Settlers Ridge Care Center
1280 Settlers Ridge Road, Celina, TX 75009 · Collin County · (972) 382-8600
128 certified beds, about 106 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 2003
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 675969 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on April 2, 2026, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Texas average is 9.4, the national average 9.2).
None of its 22 health citations since January 2024 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 3.20 hours per resident per day, against 3.39 across Texas and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.19 of those hours.
43.2% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Texas average 55.3%).
CMS links it to Stonegate Senior Living, an affiliated group of 24 nursing homes.
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 22 health citations on file.
April 2, 2026Standard inspection · 6 citations
- E Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #33, #57, #10, #65, and #16) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, #57, #10, #65 and #16's comprehensive care plan addressed their goals, needs, strengths, medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for not receiving proper care and services due to inaccurate care plans.
- E Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen safety. The facility failed to ensure food in the facility's dry storage, and refrigerator areas were labeled and dated according to guidelines. The facility failed to seal lids securely on containers in the refrigerator area and dry storage pantry. These deficient practices could affect residents who received meals or snacks from the kitchen and place them at risk for cross contamination and other food-borne illnesses. Findings Included: 3/31/2026 Dry Pantry area revealed 12 plastic round maroon bowls had plastic lids that were unsealed, exposed to the air, not labeled and not dated. [...]
- E Keep all essential equipment working safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in operating condition by failing to maintain walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer coolant fans for 1 of 1 kitchens reviewed for equipment in operating condition. The facility failed to maintain the coolant fans in the walk-in freezer and in the walk-in refrigerator for operating condition. The facility's failure to maintain coolant fans in operating condition had the potential to place all residents at risk for cross-contamination and increased risk of foodborne illness. Findings Included:Walk-in refrigerator revealed dripping liquid from the coolant fan within the refrigerator. Walk-in freezer revealed ice build up on the coolant fan within the freezer. Observations of the kitchen during the brief initial tour of the kitchen on 03/31/26 at 9:12am revealed the following: [...]
- D Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet that take into account the resident's clinical condition for one (Resident #86) of six residents reviewed for diet status and maintenance. The facility failed to offer Resident #86 the right diet as indicated in the residents' physician orders. These failures could increase the resident's risk for aspiration and choking. Record Review of Resident #86's admission MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #86's admission date of 03/18/26. She was [AGE] year-old female with active diagnoses included: acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and pleural effusion (buildup of excess fluid between the layers of the pleura outside your lungs), malnutrition (imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets) and dysphagia (difficult swallowing). [...]
- D Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
Inspectors wroteBased on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 5 Residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #26). The facility failed to ensure Resident #26 swallowed his medication before the staff member left the resident's room. This failure could place Residents at risk for missed doses, ineffective treatment, and potential decline in condition. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #26's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 03/23/26, reflected the Resident was a [AGE] year-old male with a BIMs score of 11 indicating he was moderately cognitively impaired. His diagnoses included: [...]
- D Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals in locked compartments based on the needs of one of five residents (Resident #16) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16 did not have unsecured Glipizide 10 MG tablet (an oral medication used to treat Type 2 Diabetes) in his room. This failure could place residents at risk for compromised medication efficacy, unsafe administration, and increased harm to residents. Findings Included:Record review of Resident #16's MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Resident's BIMS score was 8 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident had diagnoses that included: [...]
December 15, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- E Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents in 2 (Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] and Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]) of 5 shower rooms reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to properly clean and sanitize the floor, toilet and sink of Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] and failed to empty the trash and soiled linen bins. 2. The facility failed to properly clean and sanitize the floor of one of the showers in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]. This failure could affect all residents that were showered in the shower rooms by exposing them to bacteria and organisms that could impact their health and diminish their quality of life.
June 18, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician, notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status for 1 of 4 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's physician when an injury of unknown origin was discovered on 5/06/2025. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their physician informed when there was a change in condition resulting in a delay in medical intervention and decline in health.
- D Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities, in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting. [...]
February 20, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
- E Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #23, Resident #22, Resident #72, and Resident #64) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure MA C administered Resident 23's medication without cross contaminating her medications on 02/18/25. 2. The facility failed to ensure MA B prepared Resident 72's medication without cross contaminating her medications on 02/18/25. 3. The facility failed to ensure MA B sanitized the blood pressure cuff between use on Resident #22 and Resident #72 on 02/18/25. 4. [...]
- D Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #205) reviewed for intravenous fluids. RN A failed to change Resident #205's Central Venous Catheter line dressing using sterile technique. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for infections and cross-contamination.
- D Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident #64) reviewed for respiratory care. 1. The facility failed to obtain an order for Resident #64's use of supplemental O2 with stated liter amount to be delivered. 2. The facility failed to include rationale for the use of O2 for Resident #64 from 02/16/25 through 02/18/25. These failures could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of receiving an incorrect amount of oxygen and the risk of oxygen toxicity. Findings Included: [...]
November 20, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
- E Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 (Resident#1) of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (Resident #2) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility failed to ensure LVN B maintained Resident #2's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag below the bladder level during wound care on 11/19/24. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving care appropriate to address their incontinence and risk for infection.
January 25, 2024Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 2 (600 hall nurses' medication cart and 400 hall nurses' medication cart) of 4 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services in that: The facility failed to ensure: 1- The 600 Hall medication cart had 2 insulin pens for Resident #18 without an opened date. 2- The 400 Hall medication cart had 1 insulin pen for Resident #54 without an opened date. These failures could affect residents resulting in diminished effectiveness, and not receiving the therapeutic benefits of the medications.
- E Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food with appetizing temperature for one (01/24/24 breakfast) of one meal reviewed for appetizing temperature. The facility failed to serve eggs and oatmeal that had a palatable texture during the breakfast meal on 01/24/24. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of weight loss, altered nutritional status, and a diminished quality of life.
- D Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (Resident #5) of eight residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further decline of Resident #5's contracture to her right and left hands after discharge from occupational therapy on 11/13/23. This failure could place residents at risk for decline in range of motion, decreased mobility, and worsening of contractures.
- D Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for two (Resident #17, Resident #72) of eight Residents reviewed for accidents/hazards/supervision/ devices. The facility failed to properly maintain wheelchairs for Residents #17 and Resident# 72. This failures could affect the resident by placing the residents at risk for discomfort, pain, and injuries. Resident #17 Record review of Resident #17's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 03/10/2023. Resident #17 had a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #17 required 2-person assistance with transfers, and she used a manual wheelchair for mobility. [...]
- D Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one (Resident #7) of four residents reviewed for behavioral health services. The Social Worker failed to follow up to ensure Resident #7 received a psychiatric service after a referral was made on 11/02/23. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving behavioral health services and a decline in Quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #7 quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected an [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 10/31/23. Resident #7 had a BIMS of 9 which indicated she was moderately cognitively impaired. There were no behaviors, signs of delusions or rejection of care noted on the assessment. [...]
- D Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the resident received behavioral interventions unless clinically contraindicated in an effort to discontinue these drugs for 1 (Resident #86) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to attempt gradual dose reduction for Resident #86's Divalproex (antipsychotic) and Seroquel (antipsychotic) medications. The facility failed to have specific side effect monitoring for Resident #86s Divalproex and Seroquel medications. These failures could place residents at risk for possible adverse side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life.
- D Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide O had an effective hair restraint during breakfast meal serving on 01/23/24. This failure could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and food contamination.
Fire safety inspections
8 fire safety citations on file: 4 on April 2, 2026, 1 on February 20, 2025, 3 on January 25, 2024.
Every fire safety citation8 citations
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
- C Have a complete alarm system manually initiated and initiated by fire sprinkler system connection.
- C Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
- E Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- F Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F To conduct inspection, testing and maintenance of fire doors by qualified individuals.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Texas | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 3.20 | 3.39 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 2.88 | 2.98 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.21 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.81 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 43.2% | 55.3% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 57.1% | 54.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.55 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 3.33 on weekdays and 2.88 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 3.11 in April to June 2025 to 3.20 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.20 | 0.19 | 3.33 | 2.88 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 106 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 3.11 | 0.23 | 3.26 | 2.73 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 105 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 3.17 | 0.23 | 3.31 | 2.82 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 103 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 3.11 | 0.18 | 3.26 | 2.75 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 102 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Texas, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.33 | 0.40 | 3.50 | 2.93 | 2.2% | 0.7% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Texas | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 15.8 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 9.9 | 3.3 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.7 | 14.0 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 20.1 | 9.6 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 28.2 | 25.7 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 3.3 | 12.3 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICT. CMS links this home to Stonegate Senior Living, a group of 24 nursing homes averaging 2.4 stars overall.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Limestone Hospital District | 5% or greater direct ownership interest | Organization | 100% | 02/27/2015 |
| Umb Bank National Association | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Price, Larry | Corporate officer | Individual | 06/01/1982 | |
| Pf Settlers Ridge SNF Ops LLC | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Stonegate Senior Living, LP | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 06/22/2022 | |
| Coates, William | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/14/2024 | |
| Campbell, Scott | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2025 | |
| Chance, James | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2025 | |
| Fisher, James | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/04/2025 | |
| Langdon, Thomas | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2025 | |
| McGehee, William | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2025 | |
| Taylor, John | Individual is an owner, partner or trustee of any ADP of the SNF | Individual | 12/02/2025 | |
| Lifetime Wellness, Ltd. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Martus Financial Services, Inc. | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/31/2023 | |
| Pf Settlers Ridge SNF Ops LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2025 | |
| Pharmerica Drug Systems LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 08/27/2017 | |
| Preservation Freehold Company | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Rehab Pro LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Sanctuary LTC, LLC | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 09/23/2021 | |
| Stonegate Senior Living, LP | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 12/02/2025 | |
| Bhardwaj, Amit | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/18/2025 | |
| Coates, William | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/14/2024 | |
| Reins, Emilee | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 04/05/2023 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health."
- How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."
- Can we see a week of menus and the kitchen, and how are special diets handled?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 2, 2026: "Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards."
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on December 15, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely."
- Who is on the floor on Saturday and Sunday, and how many residents does each aide care for?Weekend nurse staffing here was 2.88 hours per resident per day, below the Texas average of 2.98.
Other nursing homes nearby
- Belterra Health & Rehab McKinney, 10.2 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 20 citations
- Baybrooke Village Care and Rehab Center McKinney, 11.1 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 44 citations
- Cedar Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Pilot Point, 11.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 34 citations
- Avir at Pilot Point Pilot Point, 11.7 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 14 citations
- Park Manor of McKinney McKinney, 11.7 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 19 citations
- North Park Health and Rehabilitation Center McKinney, 12.2 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 10 citations
- Meadowbrook Care Center Van Alstyne, 12.3 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 17 citations
- Victoria Gardens of Frisco Frisco, 13.6 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 16 citations
Texas contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Texas. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Resident advocate: Texas Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, 800-252-2412. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
Common questions
- What is Settlers Ridge Care Center's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Settlers Ridge Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 2 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Settlers Ridge Care Center get at its last inspection?
- 6 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on April 2, 2026. The Texas average is 9.4.
- Has Settlers Ridge Care Center been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Settlers Ridge Care Center accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Settlers Ridge Care Center?
- CMS lists 23 owners and managers, and links the home to Stonegate Senior Living. Legal business name: SOUTH LIMESTONE HOSPITAL DISTRICT.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.