Find a nursing home

Home / Minnesota / Hopkins

Chapel View Health Care Center

615 Minnetonka Mills Road, Hopkins, MN 55343 · Hennepin County · (952) 938-2761

100 certified beds, about 91 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1987

Certified for Medicaid Certified for Medicare
Overall
4 of 5
Health inspections
3 of 5
Staffing
5 of 5
Quality measures
3 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245493 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on December 4, 2025, inspectors cited 2 health deficiencies (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).

Of 26 health citations since September 2023, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,345 in the last three years; the largest was $17,345, and the latest is dated April 24, 2025.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.31 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.34 of those hours.

35.5% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).

CMS links it to Cassia, an affiliated group of 16 nursing homes.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 26 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
1L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
19D
3E
1F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
1C
April 16, 2026Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. G
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow practitioner orders for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for respiratory care when R3 was sent to an off-site appointment without oxygen, resulting in a change in her condition requiring hospitalization. The noncompliance that began on 1/27/26 was corrected prior to the start of survey when the facility implemented a corrective action plan on 1/27/26. This is issued in past noncompliance.
December 4, 2025Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    F921 · Environmental · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 of 1 resident (R4) whose wheelchair was soiled. In addition, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment cleanliness of intravenous (IV) poles for 2 of 4 residents (R40 and R98) reviewed for tube feeding.
  2. C
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    F577 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) December 30, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure results of complaint investigations were available for review. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility, as well as family, visitors, and staff.
April 24, 2025Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. L
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety, widespread · found on a complaint visit · Past noncompliance: already fixed when inspectors found it
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement infection control strategies for respiratory protection to mitigate the risk and spread of Influenza A. As a result, the facility developed an outbreak where 13 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R9, R13, R8, R10, R11 and R12) tested positive for Influenza A. Five residents (R1, R2, R5, R10 and R15) were sent to ED and admitted to hospital, These practices resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) due to the likelihood of spread to the remaining 80 residents in the facility. The IJ began on 3/31/25, when the facility failed to implement ongoing monitoring, screening of residents with respiratory symptoms and implement transmission-based precautions and was identified on 4/18/25. [...]
  2. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and appropriately monitor 2 of 3 residents (R5, R13) with acute illnesses including but not limited to influenza that resulted in hospitalization reviewed for change of condition.
  3. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a system to ensure physician orders were accurately transcribed to prevent and/or mitigate risk of medication errors for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for medication errors. The facility's failures resulted in R17 received ibuprofen 66 times not in accordance with physician orders.
  4. D
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    F760 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents (R15) reviewed for medication errors.
  5. D
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    F770 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for laboratory studies had been obtained in a timely manner for 3 of 3 residents (R5, R13, R15) who had physician ordered labs.
  6. D
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    F773 · Administration · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of an abnormal laboratory result for 1 of 3 residents (R13) who had laboratory orders.
  7. D
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    F842 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for documentation.
April 2, 2025Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. E
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    F554 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 17, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to appropriately complete a thorough self administration assessment on 3 of 4 (R2, R3 and R4) sampled residents (who preferred not to administer their own medication) by ensuring residents who were left while the administration was occurring unattended, were found competent to leave their masks and/on or turn off the nebulizer appropriately when finished.
November 21, 2024Standard inspection · 2 citations
  1. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and discuss risks and benefits prior to installation of grab bars for 1 of 1 residents (R194) observed to have grab bars affixed to their bed.
  2. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) January 13, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed and appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn as required during high contact care for 2 of 3 residents (R193, R9) who required EBP and were reviewed for infection control.
June 26, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. E
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility failed identify the preference for health care directives for seven of ten residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, R7, and R10) reviewed for advanced directives.
  2. E
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    F678 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) July 29, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and record review, the facility could not ensure staff were properly trained in basic life support (BLS) including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to provide BLS/CPR to residents requiring such care for 18 of 62 licensed staff records registered nurse(RN)-A, RN-B, RN-C, RN-D, RN-E, RN-F, RN-G, RN-H, RN-L, licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, LPN-B, LPN-C, LPN-D, LPN-E, LPN-F, LPN-G, LPN-H, and LPN-I) when reviewed for BLS/CPR training. The facility contacted licensed staff for proof of BLS/CPR Certification and obtained five more staff BLS/CPR certifications.
April 18, 2024Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    F561 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident bathing preferences were honored for 1 of 2 residents (R3) who voiced concerns about bathing routines.
  2. D
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    F657 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R3) for services provided per plan of care.
  3. D
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    F755 · Pharmacy Service · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) May 20, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supply and administration of ordered medications for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services.
October 5, 2023Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 7 citations
  1. F
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, widespread · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteINFECTIOUS DISEASE SURVEILLANCE Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing surveillance program for infectious disease tracking of new admissions that could affect all 90 residents and all staff at the facility, ensured hand hygiene and infection control was completed for 2 of 3 resident (R27 & R46) observed for incontinent cares and hand hygiene was completed during catheter cares to minimal risk of infection for 1of 1 residents (R27) reviewed for infection control practices. During an interview on 10/4/23 at 12:33 p.m., the facility infection preventionist (IP) stated the facility conducts infection surveillance for tracking and trending infections via spreadsheets. [...]
  2. D
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    F582 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), was not provided to 1 of 3 residents (R111) who continued to reside in the facility upon termination of Medicare A benefits.
  3. D
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    F645 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) level I was completed and accurate prior to admission to the facility for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R22) reviewed for pre-admission screening (PAS).
  4. D
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    F677 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide oral care for 1 of 1 residents (R14) reviewed for activities of daily living for dependant residents.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    F690 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper catheter care and maintenance to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 2 of 2 (R27, R75) residents reviewed for catheters.
  6. D
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    F695 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with the provider orders for 1 of 1 residents (R14) reviewed for respiratory care.
  7. D
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    F700 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) November 15, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess the resident for risk of entrapment, review risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or their representative, and obtain informed consent for 1 of 1 residents (R21) reviewed for bilaterial grab bars on their bed.
September 19, 2023Complaint inspection · 1 citation
  1. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) October 27, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility delayed the necessary care and treatment to manage symptoms of pain, anxiety, and agitation for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care. R2 was restless, yelling out for help, and not provided the prescribed medications to alleviate discomfort. R2's care plan dated 7/14/23, indicated R2 required staff to monitor her degenerative joint disease (inflammation and joint damage) and if the condition worsened to update her medical providers for additional medication. R2's care plan dated 7/17/23, indicated she was alert, oriented, and able to make her needs known. The planned intervention was to update her medical provider if she developed worsening symptoms not resolved by the current treatment plan. [...]

Fire safety inspections

19 fire safety citations on file: 3 on December 4, 2025, 7 on November 21, 2024, 9 on October 5, 2023.

Every fire safety citation19 citations
  1. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · December 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  2. D
    Ensure that special areas are constructed so that walls can resist fire for one hour or have an approved fire extinguishing system.
    K 321 · December 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  3. D
    Ensure that corridors are separated from use areas by walls constructed to limit the passage of smoke.
    K 362 · December 4, 2025 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  4. F
    Install emergency lighting that can last at least 1 1/2 hours.
    K 291 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  5. E
    Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
    K 225 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  6. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  7. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  8. C
    Follow proper procedures when the fire alarm was out of service for more than 4 hours.
    K 346 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  9. C
    Follow proper procedures when the automatic sprinkler systems was out of service for more than 10 hours.
    K 354 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  10. C
    Have simulated fire drills held at unexpected times.
    K 712 · November 21, 2024 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  11. F
    Implement emergency and standby power systems.
    E 41 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  12. F
    Have stairways and smokeproof enclosures used as exits that meet safety requirements.
    K 225 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  13. F
    Inspect, test, and maintain automatic sprinkler systems.
    K 353 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  14. F
    Have generator or other power source capable of supplying service within 10 seconds.
    K 918 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  15. E
    Keep aisles, corridors, and exits free of obstruction in case of emergency.
    K 211 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  16. E
    Install corridor and hallway doors that block smoke.
    K 363 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  17. D
    Have properly located and lighted "Exit" signs.
    K 293 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  18. D
    Provide properly protected cooking facilities.
    K 324 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)
  19. D
    Have approved installation, maintenance and testing program for fire alarm systems.
    K 345 · October 5, 2023 · Corrected (the home has a date of correction)

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
April 24, 2025Fine $17,345

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)4.314.193.86
Registered nurses1.341.060.69
All nursing staff on weekends3.913.713.42
Nurse aides2.24
Licensed practical nurses0.73
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)35.5%42.2%45.8%
Registered nurse turnover43.2%38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left0

CMS expects 3.62 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.47 on weekdays and 3.91 on weekends, 13% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.55 in April to June 2025 to 4.31 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20264.311.344.473.91 0.0%0 of 9091
Oct to Dec 20254.301.354.453.94 0.0%0 of 9290
Jul to Sep 20254.331.284.493.91 0.0%0 of 9290
Apr to Jun 20254.551.224.754.03 1.1%0 of 9188
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Minnesota, Jan to Mar 20264.191.054.383.735.2%0.8% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Staff pay reports

Staff pay at this home

No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.

Official wage estimates for Minnesota

JobMedianMiddle halfEmployed
Minnesota, all employers
CNAs (nursing assistants)$22.44$19.39 to $23.7229,120
LPNs and LVNs$30.65$28.83 to $34.2612,840
Registered nurses$48.80$42.76 to $55.1770,110
United States, nursing care facilities
CNAs (nursing assistants)$20.67$17.91 to $22.55534,270
LPNs and LVNs$33.86$30.05 to $37.40188,210
Registered nurses$41.11$37.85 to $47.68142,270

Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.

Work here? Share your pay anonymously

For Chapel View Health Care Center. No name, email or phone, and nothing you could type about a resident: every answer is a number or a choice.

Your job
Employed by
Usual shift
Do you get a shift differential?
Optional questions
Mandatory overtime?
How did staffing feel on your usual shift?

Every report is reviewed before it counts; what it says about the home never decides whether it counts. How pay reports are handled.

How staff pay reports work · CNA pay by state

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeMinnesotaUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
17.818.213.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.41.90.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
1.72.61.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.54.03.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.41.91.6
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
19.220.514.1
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
4.95.24.6
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
16.817.115.4
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
24.923.523.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
11.014.812.0

Short-term rehab results

For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Chapel View Health Care Center's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it better than the national rate (62.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.

Went home or back to the community

62.9% this home

Better than the national rate

US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse

Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 266 eligible stays.

Potentially preventable readmissions

10.5% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse

Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 269 eligible stays.

Infections that led to a hospital stay

6.2% this home

No different from the national rate

US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse

Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 159 eligible stays.

Self-care and mobility at discharge

54.3% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%

Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 116 residents counted.

Falls with major injury

2.5% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%

Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 162 residents counted.

New or worsened pressure ulcers

2.1% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%

Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 162 residents counted.

Medication list given at discharge

95.6% this home

Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%

Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 113 residents counted.

Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.

Owners and operators

Legal business name: AUGUSTANA CHAPEL VIEW HOMES INC. CMS links this home to Cassia, a group of 16 nursing homes averaging 4.4 stars overall.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Augustana Care5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2018
Cassia5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization100%01/01/2020
Ellingson, ErikCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Morris, CynthiaCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2025
Nye, GeraldCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Parks, CharlesCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Ramsdale, ScottCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2018
Verlautz, MicheleneCorporate directorIndividual01/01/2024
Brady, JaimeCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2025
Brown, AngelaCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2018
Kern, MatthewCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2018
Libbon, PaulCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2025
Mason, KrissaCorporate officerIndividual10/01/2025
Stadtherr, SeelochaniCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2018
Youngquist, KathrynCorporate officerIndividual01/01/2018
CassiaOperational/managerial controlOrganization01/01/2018
Brady, JaimeOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2025
Davenport, JessicaOperational/managerial controlIndividual02/09/2025
Heyrman, TaraOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/12/2022
Klein, AndrewOperational/managerial controlIndividual05/03/2022
Kuka, KellyOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
Libbon, PaulOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2025
Mason, KrissaOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2025
Mittal, VikasOperational/managerial controlIndividual10/01/2025
Moore, LisaOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
Pahl, SamuelOperational/managerial controlIndividual06/17/2004
Saibou, LauraOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
Stadtherr, SeelochaniOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
Youngquist, KathrynOperational/managerial controlIndividual01/01/2018
CassiaAdp of the SNFOrganization12/05/2025
Brady, JaimeAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2025
Brown, AngelaAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2018
Libbon, PaulAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2025
Mason, KrissaAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2025
Mittal, VikasAdp of the SNFIndividual10/01/2025
Pahl, SamuelAdp of the SNFIndividual01/15/2026
Stadtherr, SeelochaniAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2018
Youngquist, KathrynAdp of the SNFIndividual01/01/2018

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 9 problems in this area, most recently on April 16, 2026: "Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed."
  2. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 5 problems in this area, most recently on December 4, 2025: "Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies."
  3. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  4. How are medications reviewed, and how often are antipsychotic or sedating drugs used?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on April 24, 2025: "Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist."

Other nursing homes nearby

Minnesota contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Chapel View Health Care Center's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Chapel View Health Care Center 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 3 for health inspections, 5 for staffing and 3 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Chapel View Health Care Center get at its last inspection?
2 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on December 4, 2025. The Minnesota average is 7.1.
Has Chapel View Health Care Center been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $17,345 in the last three years.
Does Chapel View Health Care Center accept Medicaid?
It is certified to take Medicaid (CMS lists it as "Medicare and Medicaid"). Certification does not mean a Medicaid bed is open: ask the admissions office.
Who owns Chapel View Health Care Center?
CMS lists 38 owners and managers, and links the home to Cassia. Legal business name: AUGUSTANA CHAPEL VIEW HOMES INC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection