Rosewalk Village
1302 N Lesley Ave, Indianapolis, IN 46219 · Marion County · (317) 353-8061
140 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · Government - County · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
3 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
1 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 155329 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 6, 2026, inspectors cited 5 health deficiencies (the Indiana average is 7.2, the national average 9.2).
Of 25 health citations since February 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated November 13, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.68 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Indiana and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.27 of those hours.
58.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Indiana average 45.9%).
CMS links it to American Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 90 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
1002/24
903/25
111/25
503/26
Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 25 health citations on file.
Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
1J
0K
0L
Actual harm
0G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
20D
2E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
March 6, 2026Standard inspection · 5 citations
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were implementing the care plan with monitoring and documenting outputs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for implementation of care plans. (Resident 3)
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely conduct interdisciplinary care plan meetings for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospice and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care planning (Residents 4, 6, and 9).
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received vision services for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for vision services. (Resident 50)
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to care plan behaviors and interventions for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for behavior management. (Resident 49)
- D Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with scheduling and tracking dental services for 2 of 2 reviewed for dental services. (Resident 7 and Resident 25).
November 13, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- J Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of dementia who was at risk of elopement did not exit the facility unsupervised for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Resident B was found in the community, had fallen, and was transported to the hospital for treatment. The immediate jeopardy began, on 10/28/25, when Resident B exited the facility unsupervised and without the staff's knowledge while wearing a wanderguard device (a wearable device used to alert staff when a resident approached restrictive areas/doors). The resident was located approximately 0.6 miles away from the facility. The resident was found lying face down on the ground by a concerned citizen. [...]
March 13, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 9 citations
- F Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food was disposed of timely with the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents that receive food from the kitchen. (Facility)
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained by not ensuring hand hygiene was performed prior to donning gloves, failed to utilize hand hygiene during a medication administration, popping pill medication in bare hands for 3 of 6 residents randomly observed for medication administration, and not donning personal protective equipment (PPE) during bathing and dressing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis. (Resident 2, Resident 12, Resident 20, and Resident 24)
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' dignity was respected for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. (Residents' J, K, and L)
- D Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was in reach for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for call lights (Resident G).
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to get residents up to a wheelchair and complete regular hair shampooing for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). (Resident G)
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with contractures (abnormal shortening or tightening of muscle tissue the renders the muscle highly resistant to stretching and can lead to permanent disability) received splint application as recommended by therapy staff for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. (Resident B)
- D Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to hold insulin when a blood sugar was below the physician's prescribed perimeters for 1 of 1 randomly observed insulin administration (Resident 20).
- D Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a binding arbitration agreement was explained to the resident representative and signed by the resident representative for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration agreements. (Resident 42 and Resident 88)
- C Post nurse staffing information every day.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure postings of current daily working staff. This had the potential to affect 98 of 98 residents that reside in the facility.
February 13, 2024Standard inspection · 10 citations
- E Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely address and follow up on a resident's change of condition; administer a resident his medication for insomnia, as ordered; address a resident's skin condition, per policy; administer treatments, as ordered; and accurately monitor fluid consumption for a resident, as ordered, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Residents 1, 20, 45, 66, and 104)
- D Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers, as preferred, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care (Resident 45).
- D Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess vision status, as instructed in the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual, while completing the MDS (Minimal Data Set) Assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for vision (Resident 24).
- D Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a care plan to address his insomnia and create a vision careplan for a resident with visual difficulties for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 4 residents reviewed for vision or hearing services. (Residents 24 and 66)
- D Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite a resident's representative to her care plan meetings for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident 1)
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide shampooing, toenail care, shaving, and incontinence care for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)s. (Resident 78, 97, and 306)
- D Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely follow through with obtaining hearing aides for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for vision or hearing services. (Resident 66)
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were appropriately implemented for a resident that has a history of falling for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 58)
- D Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely schedule a mammogram, as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 43)
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' rooms were in good repair and a call light was functioning as appropriate for 3 of 4 resident rooms were observed during a environmental tour. (Residents' 45, 57 and 71)
Fire safety inspections
15 fire safety citations on file: 4 on March 6, 2026, 3 on March 13, 2025, 8 on February 13, 2024.
Every fire safety citation15 citations
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- F Ensure that testing and maintenance of electrical equipment is performed.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Have restrictions on the use of highly flammable decorations.
- E Add doors in an exit area that do not require the use of a key from the exit side unless in case of special locking arrangements.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Install an approved automatic sprinkler system.
- E Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Properly select, install, inspect, or maintain portable fire extinguishes.
- E Ensure that waiting areas, nurse’s stations, gift shops, and cooking facilities, open to the corridor are properly protected.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- C Meet other general requirements.
Fines and payment denials
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| November 13, 2025 | Fine | $14,901 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.68 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.08 | 3.25 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.24 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.17 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 58.8% | 45.9% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 64.3% | 40.3% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 4.38 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.92 on weekdays and 3.08 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.33 in April to June 2025 to 3.68 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.68 | 0.27 | 3.92 | 3.08 | 0.0% | 2 of 90 | 91 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.54 | 0.29 | 3.78 | 2.93 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 101 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.26 | 0.26 | 3.48 | 2.70 | 0.0% | 1 of 92 | 104 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.33 | 0.34 | 3.58 | 2.71 | 3.3% | 4 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Indiana, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.63 | 0.62 | 3.80 | 3.19 | 3.4% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Indiana | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.5 | 11.0 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 11.9 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.4 | 13.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 27.6 | 22.2 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 0.0 | 10.8 | 12.0 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY. CMS links this home to American Senior Communities, a group of 90 nursing homes averaging 3.9 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohi Asset (in) Rosewalk, LLC | 5% or greater security interest | Organization | 08/31/2012 | |
| Chies, Steven | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/17/2016 | |
| Jackson, Blake | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2003 | |
| Jackson, Ethan | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2003 | |
| Jackson, Mark | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2003 | |
| Jackson, Michael | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/14/2024 | |
| Jackson, Wessley | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2003 | |
| Justice, David | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 01/01/2003 | |
| Kelsey, Donna | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 07/18/2024 | |
| Stitle, Stephen | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 03/16/2016 | |
| Wright, Theressa | Managing control - governing body | Individual | 05/21/2021 | |
| Doucet, Kelly | Corporate director | Individual | 02/03/2025 | |
| Drummer, Carl | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2017 | |
| Fisch, Gary | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2025 | |
| Hanify, Thomas | Corporate director | Individual | 01/01/2022 | |
| Horn, Brenda | Corporate director | Individual | 09/20/2023 | |
| Lazard, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 01/29/2021 | |
| O'Brien, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 02/03/2025 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Corporate officer | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Caine, Virginia | Corporate officer | Individual | 01/10/1994 | |
| Goddard, Nichole | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/11/2022 | |
| Harris, Lisa | Corporate officer | Individual | 12/22/2003 | |
| Simpson, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 08/06/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2003 | |
| The Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 01/01/2003 | |
| Babcock, Paul | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 09/30/2020 | |
| Dice, Mark | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Goddard, Nichole | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 07/11/2022 | |
| Hafidh, Saad | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 11/15/2018 | |
| Johnson, Omar | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/27/2020 | |
| Shane, Andrew | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Simpson, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/06/2023 | |
| Taruwinga, Loice | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/03/2023 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| American Senior Communities LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 07/02/2025 | |
| Ohi Asset (in) Rosewalk, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/31/2012 | |
| Dice, Mark | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 | |
| Hafidh, Saad | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2026 | |
| Johnson, Omar | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/22/2026 | |
| Shane, Andrew | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 02/01/2023 | |
| Van Camp, Steven | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 06/01/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 10 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2026: "Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services."
- When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 6, 2026: "Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 13, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
- Who is the administrator and director of nursing, and how long have they been in the job?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 13, 2025: "Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 3.08 hours per resident per day, below the Indiana average of 3.25.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Community Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Indianapolis, 1 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 37 citations
- Miller's Merry Manor Indianapolis, 1.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Arlington Place Health Campus Indianapolis, 1.1 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 21 citations
- Wildwood Healthcare Center Indianapolis, 2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- Brickyard Healthcare - Brookview Care Center Indianapolis, 2.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 25 citations
- Harrison Terrace Indianapolis, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Envive of Beech Grove Beech Grove, 3.5 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 11 citations
- Brickyard Healthcare - Churchman Care Center Indianapolis, 3.8 mi · 5 of 5 stars · 15 citations
Indiana contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Indiana. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Indiana Department of Health, Division of Long-Term Care, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- Resident advocate: Indiana Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, 800-622-4484. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
- State inspection reports: Indiana Department of Health, Nursing Home Report Cards, where Indiana publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Rosewalk Village's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Rosewalk Village 3 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 1 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Rosewalk Village get at its last inspection?
- 5 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 6, 2026. The Indiana average is 7.2.
- Has Rosewalk Village been fined?
- Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years.
- Does Rosewalk Village accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Rosewalk Village?
- CMS lists 41 owners and managers, and links the home to American Senior Communities. Legal business name: THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.