Find a nursing home

Home / Connecticut / Bridgeport

Springs at 3030 Park, the

3030 Park Avenue, Bridgeport, CT 06604 · Greater Bridgeport County · (203) 374-5611

23 certified beds, about 21 residents a day · For profit - Limited Liability company · Medicare since 2009

CMS high performing icon Part of a continuing care retirement community Certified for Medicare
Overall
5 of 5
Health inspections
5 of 5
Staffing
4 of 5
Quality measures
5 of 5

CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 075440 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes

The record in brief

At its most recent standard inspection, on January 7, 2026, inspectors cited 3 health deficiencies (the Connecticut average is 13.4, the national average 9.2).

Of 18 health citations since February 2023, 1 was rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents.

CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years; the largest was $8,018, and the latest is dated March 21, 2024.

Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.91 hours per resident per day, against 3.73 across Connecticut and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 2.01 of those hours.

Health inspections

Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.

Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.

Potential for minimal harm Potential for more than minimal harm Actual harm Immediate jeopardy Found on a complaint visit

Where its citations fall on CMS's grid

CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 18 health citations on file.

Severity
Isolated
Pattern
Widespread
Immediate jeopardy
0J
0K
0L
Actual harm
1G
0H
0I
Potential for more than minimal harm
15D
2E
0F
Potential for minimal harm
0A
0B
0C
January 7, 2026Standard inspection, Complaint inspection · 3 citations
  1. E
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    F790 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 residents (Residents # 7, 12, and 16) reviewed for dental services, the facility failed to offer routine dental services to long-term care residents, per the facility policy.
  2. D
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    F600 · Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for staff to resident altercation, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from abuse.
  3. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) February 15, 2026
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 of 3 resident (Resident #3, 28, and 32) reviewed for transmission based precautions, the facility failed ensure that appropriate signage was posted for Resident #3 who was on contact precautions, failed to ensure nursing staff adhered to appropriate infection control techniques for Resident #28, who was on droplet precautions, and failed to ensure nursing staff adhered to appropriate infection control techniques for Resident #32 who was on enhanced barrier precautions.
February 11, 2025Standard inspection · 7 citations
  1. D
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    F550 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for ADL's and who required assistance with toileting, the facility failed to ensure care that promoted the resident's dignity.
  2. D
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    F578 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 3 of 4 residents (Resident #13, 3 and 173) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained that reflected the resident/resident representatives wishes for code status (code status refers to the level of medical interventions a person wishes to have started if their heart or breathing stops).
  3. D
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    F580 · Resident Rights · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician when medications and creams were not available/provided according to the physician's order.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #223) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to administer medications and creams according to the physician's order.
  5. D
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    F686 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 3 of 3 residents (Resident # 7, 3 and 16) reviewed for pressure ulcers, for Resident #7 the facility failed to conduct comprehensive skin assessments by a registered nurse following the identification of a pressure injury consistent with professional standards, for Resident #3, the facility failed to complete a required nutritional assessment related to the presence of a newly identified pressure injury and for Resident #16 the facility failed to ensure the air mattress was set by the residents' weight per the physician order.
  6. D
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to implement interventions and supervision to prevent falls.
  7. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 20, 2025
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record of residents identified with Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in accordance with infection control standards.
March 21, 2024Complaint inspection · 2 citations
  1. G
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    F689 · Quality of Life and Care · Actual harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1) who required staff assistance with getting in and out of the bed and chair, via a mechanical lift, the facility failed to ensure a proper transfer to prevent a fall that resulted in Resident #1 sustaining bilateral femur fractures.
  2. D
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    F726 · Nursing and Physician Services · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · found on a complaint visit · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) June 15, 2024
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one of four sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for a mechanical lift (Hoyer) transfer, the facility failed to provide documentation that staff education and competencies were conducted to ensure safe transfer techniques.
February 27, 2023Standard inspection · 6 citations
  1. E
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    F812 · Nutrition and Dietary · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, pattern · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on review of facility documentation, observations of the kitchen and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food temperatures were taken and documented daily at each meal and failed to ensure proper infection control practices for hand washing were maintained while plating food at mealtime.
  2. D
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    F655 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) April 14, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for 1 sampled resident (Resident # 171) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of resident admission to address the resident's needs.
  3. D
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    F658 · Resident Assessment and Care Planning · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for 1 sample resident (Resident #10) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed comprehensively after significant change of condition in accordance to the professional standard and facility practice.
  4. D
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    F684 · Quality of Life and Care · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews for 1 sampled resident ( Resident # 171) reviewed for edema, the facility failed to ensure body weights were obtained as ordered by the physician.
  5. D
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    F880 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on observation, facility policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff was wearing a N-95 mask and face shield/goggles prior to going in a positive COVID-19 room in accordance to facility practice.
  6. D
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    F883 · Infection Control · No actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm, isolated · Corrected (the home has a date of correction) March 24, 2023
    Inspectors wroteBased on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy review and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for vaccinations, the facility failed to administer pneumovax vaccine following a request to receive the vaccinations.

Fines and payment denials

DatePenaltyAmount or length
March 21, 2024Fine $8,018

A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.

Staffing

Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUnited States
All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides)5.913.733.86
Registered nurses2.010.690.69
All nursing staff on weekends5.053.373.42
Nurse aides2.89
Licensed practical nurses1.01
Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year)not reported37.4%45.8%
Registered nurse turnovernot reported38.6%42.9%
Administrators who left1

CMS expects 4.33 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.

Staffing by quarter, from daily payroll records

Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 6.26 on weekdays and 5.05 on weekends, 19% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.69 in April to June 2025 to 5.91 in January to March 2026.

QuarterAll nursing staffRegistered nursesWeekdaysWeekendsContract staff shareDays with no RN hoursResidents a day
Jan to Mar 20265.912.016.265.05 0.0%0 of 9021
Oct to Dec 20256.202.066.565.31 0.0%0 of 9220
Jul to Sep 20256.352.106.685.51 0.0%0 of 9219
Apr to Jun 20255.691.906.014.89 0.0%0 of 9121
United States, Jan to Mar 20263.750.623.923.335.3%0.5% of days
Connecticut, Jan to Mar 20263.660.613.803.316.0%1.3% of days

Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.

Quality measures

The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.

MeasureThis homeConnecticutUS
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
9.517.913.9
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.00.70.8
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.81.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
0.03.53.2
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
2.61.51.6
Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1
3.44.04.6
Percentage of short-stay residents who were rehospitalized after a nursing home admission
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
23.824.323.8
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit
Short Stay residents, 20250101-20251231
4.010.812.0

Owners and operators

Legal business name: CT WATERMARK 3030 LLC.

NameRoleTypeShareSince
Ct Watermark Operator LLC5% or greater direct ownership interestOrganization100%06/01/2016
Ct Watermark Partners LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2016
Ctw Capital LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization06/01/2016
Tfg Holdings X LLC5% or greater indirect ownership interestOrganization12/31/2019
Barnes, David5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual06/01/2016
Freshwater, David5% or greater indirect ownership interestIndividual06/01/2016
Zarrilli, FrederickIndirect ownership interestIndividual06/01/2016
Senior Living Hospitality Group LLCOperational/managerial controlOrganization03/01/2025
Keogh, NatashaOperational/managerial controlIndividual11/05/2012
Zarrilli, FrederickOperational/managerial controlIndividual03/01/2025
Senior Living Hospitality Group LLCAdp of the SNFOrganization03/28/2025
Zarrilli, FrederickAdp of the SNFIndividual03/01/2025

As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.

Questions to ask on a visit

Chosen from this home's own inspection record.

  1. How do you prevent falls and pressure injuries, and how are families told when one happens?Inspectors cited 6 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident."
  2. What changed in infection control since the last inspection, and who on staff is the infection preventionist?Inspectors cited 4 problems in this area, most recently on January 7, 2026: "Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program."
  3. How do residents and families raise a complaint or grievance, and how fast is it answered?Inspectors cited 3 problems in this area, most recently on February 11, 2025: "Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights."
  4. When is the care plan meeting, and can family attend it?Inspectors cited 2 problems in this area, most recently on February 27, 2023: "Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted"
  5. How long has the current administrator been here?CMS counts 1 administrator who left in the period it measured.

Other nursing homes nearby

Connecticut contacts for a concern about a nursing home

These are the official offices in Connecticut. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.

Common questions

What is Springs at 3030 Park, the's Medicare star rating?
CMS rates Springs at 3030 Park, the 5 out of 5 stars overall, with 5 for health inspections, 4 for staffing and 5 for quality measures (CMS data as of September 1, 2026).
How many deficiencies did Springs at 3030 Park, the get at its last inspection?
3 health deficiencies at the standard inspection on January 7, 2026. The Connecticut average is 13.4.
Has Springs at 3030 Park, the been fined?
Yes. CMS lists 1 fine totaling $8,018 in the last three years.
Does Springs at 3030 Park, the accept Medicaid?
CMS lists it as "Medicare", so it is not certified for Medicaid.
Who owns Springs at 3030 Park, the?
CMS lists 12 owners and managers. Legal business name: CT WATERMARK 3030 LLC.

Sources

Find a nursing home Read an inspection