18621 Neff Rd, Cleveland, OH 44119 · Cuyahoga County · (216) 486-0268
104 certified beds, about 75 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1981
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 365567 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on September 26, 2024, inspectors cited 6 health deficiencies (the Ohio average is 10.5, the national average 9.2).
None of its 24 health citations since April 2019 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy.
CMS lists no fines against this home in the last three years.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 4.60 hours per resident per day, against 3.69 across Ohio and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 0.66 of those hours.
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 24 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide food at appetizing temperatures. This had the potential to affect 189 of 196 facility residents. The facility identified seven residents (Residents #119, #120, #126, #149, #155, #166, #186) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 196.
Inspectors wroteTHE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and complete. This finding affected one (Resident #42) of nine resident records reviewed for accuracy. The facility census was 74.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to serve hot and palatable foods. This had the potential to affect all residents, except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observations, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents, except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents residing on the Westpark Unit (#1, #2, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #12, #14, #15, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #27, #28, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #39, #40, #41, #42, #47, #48, #50, #51, #52, #55, #56, #58, #60, #61, #67, #68, #71, #73, #74, #179, #180, #181, #182, #229), except resident #54 and #56 who received no food by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure urinary drainage bags were covered with privacy bags. This affected one resident (#68) of three reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all fall interventions were in place for one resident (Resident #51) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 83. Findings Include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures of the left sided ribs, diabetes, high blood pressure, hyperlipidemia, gastric reflux, insomnia, over active bladder, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's, dementia without behavioral disturbance, osteoarthritis, urge incontinence and cataracts. Review of the quarterly comprehensive Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 3.0 dated 06/30/24 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, needed assistance for all personal care, and had fallen once since the previous assessment dated [DATE]. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were taken and documented per physician orders for a resident that was at risk for weight loss. This affected one resident (#68) of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 83.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect 70 of 71 residents receiving food from the kitchen (the facility identified Resident #53 as receiving no food from the facility kitchen). The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to properly dispose of red biohazard bags. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and appropriate food substitutions were provided. This affected five residents (#18, #42, #37, #55, and #67) of five residents observed during a breakfast meal and had the potential to affect all residents except Resident #53 who received nothing by mouth. The facility also failed to ensure therapeutic diets were followed as prescribed. This affected one resident (#42) of four residents (#37, #42, #50, and #67) reviewed for food concerns. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman was notified of residents discharged to hospital. This affected two residents (#27 and #73) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure written bed hold notices were provided to residents or the resident representative when transferred to the hospital. This affected two residents (#27 and #73) of two residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the proper use of incontinence briefs and liners to prevent potential skin breakdown and infection. This affected three (#6, #31 and #68) of three residents observed for incontinence care.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded timely. This affected two (Residents #35 and #65) of 32 residents whose medications were stored in the first floor medication cart. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature. This affected one (#55) of five residents reviewed for food concerns and had the potential to affect 70 of 71 residents (the facility identified Resident #53 as receiving no food from the kitchen). The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored. This affected one resident (#67) of four residents (#37, #42, #50, and #67) reviewed for food concerns. The facility census was 71.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide the appropriate portion of the planned menu items during the lunch meal on 04/22/19 according to the dietary spreadsheet. This had the potential to affect all 125 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #31 and #73) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 127.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, food transportation carts were cleaned, food products were dated when opened and food/beverages were served in a manner to prevent contamination and/or food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 125 residents who received meal trays from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (Resident #31 and #73) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 127.
Inspectors wroteBased on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessments were accurately completed. This affected two residents (Resident #69 and #114) of 30 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings Include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #114 the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Record review revealed the resident had an indwelling urinary (Foley) catheter due to diagnoses of retention of urine. Resident #114 also had a care plan in place for the indwelling catheter related to a mass of bladder. A review of MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 03/17/19 revealed no indication of an indwelling catheter in Section H of the MDS 3.0 assessment. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter tubing was secured per Resident #19 and Resident #114's plan of care to prevent the catheter from pulling and/or causing irritation or pain. This affected two residents (Resident #19 and #114) of three residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, retention of urine and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms. Record review revealed the resident had an indwelling catheter due to the diagnosis of retention of urine. Resident #114 had a care plan in place to have the catheter tubing secured to her leg every morning. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #324's liquids were properly thickened as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #324) of four residents reviewed for thickened liquids. Findings Include: Review of Resident #324's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/07/19 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease and major depressive disorder. Review of a physician's orders revealed Resident #324 was ordered a dysphagia II carbohydrate controlled no added salt diet with nectar thick liquids. Review of Resident #324's baseline care plan dated 04/07/19 revealed the resident was on dysphagia II no added salt diet with nectar thick liquids with a goal to maintain adequate nutrition. [...]
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was provided to Resident #324 as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #324) of five residents who received therapeutic a dysphagia II diet.
18 fire safety citations on file: 6 on September 26, 2024, 6 on May 19, 2022, 6 on April 25, 2019.
CMS lists no fines or payment denials against this home in the last three years. The national average is 0.9 fines per home.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 4.60 | 3.69 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.13 | 3.28 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 2.56 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 1.38 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | not reported | 48.7% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | not reported | 43.9% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.64 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 4.79 on weekdays and 4.13 on weekends, 14% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 13.5% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 4.33 in April to June 2025 to 4.60 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.60 | 0.66 | 4.79 | 4.13 | 13.5% | 0 of 90 | 75 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.59 | 0.61 | 4.75 | 4.17 | 12.2% | 0 of 92 | 76 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.68 | 0.81 | 4.84 | 4.27 | 14.6% | 0 of 92 | 80 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 4.33 | 0.84 | 4.56 | 3.77 | 11.6% | 0 of 91 | 76 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Ohio, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.64 | 0.60 | 3.80 | 3.24 | 4.6% | 0.4% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review. If you work here, your report helps start one.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $18.76 | $17.93 to $21.44 | 63,280 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $29.78 | $27.34 to $31.68 | 39,900 |
| Registered nurses | $39.67 | $38.08 to $47.61 | 143,730 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Ohio | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 8.2 | 5.3 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.2 | 6.1 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 4.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 15.0 | 8.8 | 15.4 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 21.0 | 24.9 | 23.8 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 14.1 | 12.9 | 12.0 |
| Number of hospitalizations per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.9 |
| Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1000 long-stay resident days Long Stay residents, 20250101-20251231 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for Slovene Home for the Aged's Medicare short-stay residents. On returning residents home or to the community, CMS rates it no different from the national rate (49.9% of residents, after adjusting for how sick they were). How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
49.9% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 51.5% · Ohio: 147 better, 20 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 68 eligible stays.
12.5% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Ohio: 3 better, 7 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 93 eligible stays.
6.6% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 7.1% · Ohio: 1 better, 4 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 48 eligible stays.
79.1% this home
Median of homes: Ohio55.6% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 43 residents counted.
0.0% this home
Median of homes: Ohio0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
2.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio1.4% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 53 residents counted.
91.3% this home
Median of homes: Ohio100.0% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 23 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: SLOVENE HOME FOR THE AGED.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sas, Jeffrey | W-2 managing employee | Individual | 11/14/2002 | |
| Hiti, Anthony | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/27/2018 | |
| Hrvatin, Philip | Corporate officer | Individual | 07/29/2014 | |
| Sas, Jeffrey | Corporate officer | Individual | 11/14/2002 | |
| Zele, Scott | Corporate officer | Individual | 05/27/2017 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Ohio. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.