2425 South Memorial, Tulsa, OK 74129 · Tulsa County · (918) 628-0932
118 certified beds, about 60 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 1989
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 375094 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on November 25, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Oklahoma average is 6.4, the national average 9.2).
Of 67 health citations since February 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 4 fines totaling $55,086 in the last three years; the largest was $22,975, and the latest is dated July 19, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.48 hours per resident per day, against 3.79 across Oklahoma and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.30 of those hours.
73.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Oklahoma average 55.5%).
CMS links it to Emerald Healthcare, an affiliated group of 14 nursing homes.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 67 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with a written notice of transfer when transferred to a hospital for 1 (#5) 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. The DON identified 18 resident transfers in the past six months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was created for 1 (#56) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The DON identified 58 residents resided in the facility required MDS assessments.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dialysis catheter was assessed every shift for 1 (#35) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis care. The DON identified five residents in the facility received dialysis treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated, and stored correctly when opened or prepared for 1 of 2 observations in the kitchen. The DON identified 58 residents received nourishment from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely incontinent care was provided for one (#6) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The administrator identified 66 residents who resided at the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained and enhanced barrier precautions were followed during pressure ulcer treatment for one (#5) of three sampled reviewed for wound care. The ADON identified 10 residents who had pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services for one (#1) of four residents who were reviewed for dialysis services. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #1 being hospitalized with a diagnosis of metabolic acidosis from missed dialysis. The DON identified 11 residents who resided in the facility who required dialysis.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate code status was documented for one (#8) and residents were offered the choice to formulate an advanced directive for two (#22 and #24) of three sampled residents reviewed for advanced directives. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a missing laptop was replaced for one (#22) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for misappropriation of property. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and/or implemented to address the residents' needs related to a urinary catheter for one (#49), pain for one (#24), and cardiovascular status for one (#22) of 24 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility. The ADON identified seven residents with a urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure baths and incontinent care were provided as ordered for three (#8, 16 and #43) of three residents reviewed for assistance with ADL's. The ADON identified 36 residents who required assistance with incontinent care and 39 residents who required assistance with showers.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided as ordered for one (#22) of one sampled resident who was observed for non pressure related wounds. The ADON identified five residents who had non pressure related wounds.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for an indwelling urinary catheter and failed to ensure a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter received services to help prevent urinary tract infections for one (#49) of one resident reviewed for catheters. The ADON identified seven residents with an indwelling urinary catheter.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a. the correct amount of water was administered via peg tube as ordered by the physician; b. the head of the bed was elevated during administration of water flushes and tube feeding through the peg tube; and c. a dietary recommendation was sent to the physician for one (#8) of one sampled resident who was administered nutrition through a peg tube. 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included dysarthria (weakness in the muscles used for speech), hemiparesis and hemiplegia (Partial to complete paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents for six (#7, 14, 16, 17, 27, and #43) of seven sampled residents who were reviewed for sufficient staffing. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to post the required staffing information. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with physician orders for one (#22) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility with 17 residents receiving insulin.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. develop and maintain policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review to include time frames for the different steps in the process, b. ensure a physician responded to a monthly medication review for one (#22) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and c. ensure the facility followed up on requests made on the monthly medication review for one (#14) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications for two (#17 and #22) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified eight residents received psychotropic medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor food cooking and holding temperatures to ensure safe temperatures were maintained in the kitchen and on the steam table during meal service. The ADON reported 52 residents received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The ADON identified 52 residents who received meals from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed of properly. The ADON reported 52 residents received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a surveillance system was in place to routinely identify infections and communicable diseases; b. a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building water systems; c. linens and laundry were processed in accordance with accepted national standards to produce hygienically clean laundry and prevent the spread of infection to the extent possible; and d. soiled linen was handled in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate an individual as the infection preventionist. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer influenza vaccinations for four (#17, 22, 27, and #43) of five and pneumococcal vaccinations for five (#8, 17, 22, 27, and #43) of five sampled residents reviewed for vaccinations. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a kitchen reach-in refrigerator was in good repair. The ADON reported 52 resident received services from the kitchen.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for one (#44) of three residents sampled for dignity. The DON reported the census was 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan related to hospice services for one (#9) of two sampled resident reviewed for hospice services. The ADON identified five residents who received hospice services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen cylinders were stored properly. The DON reported the census was 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to complete required nurse aide yearly performance reviews for one (CNA #1) of three direct care employee files reviewed. The corporate administrator identified 53 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered for one (#60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON reported the census was 53.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program for one (#4) of one sampled residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The ADON identified three residents were receiving antibiotics.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations and interview, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable room temperature for three (#7, 8, and #9) of three sampled residents whose room temperatures were obtained. The Administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was ongoing communication with the dialysis center for one (#1) and ongoing assessments of residents before and after dialysis treatments for three (#1, 3, and #4) of four sampled residents reviewed for dialysis care. The Administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility. The were six residents receiving dialysis treatments.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to facilitate the inclusion of residents' representative in their care plan conferences for two (#1 and #2) of three sampled residents whose care plan conferences were reviewed. The Administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accommodate a residents' need for adaptive equipment that would allow the highest possible level of physical functioning and well-being for one (#2) of one sampled resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. The Administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of changes in condition for one (#1) of three sampled resident who were reviewed for notification of change. The Administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound assessments were completed for one (#6) of three sampled residents whose wound assessments were reviewed and failed to follow infection control practices during wound care for one (#5) of one sampled resident whose wound care was observed. The administrator identified 68 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. residents received baths as requested and according to schedule for two (#9 and #14) of three sampled residents reviewed for baths; b. medications were administered as ordered by a physician for two (#15 and #17) of three sampled resident reviewed for following physician orders; and c. blood sugars levels were obtained as ordered by a physician for two (#15 and #17) of three sampled residents reviewed for following physician orders. A facility census report, dated 01/31/24, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Oklahoma Stated Department of Health. A facility census report, dated 01/31/24, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of a report of alleged sexual abuse for one (#13) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. A facility census report, dated 01/31/24, documented 66 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not involuntarily discharged without notice and right to appeal and failed to document a discharge in a resident's medical record for one (#8) of three sampled resident reviewed for discharges. A facility Length of Stay By Discharge Reason Report, dated [DATE] through [DATE], documented 37 residents discharged from the facility during the specified period.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer and a notice of discharge for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharges. A facility Length of Stay By Discharge Reason Report, dated 10/01/23 through 11/30/23, documented 37 residents discharged from the facility during the specified period.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a bed hold policy to a resident prior to transfer for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharges. A facility Length of Stay By Discharge Reason Report, dated 10/01/23 through 11/30/23, documented 37 residents discharged from the facility during the specified period.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to allow a resident's return to the facility after being transferred to a local hospital for a mental health evaluation for one (#8) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharges. A facility Length of Stay By Discharge Reason Report, dated 10/01/23 through 11/30/23, documented 37 residents discharged from the facility during the specified period.
Inspectors wroteOn [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure CPR was provided to Resident #66 who had a physician ordered full code status. On [DATE] at 7:30 p.m., a hospice nurse had came to evaluate Resident #66 for services and found resident without audible heart tones, absent respirations and unable to obtain palpable blood pressure. There was no documentation a facility staff member assessed the resident during this time. On interview, CMA #1 and an agency nurse had been in there 15 minutes prior to reposition resident. RN #1 stated they were alerted the resident had expired and knew the resident was a full code. CPR was not provided. On [DATE] at 9:07 a.m., The Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff notified residents' representatives when a change in condition occurred for two (#1 and #120) of three sampled residents reviewed for notifications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate liability notice prior to a resident coming off of skilled services for three (#21, 44, and #48) of three sampled residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The DON identified 23 residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services with benefit days remaining in the past six months.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide maintenance services necessary to ensure the following: a. floor tile was in good repair and not a trip hazard, b. wall paper was not peeling from the walls in Resident rooms and common areas, c. sheet rock was not damaged with cracks and deteriorating in common areas, and d. a clean and sanitary home like environment. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide bathing assistance for two (#65 and #120) and, b, provide assistance to a dependent resident during the lunch meal service for one (#9) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for ADL assistance. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to: a. obtain weekly measurements of a pressure ulcer as ordered, b. ensure an effect communication for wound care orders from a third party contract provider was in place, c. provide wound care as ordered and d. assess and monitor a pressure ulcer for changes for one (#20) of three sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 15 residents with pressure ulcers.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an RN worked eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for four of 31 days reviewed in the month of January 2023. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. medications were administered as ordered for two (#20 and #56) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, and b. controlled medications awaiting destruction were verified by two licensed staff for 15 (#17, 35, 52, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 and #81) of 15 sampled residents whose discontinued medications were observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective administration for the coordination and continuity of care for one (#20) of one sampled resident reviewed for third party contract services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. provide wound care in a manner which prevented cross contamination for one (#20) of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, and b. implement their infection control policy for a system for regular surveillance of all infections. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to: a. ensure residents were offered the pneumonia vaccine for one (#47) and b. ensure residents were offered the flu vaccine annually for three (#14, 21, and #47) of five sampled residents reviewed for vaccinations. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement: a. A process for tracking and securely documenting the COVID-19 vaccination status of all staff and residents The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan had been completed within 48 hours of admission for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for admission assessments. The DON identified 20 residents were admitted within the past 30 days.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for dialysis for one (#47) of of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented nine residents received dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to fully complete an admission assessment for one (#20) of three sampled residents reviewed for admission assessments. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered Pre/Post dialysis vitals and weights for one (#47) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented nine residents received dialysis services.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a monthly drug regimen review was completed by a licensed pharmacist for one (#32) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to a GDR for one (#37) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 26 residents received psychoactive medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, the facility failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for the residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a PICC line for IV antibiotic administration was placed in a timely manner by a third party contract service for one (#20) of one sampled resident reviewed for third party contract services. The DON identified two residents who received services from Contract Agency #1.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure records were accessible and complete for one (#20) of 24 sampled residents whose records were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation of the vaccination status of each resident to include exemptions for unvaccinated residents for 63 residents who resided in the facility. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 02/22/23, documented 63 residents.
23 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 11, 2024, 14 on February 27, 2023, 5 on February 22, 2022.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| July 19, 2024 | Fine | $22,975 |
| March 19, 2024 | Payment Denial | 2 days from June 19, 2024 |
| November 6, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
| October 17, 2023 | Fine | $4,587 |
| September 25, 2023 | Fine | $13,762 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.48 | 3.79 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.24 | 3.44 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.33 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.84 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 73.6% | 55.5% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 66.7% | 53.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.53 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.57 on weekdays and 3.24 on weekends, 9% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.61 in April to June 2025 to 3.48 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.48 | 0.30 | 3.57 | 3.24 | 0.0% | 1 of 90 | 60 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.52 | 0.35 | 3.56 | 3.41 | 0.1% | 0 of 92 | 58 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.58 | 0.40 | 3.65 | 3.41 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 57 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.61 | 0.38 | 3.73 | 3.32 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 56 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Oklahoma, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.79 | 0.32 | 3.94 | 3.42 | 2.2% | 1.6% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $17.27 | $15.82 to $18.39 | 19,410 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $28.04 | $24.06 to $29.84 | 11,540 |
| Registered nurses | $39.87 | $37.19 to $47.55 | 38,270 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Oklahoma | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.4 | 13.6 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.6 | 2.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 5.5 | 13.7 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.1 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.1 | 17.5 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 36.5 | 27.3 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 18.2 | 16.6 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Emerald Care Center Tulsa's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Oklahoma: 24 better, 16 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 53 eligible stays.
11.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Oklahoma: 1 better, 9 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 73 eligible stays.
6.0% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Oklahoma: 0 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 26 eligible stays.
65.4% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma54.3% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 46 residents counted.
5.8% this home
Median of homes: Oklahoma2.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 45 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Oklahoma100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 6 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: GARDEN MANOR REHAB AND NURSING OF TULSA LLC. CMS links this home to Emerald Healthcare, a group of 14 nursing homes averaging 1.3 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Garden Manor Rehab and Nursing of Midwest City LLC | 5% or greater indirect ownership interest | Organization | 25% | 08/29/2025 |
| Fleischmann, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/17/2022 | |
| Chafetz, Yisroel | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/29/2025 | |
| Fleischmann, David | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 01/17/2022 | |
| Lahasky, Ephram | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 08/29/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Oklahoma. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.