Home / Minnesota / Parkers Prairie
212 West Soo Street, Box 30, Parkers Prairie, MN 56361 · Otter Tail County · (218) 338-4671
53 certified beds, about 49 residents a day · Non profit - Corporation · Medicare and Medicaid since 1991
CMS Care Compare ratings, data as of September 1, 2026 · CCN 245588 · See it on Medicare.gov · Compare with other homes
At its most recent standard inspection, on February 25, 2026, inspectors cited 1 health deficiency (the Minnesota average is 7.1, the national average 9.2).
Of 10 health citations since January 2024, 2 were rated as actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents (1 immediate jeopardy).
CMS lists 1 fine totaling $14,901 in the last three years; the largest was $14,901, and the latest is dated April 17, 2025.
Nurses and nurse aides worked 5.15 hours per resident per day, against 4.19 across Minnesota and 3.86 nationally. Registered nurses accounted for 1.01 of those hours.
29.9% of nursing staff left within the year CMS measured (Minnesota average 42.2%).
Federal rules call for a standard inspection at least every 15 months, plus a visit whenever a complaint is filed. Each mark below is one citation, colored by how serious inspectors rated it. How to read a citation.
Under each citation, the quoted text is the inspector's own summary from the federal statement of deficiencies (CMS form 2567), word for word apart from a privacy scrub; CMS removes residents' and staff names before it publishes the text. The full notes are on Medicare.gov.
CMS rates every citation by how much harm it caused (rows) and how many residents it touched (columns). The count in each box is this home's, across all 10 health citations on file.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the physician for out-of-range blood sugars for 1 of 5 residents, (R1) reviewed for unnecessary medications.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and representative were notified of increased right hip pain and bruising for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for injury of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse within 2 hours for 1 of 1 resident (R1) with an injury of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interviews and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of potential resident abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who was found to have an injury of unknown origin.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure proper assessment of bed rails for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for siderails. Staff implemented a new mattress on a bed with side rails attached, resulting in R1's head becoming trapped between the mattress and the side rail of the bed. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 4/10/25, at approximately 12:00 a.m., when facility staff replaced the mattress on R1's bed without checking the entrapment zones between the mattress and the side rail resulting in R1's head becoming trapped between the mattress and the siderail. The IJ was identified on 4/17/25, the administrator was notified of the IJ on 4/17/25, at 4:10 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/11/25, and the deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to establish an on-going infection control program which included comprehensive surveillance of resident infections including, signs and symptoms of infections, an antibiotic timeout (timeframe used after an antibiotic was initiated to ensure appropriate use and effectiveness) was performed and start/stop dates of antibiotics to prevent the spread of communicable disease and infections. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 46 residents who resided in the facility.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, food was not served in a sanitary manner for 15 residents who dined in the north dining area, observed during dining services. In addition, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner to prevent potential illness for 15 residents who currently received ice from the ice machine in the north dining area. Further, the facility failed to maintain proper holding food temperatures for 13 of 17 residents observed to receive egg salad sandwiches. These deficient practices had the potential to cause foodborne illness.
Inspectors wroteBased on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper placement of a lift sling for the ceiling (overhead) mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in harm for R1 when she fell from the mechanical lift and sustained a left rib fracture. This deficient practice is being cited at past non-compliance related to corrective action taken to ensure proper placement of the lift slings when using mechanical lifts prior to the survey.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances forms and procedures were posted in prominent locations throughout the facility for residents and resident representatives to file grievances anonymously if desired, for 5 of 5 residents (R17, R40, R37, R31, R5) reviewed for grievances.
Inspectors wroteBased on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices such as hand hygiene, avoiding contamination of utensils during a water pass, and ensuring the personal laundry was transported in a manner that prevented risk of contamination for 2 of 5 hallways observed for linen transportation. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the spout of the coffee machine in that facility's kitchen was free of build up.
6 fire safety citations on file: 1 on February 25, 2026, 2 on December 11, 2024, 3 on January 10, 2024.
| Date | Penalty | Amount or length |
|---|---|---|
| April 17, 2025 | Fine | $14,901 |
A payment denial means Medicare and Medicaid stopped paying for new admissions for that period.
Hours of care per resident per day, from the payroll records every home sends CMS. Higher means more staff time with each resident.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | United States |
|---|---|---|---|
| All nursing staff (RN, LPN and aides) | 5.15 | 4.19 | 3.86 |
| Registered nurses | 1.01 | 1.06 | 0.69 |
| All nursing staff on weekends | 4.50 | 3.71 | 3.42 |
| Nurse aides | 3.26 | ||
| Licensed practical nurses | 0.89 | ||
| Nursing staff turnover (share who left in a year) | 29.9% | 42.2% | 45.8% |
| Registered nurse turnover | 8.3% | 38.6% | 42.9% |
| Administrators who left | 0 |
CMS expects 3.27 hours a day for residents as sick as this home's (its case-mix figure). The staffing star compares the two.
Every nursing home sends CMS its staff hours for each day (the Payroll Based Journal). Here they are added up by quarter. The latest quarter is the one behind the figures above. In January to March 2026, nursing staff hours per resident were 5.41 on weekdays and 4.50 on weekends, 17% lower on weekends (nationally, weekends ran 15% lower). Contract or agency staff worked 0.0% of nursing hours, against 5.3% nationally. Total nursing hours per resident went from 5.26 in April to June 2025 to 5.15 in January to March 2026.
| Quarter | All nursing staff | Registered nurses | Weekdays | Weekends | Contract staff share | Days with no RN hours | Residents a day |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan to Mar 2026 | 5.15 | 1.01 | 5.41 | 4.50 | 0.0% | 0 of 90 | 49 |
| Oct to Dec 2025 | 4.76 | 0.96 | 5.01 | 4.14 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 51 |
| Jul to Sep 2025 | 4.90 | 0.98 | 5.18 | 4.18 | 0.0% | 0 of 92 | 49 |
| Apr to Jun 2025 | 5.26 | 1.05 | 5.54 | 4.55 | 0.0% | 0 of 91 | 47 |
| United States, Jan to Mar 2026 | 3.75 | 0.62 | 3.92 | 3.33 | 5.3% | 0.5% of days | |
| Minnesota, Jan to Mar 2026 | 4.19 | 1.05 | 4.38 | 3.73 | 5.2% | 0.8% of days |
Hours per resident per day: staff hours in the quarter divided by resident days (the daily census CMS derives from resident assessments). Registered nurses include the director of nursing and RNs with administrative duties; aides include nurse aides in training and medication aides, as in CMS's own staffing measure. How these are calculated.
Staff pay reports
No staff pay figure for this home has passed review yet. A figure appears only after at least 5 reports from at least 3 different people, sent over at least 60 days, have passed review.
| Job | Median | Middle half | Employed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota, all employers | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $22.44 | $19.39 to $23.72 | 29,120 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $30.65 | $28.83 to $34.26 | 12,840 |
| Registered nurses | $48.80 | $42.76 to $55.17 | 70,110 |
| United States, nursing care facilities | |||
| CNAs (nursing assistants) | $20.67 | $17.91 to $22.55 | 534,270 |
| LPNs and LVNs | $33.86 | $30.05 to $37.40 | 188,210 |
| Registered nurses | $41.11 | $37.85 to $47.68 | 142,270 |
Hourly wages; the middle half runs from the 25th to the 75th percentile. Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025. BLS has no separate estimate for medication aides. These are survey estimates for whole occupations, not figures for any one home.
The measures CMS uses for the quality star. Lower is better for every one of them.
| Measure | This home | Minnesota | US |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 10.5 | 18.2 | 13.9 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.4 | 1.9 | 0.8 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 3.2 |
| Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication Short Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to walk independently worsened Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 12.2 | 20.5 | 14.1 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents with pressure ulcers Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 2.7 | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication Long Stay residents, 2025Q2-2026Q1 | 17.0 | 17.1 | 15.4 |
For a stay to recover after a hospital visit, these are the results CMS publishes for St. Williams Living Center's Medicare short-stay residents. How to read these, and what Medicare pays for.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 51.5% · Minnesota: 66 better, 14 worse
Rate of successful return to home or community from a SNF (risk-standardized discharge to community rate). Higher is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 21 eligible stays.
10.2% this home
No different from the national rate
US median of homes 10.7% · Minnesota: 0 better, 0 worse
Rate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2022 to September 2024. 25 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
US median of homes 7.1% · Minnesota: 2 better, 0 worse
Percentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization (risk-standardized rate). Lower is better. October 2023 to September 2024. 10 eligible stays.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota57.8% · US 56.6%
Percentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 12 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota0.0% · US 0.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay. Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota2.0% · US 1.7%
Percentage of residents with pressure ulcers or pressure injuries that are new or worsened (adjusted rate). Lower is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 13 residents counted.
Not reported
CMS note: The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Median of homes: Minnesota98.5% · US 98.7%
Percentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge. Higher is better. October 2024 to September 2025. 10 residents counted.
Source: CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program - Provider Data, released 2026-09-30. Better, no different and worse are CMS's own comparisons with the national rate, after adjusting for how sick residents were. Medians of homes and the state counts are worked out by us from the same file.
Legal business name: ST. WILLIAM'S LIVING CENTER.
| Name | Role | Type | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midwest Bank | 5% or greater mortgage interest | Organization | 04/29/2005 | |
| Dorn, Viola | Corporate director | Individual | 01/12/2012 | |
| Haggenmiller, Jerome | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Hinrichs, Rose | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2018 | |
| Hoffman, Scott | Corporate director | Individual | 09/01/2022 | |
| Jakubiec, Dawn | Corporate director | Individual | 01/02/2012 | |
| Theis, Jeremy | Corporate director | Individual | 07/01/2023 | |
| Vaske, David | Corporate director | Individual | 08/01/2023 | |
| Bitzan, Marlene | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 05/21/2013 | |
| Kelly, Timothy | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 04/01/2013 | |
| Sundby, Scott | Operational/managerial control | Individual | 02/16/2015 | |
| Bitzan, Marlene | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 05/21/2013 | |
| Kelly, Timothy | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 12/06/2024 | |
| Sundby, Scott | Adp of the SNF | Individual | 07/15/2025 |
As listed in the CMS ownership file, which names owners with a 5% or greater stake and the people and companies with operational or managerial control.
Chosen from this home's own inspection record.
These are the official offices in Minnesota. NursingHomeClear cannot take or act on complaints.