Home / Minnesota / Saint Louis Park
Sholom Home West
3620 Phillips Parkway South, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 · Hennepin County · (952) 935-6311
139 certified beds, about 130 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245574 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
The record in brief
At its most recent standard inspection, on March 19, 2026, inspectors cited 4 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
None of its 17 health citations since September 2023 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.39 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.34 of those hours.
18.8% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Health inspections
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
Where its citations fall on CMS's grid
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 17 health citations on file.
March 19, 2026Standard inspection · 4 citations
- E Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman for Long Term Care (OMB - LTC) was notified of resident transfers or discharges for 3 of 5 residents (R73, R139, R141) reviewed for transfers or discharges from the facility.
- D Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident records upon discharge were complete and accurate for 1 of 1 resident (R141) reviewed for discharge. Findings Include - R141's Face Sheet (undated) documented the diagnoses of sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus ( a germ found on people's skin ), pneumonia, acute and subacute infective endocarditis (inflammation of the heart's inner lining). R141's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a registered nurse signing date of 2/07/26, documented R141 was moderately cognitively impaired and require set up to moderate assistance with all activities of daily living. R141's nurse progress notes on 2/08/26, indicated R141 had eloped from the facility and was later found wondering at Target. [...]
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete proper disinfection of a blood glucose monitor for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for glucose monitoring.
- D Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment cleanliness of intravenous (IV) poles for 1 of 1 resident (R86) reviewed for tube feeding. R86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R86 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R86 diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) following stroke, hypertension, gastrostomy tube (tube into stomach for feeding), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following stroke, and encephalopathy (group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction). On 3/17/26 at 8:40 a.m., observed IV pole in R86's room with tube feeding pump attached. [...]
March 12, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a call light to one of three residents (R2) reviewed for access to call lights when R2 did not have a functioning call light for an unknown number of weeks. Findings Include: R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS indicated R2 was continent of bowel and bladder, and independent with toileting. R2's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 15 indicating intact cognition. The census report, undated, indicated R2 moved to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/7/24. R2's Quarterly Review MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's Significant Change in Status MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 required moderate assistance with toileting. [...]
January 8, 2025Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 8 citations
- E Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms and procedures were posted in prominent locations throughout the facility for residents and resident representatives to file grievances, and anonymously if desired for 4 of 4 residents (R26, R35, R102 and R104) reviewed for grievances.
- E Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to hold care conference meetings with the resident and/or their representative to allow the resident and/or representative the opportunity to review and participate in the revision of the care plan for 5 of 5 residents (R14, R105, R6, R74,R97) reviewed for care planning.
- E Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to provide a process by which residents could make their own food selections for meals for 6 of 6 residents (R241, R73, R6, R23, R104, R35) reviewed for food.
- D Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to complete a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for 1 of 2 residents (R95) reviewed with a new mental illness diagnosis.
- D Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferred activities for individual entertainment were offered for 1 of 1 resident (R97) reviewed for activities.
- D Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide timely repositioning for 1 of 1 resident (R58) who was dependent upon staff for repositioning and high risk for pressure ulcers.
- D Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines by appropriately implementing measures to prevent the spread of infection when the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was discarded prior to leaving resident rooms (R19 and R1), and failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R58) who had an indwelling device present.
- D Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R24, R25, and R124) received pneumococcal vaccinations based on shared clinical decision-making in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations reviewed for immunizations.
December 5, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely notification for change in condition to the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition.
March 4, 2024Complaint inspection · 1 citation
- D Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor edema for 2 of 2 (R1, R3) residents reviewed with lower extremity edema.
September 21, 2023Standard inspection · 2 citations
- D Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 1 of 1 resident (R28) observed for dignity.
- D Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide restorative walking program as ordered for 1 of 1 residents (R42) reviewed for range of motion (ROM).
Fire safety inspections
18 fire safety citations on file: 3 on March 19, 2026, 4 on January 8, 2025, 11 on September 21, 2023.
Every fire safety citation18 citations
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- E Have restrictions on the use of portable space heaters.
- D Ensure proper usage of power strips and extension cords.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- E Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
- D Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
- D Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- F Ensure heating and ventilation systems that have been properly installed according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- F Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
- F Ensure that building systems meet requirements determined by risk assessment procedures performed by qualified personnel.
- F Ensure receptacles at patient bed locations and where general anesthesia is administered, are tested after initial installation, replacement or servicing.
- E Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
- E Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
- E Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
- E Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
- E Ensure smoke barriers are constructed to a 1 hour fire resistance rating.
- D Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
- D Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
Fines and payment denials
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Staffing
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.39 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.34 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 5.08 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.90 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.15 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 18.8% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 19.4% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 1 |
CMS expects 3.35 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.51 on weekdays and 5.08 on weekends, 8% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.52 in April to June 2025 to 5.39 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.39 | 1.34 | 5.51 | 5.08 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 130 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 5.43 | 1.31 | 5.58 | 5.03 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 133 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 5.43 | 1.31 | 5.61 | 4.99 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 129 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.52 | 1.36 | 5.73 | 5.02 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 128 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Quality measures
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 14.8 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 16.9 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 23.3 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 31.6 | 23.5 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 13.8 | 14.8 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.1 | 1.9 | 1.8 |
Owners and operators
Legal business name: SHOLOM HOME WEST INC.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Furman, Lisa | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Jacobs, David | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Lampert, Renee | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Meiches, Robert | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2017 | |
| Mosow, Daniel | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Nirenstein, David | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Packer, Florence | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Pierotti, Jeremy | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Resig, Michael | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Rosen, Layne | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Rutzick, Sheryl | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2016 | |
| Salita, Marc | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Schanfield, Paul | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2018 | |
| Segal, Judith | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2024 | |
| Seiler, Scott | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2014 | |
| Stone, Jonathan | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2021 | |
| Ungerman, Sonia | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Weissman, Douglas | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Wolson, Kimberly | Corporate director | Individual | 10/01/2023 | |
| Berryman, David | Corporate officer | Individual | 03/07/2016 | |
| Newbrough, James | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/20/2024 | |
| Sholom Community Alliance | Operational/managerial control | Organization | 07/13/1995 | |
| Berryman, David | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 03/07/2016 | |
| Horvath, Andrea | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Newbrough, James | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/20/2024 | |
| Pederson, Jane | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 01/01/2024 | |
| Schmeling, Cory | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 08/16/2019 | |
| Wyckoff, Douglas | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 12/20/2016 | |
| Sholom Community Alliance | Adp of the SNF | Organization | 04/03/2026 | |
| Horvath, Andrea | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/27/2025 | |
| Pederson, Jane | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/28/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Questions to ask on a visit
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
- How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies."
- How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 8, 2025: "Provide activities to meet all resident's needs."
- What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
- Can we see a resident room, a shower room and the dining room on this visit?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on March 19, 2026: "Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public."
- How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.
Other nursing homes nearby
- The Estates at St. Louis Park LLC Saint Louis Park, 0.7 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 47 citations
- Chapel View Health Care Center Hopkins, 0.9 mi · 4 of 5 stars · 26 citations
- The Villas at the Cedars Saint Louis Park, 1.2 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 59 citations
- The Villas at St. Louis Park Saint Louis Park, 1.8 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 50 citations
- Hopkins Restorative Care Center Hopkins, 1.9 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 46 citations
- The Villas at the Park Saint Louis Park, 2.5 mi · 2 of 5 stars · 29 citations
- The Villas at Brookview Golden Valley, 3.3 mi · 1 of 5 stars · 36 citations
- Jones Harrison Residence Minneapolis, 3.4 mi · 3 of 5 stars · 30 citations
Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.
- Inspections and complaints: Minnesota Department of Health, Health Regulation Division, the state agency that inspects nursing homes for CMS and takes complaints about care.
- State inspection reports: MDH Nursing and Boarding Care Home Survey and Complaint Inspection Findings, where Minnesota publishes its own records on licensed homes.
Common questions
- What is Sholom Home West's Medicare star rating?
- CMS rates Sholom Home West 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 4 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
- How many deficiencies did Sholom Home West get at its last inspection?
- 4 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on March 19, 2026. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
- Has Sholom Home West been fined?
- CMS lists no fines in the last three years.
- Does Sholom Home West accept Medicaid?
- It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
- Who owns Sholom Home West?
- CMS lists 31 owners and managers. Legal business name: SHOLOM HOME WEST INC.
Sources
- Ratings, staffing and fines: CMS Provider Information, released September 30, 2026, data as of September 1, 2026.
- Citations: CMS Health Deficiencies and Fire Safety Deficiencies.
- Owners: CMS Ownership. Penalties: CMS Penalties.
- Staffing by quarter: CMS Payroll Based Journal Daily Nurse Staffing, April 2025 to March 2026, summed by NursingHomeClear.
- Inspector summaries: CMS Full Statement of Deficiencies (CMS-2567 text), data as of September 1, 2026. Each quote is the part of the statement before the detailed findings.
- Inspection reports with the inspectors' full notes are on this home's Medicare.gov page.
- Something wrong on this page? Ask for a correction. We fix errors in our copy of the data; findings themselves can only be changed by CMS and the state.
- NursingHomeClear is independent and not affiliated with CMS, Medicare or any state agency. This page reports federal records; it does not rate, recommend or endorse any home, and it is not medical or legal advice.