Home / Mississippi / Senatobia
402 Getwell Dr, Senatobia, MS 38668 · Tate County · (662) 562-5664
106 certified beds, about 97 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 255302 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on August 7, 2025, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Mississippi average is 6.8, the national average 9.2).
Of 21 health citations since March 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (2 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,021 in the last three years; the largest was $8,021, and the latest is dated August 20, 2024.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.93 hours per resident per day, against 4.18 across Mississippi and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.65 of those hours.
74.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Mississippi average 45.7%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 21 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician's orders and accepted standards of practice for four (4) of 4 residents observed during medication administration observation on one (1) of two (2) halls. The facility's medication error rate was 100%. This had the potential to affect residents through delayed medication administration. Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3 and Resident #4. Cross Reference F760Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Medication Errors dated 09/09/25 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to administer physician ordered significant medications timely for one (1) of four (4) medication carts observed. Cross Reference F759Findings Include:Review of the facility policy Medication Errors dated 09/09/25 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by ensuring residents receive care and services safely in an environment free of significant medication errors .Resident #1On 05/13/26 at 12:15 PM an observation and interview with Resident # 1 revealed that her medications were late most of the time. She stated, If you consider eleven o'clock, one o'clock or two o'clock on time, then I'm getting them on time. She revealed that she had mentioned it before, but it didn't do any good. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from exploitation and misappropriation of personal funds for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for misappropriation of property (Resident #1).
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, record review, and the facility's policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents or their representatives were involved in the care planning process for two (2) of 28 residents reviewed for care planning. Residents # 21 and 87.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete and transmit Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the timeframes required by the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual for (3) three of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Residents #39, 69, and 95. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion revealed: Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the RAI specified by the State. 2. Types of Assessments…b. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to complete and transmit the Quarterly and Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the required time frame for 10 of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Residents # 24, #35, #58, #63, #82, #90, #105, #107, #108 and #118. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion date implemented 2/01/2025 revealed: Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by the State. 2. Types of Assessments…e. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for one (1) of 33 MDS assessments reviewed. Resident #122. Findings Include Record review of the facility policy, “Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Completion” revealed “Policy Explanation of Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident’s functional capacity, using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) specified by the State. Record review of the Progress Note for Resident #122, dated 7/17/25, revealed that the resident was discharging home. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of medications for two (2) of eight (8) residents reviewed for drug diversion (Residents #14 and #42).
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for six (6) of 29 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Residents #12, #42, #79, #84, #108, and #111)
Inspectors wroteBased on resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for residents with personal hygiene needs for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #5 and Resident #6. Findings Include: Record review of the undated facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs . Resident #5 On 03/25/25 at 11:30 AM, an interview with Resident #5 revealed she did not get her shower on Saturday, 03/22/25, and she hadn't had a shower since last Thursday, 03/20/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide care to maintain personal hygiene for two (2) of six (6) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Resident #5 and Resident #6. Findings Include: Record review of the undated facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. The resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene Resident #5 An interview on 03/25/25 at 11:30 AM with Resident #5 revealed that the care at the facility wasn't perfect but was okay. Resident #5 revealed that she did not get her shower on Saturday, 03/22/25, and she hadn't had a shower since last Thursday, 03/20/25. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement effective comprehensive care plan interventions for a resident who was at risk for wandering and elopement for one (1) of three (3) residents at risk for wandering and elopement. Resident #1 Resident #1 was left on the front patio, where she subsequently exited the premises unnoticed and unsupervised. The resident was later found at a grocery store approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. Video surveillance footage revealed Resident #1 left the facility at 4:05 PM and was located at the grocery store at 4:25 PM. The facility's failure to implement effective care plan interventions placed Resident #1, and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment or death. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, facility policy reviews, and the facility's investigation, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was identified as an elopement and wandering risk from leaving the facility unnoticed and unsupervised for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for wandering. Resident #1. The facility's failure to provide supervision resulted in Resident #1 being left on the front patio, where she subsequently exited the premises unnoticed and unsupervised. The resident was later found at a grocery store approximately 0.3 miles from the facility. Video surveillance footage revealed Resident #1 left the facility at 4:05 PM and was located at the grocery store at 4:25 PM. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan related to nail care for one (1) of nineteen residents reviewed. Resident #33. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans with an implemented date of 12/2022 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. Record review of Resident #33's Care Plan dated 10/11/21 revealed that she had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to weakness and dementia. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide nail care for a resident who was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care for one (1) of nineteen residents reviewed. Resident #33. Findings Include: Record review of the undated facility policy on Nail Care revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .2. Routing cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care on an ongoing basis. 3. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided regularly. 4. Principles of nail care: a. Nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury . On 03/26/24 at 10:30 AM, an observation of Resident #33 revealed her sitting in her wheelchair at a table in the A-Wing Day Room and her fingernails on both hands were long and jagged. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to accurately code a residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for (1) one of 19 resident assessments reviewed. (Resident #55)
Inspectors wroteBased on staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to properly store drugs which were delivered by the pharmacy in one (1) of four (4) medication carts in the facility. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/13/23, the State Agency (SA) determined the deficiency to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the deficiency was corrected as of 12/18/23, prior to the SA's first entrance on 3/26/24. Findings Include: Record review of the undated facility policy titled Medication Storage revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines 1. General Guidelines: a. All drugs and biological's will be stored in locked compartments 2. Narcotics and Controlled Substances: a. Schedule II drugs and back-up stock of Schedule III, IV, and V medications are stored under double-lock and key. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to submit a Change in Status form for a resident with a new diagnosis of anxiety disorder and ensure the Resident was evaluated for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II for one (1) of two (2) resident reviewed for PASARR. Resident #62.
Inspectors wroteBased on staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop a Baseline Care Plan within 48 hours of admission for one (1) of 20 residents reviewed.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan for a resident with a new diagnosis of Anxiety disorder, for 1 (one) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assessment and treatment to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident # 136.
2 fire safety citations on file: 1 on August 7, 2025, 1 on March 28, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| August 20, 2024 | Fine | $8,021 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.93 | 4.18 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 3.36 | 3.50 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.42 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.87 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 74.6% | 45.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 80.0% | 38.5% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 2 |
CMS expects 3.27 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.17 on weekdays and 3.36 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 27.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.47 in April to June 2025 to 3.93 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.93 | 0.65 | 4.17 | 3.36 | 27.8% | 0 of 90 | 97 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.76 | 0.60 | 4.03 | 3.05 | 13.6% | 0 of 92 | 93 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.03 | 0.65 | 4.32 | 3.27 | 6.2% | 0 of 92 | 87 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.47 | 0.72 | 4.84 | 3.53 | 17.9% | 0 of 91 | 89 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Mississippi, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.09 | 0.60 | 4.35 | 3.44 | 6.2% | 0.1% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mississippi, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $15.15 | $14.19 to $16.92 | 14,200 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $24.14 | $22.50 to $27.90 | 9,850 |
| Registered nurses | $37.06 | $31.22 to $40.62 | 29,060 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Mississippi | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 33.5 | 20.5 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.6 | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 46.3 | 19.6 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.4 | 6.3 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.2 | 21.7 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 29.0 | 27.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.3 | 15.5 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Senatobia Healthcare & Rehab's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (60.1% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
60.1% this home
Better than the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Mississippi: 21 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 234 eligible stays.
11.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Mississippi: 1 better, 10 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 217 eligible stays.
5.8% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Mississippi: 1 better, 3 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 153 eligible stays.
31.3% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi52.2% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 99 residents counted.
0.6% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi0.7% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 167 residents counted.
2.5% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi2.8% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 167 residents counted.
81.7% this home
Median of homes: Mississippi98.3% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 71 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SCCR,LLC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sccr,llc | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 04/01/2009 | |
| Northrip, Marty | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Individual | 04/01/2009 | |
| Doss, Burton | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 02/18/2019 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Mississippi. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.