegations of abuse or neglect reported and investigated, and who tells the family?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2025: "Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities."
When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2025: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 8, 2025: "Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature."

Other nursing homes nearby

Saint John Paul II Center
Danbury, 4.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 51 citations
Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge
West Redding, 4.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 18 citations
Havencare at Hancock Hall
Danbury, 4.9 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Havencare at Filosa
Danbury, 5 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 17 citations
Civita Care Center at Danbury
Danbury, 5.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 50 citations
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Glen Hill
Danbury, 6.4 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 30 citations
Bethel Health Care Center
Bethel, 8 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 31 citations
Wilton Meadows Health Care Center
Wilton, 8.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 39 citations

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Connecticut Department of Public Health, Facility Licensing and Investigations Section, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Connecticut Long Term Care Ombudsman Program, 860-424-5200. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Connecticut DPH Nursing Home Site, survey findings by facility, where Connecticut publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 2 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation get at its last inspection?: 11 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 8, 2025. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation been fined?: CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
Does Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Laurel Ridge Center for Health & Rehabilitation?: CMS lists 36 owners and managers, and links the home to National Health Care Associates. Legal business name: LAUREL RIDGE ACQUISITION OPERATOR LLC.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.