What is Sherwood Oaks's Medicare star rating?

CMS rates Sherwood Oaks 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).

How many deficiencies did Sherwood Oaks get at its last inspection?

1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on February 19, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.

Does Sherwood Oaks accept Medicaid?

It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.

Who owns Sherwood Oaks?

CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to Upmc Senior Communities. Legal business name: PITTSBURGH LIFEFTIME CARE COMMUNITY.

Sherwood Oaks: Inspections, Staffing & Ratings

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on February 19, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Pennsylvania average is 10, the national average 9.2).

Of 16 health citations since April 2024, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years; the largest was $8,281, and the latest is dated August 13, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.81 hours per resident per day, against 3.89 across Pennsylvania and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 2.04 of those hours.

43.6% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Pennsylvania average 44.5%).

CMS links it to Upmc Senior Communities, an affiliated group of 6 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

604/24

209/24

112/24

403/25

208/25

102/26

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 16 health citations on file.

Severity

Isolated

Pattern

Widespread

Immediate jeopardy

Actual harm

Potential for more than minimal harm

10D

Potential for minimal harm

February 19, 2026Standard inspection · 1 citation · risk-based survey (a shorter visit CMS gives only to higher performing homes)

D

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 13, 2026

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy, clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during high contact activities and failed to follow hand hygiene procedures during a dressing change for one of two residents (Resident R6).

August 13, 2025Complaint inspection · 2 citations

J

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on facility policy review, clinical and facility record review, facility provided documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one resident resulting in elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised and unauthorized location without staff's knowledge). This failure created an immediate jeopardy situation for one of seven residents (Resident R1) identified as having a high risk for wandering.
D

Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.

F835 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) August 28, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on a review of job descriptions, facility and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) did not effectively manage the facility to make certain that proper supervision was provided for residents at high risk for elopement as required, resulting in a resident elopement creating an immediate jeopardy situation.

March 5, 2025Standard inspection · 4 citations

E

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medications in three of four medications carts (West cart, Founder Cart, and Lake Cart).
D

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

F656 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to meet resident care needs for two of five residents (Residents R13 and R23).
D

Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.

F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for a lab test for one of four residents (Resident R31).
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 10, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of four residents (Resident R6).

December 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation

E

Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.

F725 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 14, 2025

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, resident observations, resident and staff interviews, and grievance review, it was determined that the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for six of eight residents (Residents R2, R4, R5, R6, R7 and R8). Findings Include: Review of the facility policy Call Lights last reviewed 2/21/24, indicates all residents have a call light or alternative communication device within their reach at all times when unattended. Facility personnel will answer a call light as soon as possible. To ensure safety and communication between staff and residents in order to timely meet their needs. Respond to emergency call lights immediately. Respond to call lights and communication devices promptly and in person whenever possible. [...]

September 25, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations

E

Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.

F623 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 7, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of clinical record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman Division for three of three residents (Residents R1, R2, and R3).
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 7, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, facility documents, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to identify a resident's risk for elopement and failed to make certain each resident received adequate supervision that resulted in an elopement (resident exits to an unsupervised or unauthorized area without the facility's knowledge) for one resident (Resident R4) and failed to routinely assess residents for elopement risk for two of five residents reviewed (Resident R5, and R6).

April 25, 2024Standard inspection · 6 citations

E

Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.

F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policies, documents, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain a resident was free from abuse and neglect for four of six residents reviewed (Resident R2, R134, R135 and R9).
E

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly disinfect reusable equipment between residents for one of three medication carts (medication cart assignment two) and failed to implement infection control practices during administration of eye drops on two of three residents (Resident R27)
D

Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

F583 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the confidentiality of residents' medical information on one of three medication carts (medication cart assignment two).
D

Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.

F607 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents for one of five residents (Resident R134).
D

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, clinical records, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate protection from hazards for hot pack use for one of five residents (Resident R18), which resulted in a erythema (reddened) area requiring monitoring until identified as healed 8 days later.
D

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

F761 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 28, 2024

Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly secure medications in one of three medication carts (medication cart assignment two).

Fire safety inspections

10 fire safety citations on file: 5 on February 19, 2026, 3 on March 5, 2025, 2 on April 25, 2024.

Every fire safety citation10 citations

F
Have power receptacles that are properly grounded.

K 912 · February 19, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.

K 321 · February 19, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Meet other general requirements.

K 100 · February 19, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.

K 345 · February 19, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
C
Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.

K 918 · February 19, 2026 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Provide exit doors that are held open by devices that will automatically close on the activation of a fire alarm or smoke detector.

K 223 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Install smoke barrier doors that can resist smoke for at least 20 minutes.

K 374 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
B
Have properly installed hallway dispensers for alcohol-based hand rub.

K 325 · March 5, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
E
Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.

K 293 · April 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
D
Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.

K 353 · April 25, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

Date	Penalty	Amount or length
August 13, 2025	Fine	$8,281

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	United States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)	5.81	3.89	3.86
Registered nurses	2.04	0.79	0.69
All nursing staff on weekends	4.90	3.53	3.42
Nurse aides	3.05
Licensed practical nurses	0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)	43.6%	44.5%	45.8%
Registered nurse turnover	22.2%	39.9%	42.9%
Administrators who left	0

CMS expects 3.46 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.18 on weekdays and 4.90 on weekends, 21% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 4.8% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.22 in April to June 2025 to 5.81 in January to March 2026.

Quarter	All nursing staff	Registered nurses	Weekdays	Weekends	Contract staff share	Days with no RN hours	Residents a day
Jan to Mar 2026	5.81	2.04	6.18	4.90	4.8%	0 of 90	36
Oct to Dec 2025	6.54	2.17	7.03	5.31	4.3%	0 of 92	34
Jul to Sep 2025	6.45	2.39	6.96	5.17	12.2%	0 of 92	33
Apr to Jun 2025	5.22	1.92	5.62	4.23	19.0%	0 of 91	39
United States, Jan to Mar 2026	3.75	0.62	3.92	3.33	5.3%	0.5% of days
Pennsylvania, Jan to Mar 2026	3.69	0.65	3.82	3.34	11.3%	0.1% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Trains nurse aides: this home runs a state-approved CNA program for its own hires (state list: PDE Approved NATCEP by County, as of March 1, 2026). A nursing home cannot charge aides it employs, or has offered a job, for state-approved training (42 CFR 483.152(c)). See Sherwood Oaks CNA training on CareerFunded, our sister site for career training.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Pennsylvania

Job	Median	Middle half	Employed
Pennsylvania, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$21.44	$18.88 to $22.52	67,740
LPNs and LVNs	$30.74	$29.02 to $35.01	38,260
Registered nurses	$46.36	$38.75 to $50.35	146,520
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)	$20.67	$17.91 to $22.55	534,270
LPNs and LVNs	$33.86	$30.05 to $37.40	188,210
Registered nurses	$41.11	$37.85 to $47.68	142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

Measure	This home	Pennsylvania	US
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	19.8	16.8	13.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	0.0	0.7	0.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	3.3	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	5.8	3.1	3.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	1.1	1.4	1.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	13.8	17.0	14.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	4.0	4.8	4.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1	8.5	17.7	15.4

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Sherwood Oaks's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (42.5% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

42.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Pennsylvania: 100 better, 108 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 46 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

9.0% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Pennsylvania: 3 better, 9 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 50 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.8% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Pennsylvania: 7 better, 5 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 28 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

66.7% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania54.4% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 21 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

0.0% this home

Median of homes: Pennsylvania2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 26 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

Not reported

CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

Median of homes: Pennsylvania100.0% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: PITTSBURGH LIFEFTIME CARE COMMUNITY. CMS links this home to Upmc Senior Communities, a group of 6 nursing homes averaging 2.8 stars overall.

Name	Role	Type	Share	Since
Upmc Senior Communities Inc	5% or greater direct ownership interest	Organization	100%	12/31/2006
Simmons, Eileen	Corporate director	Individual		01/01/2025
Simmons, Eileen	Corporate officer	Individual		01/01/2025
Pittsburgh Lifeftime Care Community	Operational/managerial control	Organization		07/21/2020
Upmc Senior Communities Inc	Operational/managerial control	Organization		12/31/2006
Bondi, Mark	Operational/managerial control	Individual		08/04/2025
Borgo, Angela	Operational/managerial control	Individual		08/07/2020
Case, Nanci	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2013
Devinney, Amy	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2025
Ehringer, George	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2016
Henderson, Jean	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2024
Nigro, William	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2020
Nord, Mark	Operational/managerial control	Individual		09/27/2021
Nowak, Joseph	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2021
Seaton, Kathy	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2019
Shoenthal, Donald	Operational/managerial control	Individual		07/01/2020
Upmc Senior Communities Inc	Adp of the SNF	Organization		07/21/2020
Bondi, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual		08/04/2025
Nord, Mark	Adp of the SNF	Individual		09/27/2021
Shoenthal, Donald	Adp of the SNF	Individual		07/01/2004

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on August 13, 2025: "Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents."
What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 19, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 5, 2025: "Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs."
How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on September 25, 2024: "Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights."

Other nursing homes nearby

Cranberry Place
Cranberry Township, 1.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 87 citations
Harmony Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center
Wexford, 5.3 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 31 citations
St. John Specialty Care Center
Mars, 5.5 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 55 citations
Passavant Retirement and Healt
Zelienople, 6.2 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 38 citations
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at Harmony
Harmony, 7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 76 citations
Concordia at Villa St. Joseph
Baden, 7.4 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 43 citations
Rochester Residence and Care Center
Rochester, 8.3 mi · not rated · 143 citations
Perry Health & Rehab Center
Wexford, 8.7 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 117 citations

Assisted living and personal care homes in Cranberry Township

Licensed assisted living residences and personal care homes in the same town or within 5 miles, each with its Pennsylvania licence record.

Sherwood Oaks
Cranberry Township, 0.2 mi · licensed for 77 · personal care home
Ridgecrest at Cranberry Woods
Cranberry Township, 2.5 mi · licensed for 115 · personal care home
Concordia of Cranberry
Mars, 3.5 mi · licensed for 84 · personal care home
The Province of Wexford
Warrendale, 4.3 mi · licensed for 143 · assisted living residence

Assisted living and personal care homes in Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Pennsylvania. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Inspections and complaints: Pennsylvania Department of Health, Division of Nursing Care Facilities, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
Resident advocate: Pennsylvania Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program, Department of Aging, 717-783-8975. The long-term care ombudsman is a free, confidential advocate for residents and families, set up under the federal Older Americans Act.
State inspection reports: Pennsylvania Department of Health Nursing Care Facility Locator, where Pennsylvania publishes its own records on licensed homes.

Common questions

What is Sherwood Oaks's Medicare star rating?: CMS rates Sherwood Oaks 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 4 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Sherwood Oaks get at its last inspection?: 1 health deficiency at the standard inspection on February 19, 2026. The Pennsylvania average is 10.
Has Sherwood Oaks been fined?: Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,281 in the last three years.
Does Sherwood Oaks accept Medicaid?: It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Sherwood Oaks?: CMS lists 20 owners and managers, and links the home to Upmc Senior Communities. Legal business name: PITTSBURGH LIFEFTIME CARE COMMUNITY.

Sources

Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.